Risk factors for lymphedema after breast surgery: A prospective cohort study in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy

INTRODUCTION

The Objective was to investigate the incidence of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment and to analyze the risk factors involved in a tertiary level hospital.

METHODS

Prospective longitudinal observational study over 3 years post-breast surgery. 232 patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer at our institution between September 2013 and February 2018. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) were mandatory in this cohort. In total, 201 patients met the inclusion criteria and had a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 1-54 months). Lymphedema was diagnosed by circumferential measurements and truncated cone calculations. Patients and tumor characteristics, shoulder range of motion limitation and local and systemic therapies were analyzed as possible risk factors for lymphedema.

RESULTS

Most cases of lymphedema appeared in the first 2 years. 13.9% of patients developed lymphedema: 31% after ALND and 4.6% after SLNB (p < 0.01), and 46.7% after mastectomy and 11.3% after breast-conserving surgery (p < 0.01). The lymphedema rate increased when axillary radiotherapy (RT) was added to radical surgery: 4.3% for SLNB alone, 6.7% for SLNB + RT, 17.6% for ALND alone, and 35.2% for ALND + RT (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, the only risk factors associated with the development of lymphedema were ALND and mastectomy, which had hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 7.28 (2.92-18.16) and 3.9 (1.60-9.49) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The main risk factors for lymphedema were the more radical surgeries (ALND and mastectomy). The risk associated with these procedures appeared to be worsened by the addition of axillary radiotherapy. A follow-up protocol in patients with ALND lasting at least two years, in which special attention is paid to these risk factors, is necessary to guarantee a comprehensive control of lymphedema that provides early detection and treatment.

Abstract P6-09-04: Predictive factors for considering to avoid axillar lymphadenectomy in selected node positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background:

To perform a systematic axillar lymphadenectomy (ALND) in clinical node positive (N+) patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is currently under discussion. We aimed to study which factors are related to a pathological complete axillar response (ypN0) after NACT in order to select which patients could benefit from a sentinel lymph node biopsy without interfering with survival.

Material and methods

N+ patients who underwent ALND after NACT between June 2008 and December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical features, molecular and histological factors, recurrence and specific mortality rates were compared between patients achieving a complete pathological axillary response vs not (ypN0 vs ypN+).

Results

345 N+ patients were reviewed. After NACT, 137 (39.6%) become ypN0[CF1] , 9 (2.6%) ypN1 mic, 113 (32.7%) ypN1, 60 (17.3%) ypN2 and 22 (6.4%) N3. Univariate analysis results regarding the predictive factors for ypN0 are detailed in [table 1]. Multivariate analyses showed molecular subtype (TN and Her2+) and clinical response as independent predictors of ypN0 [table 2]. After a mean follow-up of 58 months, overall survival was statistically superior in ypN0 vs ypN1 (p= 0.001).

Table 1.Predictive factors for ypN0 YpN0 (n = 137)YpN+ (n = 208)pAge (mean, years)58.3 ± 13.2758.59 ± 12.340.799BMI (mean)27.8±5.4927.8±5.360.973Dosis of QT (median)(%)  0.575IIA6 (31.6)13 (68.4) IIB71 (39.3)110 (60.8) IIIA28 (36.8)48 (63.2) IIIB24 (43.6)31 (56.4) IIIC7 (58.3)5 (41.7) Radiological image(%)  0.930Nodule77 (38.1)125 (61.9) Non-mass distortion10 (43.5)13 (56.5) Radiological size (median)32 (0-115)29 (0-130)0.246Suspicious a-LN by US(%)  0.486130 (30.9)37 (24.3) 25 (5.2)14 (9.2) &gt;257 (58.8)91 (59.9) Histological subtype(%)  0.093Invasive Ductal Carcinoma133 (40.9)192 (59.1) Invasive Lobular Carcinoma2 (20)8 (80) Others2 (22.2)7 (78.8) Nottingham grade(%)  &lt;0.001G11 (6.2)15 (93.8) G244 (28.6)110 (71.4) G386 (53.4)75 (46.6) Molecular-like subtype(%)  &lt;0.001Luminal A-like2 (5.3)36 (94.7) Luminal B-like (Her2 -)21(18.1)95 (81.9) Luminal B-like (Her2 +)40 (63.5)23 (36.5) HER-2 enriched (non luminal)43 (74.1)15 (25.9) Triple Negative31 (44.9)38 (55.1) Vascular invasion19 (42.2)26 (57.8)0.889Clinical Response(%)  &lt;0.001Complete61 (75.3)20 (24.7) Partial69 (31.8)148 (68.2) No response6 (20.7)23 (79.3) Progression1 (10)9 (90) Percentage are given per row.

