Pain, Analgesic Use, and Patient Satisfaction With Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery : A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The REGAIN (Regional versus General Anesthesia for Promoting Independence after Hip Fracture) trial found similar ambulation and survival at 60 days with spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. Trial outcomes evaluating pain, prescription analgesic use, and patient satisfaction have not yet been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To compare pain, analgesic use, and satisfaction after hip fracture surgery with spinal versus general anesthesia.

DESIGN

Preplanned secondary analysis of a pragmatic randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02507505).

SETTING

46 U.S. and Canadian hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged 50 years or older undergoing hip fracture surgery.

INTERVENTION

Spinal or general anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS

Pain on postoperative days 1 through 3; 60-, 180-, and 365-day pain and prescription analgesic use; and satisfaction with care.

RESULTS

A total of 1600 patients were enrolled. The average age was 78 years, and 77% were women. A total of 73.5% (1050 of 1428) of patients reported severe pain during the first 24 hours after surgery. Worst pain over the first 24 hours after surgery was greater with spinal anesthesia (rated from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain imaginable]; mean difference, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.12 to 0.68]). Pain did not differ across groups at other time points. Prescription analgesic use at 60 days occurred in 25% (141 of 563) and 18.8% (108 of 574) of patients assigned to spinal and general anesthesia, respectively (relative risk, 1.33 [CI, 1.06 to 1.65]). Satisfaction was similar across groups.

LIMITATION

Missing outcome data and multiple outcomes assessed.

CONCLUSION

Severe pain is common after hip fracture. Spinal anesthesia was associated with more pain in the first 24 hours after surgery and more prescription analgesic use at 60 days compared with general anesthesia.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

Impact of intraoperative normovolemic hemodilution on transfusion requirements for 68 patients undergoing lumbar laminectomies with instrumented posterolateral fusion

STUDY DESIGN

To determine whether the normovolemic hemodilution (NH) technique would limit postoperative homologous blood transfusion requirements in 68 patients having multilevel lumbar laminectomies (3-6 levels) with predominant 1- or 2-level instrumented fusions.

OBJECTIVE

In this setting, to define postoperative homologous blood transfusion requirements using NH.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

NH limits postoperative homologous blood transfusion requirements following various types of surgical procedures including those on the spine.

METHODS

NH was used in an attempt to limit postoperative homologous transfusion requirements in 68 patients undergoing lumbar surgery. NH involves the removal of 1 to 2 U of blood replaced with crystalloid (2-4 mL per milliliter of blood harvested). Multiple variables contributing to homologous transfusion requirements were analyzed.

RESULTS

Using NH, no homologous blood transfusions were required in 52 patients with a mean preoperative hematocrit of 41.3 undergoing average 3.7 level laminectomies with 1.5 level fusions. However, 16 patients with an average preoperative hematocrit of 38.5 undergoing average 4.3 level laminectomies with 1.6 level fusions required transfusion of 31 U of homologous blood after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Using NH, 16 (23.5%) patients required 31 postoperative homologous blood transfusions. By contrast, the remaining 52 patients with similar procedures were able to avoid the use of homologous transfusion.