1
|
Abstract P1-08-27: Advanced stage at diagnosis and worse clinicopathologic features in young woman with breast cancer. A sub-analysis of Brazilian population through the AMAZONA III study (GBECAM 0115). Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p1-08-27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) in young women is uncommon and often more aggressive. There are disparities in terms of screening coverage, diagnostic features and access to optimal treatment among young BC patients worldwide. To better understand this scenario through real world data we performed a sub-analysis of AMAZONA III study. METHODS: The AMAZONA III study (GBECAM 0115) is a prospective registry that included 2950 women newly diagnosed with invasive BC in Brazil during the period of January 2016 to March 2018 within 22 sites. Of them, 2888 patients had valid data regarding age at diagnosis and complete baseline information. For the purpose of comparisons of epidemiologic and clinicopathologic features at the time of diagnosis of BC, patients were divided in two groups: women aged ≤40 years (Group 1) and >40 years (Group 2). Quantitative variables were expressed with mean, while categorical variables were described as their count and percentage and compared using the chi-square test. RESULTS: Of 2888 women, 486 (17%) were ≤40 years of age. No differences were found between ethnicity, performance status, body mass index, personal income, health insurance and family history of cancer between the two groups. Young women had higher educational level (p<0.001), were more involved into a labor activity (p<0.001) and were more frequently married (p<0.001). There were also significant differences regarding nulliparity (p<0.001) and previous use of oral contraceptives (p<0.001). Mode of detection of BC was symptomatic in 73.4% of young group versus 64.5% in older group and screen-detected was only 26.6% vs. 35.5% respectively (p<0.001). Table 1 describes clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups. Young women presented more frequently with stage III,T3/T4, Grade 3 tumors and HER-2 positive, Luminal B and triple negative subtypes. Women older than 40 years had more stage I, Luminal A and Grade 1/2 tumors. CONCLUSION: Brazilian women under the age of 40 have unfavorable clinicopathological features of BC at diagnosis with more aggressive subtypes and advanced stage compared with older women. No differences in socioeconomic and ethnical aspects were found but a higher percentage of young women had symptomatic detection of BC which could explain the later stage of disease at diagnosis. Young women were economically active and the majority married which highlights the socioeconomic impact of this disease in Brazil.
Breast cancer features by age groups at diagnosis in Brazilian women.InformationGroup 1 (≤40 years)Group 2 (> 40 years)p-valueN: 2888486 (16.83%)2402 (83.17%) Stage at diagnosis p< 0.001I76 (19.2%)541 (27.8%) II156 (39.4%)816 (41.9%) III146 (36.8%)489 (25.1%) IV19 (4.6%)101 (5.2%) Tumor size p< 0.001T1114 (27.1%)749 (36.9%) T2141 (33.6%)764 (37.6%) T3101 (24.1%)282 (13.9%) T464 (15.2%)235 (11.6%) Tumor grade p < 0.001Grade 146 (10.7%)381 (17.9%) Grade 2198 (46.2%)1150 (52.0%) Grade 3185 (43.1%)641 (30.1%) Molecular Subtype p < 0.001Luminal A106 (30.6%)957 (51.3%) Luminal B - HER 2 negative55 (15.8%)212 (11.4%) Luminal B- HER 2 positive79 (22.8%)298 (16.0%) HER 2 positive27 (7.8%)135 (7.2%) Triple negative80 (23.0%)264 (14.1%)
Citation Format: Franzoi MA, Rosa D, Barrios C, Bines J, Cronemberger E, Queiroz G, Cordeiro de Lima VC, Junior R, Couto J, Emerenciano K, Resende H, Crocamo S, Reinert T, Van Evyl B, Neron Y, Dybal V, Lazaretti N, Costamilan RdC, de Andrade D, Mathias C, Zerwes Vacaro G, Borges G, Silva K, Werutsky G, Morelle A, Sampaio Filho CA, Mano M, Zaffaroni F, Simon S, Liedke PE. Advanced stage at diagnosis and worse clinicopathologic features in young woman with breast cancer. A sub-analysis of Brazilian population through the AMAZONA III study (GBECAM 0115) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-27.
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract P1-08-29: Current status of clinical and pathological characteristics of breast cancer patients in Brazil: Results of the AMAZONA III study (GBECAM 0115). Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p1-08-29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common tumor in women in Brazil with about 60 thousand new cases estimated per year. In low and middle-income countries, patients with BC are diagnosed with more advanced stages as compared with high-income countries. In Brazil, disparities in access to new therapies are recognized; previous data suggests worse survival of BC patients treated in the public system. The aim of AMAZONA III study (GBECAM 0115) is to describe the current status of BC care in Brazil. Here we report patients data at baseline.