Table 2.Multivariate analysis logistic regression of clinical predictive factors of ypN0. OR95% Confidence Intervalp valueMolecular subtype   No-luminal vs Luminal7,7483,913-15,343&lt;0,001Clinical response   Response vs not response6,8491,834-25,5710,04OR: Odd ratio. No-luminal includes: luminal B (HER2 +), HER2 Henriched and triple negative. Luminal includes: Luminal A and Luminal B (HER2 -).

Conclusions

A remarkable percentage of N+ became ypN0 after NATC. Molecular subtype and complete clinical response were independent predictive factors of ypN0. We propose to offer the benefit of a targeted axillary procedure in those patients.

Citation Format: Fernandez-Gonzalez S, Falo Zamora C, Nuñez D, Vethencourt A, Pla MJ, Soler T, Guma A, Perez X, Gil M, Ponce J, Garcia A. Predictive factors for considering to avoid axillar lymphadenectomy in selected node positive breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-04.

Abstract P3-13-07: Is radiofrequency ablation better than lumpectomy for margin status in breast cancer? Results of a randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE: To study the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as local treatment for breast cancer and to intraoperatively evaluate the margin status after RFA in comparison with lumpectomy.

MATERIAL and METHODS: Preliminary in vitro RF ablation experimentation with two mastectomy specimens was performed to test the electrode, practice the ultrasound technique and evaluate the macroscopic and microscopic effects of RF. Then, aprospective, randomized open-label phase II clinical trial (NCT02281812) was conducted in a single institution from 2013-2017. Forty subjects, mean age 64 (range 46-86), with ductal infiltrating carcinoma of the breast ≤2 cm were randomly assigned to RFA plus lumpectomy or lumpectomy alone. Margin status, tumor cell viability (TCV) after RFA (by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and Cytokeratin 18 (CK18) staining), adverse events and local recurrences were evaluated by univariable and multivariable analyses (SPSS statistical software).

RESULTS: In the experimental design with mastectomies, the only procedural complication was a skin burn at the entrance site of the electrodes. We learned that the tip of the electrodes should cut cross the tumor by at least 10mm.

The clinical trial includes two groups: study group (n=20) and control group (n=20). NADH and CK18 staining demonstrated absence of TCV after RFA with at least one of the two techniques. The percentage of intraoperatively affected surgical margins was higher in the control group although local adverse effects after surgery was higher in the RFA treatment arm. Three study subjects presented local infection (two had partial irradiation of the breast) and none in the control group. Median follow up was 25 months (range 1–83). No recurrence or second surgery was required during the study period.

Outcomes RFA group (n = 20)Control group (n=20)p valueSpecimen weight (median, gr)42 (24-80)27 (11-60)0.004Specimen volume (median, ml)369 (259-847)201 (100-602)0.004Positive margin (intraoperative)4/20 (20%)11/20 (55%)0.022Pathological size (median, mm)11.5 (5-20)10.5 (6-16)0.07Local Adverse effect8/20 (40%)1/20 (5%)0.01Breast Inflammation5/20 (25%)1/20 (5%)0.182Breast Infection3/20 (15%)0/20 (0%)0.23RFA: radiofrequency ablation. n=number of subjects

CONCLUSION: RFA seems effective in the cases considered and could be more accurate than lumpectomy in terms of obtaining more free margins. Surgical excision associated with RFA leads to a higher amount of local adverse effects, especially if combined with partial irradiation of the breast. RFA could be considered as a less invasive treatment in tumors smaller than 20 mm; however, this warrants further investigation.

