Minimal Residual Disease in Myeloma: Application for Clinical Care and New Drug Registration

The development of novel agents has transformed the treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma, with minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity now achievable across the entire disease spectrum. Bone marrow-based technologies to assess MRD, including approaches using next-generation flow and next-generation sequencing, have provided real-time clinical tools for the sensitive detection and monitoring of MRD in patients with multiple myeloma. Complementary liquid biopsy-based assays are now quickly progressing with some, such as mass spectrometry methods, being very close to clinical use, while others utilizing nucleic acid-based technologies are still developing and will prove important to further our understanding of the biology of MRD. On the regulatory front, multiple retrospective individual patient and clinical trial level meta-analyses have already shown and will continue to assess the potential of MRD as a surrogate for patient outcome. Given all this progress, it is not surprising that a number of clinicians are now considering using MRD to inform real-world clinical care of patients across the spectrum from smoldering myeloma to relapsed refractory multiple myeloma, with each disease setting presenting key challenges and questions that will need to be addressed through clinical trials. The pace of advances in targeted and immune therapies in multiple myeloma is unprecedented, and novel MRD-driven biomarker strategies are essential to accelerate innovative clinical trials leading to regulatory approval of novel treatments and continued improvement in patient outcomes.

Clinical benefit of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in myeloma patients with non-canonical NF-κB pathway activation

OBJECTIVES

Evaluating potential relationships between progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor gene expression patterns and mutational status was an exploratory objective of the phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study (NCT01564537) of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) vs placebo-Rd in 722 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM).

METHODS

We utilized gene expression and mutation data from screening bone marrow aspirates to identify tumors with non-canonical nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway activation.

RESULTS

DNA/RNA sequencing data were available for 339 (47.0%)/399 (55.2%) patients; 49/339 (14.5%) patients had non-canonical NF-κB pathway gene mutations (tumor-necrosis-factor receptor-associated factor 2, 3 [TRAF2, TRAF3], baculoviral-inhibitor-of-apoptosis repeat-containing 2/3 [BIRC2/3]), and PFS was significantly longer with IRd vs placebo-Rd in these patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.23). In patients with lower TRAF3 expression (median not reached vs 11 months, HR 0.47) and higher NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK) expression (median not reached vs 14 months, HR 0.45), both associated with non-canonical NF-κB pathway activation, PFS was significantly longer with IRd vs placebo-Rd. TRAF3 expression was decreased in patients harboring t(4;14) and 1q21 amplification, suggesting increased non-canonical NF-κB pathway activation.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding ixazomib to Rd provides clinical benefit in MM tumors with increased non-canonical NF-κB pathway activity. This is a potential mechanism for activity in 1q21 amplified high-risk tumors.

c-MYC expression and maturity phenotypes are associated with outcome benefit from addition of ixazomib to lenalidomide-dexamethasone in myeloma

OBJECTIVES

In the TOURMALINE-MM1 phase 3 trial in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) showed different magnitudes of progression-free survival (PFS) benefit vs placebo-Rd according to number and type of prior therapies, with greater benefit seen in patients with >1 prior line of therapy or 1 prior line of therapy without stem cell transplantation (SCT).

METHODS

RNA sequencing data were used to investigate the basis of these differences.

RESULTS

The PFS benefit of IRd vs placebo-Rd was greater in patients with tumors expressing high c-MYC levels (median not reached vs 11.3 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26, 0.66; P < .001) compared with in those expressing low c-MYC levels (median 20.6 vs 16.6 months; HR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.42, 1.2). Expression of c-MYC in tumors varied based on the number and type of prior therapy received, with the lowest levels observed in tumors of patients who had received 1 prior line of therapy including SCT. These tumors also had higher expression levels of CD19 and CD81.

CONCLUSIONS

PFS analyses suggest that lenalidomide and ixazomib target tumors with different levels of c-MYC, CD19, and CD81 expression, thus providing a potential rationale for the differential benefits observed in the TOURMALINE-MM1 study. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as: NCT01564537.

Twice-weekly ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Weekly ixazomib with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) is feasible and has shown activity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. This phase 1/2 study (NCT01383928) evaluated the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of twice-weekly ixazomib plus Rd in NDMM; 64 patients were enrolled across both phases. Patients received twice-weekly oral ixazomib 3·0 or 3·7 mg plus lenalidomide 25 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg (10 mg in cycles 9-16) for up to sixteen 21-day cycles, followed by maintenance with twice-weekly ixazomib alone. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported in cycle 1; the RP2D was 3·0 mg based on overall tolerability across multiple cycles. In 62 evaluable patients, the confirmed overall response rate was 94% (68% ≥very good partial response; 24% complete response). Median progression-free survival was 24·9 months. Responses (median duration 36·9 months for patients receiving the RP2D) deepened during treatment. Grade 3 drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 64% of patients, including: rash, 13%; peripheral neuropathy, 8%; hyperglycaemia, 8%. There were no grade 4 drug-related AEs. Thirteen patients discontinued due to AEs. Twice-weekly ixazomib-Rd offers substantial activity with promising long-term outcomes in NDMM patients but may be associated with greater toxicity compared with weekly ixazomib-Rd in this setting.

