Cardiac rehabilitation: pedagogical education strategies have positive effect on long-term patient-reported outcomes

This study examined whether patients attending cardiac rehabilitation (CR) based on the pedagogical strategy learning and coping (LC) led to improved health-related quality of life (HRQL), reduced symptoms of anxiety and depression and improved self-management 6 and 12 months after the completion of CR compared with patients attending CR based on the pedagogical strategy 'Empowerment, Motivation and Medical Adherence' (EMMA). A pragmatic cluster-controlled trial of two pedagogical strategies, LC and EMMA, including 10 primary health care settings and 555 patients diagnosed with ischaemic heart disease and referred to CR between August 2018 and July 2019 was conducted. In total, 312 patients replied to the questionnaires collected at baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after completing CR. Linear regression analyses adjusted for potential confounder variables and cluster effects were performed. We found clinically relevant and statistically significant improvements in HRQL, anxiety, depression and self-management after completing CR. The improvements were sustained at 6 and 12 months after the completion of CR. We found no differences between the two evidence-based patient education strategies. In conclusion, this study supports the use of evidence-based patient education strategies, but there is no evidence to suggest that one pedagogical strategy is superior to the other.

Cardiac rehabilitation do not diminish the socioeconomic and ethnical disparity in patients with coronary heart disease

Aims

Cardiac patients with low socioeconomic status and non-western ethnic background have worse outcomes. The aim of this nationwide study was to determine whether the immediate effect of CR differs between groups defined by socioeconomic status and ethnic background, and whether disparity in the prognosis of cardiac patients is diminished by CR participation.

Methods

We included all patients in Denmark with myocardial infarction and/or coronary revascularization from August 2015 until March 2018. Level of education, as a marker for socioeconomic status, was divided into four groups, and ethnicity into Danish, non-Western and Western. Participation in CR was identified through the Danish Cardiac Rehabilitation Database (DHRD) and the Danish National Patient Register. Primary outcome was achievement of CR quality indicators, including risk factor control and medication, from DHRD, and secondary outcome a composite endpoint of cardiovascular disease hospitalization and all-cause mortality (MACE).

Results

We identified 34,511 patients of whom 19,383 had participated in CR and 9,882 provided information on CR data from DHRD. Higher education was associated with greater improvement in VO2peak and non-western patients were less likely to be screened for depression or receive dietary consulting. No other significant disparity in CR quality indicators, was found across education and ethnicity. There was a strong socioeconomic gradient in MACE irrespective of CR participation, medication and risk factor control (adjusted HR 0.71 (0.58–0.86) for high versus low education). Similarly, non-western origin was associated with higher risk of MACE (adjusted HR 1.2 (1.1–1.4).

Conclusion

We found strong socioeconomic and ethnic disparity in prognosis of CHD patients which were unaffected by CR participation. The results indicate that CR, conventional risk factor control and medical treatment have limited impact on these disparities.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The Danish Heart Foundation Figure 1Figure 2

Cardiac rehabilitation for patients with heart failure: a national Danish register-based study of predictors of referral and outcomes

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The Danish Heart Foundation

Background

 Heart failure (HF) places a large burden on patients and society as a major cause of morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Participation in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in people with HF is a clinically and cost-effective strategy and recommended in international clinical guidelines.

Purpose

The aims of this study were to: (1) examine the temporal trends and predictors of national CR referral, and (2) compare the risk of hospital readmission and mortality in those referred for CR compared to no referral.

Methods

All patients in Denmark with incident HF were identified by the Danish Heart Failure Register in the period 2010 to 2018 (n = 33,257) and CR referral assessed within 120 days of hospital admission. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between CR referral and predictors and to compare risk of hospital readmission and mortality until 1 year between referred and not referred patients.

Results

Overall, 45.0% of HF patients were referred to exercise-based CR, increasing from 31.7% in 2010 to 52.2% in 2018. Factors independently associated with higher CR referral were: NYHA functional class II, LVEF <50%, diagnosis of myocardial infarction and use of ACE inhibitor. Male gender, older age, region, unemployment, retirement, living alone, non-Danish ethnic origin, lower educational level, NYHA class IV, treatment for hypertension, existing chronic obstructive lung disease and stroke were associated with lower CR referral. CR referral was associated with lower risk of readmission (adjusted odds ratio: 0.90;95%CI: 0.85-0.95), HF-specific mortality (0.61; 0.39-0.95) and all-cause mortality (0.61; 0.55-0.69) as compared to no referral.

