DIPG-32. Paediatric histone-mutant diffuse midline glioma: real world outcomes from a low-middle income country (LMIC) setting

BACKGROUND: Histone-mutant diffuse midline glioma (H3K27M) is a distinct high-grade central nervous system (CNS) tumor arising in the midline structures of the brain and/or spinal cord in children and young adults with dismal clinical outcomes. Real world data on this entity, particularly from the low-middle income countries (LMICs) is lacking. We report outcomes of pediatric histone-mutant diffuse midline gliomas treated between 2014-2021 at our comprehensive cancer centre in India. METHODS: Children (<16 years) with biopsy-proven diffuse midline glioma demonstrating histone mutation (H3K27M) on gene expression profiling were identified through electronic search of neuro-pathology database. Clinico-demographic characteristics, histo-molecular features, treatment details, and survival outcomes were retrieved retrospectively from institutional records. All children had undergone biopsy and occasionally debulking surgery prior to definitive radiotherapy (RT). Upfront temozolomide (TMZ) either concurrent and/or adjuvant was at the discretion of treating oncologist. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods and expressed as point estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Median age of the study cohort (N=51) was 11 years (inter-quartile range 6-14 years) with no gender predilection. Metastatic disease (leptomeningeal dissemination, sub-ependymal spread, or distant brain involvement) was seen at presentation in 7 (13.7%) patients and at first progression after definitive RT in 10 (19.6%) patients. At a median follow up of 10.3 months, 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS and OS were 21.5% (95%CI: 12.2-37.9%) and 45.6% (33.1-62%) yielding median PFS and OS of 7.8 months (95%CI: 5.6-11 months) and 11.3 months (95%CI: 9.4-14.9 months) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We report aggressive biological course and dismal outcomes in pediatric histone-mutant diffuse midline gliomas (H3K27M) treated in a LMIC setting. High incidence of metastatic CNS failure in our cohort suggests a potential role for testing neuraxial irradiation and aggressive systemic therapy to improve survival.

Months and Severity Score (MOSES) in a Phase III trial (PARCER): A new comprehensive method for reporting adverse events in oncology clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Adverse event reporting in oncology trials lacks temporal description. We propose a toxicity summarizing method that incorporates time.

METHODS

Patients recruited in a phase III trial (NCT01279135) that compared three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for late toxicity in cervical cancer were included. Adverse events were reported using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 and quality of life (QOL) with EORTC QLQ-C30 and CX24. A total of six symptoms with a related QOL question (diarrhoea, abdominal pain, anorexia, urinary incontinence, frequency and fatigue) were included. Month and severity score [MOSES= ∑ (CTCAE grade x proportionate time)] was calculated. Cumulative-MOSES (C-MOSES) was calculated by summating these 6 individual MOSES. QoL was categorized as "substantially symptomatic" or "not". Receiver operator curve analysis was performed to determine the MOSES cut off that predicts for substantial QOL symptoms. CTCAE and MOSES were tested for accurately categorizing QOL impact.

FINDINGS

In the construction dataset, 201/300 patients had symptoms. MOSES > 0.20 had higher accuracy than CTCAE for predicting impact on QOL related to diarrhoea (85% vs. 69%), anorexia (61% vs 51%), abdominal pain (71% vs. 57%), urinary incontinence (72% vs. 61%) and frequency (62% vs. 59%). C-MOSES > 0·70 correlated with reduction in role functioning and global QOL. While no difference was seen in CTCAE grade ≥1 Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity between 3DCRT or IMRT arm, 3DCRT had higher C-MOSES than IMRT (HR=0.64;95% CI 0.41-0.99, p = 0.04).

INTERPRETATION

MOSES has higher accuracy than CTCAE in categorizing symptom specific and functional QOL. These results require further external validation.

FUNDING

None.

Measuring Satisfaction in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Ambulatory Care: A Validation Study

Introduction Patient satisfaction constitutes a vital service quality indicator. It provides a measure of the gap in health-care requirements and patients' expectations.

Objective The aim of this study was to perform linguistic validation of the questionnaire assessing satisfaction with outpatient care.

Materials and Methods A tool for measuring patient satisfaction was developed and validated at our institute in the English language. This tool was translated into Hindi and Marathi. Subsequently, 339 patients diagnosed with breast cancer consulting in the outpatient department from the different parts of India and having diverse linguistic and socioeconomic backgrounds were enrolled. Patients were asked to complete the satisfaction tool after consultation at a single point of time in a prospective manner.

Results All patients completed the questionnaire. The questionnaire was filled by 120, 116, and 103 patients in Hindi, Marathi, and English, respectively. Both convergent validity and discriminant validity were supported as the correlation coefficient was >0.4 for all items within a scale and <0.7 between different scales. Factor analysis was valid for all except for open-end questions. The internal consistency was >0.9 for all the questions. The mean overall satisfaction score was 88.35 (standard deviation: 19.63). Patients were satisfied in all the aspects of the consultation process, including appointment scheduling, assistant medical staff and faculty, and treating physician. However, some expressed dissatisfaction toward long-waiting times.

