Characteristics and technical survival of home hemodialysis in the Valencian Community (1976-2020)

INTRODUCTION

Home hemodialysis (HDD) is implemented in the Valencian Community with a higher prevalence than to the rest of the national territory, with a prevalence of 13.4 patients pmp in December 2018. We carried out an assessment of the patients characteristics and the overall and technical survival in HDD depending on the historical moment of onset and its origin.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective and descriptive study including patients of the Valencian Registry of Renal Patients from the beginning of data reported until December 2020. We calculated overall survival (combined event death-technical failure, censoring transplantation) and technical survival (event technical failure, censoring exitus and transplantation). Comparing technical survival according to the starting era: ancient (1976-2000) vs modern (2001-2020) and according to the modality of origin. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression in the total series for both overall and technical survival.

RESULTS

236 patients on HDD (611.4 patient-years of follow-up), mean age 49.7±16.3 years; median time of prior renal replacement therapy 0.2 years. The ratio of transplantation, death, and technical failure were 13.2, 4.4, and 7 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. In the comparison by ancient (n=57) vs modern (n=179) eras, age (37.5 vs 53.5 years), DM (3.5 vs 13.4%) and chronic tubuleinterstitial nephropathy (24.6 vs 8.9%) as a cause of chronic kidney disease were statistically significant. The probability of coming from outpatient consultation (33.3 vs 48.6%) and peritoneal dialysis (1.8 vs 12.8%) were higher in modern era with statistical significance. In the ancient era a single hospital centralized 57.9% of the patients, and in the modern era between two hospitals centralized 55.8% of the patients. Overall survival in the ancient era was 83.7% at 1year, 77.4% at 2 years, and 61% at 5 years; and in the modern era 87.3% per year, 83% 2 years and 47.8% 5 years (Log Rank 0.521). Technical survival in the ancient era was 85.4% at 1year, 79% 2 years, and 64.1% 5 years; and in the modern era 91.4% per year, 88.5% 2 years and 74.5% 5 years (Log Rank 0.195). There were no statistical differences in the comparison based on technical of provenance. In the Cox regression it was statistically significant for overall survival: the age and being diagnosed with heart disease, vascular disease or active neoplasia and for technical survival liver disease or social problem, both in univariate and multivariate.

CONCLUSIONS

In the modern era there is a considerable increase in HDD patients in the Valencian Community. There was a center effect in the development of HDD programs, most of the patients depended on few healthcare centers. The patients were older and had greater comorbidity in the modern era, despite this without affecting the technical and overall survival of the HDD.

Experience in Spain with the first patients in home hemodialysis treated with low-flow dialysate monitors

Home hemodialysis (HHD) with low-flow dialysate devices has gained popularity in recent years due to its simple design, portability, and ability to provide greater freedom of movement for our patients. However, there are doubts about the adequacy that this technology offers, since it uses monitors with low-flow bath and lactate. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the clinical benefits of low-flow HHD with the NxStage System One® recently introduced in Spain. We present the results of an observational, retrospective cohort study that included the first patients who started short daily HHD with this device in 12 Spanish centers. We analyzed the evolution of 86 patients at 0, 6 and 12 months, including data related to prescription, and evolution of biochemical parameters related to dialysis dose, anemia, mineral-bone metabolism; evolution of residual renal function, medication usage, and causes of withdrawal during the followup. We were able to demonstrate that this NxStage System One® monitor, in patients with HHD, have provided an adequate dialysis dose, with optimal ultrafiltration rate, with improvement of main biochemical markers of dialysis adequacy. The usage of this technique was associated to a decrease of antihypertensive drugs, phosphate binders and erythropoietin agents, with very good results both patient and technique survival. The simplicity of the technique, together with its good clinical outcomes, should facilitate the growth and utilization of HHD, both in incident and prevalent patients.

Characteristics and technical survival of home hemodialysis in the Valencian Community (1976-2020)

INTRODUCTION

Home hemodialysis (HDD) is implemented in the Valencian Community with a higher prevalence than to the rest of the national territory, with a prevalence of 13.4 patients' pmp in December 2018. We carried out an assessment of the patients' characteristics and the overall and technical survival in HDD depending on the historical moment of onset and its origin.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective and descriptive study including patients of the Valencian Registry of Renal Patients from the beginning of data reported until December 2020. We calculated overall survival (combined event death-technical failure, censoring transplantation) and technical survival (event technical failure, censoring exitus and transplantation). Comparing technical survival according to the starting era: ancient (1976-2000) vs modern (2001-2020) and according to the modality of origin. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression in the total series for both overall and technical survivals.

RESULTS

236 patients on HDD (611.4 patient-years of follow-up), mean age 49.7±16.3 years; median time of prior renal replacement therapy 0.2 years. The ratio of transplantation, death, and technical failure were 13.2, 4.4, and 7 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. In the comparison by ancient (n=57) vs modern (n=179) eras, age (37.5 vs 53.5 years), DM (3.5 vs 13.4%) and chronic tubuleinterstitial nephropathy (24.6 vs 8.9%) as a cause of chronic kidney disease were statistically significant. The probability of coming from outpatient consultation (33.3 vs 48.6%) and peritoneal dialysis (1.8 vs 12.8%) were higher in modern era with statistical significance. In the ancient era a single hospital centralized 57.9% of the patients, and in the modern era between two hospitals centralized 55.8% of the patients. Overall survival in the ancient era was 83.7% at 1 year, 77.4% at 2 years, and 61% at 5 years; and in the modern era 87.3% per year, 83% 2 years and 47.8% 5 years (Log Rank 0.521). Technical survival in the ancient era was 85.4% at 1 year, 79% 2 years, and 64.1% 5 years; and in the modern era 91.4% per year, 88.5% 2 years and 74.5% 5 years (Log Rank 0.195). There were no statistical differences in the comparison based on technical of provenance. In the Cox regression it was statistically significant for overall survival: the age and being diagnosed with heart disease, vascular disease or active neoplasia and for technical survival liver disease or social problem, both in univariate and multivariate.

