A phase I pharmacokinetic study of the vascular disrupting agent ombrabulin (AVE8062) and docetaxel in advanced solid tumours

BACKGROUND

The vascular disrupting agent ombrabulin shows synergy with docetaxel in vivo. Recommended phase II doses were determined in a dose escalation study in advanced solid tumours.

METHODS

Ombrabulin (30-min infusion, day 1) followed by docetaxel (1-h infusion, day 2) every 3 weeks was explored. Ombrabulin was escalated from 11.5 to 42 mg m(-2) with 75 mg m(-2) docetaxel, then from 30 to 35 mg m(-2) with 100 mg m(-2) docetaxel. Recommended phase II dose cohorts were expanded.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were treated. Recommended phase II doses were 35 mg m(-2) ombrabulin with 75 mg m(-2) docetaxel (35/75 mg m(-2); 13 patients) and 30 mg m(-2) ombrabulin with 100 mg m(-2) docetaxel (30/100 mg m(-2); 16 patients). Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 fatigue (two patients; 42/75, 35/100), grade 3 neutropaenic infection (25/75), grade 3 headache (42/75), grade 4 febrile neutropaenia (30/100), and grade 3 thrombosis (35/100). Toxicities were consistent with each agent; mild nausea/vomiting, asthaenia/fatigue, alopecia, and anaemia were common, as were neutropaenia and leukopaenia. Diarrhoea, nail disorders and neurological symptoms were frequent at 100 mg m(-2) docetaxel. Pharmacokinetic analyses did not show any relevant drug interactions. Ten patients had partial responses (seven at 30 mg m(-2) ombrabulin), eight lasting >3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential administration of ombrabulin with 75 or 100 mg m(-2) docetaxel every 3 weeks is feasible.

Phase II study of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin given every 2 weeks for patients with a resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

We have previously reported a favourable response rate in patients with advanced esophageal cancer after treatment with a biweekly regimen of paclitaxel and cisplatin. In this study we investigate the feasibility and efficacy of this regimen in a neo-adjuvant setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus received paclit-axel 180 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks. Patients received three courses and responding patients received three additional courses; thereafter, patients were referred for surgery. Patient characteristics of 50 eligible patients were as follows: male, 60%; median age, 62 years (range 45-78); median World Health Organization performance status of 1 (range 0-2).

RESULTS

Ninety-four per cent of patients received at least three courses of chemotherapy. Haematological toxicity consisted of National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 71% of patients, with neutropenic fever occurring in only two patients (4%). The overall response rate was 59%. Pathological examination showed tumour-free margins in 38 patients. In seven patients no residual tumour was found. The median overall survival was 20 months and the 1- and 3-year survival rates were 68% and 30%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This dose-dense schedule of paclitaxel and cisplatin administered biweekly is well tolerated and the observed overall and complete response rates are promising.

Phase I study of a weekly schedule of a fixed dose of cisplatin and escalating doses of paclitaxel in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer

The objective of this study was to determine the toxicities and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a dose-dense schedule with a fixed dose of cisplatin and escalating doses of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic or irresectable squamous cell-, adeno-, or undifferentiated carcinoma of the oesophagus. Patients received paclitaxel over 3 h followed by a 3-h infusion of a fixed dose of cisplatin of 70 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36 and 43. The starting dose of paclitaxel was 80 mg/m(2). Patients were re-treated if white blood cell count (WBC) was >/=1 x 10(9) cells/l, except for day 29 when the WBC had to be >/=3 x 10(9) cells/l. Six patients were treated at each dose level. The dose of paclitaxel was increased by 10 mg/m(2) per level. Of the 24 patients enrolled, 13 had adenocarcinoma, 10 had squamous cell carcinoma and one had an undifferentiated carcinoma. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 22 of 24 patients were evaluable for response. The paclitaxel dose could be escalated to 110 mg/m(2). At this dose, 3 out of 6 patients developed dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) including neutropenic enterocolitis with sepsis, vomiting and diarrhoea. Diarrhoea grades 3 and 4 was seen in 4 (17%) patients. Two of these patients died of neutropenic enterocolitis. Neutropenia grades 3 or 4 was seen in 20 (83%) patients, but apart from the two patients with neutropenic enterocolitis no other infectious complications were seen. Mild to moderate sensory neurotoxicity was seen in 11 (46%) patients (grade 1 in 8 patients and grade 2 in 3 patients). Other toxicities were mild and easily manageable. Of the 22 evaluable patients, 11 (50%) patients achieved a partial or complete response with a median duration of 13 months. Ten patients with either locally advanced disease or supraclavicular or celiac lymph nodes received additional local treatment after response to chemotherapy, seven patients are still without evidence of disease after a median follow-up of 32 months. Paclitaxel at a dose 100 mg/m(2) infused over 3 h followed by a 3-h infusion of 70 mg/m(2) cisplatin can be recommended for further studies in patients with metastatic or unresectable oesophageal cancer. Occurring diarrhoea should be handled with caution because it may be a sign of neutropenic enterocolitis. The response rate of this dose-dense schedule seems encouraging.

