Outcomes of regional transfers of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a UK vascular network

INTRODUCTION Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm is a surgical emergency. In order to improve operative outcomes, vascular services have been centralised in the United Kingdom. This means that a patient may present to a hospital with a ruptured aneurysm, but require transfer to a vascular centre for definitive treatment. METHODS This retrospective cohort study identified patients who underwent surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a tertiary vascular centre over a 2-year period. Data on demographics and originating unit were recorded. Outcomes assessed included 30-day mortality, operative mortality and postoperative morbidity. RESULTS We identified 70 patients who underwent surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in the 2-year period; 36 presented directly to the vascular unit (VU), 14 to referral unit 1 (RU1) and 20 to referral unit 2 (RU2); 30-day mortality rates were 27.7% (VU), 35.5% (RU1) and 30.0% (RU2), respectively. There was no statistical difference in mortality between units. Postoperative complications were seen in 35.9% of VU patients, 78.6% of RU1 patients and 70% of RU2 patients. This was statistically significant between VU and RU1 (P = 0.006) and VU and RU2 (P = 0.02). Direct operative complications were seen in 9 patients, gastrointestinal complications in 9, limb complications in 6 and systemic complications in 40. CONCLUSION This study found that site of presentation does not affect mortality but is associated with increased morbidity. This is a complex issue, which will require a prospective multicentre study to investigate further.

The Association between Diabetes and Herpes Simplex Eye Disease

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and presence and severity of Herpes simplex eye disease (HSED).

METHODS

We conducted two sub-studies. We included the patients seen on the Cornea Service of the Wills Eye Hospital from January 2008 to August 2012. Study 1 included 541 patients with HSED and 3226 controls. Study 2 involved 40 diabetic and 120 non-diabetic ocular surface HSED patients. Severity of ocular surface HSED was graded as mild, moderate, or severe, based on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Patients were excluded if they had fewer than two office visits or had non-Herpes simplex-related vision-threatening conditions. Diabetes was graded as: diet group (DM controlled with diet), oral group (DM controlled with oral medications), and insulin group (DM control required insulin).

RESULTS

Five of 541 (0.93%) HSED patients had type 1 DM, similar to 19/3246 (0.59%) controls (p = 0.375); 48 of 541 (8.88%) HSED patients had type 2 DM, similar to 287/3246 (8.84%) controls (p = 0.981). Using multinomial logistic regression analyses, the probability/risk of being in the severe ocular surface HSED group as opposed to the mild ocular surface HSED group were not statistically significantly different between DM patients and those without DM (p = 0.120; OR, 1.900; 95% CI, 0.846-4.266).

CONCLUSIONS

There may not be a positive association between type 2 DM and HSED.