No change in apolipoprotein AI metabolism when subcutaneous insulin infusion is replaced by intraperitoneal insulin infusion in type 1 diabetic patients

In type 1 diabetic patients, the replacement of subcutaneous insulin infusion by intraperitoneal insulin infusion restores the normal physiological gradient between the portal vein and the peripheral circulation, which is likely to modify HDL metabolism. This stable isotope kinetic study was designed to compare HDL apolipoprotein (apo) AI metabolism in seven type 1 diabetic patients first treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion by an external pump and then 3 months after the beginning of intraperitoneal insulin infusion by an implantable pump. Glycaemic control was comparable under subcutaneous and intraperitoneal insulin infusion (HbA1c=7.34+/-0.94% versus 7.24+/-1.00%, NS). HDL composition was similar under both insulin regimens (esterified cholesterol=20.1+/-2.5% versus 24.0+/-3.0% (NS), free cholesterol=3.4+/-1.1% versus 3.3+/-0.9% (NS), triglycerides=2.4+/-0.9% versus 2.1+/-0.9% (NS), phospholipids=22.7+/-5.3% versus 25.2+/-6.5% (NS) and proteins=51.2+/-6.3% versus 45.5+/-4.7% (NS)). The replacement of subcutaneous insulin infusion by intraperitoneal insulin infusion induced significant changes neither in apoAI fractional catabolic rate, nor in apoAI production rate, nor in apoAI pool size (respectively, 0.199+/-0.051 pool d(-1) versus 0.211+/-0.017 pool d(-1), 12.0+/-3.2 mg kg(-1)d(-1) versus 12.1+/-1.8 mg kg(-1)d(-1), 60.4+/-5.0 mg kg(-1) versus 57.5+/-7.5 mg kg(-1)). In conclusion, HDL metabolism is not modified by the replacement of subcutaneous insulin infusion by intraperitoneal insulin infusion when glycaemia is well controlled under both insulin regimens. As far as HDL metabolism is concerned there is no advantage in favour of one way of insulin administration or another.

Comparison of apolipoprotein B100 metabolism between continuous subcutaneous and intraperitoneal insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

In type 1 diabetic patients, the replacement of s.c. insulin infusion with i.p. insulin infusion restores the normal physiological gradient between the portal vein and the peripheral circulation, which is likely to modify lipoprotein metabolism.

DESIGN

To check this hypothesis, we performed two apolipoprotein (apo) B100 kinetic studies in seven type 1 diabetic patients, first under s.c. insulin infusion and then 3 months after the beginning of i.p. insulin infusion.

RESULTS

Glycemic control was similar under s.c. insulin infusion and i.p. insulin infusion, as assessed by glycated hemoglobin A1c and the capillary glycemic curve determined during the kinetic study. Very low-density and intermediate-density lipoprotein apoB100 pool size, production rate, and fractional catabolic rate (FCR) were similar under s.c. insulin infusion and i.p. insulin infusion. The low-density lipoprotein apoB100 FCR tended to decrease under ip insulin (0.45 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.55 +/- 0.11 pool/d), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (95% confidence interval for the difference, -0.33, 0.11). The low-density lipoprotein apoB100 pool size and production rate remained unchanged under i.p. insulin infusion compared with s.c. insulin infusion.

CONCLUSION

In type 1 diabetic patients, the replacement of s.c. insulin infusion with i.p. insulin infusion does not induce profound modifications of apoB100-containing lipoprotein production and FCRs.

Normal metabolism of apolipoprotein B100-containing lipoproteins despite qualitative abnormalities in type 1 diabetic men

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Type 1 diabetic subjects are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease and exhibit multiple qualitative abnormalities of apolipoprotein (apo) B100-containing lipoproteins. This stable isotope kinetic experiment was designed to study whether these abnormalities are associated with changes in the synthesis and fractional catabolic rates of VLDL-, IDL- and LDL-apoB100.

METHODS

Using a bolus followed by a 16-h constant infusion of 13C-leucine, we performed a kinetic study in eight men with type 1 diabetes treated with a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion administered by an external pump and in seven healthy men, in the fed state.

RESULTS

The mean HbA1c level in the type 1 diabetic patients was 8.00+/-1.48%. Plasma triglyceride, and total, LDL and HDL cholesterol levels were similar in patients and control subjects. VLDL were less triglyceride rich in type 1 diabetic patients than in control subjects (VLDL triglyceride : apoB 6.91+/-0.81 vs 8.29+/-1.24 mmol/g, p=0.05). Conversely, the IDL and LDL of the type 1 diabetic patients contained relatively higher levels of triglycerides (IDL triglycerides : apoB 2.16+/-0.36 vs 1.57+/-0.30 mmol/g, p<0.01; LDL triglycerides : apoB 0.27+/-0.06 vs 0.16+/-0.04 mmol/g, p<0.05). The apoB100 pool size, production and fractional catabolic rates in the two groups of subjects were similar for all lipoprotein fractions.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Despite qualitative abnormalities, especially abnormalities of triglyceride content, the metabolism of apoB100-containing lipoproteins is not altered in type 1 diabetic men with fair glycaemic control with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. The high risk of atherosclerosis in these patients cannot be explained by kinetic abnormalities of apoB100-containing lipoproteins.

Intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy in the treatment of Graves' ophthalmopathy

Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) is a specific immune-mediated disorder, whose treatment is sometimes difficult. In order to investigate the efficacy of intravenous methylprednisolone (MP) pulse therapy in GO, we studied eight patients with GO, followed up for at least 6 months by clinical patient self-assessment, ophthalmological examination and orbital computed tomography (OCT). A 12.5 mg/kg dose of MP was administered intravenously over a 10 hour period, once every month. Three to six MP pulse administrations were performed in each patient. All patients were outpatients. A 0.5 mg/kg/day oral prednisone dose was given to each patient as interpulse therapy. Clinical assessment of MP pulse therapy showed a good response in 87.5% and no response in 12.5% of patients. The treatment was rapidly efficient, mostly on patient self-assessment, soft tissue inflammation, ophthalmoplegia, corneal involvement, visual acuity and extraocular muscle enlargement on OCT. Post-treatment ophthalmic index was significantly improved (6.75 +/- 3.06 vs. 2.5 +/- 1.41: p < 0.05). MP pulse therapy had less effect on proptosis (22.94 +/- 2.32 mm vs. 21.56 +/- 2.22 mm: p < 0.05). No adverse effects were noted with MP pulse therapy. Patients showed no relapse of eye involvement during a mean follow up of 31.8 months (2-77 months). In conclusion, our results suggest that intravenous MP pulse therapy is a good immunosuppressive therapy for GO. Moreover, in comparison with the previous studies, the MP dose used in our present study appears to be optimal with high efficacy. MP pulse therapy represents a safe and efficient treatment in GO, which can easily be performed in outpatients.