Phase II study of the combination cisplatin, etoposide, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

The objective of this study was to determine the toxicity and the efficacy of the combination of cisplatin, etoposide, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid in the treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Patients received cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, etoposide 125 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 and etoposide 200 mg/m(2) p.o. on days 3 and 5, 5-FU 375 mg/m(2)/day continuously i.v. combined with folinic acid 30 mg p.o. 6 times per day on days 1--4. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks until progression or up to a maximum of 6 courses. Patients were evaluated for response after every two courses. Sixty-nine patients received a total of 291 courses (median 4, range 1--6). The hematological toxicity consisted of leukocytopenia grade 3 or 4 in 17 and 16% of patients, respectively. Leukocytopenic fever was seen in 19% of patients. Thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4 was seen in 13 and 7% of patients, respectively. Non-hematological toxicity consisted of nausea/vomiting grade 3 in 32%, diarrhea grade 3 in 6% and mucositis grade 3 or 4 in 23% of patients. The overall response rate was 34% (complete response 4%, partial response 30%) and the median time to progression was 7 months in 13 patients who received no additional treatment. The median survival for all patients was 9.5 months with a 1-year survival rate of 36%. Ten patients with initially locally unresectable disease (N=2) or celiac or supraclavicular lymph node metastases (N=8) who received additional treatment (esophageal resection in seven patients and radiotherapy in three patients) after they had responded to chemotherapy had a 3-year survival of 50%. We conclude that the combination cisplatin and etoposide combined with 5-FU and folinic acid is a safe and active regimen for patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Mucositis is the most prevalent toxicity.

Eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester supplementation in cachectic cancer patients and healthy subjects: effects on lipolysis and lipid oxidation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Recent reports suggest that weight loss in cachectic cancer patients may be inhibited by supplementation of the n-3 fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3; EPA), presumably due to inhibition of lipolysis. The aim of the present double-blind, randomized trial was to assess whether short-term oral EPA ethyl ester (EE) supplementation inhibits lipolysis and lipid oxidation in weight-losing cancer patients and in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Seventeen weight-losing, cancer patients of different tumor types, and 16 healthy subjects were randomized to receive EPA-EE (6 g/d) or placebo (oleic acid (OA)-EE; 6 g/d) for seven days. At baseline (day 0) and during supplementation (days 2 and 7) whole-body lipolysis and palmitic acid release were measured in the overnight fasting state using [1, 1, 2, 3, 3-(2)H(5)]glycerol and [1-(13)C]palmitic acid. Palmitate oxidation was determined by measuring(13)CO(2)enrichment in expired breath.

RESULTS

No significant effects of EPA-EE on whole-body lipolysis, palmitic acid release, or palmitate oxidation were detected in cancer patients nor in healthy subjects in comparison with OA-EE. EPA-EE supplementation reduced plasma-free fatty acid and triacylglycerol concentrations significantly in healthy subjects but not in cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that supplementation of EPA-EE does not significantly inhibit lipolysis or lipid oxidation in weight-losing cancer patients or in healthy subjects during short-term supplementation when using OA-EE as a placebo supplement.

Cisplatin and etoposide in oesophageal cancer: a phase II study. Rotterdam Oesophageal Tumour Study Group

In the search for effective chemotherapy regimens which can be used in multimodality treatment programmes for patients with cancer of the oesophagus, we conducted a phase II trial to determine the activity and toxicity of the combination of cisplatin and etoposide in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. Seventy-three consecutive patients with unresectable or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic oesophagus were treated with cisplatin 80 mg m-2 by 4 h infusion on day 1, etoposide 100 mg (fixed dose) by 2 h infusion on day 1 and 2, and etoposide 200 mg m-2 orally on day 3 and 5. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks, for a maximum of six courses. The oral dosages of etoposide were modified individually until a significant degree of myelosuppression was reached. Of 65 evaluable patients, five complete responses (CRs) and 26 partial responses (PRs) were seen, for an overall response rate of 48% (95% confidence interval 35-60%). Median time to progression was 7 months (range 3-72 + months). There were two toxic deaths (neutropenic sepsis). The response rate equals that of other cisplatin-based regimens. Its toxicity profile allows addition of a third active drug such as 5-fluorouracil.