Citation Format: Garcia-Tejedor A, Guma A, Soler T, Valdivieso A, Petit A, Contreras N, Chappuis CG, Falo C, Pernas S, Anselem A, Fernandez-Montoli E, Pla MJ, Burdio F, Ponce J. Is radiofrequency ablation better than lumpectomy for margin status in breast cancer? Results of a randomized clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-07.

Abstract P4-08-08: Biomarkers to predict distant recurrence free survival after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. A long follow up retrospective study

Background:

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is gaining more acceptances for the management of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer (BC). Rate of patients achieving pathological complete response is very low and Ki67 suppression and PEPI score are the only prognostic factors associated with relapse free survival.

The aim of our study was to identify biomarkers of prediction of distant relapse risk that could help clinicians in the decision-making of systemic adjuvant treatment in patients previously treated with NET

Material & Methods:

Retrospective study of 119 postmenopausal women with ER or progesterone receptor (PR) positive BC treated with NET in ICO-HUB from 1997 to 2009. Clinical-pathological data and treatments administered were reviewed. IHC expression of ER, PR, Ki67, Androgen receptor (AR), BCL-2, Cyclin D1 (CD1), p16, p53, CD 44 and synaptophysin were analyzed in post-NET surgical formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples through a tissue microarray. Survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analysis of variables associated with distant relapse free survival (DRFS) was evaluated by Cox proportional hazard model.

Results:

Mean age was 74 (63-88). cT: T2 5%, T3 6.5%, T4 43.5%. cN: N0 59%, N1 25%, N2-3 16%. Stage: I 21%, II 49.5%, III 29.5%. Histological subtype: ductal 84%, lobular 6%, others 10%. Histological grade: G1 20%, G2 55%, G3 25%.

Vascular invasion 15%. NET: Aromatase Inhibitors 64%, SERM 36%. Median duration of NET 8.5 months. Clinical Response: Complete 4%, Partial 55%, Stable 37%, Progression 4%. Surgery: Lumpectomy 72%, Mastectomy 28%;Lymphadenectomy 70.5%, Sentinel lymph node biopsy 6%, No surgical approach of axilla 23.5%. Surgical specimen: ypT1 36%, ypT2 54%, ypT3 6%, ypT4 4%; ypN0 28%, ypN1 22%, ypN2 13.5%, ypN3 12% ypNx 23.5%. Surgical margins: Negative 89% Positive 11%. Median fibrosis rate 20% (0-95). PR and Ki67 showed a statistically significant decrease after NET(p&lt;0,05) but no ER (p=0,29).

Adjuvant treatment: chemotherapy 7%, radiotherapy 76%, endocrine therapy 96%. Median follow-up: 104 months. Only 21 patients developed distance relapse. Median OS was 139 months [95% CI = 98-181]. Univariate analysis for DRFS showed statistically significant differences in cN (HR=3), histological grade 3 (HR=3.61), ypN (HR=3.62), p16 (HR=6.1) and p53 (HR=2.79). Multivariate analysis of post-NET biomarkers showed that negative nuclear p16 expression (HR=4.79)and positive p53 (HR=2.83)were independently associated with worse DRFS. In multivariate analysis of all clinico-pathological and molecular factors, histological grade 3 (HR=2.82) was the sole DRFS independent factor.

Conclusions:

Negative nuclear p16 expression and positive p53 post-NET were associated with worseDRFS. Whenall clinico-pathological and molecular factors were analysed, G3 was the sole DRFS independent factor. Patients with G3, negative p16 or positive p53 after NET could probably benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy or CDK 4-6 inhibitors treatment. In our series, we did not find usefulness in analysing ER, PR and Ki67 post-NET changes to predict DRFS.

Citation Format: Gil-Gil M, Morilla I, Petit A, Soler T, Perez-Martin X, Guma A, Pla MJ, Ortega R, Garcia-Tejedor A, Falo C, Montal R, Perez-Casanova L, Loayza C, Pernas S. Biomarkers to predict distant recurrence free survival after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. A long follow up retrospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-08.

