Changes in the characteristics of patients treated for brain metastases with repeat stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT): a retrospective study of 184 patients

PURPOSE

Brain metastases (BMs) are the leading cause of intracranial malignant neoplasms in adults. WHO, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), age, number of BMs, extracerebral progression (ECP), recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (Ds-GPA) are validated prognostic tools to help clinicians decide on treatment. No consensus exists for repeat stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for BMs. The aim of this study was to review the changes in patient characteristics treated with repeated SRTs.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The data of patients treated between 2010 and 2020 with at least two courses of SRT without previous whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) were reviewed. Age, WHO, KPS, ECP, type of systemic treatment, number of BMs were recorded. RPA, Ds-GPA and brain metastasis velocity (BMV) were calculated.

RESULTS

184 patients were treated for 915 BMs and received two to six SRTs for local or distant brain recurrence. The median number of BMs treated per SRT was 1 (range: 1-6), for a median of 4 BMs treated during all sessions (range: 2-19). WHO, Ds-GPA and RPA were stable between each session of SRT, whereas KPS was significantly better in SRT1 than in the following SRT. The number of BMs was not significantly different between each SRT, but there was a tendency for more BM at SRT1 (p = 0.06). At SRT1, patients had largest BM and undergo more surgery than during the following SRT (p < 0.001). 6.5%, 37.5% and 56% of patients were classified as high, intermediate, and low BMV, respectively, at the last SRT session. There was almost perfect concordance between the BMV-grade calculated at the last SRT session and at SRT2 (r = 0.89; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Repeated SRT doesn't lead to a marked alteration in the general condition, KPS was maintained at over 70% for more than 95% of patients during all SRTs. Long survival can be expected, especially in low-grade BMV patients. WBRT shouldn't be aborted, especially for patients developing more than twelve BMs annually.

Acute toxicities and cumulative dose to the brain of repeated sessions of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases: a retrospective study of 184 patients

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is a focal treatment for brain metastases (BMs); thus, 20 to 40% of patients will require salvage treatment after an initial SRT session, either because of local or distant failure. SRT is not exempt from acute toxicity, and the acute toxicities of repeated SRT are not well known. The objective of this study was to analyze the acute toxicities of repeated courses of SRT and to determine whether repeated SRT could lead to cumulative brain doses equivalent to those of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2010 and 2020, data from 184 patients treated for 915 BMs via two to six SRT sessions for local or distant BM recurrence without previous or intercurrent WBRT were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were seen via consultations during SRT, and the delivered dose, the use of corticosteroid therapy and neurological symptoms were recorded and rated according to the CTCAEv4. The dosimetric characteristics of 79% of BMs were collected, and summation plans of 76.6% of BMs were created.

RESULTS

36% of patients developed acute toxicity during at least one session. No grade three or four toxicity was registered, and grade one or two cephalalgy was the most frequently reported symptom. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of acute toxicity between consecutive SRT sessions. In the multivariate analysis, acute toxicity was associated with the use of corticosteroid therapy before irradiation (OR = 2.6; p = 0.01), BMV grade (high vs. low grade OR = 5.17; p = 0.02), and number of SRT sessions (3 SRT vs. 2 SRT: OR = 2.64; p = 0.01). The median volume equivalent to the WBRT dose (V_WBRT) was 47.9 ml. In the multivariate analysis, the V_WBRT was significantly associated with the total GTV (p < 0.001) and number of BMs (p < 0.001). Even for patients treated for more than ten cumulated BMs, the median BED to the brain was very low compared to the dose delivered during WBRT.

CONCLUSION

Repeated SRT for local or distant recurrent BM is well tolerated, without grade three or four toxicity, and does not cause more acute neurological toxicity with repeated SRT sessions. Moreover, even for patients treated for more than ten BMs, the V_WBRT is low.

Guidelines of the French Society of ENT (SFORL): Drug-induced sleep endoscopy in adult obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

OBJECTIVES

To determine the indications, anesthesiological and surgical procedure and interest of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in the treatment of adult obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

DESIGN

A redactional committee of 17 experts was set up. Conflicts of interest were disclosed and followed up throughout the process of drawing up the guidelines. The work received no funding from any firm dealing in health products (drugs or devices). The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method was applied to assess the quality of the data on which the guidelines were founded. It was stressed that strong recommendations should not be made on the basis of poor-quality or insufficient data.

METHODS

The committee studied 29 questions on 5 topics: indications and contraindications, anesthetic technique, surgical technique, interpretation and reporting of results, and management guided by results.

RESULTS

Expert review and application of the GRADE method led to 30 guidelines: 10 with high level of evidence (Grade 1+ or 1-), 19 with low level (GRADE 2+ or 2-) and 1 expert opinion.

CONCLUSION

Experts fully agreed on the strong guidelines formalizing the indications and modalities of drug-induced sleep endoscopy for adult obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

[Skull base meningioma: Clinical and radiological efficacy based on a quantitative volumetric analysis]

PURPOSE

To date, no correlation has been found between clinical and radiological efficacy after irradiation of skull base meningiomas. However, the evaluation of the radiological response was most often made by questionable methods that may have underestimated the radiological effectiveness of radiotherapy. The objective of this work is to verify this hypothesis by quantitative volumetric analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from 35 patients treated with either helical tomotherapy (45.7%) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (54.3%) were retrospectively analysed. These were mainly women (94%) aged 59 (43-81) with lesions mainly of the cavernous sinus (60%). There was a median of 2 (1-4) symptoms and the main symptoms were visual impairment (39%), cranial nerve deficits (23.4%) and headaches (17.2%).

RESULTS

Median tumour volume decreased significantly (P<0.05) from 9.6mL (0.3-36.6) to 6.8mL (0.1-26.5) after median follow-up of 44 months (24-77). Sixty-three percent of patients had an improvement of at least one symptom. In univariate analysis, clinical efficacy (P<0.05), radiotherapy technique (P<0.05), tumor topography (P<0.05) and initial tumor volume (P<0.05) were predictive factors for radiological response. In multivariate analysis, only the inverse correlation between radiological response and initial tumor volume remained significant (ρ: -0.47 95% CI -3.2 to 5.7; P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The quantitative volumetric monitoring demonstrates a major radiological efficiency of radiotherapy. However, no clear correlation between clinical and radiological efficacy was found.

[Infants poisoned with cannabis]

We reported three cases of infants poisoned with cannabis. These patients presented with acute neurological disorders such as drowsiness accompanied by hypotonia, mydriasis and seizure. Cannabis was found in all children either in the urine or in the blood. These cases illustrated that young age should not exclude toxicologic analysis in acute neurological disorders. Cannabis poisoning in infants is a rare reason for consultation. Clinical signs and symptoms are unspecific and severe manifesta- tions in pediatric age are not well known by emergency physicians and paediatricians.