Conclusions

Although CR referral has increased over time, only some 1 in 2 diagnosed HF patients in Denmark are referred to exercise-based CR. CR referral is associated with lower risk in readmissions and mortality. Strategies to promote CR referral including healthcare professional education on the benefits of CR and alternative methods of CR delivery are urgently needed to improve access to CR, especially for high-risk groups.

Short- and long-term effects of the patient education strategy-learning and coping-in cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial (LC-REHAB)

The objectives were to assess the short- and long-term effect of the patient education strategy 'Learning and Coping' (LC) in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on health-related quality of life, patient education impact, cardiac risk factors and lifestyle. In total, 825 patients hospitalized with ischaemic heart disease or heart failure were randomized to either LC-CR or standard CR at three Danish hospitals. Teaching approach in LC-CR was situational, inductive and reflective, with experienced patients as co-educators and supplemental interviews. Teaching approach in standard CR was structured and deductive. Outcomes were assessed immediately after CR, and after 3 months (short term), and after 3 years (long term). Between-arm differences in favour of LC-CR were SF-12 'role emotional' (3.7, 95% CI: 0.6-6.8) and MDI depression score (0.9, 0.1-1.8) immediately after CR, exercise capacity (4 W, 1-9) at 3 months and SF-12 'role physical' (4.6, 0.1-9.0) (long term). Between-arm differences in favour of controls were waist circumference (-1.7 cm, -2.3 to -1.0) immediately after CR and HeiQ domain 'Constructive attitudes and approaches' (0.11, 0.04-0.18), triglycerides (-0.12 mmol/l, -0.21 to -0.02), systolic blood pressure (-3.12 mmHg, -5.66 to -0.58) at 3 months. Adding LC strategies to CR provides inconsistent short-term results but improves 'role physical' long term.

Effects of the patient education strategy 'Learning and Coping' in cardiac rehabilitation on readmissions and mortality: a randomized controlled trial (LC-REHAB)

We assessed the effects of the patient education strategy 'Learning and Coping' (LC) in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on mortality and readmissions by exploring results from the LC-REHAB trial. In all, 825 patients with ischaemic heart disease or heart failure were randomized to the intervention arm (LC-CR) or the control arm (standard CR) at three hospitals in Denmark. LC-CR was situational and inductive, with experienced patients as co-educators supplemented with two individual interviews. Group-based training and education hours were the same in both arms. Outcomes were time to death or readmission, length of stay and absolute number of deaths or readmissions. No between-arm differences were found in time to death, first readmission, or length of stay. Within 30 days after completion of CR, the absolute number of all-cause readmissions was 117 in the LC arm and 146 in the control arm, adjusted odds ratio 78 (95% CI: 0.61-1.01), P = 0.06. This trend diminished over time. Adding LC strategies to standard CR showed a short term but no significant long-term effect on mortality or readmissions. However, the study was not powered to detect differences in mortality and morbidity. Thus, a risk of overseeing a true effect was present.

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation after heart valve surgery: cost analysis of healthcare use and sick leave

Background

Owing to a lack of evidence, patients undergoing heart valve surgery have been offered exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) since 2009 based on recommendations for patients with ischaemic heart disease in Denmark. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of CR on the costs of healthcare use and sick leave among heart valve surgery patients over 12 months post surgery.

Methods

We conducted a nationwide survey on the CR participation of all patients having undergone valve surgery between 1 January 2011 and 30 June 2011 (n=667). Among the responders (n=500, 75%), the resource use categories of primary and secondary healthcare, prescription medication and sick leave were analysed for CR participants (n=277) and non-participants (n=223) over 12 months. A difference-in-difference analysis was undertaken. All estimates were presented as the means per patient (95% CI) based on non-parametric bootstrapping of SEs.

Results

Total costs during the 12 months following surgery were €16 065 per patient (95% CI 13 730 to 18 399) in the CR group and €15 182 (12 695 to 17 670) in the non-CR group. CR led to 5.6 (2.9 to 8.3, p<0.01) more outpatient visits per patient. No statistically significant differences in other cost categories or total costs €1330 (−4427 to 7086, p=0.65) were found between the groups.

Conclusions

CR, as provided in Denmark, can be considered cost neutral. CR is associated with more outpatient visits, but CR participation potentially offsets more expensive outpatient visits. Further studies should investigate the benefits of CR to heart valve surgery patients as part of a formal cost-utility analysis.