Risk factors of stone residual after retrograde intrarenal surgery: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Complete removal of renal stones is crucial for optimal patient outcomes, but recent studies have reported residual stones after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). This study aimed to identify the associated risk factors to improve patient management and treatment selection.

METHODS

This cohort study was conducted over 18 months at two hospitals and recruited adult patients with renal stones less than 3 cm. Preoperative assessment included medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and radiological imaging. Intraoperative and postoperative data collection and follow-up were conducted to evaluate surgical success and potential complications.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were included, with a mean age of 45.3 ± 10.7 years and a mean BMI of 26.2 ± 1.4 kg/m2. Approximately 19% of the patients had residual stones after the RIRS procedure. The RUSS score showed good diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.843, and the optimal cut point was ⩾2.0 with a sensitivity of 52.6% and specificity of 95.1%. Independent predictors of residual stones were multiple sites (OR = 24.98; p = 0.002), multiple stones (OR = 13.62, p = 0.002), stone size of 21-30 mm (OR = 4.91, p = 0.038), lower calyx site (OR = 4.85, p = 0.033), and surgeon experience of fewer than 50 cases (OR = 6.82, p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies several factors associated with residual stones after RIRS for renal stones, including stone size, location, number, and surgeon experience. The study suggests that the RUSS score can be used as a reliable tool for predicting the likelihood of residual stones, which can help clinicians in patient selection and treatment planning.

Clinical and urodynamic findings before and after surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse in women with lower urinary tract symptoms. A prospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between urodynamic findings and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) before and after surgical treatment of POP.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients with stage II or more anterior POP associated with LUTS and eligible for surgical repair of POP were included in this prospective study. All cases had clinical evaluation and urodynamic testing (UDS) before and 6 months after surgical repair of POP.

RESULTS

Mean age was 45±9 years. Mean BMI was 28±6 kg/m². Most cases were multiparous, had stage III cystocele (50/74, 68%), and an associating apical prolapse (37/74, 50%). Native tissue repair was done in 53/74 (72%) cases with a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure (AIP) in 41/74 (55%) for overt (26/74, 35%) or occult (15/74, 20%) stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Preoperative UDS revealed detrusor overactivity (DO) in 19/56 (34%) patients of those presenting with storage LUTS and an obstructed P_detQ_max in 20/26 (77%) patients presenting with voiding LUTS. At the 6-month postoperative follow-up, 61/74 (82%) patients had marked improvement of their LUTS, SUI resolved in 39/41 (95%) patients and 1/33 (3%) patient developed de novo SUI. Preoperative DO and post-void residual urine volume (PVR) were not related to the postoperative improvement, or persistence of LUTS. Meanwhile, detrusor underactivity (DU) was detected both on preoperative and postoperative UDS of 4 patients with persistent voiding LUTS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients had significant improvement in LUTS after POP surgery with or without an AIP. DU was associated with persistence of voiding LUTS. Meanwhile, preoperative DO and PVR were of limited prognostic value.

Effect of perioperative selective alpha-1 blockers in non-stented ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for ureteric stones: a randomized controlled trial

Introduction

The aim of this studywas to assess the efficacy of perioperative alpha-1 blockers on improving the success rate and decreasing complications of non-stented ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for ureteric stones.

Material and methods

A randomized control trial was conducted at two high volume urological centers from September 2017 to December 2018. We enrolled 150 patients with lower ureteric stones. They were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in group A, underwent non-stented ureteroscopy using Ho-YAG laser for stone disintegration and received alpha-1 blockers for one week preoperatively and another two weeks postoperatively. Patients in group B, underwent non-stented ureteroscopy and laser and received a placebo.

Results

One hundred and twenty patients were available for analysis at the end of our study. There was no statistically significant difference found between both groups regarding demographic data and stone parameters. The need for intraoperative ureteric dilatation was 32.7% and 51.6% for both groups A and B respectively with a statistically significant difference. The incidence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and the need for analgesics were higher in group B with a statistically significant difference.

Conclusions

Administration of perioperative tamsulosin seems to not only to significantly decrease the need for intra-operative dilatation and hence operative time, but also leads to a significant decrease in the development of postoperative LUTs, postoperative pain and the need for analgesia and hospital stay.

Simultaneous antegrade and retrograde endourological approach in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position for the management of missed stents associated with complex renal stones: a non-randomized pilot study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the simultaneous antegrade and retrograde endourological approach in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position (GMSVP) for the management of missed stent with complex renal stones.

METHODS

Over 5 years, patients presented to our clinic or referred to our hospital with missed DJ stent and complex renal stones were included prospectively in our study. Inclusion criteria were patients with neglected DJ stents (more than 6 months) complicated with complex stone burden, in addition to stents that was Fragmented and required renal access for removal. Stent and stone removal were performed using a simultaneous antegrade and retrograde renal approach in the GMSVP. The success rate and any perioperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

45 patients were available for evaluation. The average stone size was 3.9 ± 0.8 cm. Renal stones, ureteric stones, and bladder stones were present in 39, 24, and 10 patients, respectively .Two patients had fragmented DJs. Semirigid ureteroscopy with PCNL was used in 19 (42.2%) cases, ECIRS in 17 (37.7%) cases, Cystolitholapaxy and PCNL in 10 (22.2%) cases. Mean operative time was 70.8 ± 10.2 min, mean hospital stay was 2.3 ± 0.8 days. The stone-free rate was 93.3% after one procedure, two patients needed an auxiliary SWL for residual stones, postoperative complications were seen in 24.4% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous antegrade and retrograde renal approach in the GMSVP is safe and effective in the management of missed DJ stents with a complex stone burden.

Case Report: Laparoscopic Approach for Orchiopexy in a 26-Year-Old Man with Accidentally Discovered Persistent Müllerian Duct Syndrome and Bilateral Undescended Testis

Background: Persistent Müllerian duct syndrome (PMDS) is not a common form of disorder of sex development in which Müllerian duct derivatives (fallopian tubes, uterus, and the proximal vagina) are present in an otherwise normally differentiated 46 XY male. In most of cases, the challenge comes in the procedure of orchiopexy.

Case Presentation: We report a case of a 26-year-old man with PMDS. It was accidentally discovered when the patient presented to our outpatient clinic concerning about his empty scrotum as a premarital check. Diagnostic laparoscopy discovered Mullerian remnants in the form of uterus, cervix, and fallopian tubes with two attached testes to the fallopian tubes. Staged laparoscopic orchiopexy was done. We discuss the presentation, the management of this case in the literature, and our intervention.

Conclusion: PMDS is not a common condition. Several concerns present in the management of these cases. Malignant transformation of the testis is the main risk facing those patients. Few literature studies discussed the risk of changing of these remnants into malignant tissue. Thus discussion with the patient, tissue histopathology, expert opinions, and literature review are the main clues in management of such cases.