Abstract P2-08-31: Tumor and axillar downstaging as a prognostic factor and evaluation of effectiveness to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer: A retrospective analysis

Introduction: Evaluation of the benefit of primary chemotherapy (PC) is not easy to establish. Pathologic complete response (pCR) has been considered the main surrogate prognostic factor of patient's survival. However, patients achieving a pCR are not the only ones who benefit from PC. The purpose of our study is to find a measure of response that includes the maximum of patients that benefit from PC in terms of survival.

Patients and methods: 224 breast cancer patients were treated in Breast Cancer Unit from Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet with taxans and antracyclines-based PC +/- trastuzumab between 2009 and 2011. pCR was defined as no invasive carcinoma found in the tumor and in the axillary lymph nodes (ypT0/ypTis ypN0). Tumor and nodal downstaging (TNDS) was calculated according to the "neoadjuvant response index" (NRI) from Rodenhuis and also as a dichotomic variable: Positive includes those patients achieving dowstaging of both T and N plus T downstaging N0 and negatives those patients without downstaging in any of both variables. Those parameters were related to patient's overall survival (OS). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 15.

Results: Median age 45.5 years (24-83). Main tumor characteristics: T2 (62.6%); N1 (50%); ductal infiltrating carcinoma (95.5%) and grade III (57.1%). Biological sub-type according to the last St Gallen classification: luminal A: 28 patients (pts); luminal B/Her2-: 61 pts; luminal B/HER2+: 34 pts; HER2+: 33 pts and triple negative: 69 pts. Pathologic complete response was achieved in 49 pts (22.5%). TNDS was evaluated in 181 patients and of those 90 was positive. According to NRI 74 patients presented cut-off&gt; 0.5 and 52 pts &gt; 0.7. Parameters related to OS were: biological subtype (P: 0.007); achieving a pCR (p: 0.007); NRI cut-off 0.5 (P: 0.001) and TNDS (p:0.000). In the multivariate analysis only TNDS and biological subtype remained statistically significant. When comparing those patients with positive vs. negative TNDS, the HR for recurrence was of 10.05 (IC 2.33 -43.57). The median OS of the series has not been reached. OS at 5y was 82.7% (IC: 77.1%-88%) and specific breast cancer OS at 5 y was 85% (IC:79.5%-90%). The number of events (breast cancer deaths) for each biological subtype according to positive vs. negative TNDS was: luminal A: 0/5 vs. 0/18; luminal B Her2-: 0/10 vs. 8/43; luminal B HER2+:0/23 vs. 2/9; HER2+: 0/22 vs. 0/2 and TN: 2/30 vs. 8/18. Survival data per subtypes and TNDS is immature due to the scarce number of events. Estimated 5y OS for TNDS positive vs. negative in luminal A: 100% vs. 100%; luminal B Her2-: 100% vs. 82%; luminal B HER2+:100 vs.77.7%; HER2+: 100% vs. 100% and TN: 93% vs. 55%, respectively.

Conclusion: In our series, TNDS measured either with the NRI from Rodenhuis or as a dichotomic variable was the best parameter to evaluate response to PC in terms of OS. OS of luminal A and luminal B/Her2 negative is less influenced by PC than the rest of subgroups. In fact both subgroups have good prognosis despite their poor sensitivity to chemotherapy. Those tumors that benefit most from PC were luminal B/ Her2+; Her2+ and triple negative patients who achieved a positive TNDS.

Citation Format: Falo C, Ventura LM, Petit A, Perez J, Cañellas J, Perez L, Loayza C, Gil M, Varela M, Garcia A, Pla MJ, Lopez A, Guma A, Pernas S. Tumor and axillar downstaging as a prognostic factor and evaluation of effectiveness to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer: A retrospective analysis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-31.

Abstract P1-01-26: Clinical Implications of pN0 mol+ in Breast Cancer Patients

Introduction: Axillary lymph node involvement is the most significant prognostic factor in breast cancer patients. The real-time PCR (RT-PCR) appeared to be a sensitive method to diagnose the lymph node axillary stage, but the clinical relevance of pN0 (mol+) has not yet been established. We present the clinical characteristics of the subgroup of patients diagnosed as pN0 (mol+) and their clinical outcome after a mean follow-up of 72 months.