Conclusion The translated tool is reliable and valid and effectively measures the satisfaction of patients receiving ambulatory care.

Outcomes of osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma and chordoma treated with image guided-intensity modulated radiation therapy

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of dose-escalated image guided-intensity modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT) in osteosarcoma (OGS), chondrosarcoma (CS) and chordoma (CH) of head and neck (H&N) and pelvis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this prospective non-randomized study, 65 patients of H&N or pelvic OGS (24), CS (7) and CH (34) mandating definitive or post-operative radiotherapy from May 2013 to December 2018 were included. Radiotherapy doses in definitive setting were 72.0 Gy for CH and 70.2 Gy for OGS and CS; while in post-operative setting it was 66.6 Gy and 64.8 Gy respectively (at 1.8 Gy per fraction).

RESULTS

Planned doses of radiotherapy could be completed in 61 (93.8%) patients; with grade III or higher acute and late toxicities of 3% and 0% respectively. With a median follow-up of 52 (range 6-92) months, the five-year actuarial local control (LC) rates were 66% in OGS, 38.1% in CS and 75.9% in CH; while cause-specific survival (CSS) rates were 54.7%, 64.3% and 92.2% respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes for patients receiving definitive and post-operative radiotherapy. Locally controlled disease at first follow-up after radiotherapy was associated with improved CSS and OS in CS (p = 0.014) and CH (p < 0.001). Radiotherapy resulted in significant and sustained improvement in Musculoskeletal tumour society (MSTS) score and reduction in pain score. Salvage re-irradiation was feasible in local progression after radiotherapy, with good outcomes and tolerability.

CONCLUSION

Dose-escalated IG-IMRT results in good LC & functional improvement with minimal toxicity in OGS, CS and CH.

Indigenous Groin Board Immobilization Reduces Planning Target Volume Margins in Groin Radiotherapy

Purpose:

To quantify the relative motion of pelvic and groin lymph nodes (PLN and GLN) and define indicative margins for image-guided radiotherapy based on bony anatomy for the frog-leg position (FLP) and groin immobilization board (GIB).

Materials and Methods:

Twenty patients with planning computed tomography (CT) scan and on treatment cone beam CTs (median = 8) for groin and pelvic radiotherapy were included in the study. Of these nine were treated with FLP and eleven with GIB. The PLN and GLN regions on the left and right were outlined in each scan. Systematic and random uncertainties were determined along with correlations between the motions of these regions. The clinical target volume to planning target volume (PTV) margins required to take motion into account was calculated for each immobilization.

Results:

The mean shifts for PLN and GLN were lesser but not statistically lower using GIB over FLP. There was significant concordance in the vertical, longitudinal and lateral motion of the pelvis and right groin (P = 0.015, 0.09 and 0.049, respectively), pelvis and left groin (P = 0.001, 0.048, and 0.006, respectively) and between left and right groin (P = 0.013, 0.01 and 0.07, respectively) for FLP and not GIB. The PTV margins required by Van Herk and Stroom's formula were reduced from 11 mm and 9 mm to 6 mm and 5 mm for pelvis; 12 mm and 11 mm to 7 mm and 6 mm for groin, respectively, using FLP over GIB.

Conclusions:

GIB brings concordance in shifts between pelvis and groin and between bilateral groins, thereby reducing the required PTV margins.

Late Toxicity After Adjuvant Conventional Radiation Versus Image-Guided Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer (PARCER): A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation in Cervical Cancer (PARCER), a phase III randomized trial, compared late toxicity after image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in women with cervical cancer undergoing postoperative radiation.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either IG-IMRT or 3D-CRT after stratification for the type of hysterectomy and use of concurrent chemotherapy. The primary end point was 3-year grade ≥ 2 late GI toxicity assessed using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v 3.0 and estimated using time-to-event, intention-to-treat analysis, with a study level type I error of 0.05 and a nominal α of .047 after accounting for one interim analysis. Secondary end points included acute toxicity, health-related quality of life, and pelvic relapse-free, disease-free, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2019, 300 patients were randomly assigned (IG-IMRT 151 and 3D-CRT 149). At a median follow-up of 46 (interquartile range 20-72) months, the 3-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 late GI toxicity in the IG-IMRT and 3D-CRT arms were 21.1% versus 42.4% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.73; P < .001). The cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 any late toxicity was 28.1% versus 48.9% (HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.76; P < .001), respectively. Patients reported reduced diarrhea (P = .04), improved appetite (P = .008), and lesser bowel symptoms (P = .002) with IG-IMRT. However, no difference was observed in the time by treatment interaction. The 3-year pelvic relapse-free survival and disease-free survival in the IG-IMRT versus the 3D-CRT arm were 81.8% versus 84% (HR 1.17; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.99; P = .55) and 76.9% versus 81.2% (HR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.71; P = .89), respectively.

CONCLUSION

IG-IMRT results in reduced toxicity with no difference in disease outcomes.

