OS01.5.A Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100 serum levels in patients with active brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd): A biomarker analysis from the TUXEDO-1 trial

Background

T-DXd is a novel antibody-drug conjugate with high activity in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. The prospective, single-arm, single-centre phase II TUXEDO-1 trial showed clinically relevant activity of T-DXd in HER2-positive BC pts with active BM with an intracranial response rate of 73.3%. This biomarker sub-study of TUXEDO-1 aimed to investigate changes in the extent of metastases-induced brain damage in patients with and without response to therapy by measuring the serum levels of two proteins constitutively expressed in the human brain and measurable upon brain damage in the blood serum: NSE and S100.

Material and Methods

We assessed serum NSE (sNSE) and serum S100 (sS100) levels in a total of 37 blood samples drawn at cycles 1, 4 and end of treatment (EOT) in all patients of the intent-to-treat population of the TUXEDO-1 trial using commercially available ELISA assays. Intracranial radiological response was centrally assessed by a board-certified neuro-radiologist using RANO criteria. sNSE and sS100 levels were compared between responders and non-responders using the Mann Whitney U test and a significance level of 0.05.

Results

At baseline, we detected no significant difference of sNSE or sS100 levels between T-DXd responders and non-responders, respectively. Baseline median sNSE level was 10.6 ng/ml (interquartile range (IQR) 8.6-12.2) in T-DXd responders as compared with median 12.5 ng/ml (IQR 12.2-12.9) in the non-responder group (n.s.). At cycle 4, corresponding numbers were 8.1 ng/ml in responding patients (IQR 7-11.2) and 12.7 ng/ml (IQR 12.2-12.9) in non-responders, respectively (p=0.009). No differences in sS100 levels were observed between the groups at any time point.

Conclusion

In patients showing intracranial objective response to T-Dxd, sNSE levels were significantly lower at cycle 4 as compared with non-responders, suggesting a reduction in metastases-induced brain damage as a direct treatment effect. sNSE may be a clinically useful biomarker for longitudinal assessment of brain metastasis burden.

OS03.5.A Characterization of the inflammatory tumor microenvironment composition in solid cancer patients with brain metastases after progression to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Background

Immunotherapy (IO) has changed the treatment landscape of metastatic cancer patients, however, treatment resistance is frequent. We aimed to characterize the inflammatory tumor microenvironment in brain metastases (BM) after IO to gain a deeper understanding of immunologic escape mechanisms.

Material and Methods

Solid cancer patients who had BM resection after IO progression (IO cohort) were retrospectively identified. We analyzed tumor-infiltrating immune cell subsets (CD3, CD8, CD45RO, FOXP3) and expression of immune checkpoint molecules (PD-L1, PD-1, LAG-3) by immunohistochemistry. A control cohort of BM tissue samples without prior IO served for comparison (no immunotherapy cohort, NIO).

Results

Twenty-eight IO patients (12/28, 42.9% females; 16/28, 57.1% males; median 61 years; 14/28, 50% lung cancer; 5/28, 17.9% melanoma; 4/28, 14.3% renal cell carcinoma; 1/28, 3.6% breast cancer; 4/28, 14.3% other cancer entities) and 57 NIO patients (28/57, 49.1% females; 29/57, 50.9% males; median 58 years; 35/57, 61.4% lung cancer; 9/57, 15.8% breast cancer; 4/57, 7.0% melanoma; 3/57, 5.3% renal cell carcinoma; 6/57, 10.5% other cancer entities) were included. IO patients had a median of one (range 0-4) systemic therapy line prior to IO. Median time from last IO application until BM resection was 5.6 months (range 0.2-49.8 months). Patients received a median number of 7 (range 1-56) IO applications (14/28, 50% PD-1-targeting IO; 8/28, 28.6% PD-L1; 2/28, 7.1% CTLA4; 4/28, 14.3% CTLA4+PD-1; 3/28, 10.7% IO+chemotherapy). No statistically significant differences in the densities of investigated TILs or PD-L1 expression between the IO and the NIO cohort were observed. Patients of the IO cohort showed higher PD-L1 expression compared to the NIO cohort (57.1 vs. 42.1%, Chi-square, p>0.05). Overall survival (OS) was similar in both cohorts, with a median OS of 11.0 months (range 5.0-17.0) in the IO cohort and 11.0 months (range 5.5-16.5) in the NIO cohort.

Conclusion

Our findings show an upregulation of PD-L1 in BM occurring after prior IO therapy in the absence of other overt changes in the inflammatory microenvironment. Ongoing analyses in this cohort are investigating possible molecular driver of resistance by analyzing DNA methylation profiles of pre-and post-IO tissue samples of the IO cohort to potentially gain insights on inflammatory IO resistance mechanisms in BM patients.

P14.03 Shifting trends and entity-specific aspects in patients with brain metastasis: real-life analysis from 6031 individuals over an observation period of 30 years

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the changing clinical characteristics of patients with brain metastases (BM) over the last three decades as the foundation for modern BM specific clinical trial planning.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

6031 patients with newly diagnosed BM from different solid tumors treated between 1986–2020 were identified from the Vienna Brain Metastasis Registry.

RESULTS

The fraction of BM originating from the most common BM causing primary tumors (lung cancer, breast cancer and melanoma) was stable over the observation period from 1986–2020. BM from renal cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer and cancer of unknown primary (CUP) decreased over time (p<0.001). Synchronous diagnosis of BM and primary tumor was more frequently observed in lung cancer and CUP patients compared to breast cancer patients (p<0.001). An increasing fraction of patients presented with asymptomatic BM (1986–1999: 20.2% vs. 2010–2020: 30.4%; p<0.001), specifically in lung cancer (p<0.001), melanoma (p<0.001) and renal cell cancer (p=0.004). A decrease of neurosurgical procedures (1986–1999: 39.3% vs. 2010–2020: 20.4%) and an increase of radiation treatments (1986–1999: 56.5% vs. 2010–2020: 73.0%) and systemic therapies (1986–1999: 0.6% vs. 2010–2020: 2.4%; p<0.001) was observed. Furthermore, median overall survival significantly increased across entities (1986–1999: 5 months vs. 2010–2020: 7 months; p=0.001). Intracranial progression as the cause of death increased across entities (p< 0.001). The prognostic DS-GPA (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.42; p< 0.001) and the Lung-molGPA (HR 1.67; p<0.001) could be validated.

CONCLUSION

We observed changes of BM presentation and clinical parameters during the observation period depending on primary tumor origins. Future BM studies should follow an entity-specific approach and address the characteristics of modern BM cohorts.