Material & Methods: Between June 2000 and November 2006, 674 patients with T1-T3 primary invasive breast cancer and low probability of axillary lymph node involvement, were included in a prospective study of the molecular analyses of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Each SLN was bi-dissected; one half was snap frozen for subsequent molecular analysis, on the other half, routine pathological analyses was performed, including immunoassaying for cam 5.2 antibody. The molecular analyses was performed by RT-PCR using the gene marker KRT 19. Adjuvant treatment and clinical outcome has been recorded after a mean follow-up of 72 months.

Results: 135 cases were staged as pN0 (mol+). Most of them corresponded to infiltrating ductal carcinoma (95%), 2.2% lobular, 1.5% colloid and 1.5% medullar. Nuclear grade: I in 5% of cases, II in 35% and III in 34% of them. By tumour stage, 1.5% were pT1a; 24% pT1b: 58% pT1c; 15% pT2 and 1.5% pT3. According to molecular subtypes, 73% of cases were luminal, 18.5% triple negative ones and 8.5% HER2 positive. All the patients except 5 ones received adjuvant systemic treatment: 41.5% hormonal therapy for at least 5 years; 32% chemotherapy followed by hormonotherapy and 18.5% chemotherapy, of those two patients received trastuzumab for 1 year. At the time of the analysis, there have been 4 local recurrences, 3 metastasic recurrences and 2 contra lateral ones. For survival analyses, 2 cases were excluded for presenting a previous breast cancer history, and one patient died after the last CMF from a septic shock. Of the 132 resting patients, 122 are free of relapse at the time of this analysis, the 3 patients with distant metastasis are on treatment for metastatic disease, 2 patients were death by other neoplastic diseases and 5 cases were death by other medical causes (4 cardiac and 1 respiratory failure). Survival rate for N0 mol+ was 94%, no specific breast cancer death have occurred at the present survival analyses.

Conclusions: Tumours diagnosed as pN0 (mol+) presented clinical and molecular characteristics of worse prognosis than pN0 (mol-) and this is translated in a higher proportion of patients staged N0 (mol+) treated with chemotherapy than pN0 (mol-). Survival in this subgroup of patients is high in relation to the adjuvant treatment delivered.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-01-26.

Sentinel node localization in patients with non-palpable breast cancer

The aim of this study was to demonstrate that radionuclide sentinel node detection can be applied to patients with non-palpable breast cancer. One hundred and ten consecutive women with unilateral breast cancer were studied. Group 1 was made up of 80 patients with palpable breast cancer (mean age, 58 years) and group 2 of 30 patients with non-palpable breast cancer detected mammographically (mean age, 55 years). Tc-nanocolloid (111 MBq) was injected peritumorally in palpable tumours, and in the tumour area (ultrasound guided) in non-palpable tumours. At 2 h post-injection, anterior and lateral scintigrams were obtained from patients in the supine position. The location of the sentinel node was marked on the patient's skin. Patients with non-palpable tumours were moved to the surgery room 3 h later, and those with palpable tumours 24 h later. The histopathological study included three haematoxylineosin sections and immunochemistry. All patients underwent axillary lymphadenectomy. The sentinel node was detected in 67 cases (84%) in group 1 and in 28 cases (93%) in group 2. In four patients (5%) in group 1 and two patients (7%) in group 2, no axillary sentinel node was detected in the surgical bed, although it had been seen in scintigraphy. In nine patients (11%) in group 1, neither scintigraphic nor surgical detection was successful. Skip metastasis was seen in six cases (10%) of palpable tumours and in one case (4%) of non-palpable tumours. It can be concluded that non-palpable breast tumours cannot be considered an exclusion criterion for sentinel node localization and biopsy. Ultrasonography-guided injection, followed by scintigraphic and surgical detection of the sentinel node, may help in the management of patients with non-palpable breast tumours.