Defining the role of high-dose radiation in oligometastatic & oligorecurrent cervical cancer

Around 5-8 per cent of women diagnosed with cervical cancer present with metastatic disease at presentation and 16-25 per cent of patients fail at either within irradiated fields or at distant sites post-curative therapy in advanced cervical cancers. Conventionally, chemotherapy with palliative intent constituted the mainstay of treatment with modest survival outcomes and radiation therapy was reserved for symptomatic benefit only. While targeted therapies and immunotherapy have been added in therapeutic armamentarium, the impact on the outcomes is modest. In limited metastatic disease, radiation therapy to metastatic sites from different primary cancers has shown survival benefits; however, the data are scarce in cervical cancer. With a better understanding of the molecular biology of the metastases and recurrence pattern, emphasis is laid upon total eradication of the disease rather than offering relief from symptoms. This article summarizes the role of radiation therapy in limited metastatic disease and recurrent cervical cancer.

Management of oligo-metastatic and oligo-recurrent cervical cancer: A pattern of care survey within the EMBRACE research network

BACKGROUND

In the metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer, systemic chemotherapy constitutes the main treatment. Though there is an increasing use of high dose external radiation and brachytherapy in the metastatic setting, no consensus exists.

METHODS

A 17-item survey was designed with additional case-based questions to explore present management of oligo-metastatic and oligo-recurrent cervix cancer within EMBRACE research group participating sites. The questions were designed to elicit prevailing practices in the management of de-novo oligo-metastasis and oligo-recurrent setting after completing the primary treatment of cervix cancer. The survey was sent electronically with two rounds of email reminders to respond over a 2-week survey period. The online survey was designed such that it was mandatory to complete all questions. The responses were recorded and results were summarized as proportions and summary statistics were generated.

RESULTS

Twenty-two centers responded to this survey. A majority (90%) of respondents reported a low incidence of de-novo oligo-metastatic cervical cancer in their practice (<5%), with a higher proportion of patients with oligo-recurrence after completing primary treatment (5-10%). All responding sites preferred to treat pelvic disease in the de-novo oligo-metastatic setting albeit with different fractionation regimens. While 68.2% of respondents recommended chemo-radiation and brachytherapy, 31.8% considered additional systemic therapy. Overall 77.3% centers recommended the use of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy to oligo-metastasis. For out-of-field nodal recurrences, 63.7% of respondents considered treating with curative intent, while 59% preferred treating in-field recurrence with palliative intent. A vast majority of the participating centers (90%) have stereotactic radiation therapy capacity and would consider a clinical trial addressing oligo-metastatic and oligo-recurrent cervical cancer.

CONCLUSION

Although contemporary practice is variable, a substantial proportion of EMBRACE centers consider high dose radiation in de-novo metastatic and oligo-recurrence settings. However, there is clear need for a joint clinical protocol and prospective studies to address the role of high dose radiation within oligo-recurrent and oligo-metastatic scenarios.

Treatment planning comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy employing a dual-layer stacked multi-leaf collimator and helical tomotherapy for cervix uteri

Purpose

To ascertain the dosimetric performance of a new delivery system (the Halcyon system, H) equipped with dual-layer stacked multi-leaf collimator (MLC) for risk-adapted targets in cervix uteri cancer patients compared to another ring-based system in clinical operation (Helical Tomotherapy, HT).

Methods

Twenty patients were retrospectively included in a treatment planning study (10 with positive lymph nodes and 10 without). The dose prescription (45Gy to the primary tumour volume and a simultaneously integrated boost up to 55Gy for the positive patients) and the clinical planning objectives were defined consistently as recommended by an ongoing multicentric clinical trial. Halcyon plans were optimised for the volumetric modulated arc therapy. The plan comparison was performed employing the quantitative analysis of the dose-volume histograms.

Results

The coverage of the primary and nodal target volumes was comparable for both techniques and both subsets of patients. The primary planning target volume (PTV) receiving at least 95% of the prescription isodose ranged from 97.2 ± 1.1% (node-negative) to 99.1 ± 1.2% (node-positive) for H and from 96.5 ± 1.9% (node-negative) to 98.3 ± 0.9% (node-positive) for HT. The uncertainty is expressed at one standard deviation from the cohort of patient per each group. For the nodal clinical target volumes, the dose received by 98% of the planning target volume ranged 55.5 ± 0.1 to 56.0 ± 0.8Gy for H and HT, respectively. The only significant and potentially relevant differences were observed for the bowels. In this case, V_40Gy resulted 226.3 ± 35.9 and 186.9 ± 115.9 cm³ for the node-positive and node-negative patients respectively for Halcyon. The corresponding findings for HT were: 258.9 ± 60.5 and 224.9 ± 102.2 cm³. On the contrary, V_15Gy resulted 1279.7 ± 296.5 and 1557.2 ± 359.9 cm³ for HT and H respectively for node-positive and 1010.8 ± 320.9 versus 1203.8 ± 332.8 cm³ for node-negative.

Conclusion

This retrospective treatment planning study, based on the dose constraints derived from the Embrace II study protocol, suggested the essential equivalence between Halcyon based and Helical Tomotherapy based plans for the intensity-modulated rotational treatment of cervix uteri cancer. Different levels of sparing were observed for the bowels with H better protecting in the high-dose region and HT in the mid-low dose regions. The clinical impact of these differences should be further addressed.