CONCLUSION

In the modern era there is a considerable increase in HDD patients in the Valencian Community. There was a center effect in the development of HDD programs, most of the patients depended on few healthcare centers. The patients were older and had greater comorbidity in the modern era, despite this without affecting the technical and overall survival of the HDD.

Experience in Spain with the first patients in home hemodialysis treated with low-flow dialysate monitors

Home hemodialysis (HHD) with low-flow dialysate devices has gained popularity in recent years due to its simple design, portability, and ability to provide greater freedom of movement for our patients. However, there are doubts about the adequacy that this technology offers, since it uses monitors with low-flow bath and lactate. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the clinical benefits of low-flow HHD with the NxStage System One® recently introduced in Spain. We present the results of an observational, retrospective cohort study that included the first patients who started short daily HHD with this device in 12 Spanish centers. We analyzed the evolution of 86 patients at 0, 6 and 12 months, including data related to prescription, and evolution of biochemical parameters related to dialysis dose, anemia, mineral-bone metabolism; evolution of residual renal function, medication usage, and causes of withdrawal during the followup. We were able to demonstrate that this NxStage System One® monitor, in patients with HHD, have provided an adequate dialysis dose, with optimal ultrafiltration rate, with improvement of main biochemical markers of dialysis adequacy. The usage of this technique was associated to a decrease of antihypertensive drugs, phosphate binders and erythropoietin agents, with very good results both patient and technique survival. The simplicity of the technique, together with its good clinical outcomes, should facilitate the growth and utilization of HHD, both in incident and prevalent patients.

Experiencia en hemodiálisis domiciliaria en España

Antecedentes: existe actualmente un interés creciente, a nivel mundial, por las posibilidades que ofrece la hemodiálisis domiciliaria, la cual se encuentra más extendida en países del norte de Europa, Canadá, Reino Unido, Estados Unidos, Australia y Nueva Zelanda. En España, ha crecido de manera muy lenta, excepto en determinadas regiones como la provincia de Castellón, donde hemos puesto especial interés en la expansión de las técnicas dialíticas domiciliarias.Objetivo: describir la experiencia en el programa de hemodiálisis domiciliaria del Hospital General de Castellón.Metodología: estudio descriptivo de los pacientes incluidos en el programa de hemodiálisis domiciliaria del Hospital General de Castellón, desde su inicio en enero del 2008 hasta diciembre del 2017.Resultados: en su conjunto, entrenamos a 41 pacientes, de los que 36 llegaron a hemodializarse en casa (régimen corto-diario). La edad de los pacientes era 58,3±13,4 años; y el índice de Charlson, 4,1±1,6. 62 % de los pacientes eran hombres, 25,6 % padecían diabetes mellitus; 15,4 % tenían diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardíaca y 32 % eran portadores de fístula de hemodiálisis. El 38,5 % de los pacientes en edad laboral estaba activo. Obtuvimos una supervivencia técnica considerando el evento muerte+fallo técnico, censurando el trasplante, del 79,4 % al año, 75,2 % a los 2 años y 42,1 % a los 5 años. En el análisis univariante, resultaron determinantes la edad, la presencia de diabetes mellitus y la presencia de insuficiencia cardíaca. En el análisis multivariante, solo se mantuvo la insuficiencia cardíaca. Las reducciones semanales de fósforo y beta-2-microglobulina fueron significativamente mayores con hemodiálisis corta diaria, en comparación con la hemodiafiltración on-line. La hemodiafiltración on-line fue superior en la reducción semanal a partir de los 17 800 daltons para la mioglobina.Conclusiones: la hemodiálisis domiciliaria es una técnica posible que ofrece al paciente una adecuada reinserción sociolaboral, buenos niveles de reducción semanal de toxinas urémicas y una aceptable supervivencia técnica en el tiempo.

Antiviral activity of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase inhibitors against plant viruses

Three SAH hydrolase inhibitors, (RS)-3-adenin-9-yl-2-hydroxypropanoic acid (isobutyl ester) [(RS)-AHPA]; (RS)-9-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl)adenine [(RS)-DHPA] and the carbocyclic analog of 3-deazaadenosine (C-c3Ado) were evaluated for their inhibitory activity against tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and potato virus X (PVX). Using the local lesion assay and ELISA, we demonstrated that all three compounds inhibit the replication of TMV and PVX. Whereas the three compounds proved about equally active against PVX, (RS)-AHPA was the most effective against TMV. (RS)-AHPA and C-c3Ado induced chlorosis in Nicotiana tabacum leaf discs. They also caused a substantial reduction in the growth of the main root of Phaseolus vulgaris. (RS)-DHPA was less phytotoxic than its two congeners.