METHODS
The AMAZONA III is a prospective BC registry that included women 18 years or older with newly diagnosed stage I to IV BC from 22 sites in Brazil in the period of January 2016 to March 2018. All patients provided written informed consent; data was collected from interview and medical charts, comprising clinical-demographic variables, initial treatment and a planned follow-up for 5 years. BC subtypes were defined by hormone receptor (HR) expression, HER2 status and grade according to von Minckwitz G. et al 2012. Here we present a descriptive analysis of the patients' baseline characteristics. Continuous variables are shown as mean (standard-deviation) and categorical variables by its absolute and relative frequencies. The study is registered in clinicaltrials.gov NCT02663973.
RESULTS
A total of 2950 patients were included in the study. Median age at diagnosis was 53 years old (8.4% <= 35 years, 34.8% 36-50 years, 56.8% > 50 years), 58.6% were white, 34.4% had brown skin-color, 83% had children before BC diagnosis (median of 1 child/patient) and 63.1% had public health insurance. In terms of method of detection 34% were screen-detected whereas 66% were symptomatic, the last was even higher (70%) in patients in younger than 50 years. The distribution of BC stage at diagnosis was I (26.4%), II (41.6%), III (27%) and IV (5%). The most common histologies were ductal (80.9%) and lobular carcinoma (6.9%). The pathological characteristics were HR positive in 78.0%, HER-2 positive in 23.4% and grade 2 in 51%. BC subtypes were as follows: Luminal A 48%, Luminal B 12%, Luminal HER2 positive 17%, Non-luminal HER2 positive 7.3% and Triple negative 15.5%.
DISCUSSION
Breast cancer is diagnosed at an earlier age among Brazilian patients. The majority of patients were detected through symptomatic BC and therefore a significant proportion is still diagnosed in stages III and IV. Among other factors, these findings could have a significant impact in treatment outcomes. Further analysis of this large cohort of patients will help to identify other important elements and direct future strategies for breast cancer control.
TRIAL REGISTRY: NCT02663973
KEYWORDS: Breast Cancer; Epidemiology; Treatment; Brazil
Citation Format: Rosa D, Barrios C, Bines J, Werustky G, Cronemberger E, Queiroz GS, Lima VC, Freitas-Júnior R, Couto J, Emerenciano K, Resende H, Crocamo S, Reinert T, Van Eyil B, Néron Y, Dybal V, Lazaretti N, Costamilan RC, Andrade DA, Mathias C, Vacaro GZ, Borges G, Torres KL, Morelle A, Sampaio Filho CA, Mano M, Zaffaroni F, Simon S. Current status of clinical and pathological characteristics of breast cancer patients in Brazil: Results of the AMAZONA III study (GBECAM 0115) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-29.
Collapse
|
3
|
Effect of betamethasone on airway obstruction and bronchial response to salbutamol in prednisolone resistant asthma. Thorax 1987; 42:65-71. [PMID: 3303425 PMCID: PMC460605 DOI: 10.1136/thx.42.1.65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Twelve patients with chronic severe asthma, having previously shown an FEV1 increase of less than 20% of the predicted value with prednisolone treatment (20-60 mg daily for 10 days), took part in a double blind crossover comparison of equipotent anti-inflammatory doses of betamethasone and prednisolone. Betamethasone (8 mg) and prednisolone (40 mg) were administered daily for 10 days with a washout period of 10 days between. In this first part of the study betamethasone was administered intramuscularly and prednisolone orally. Placebo injections and tablets were used. Mean FEV1 was not significantly different before each period. There was a significant increase in FEV1 while they were taking betamethasone but not prednisolone. Individual analysis of the data showed that FEV1 increased with betamethasone in nine patients and remained stable or decreased in three. During treatment with prednisolone baseline FEV1 increased moderately in three patients (FEV1 0.3, 0.5 and 0.6 l) and remained stable or decreased in nine. There was no significant difference between the bronchodilator responses to cumulative doses of inhaled salbutamol when they were measured immediately before, on the last day of treatment with each steroid, and between steroid treatment periods. The same protocol was followed four months later in five of the 12 patients but both drugs were administered orally on this occasion. Similar results were obtained. The greater effect of betamethasone on bronchial obstruction may be due to its longer biological half life or to some unidentified property of its metabolites. The bronchial response to inhaled beta 2 agonist appears not to be influenced by either steroid in these patients.
Collapse
|