A phase I/II dose-escalation study investigating all-oral ixazomib-melphalan-prednisone induction followed by single-agent ixazomib maintenance in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

This phase I/II dose-escalation study investigated the all-oral ixazomib-melphalan-prednisone regimen, followed by single-agent ixazomib maintenance, in elderly, transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Primary phase I objectives were to determine the safety and recommended phase II dose of ixazomib-melphalan-prednisone. The primary phase II objective was to determine the complete plus very good partial response rate. In phase I, patients were enrolled to 4 arms investigating weekly or twice-weekly ixazomib (13 28-day cycles or nine 42-day cycles) plus melphalan-prednisone. In phase II, an expansion cohort was enrolled at the recommended phase II ixazomib dose. Of the 61 patients enrolled, 26 received the recommended phase II dose (ixazomib 4.0 mg [days 1, 8, 15] plus melphalan-prednisone 60 mg/m² [days 1-4], 28-day cycles). Of the 61 enrolled patients, 36 (13 of 26 in the recommended phase II dose cohort) received single-agent ixazomib maintenance (days 1, 8, 15; 28-day cycles). In phase I, 10/38 patients reported dose-limiting toxicities in cycle 1, including grade 3 and/or 4 neutropenia (n=6) and thrombocytopenia (n=4). Complete plus very good partial response rate was 48% (48% at recommended phase II dose), including 28% (22%) complete response or better; responses deepened during maintenance in 34% (33%) of evaluable patients. After median follow up of 43.6 months, median progression-free survival was 22.1 months. Adverse events were mainly hematologic events, gastrointestinal events, and peripheral neuropathy. This study demonstrates the feasibility, tolerability, and activity of ixazomib-melphalan-prednisone induction and single-agent ixazomib maintenance in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. clinicaltrials.gov identifier 01335685.

Impact of prior therapy on the efficacy and safety of oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs. placebo-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in TOURMALINE-MM1

Prior treatment exposure in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma may affect outcomes with subsequent therapies. We analyzed efficacy and safety according to prior treatment in the phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib-Rd) versus placebo-Rd. Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma received ixazomib-Rd or placebo-Rd. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in subgroups defined according to type (proteasome inhibitor [PI] and immunomodulatory drug) and number (1 vs. 2 or 3) of prior therapies received. Of 722 patients, 503 (70%) had received a prior PI, and 397 (55%) prior lenalidomide/thalidomide; 425 patients had received 1 prior therapy, and 297 received 2 or 3 prior therapies. At a median follow up of ~15 months, PFS was prolonged with ixazomib-Rd vs. placebo-Rd regardless of type of prior therapy received; HR 0.739 and 0.749 in PI-exposed and –naïve patients, HR 0.744 and 0.700 in immunomodulatory-drug-exposed and -naïve patients, respectively. PFS benefit with ixazomib-Rd vs. placebo-Rd appeared greater in patients with 2 or 3 prior therapies (HR 0.58) and in those with 1 prior therapy without prior transplant (HR 0.60) versus those with 1 prior therapy and transplant (HR 1.23). Across all subgroups, toxicity was consistent with that seen in the intent-to-treat population. In patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, ixazomib-Rd was associated with a consistent clinical benefit vs. placebo-Rd regardless of prior treatment with bortezomib or immunomodulatory drugs. Patients with 2 or 3 prior therapies, or 1 prior therapy without transplant seemed to have greater benefit than patients with 1 prior therapy and transplant. TOURMALINE-MM1 registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01564537.

The Role of Minimal Residual Disease Testing in Myeloma Treatment Selection and Drug Development: Current Value and Future Applications

Treatment of myeloma has benefited from the introduction of more effective and better tolerated agents, improvements in supportive care, better understanding of disease biology, revision of diagnostic criteria, and new sensitive and specific tools for disease prognostication and management. Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) in response to therapy is one of these tools, as longer progression-free survival (PFS) is seen consistently among patients who have achieved MRD negativity. Current therapies lead to unprecedented frequency and depth of response, and next-generation flow and sequencing methods to measure MRD in bone marrow are in use and being developed with sensitivities in the range of 10^-5 to 10^-6 cells. These technologies may be combined with functional imaging to detect MRD outside of bone marrow. Moreover, immune profiling methods are being developed to better understand the immune environment in myeloma and response to immunomodulatory agents while methods for molecular profiling of myeloma cells and circulating DNA in blood are also emerging. With the continued development and standardization of these methodologies, MRD has high potential for use in gaining new drug approvals in myeloma. The FDA has outlined two pathways by which MRD could be qualified as a surrogate endpoint for clinical studies directed at obtaining accelerated approval for new myeloma drugs. Most importantly, better understanding of MRD should also contribute to better treatment monitoring. Potentially, MRD status could be used as a prognostic factor for making treatment decisions and for informing timing of therapeutic interventions. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 3980-93. ©2017 AACR.

Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor that is currently being studied for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 722 patients who had relapsed, refractory, or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma to receive ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib group) or placebo plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (placebo group). The primary end point was progression-free survival.

RESULTS

Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ixazomib group than in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 14.7 months (median progression-free survival, 20.6 months vs. 14.7 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death in the ixazomib group, 0.74; P=0.01); a benefit with respect to progression-free survival was observed with the ixazomib regimen, as compared with the placebo regimen, in all prespecified patient subgroups, including in patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. The overall rates of response were 78% in the ixazomib group and 72% in the placebo group, and the corresponding rates of complete response plus very good partial response were 48% and 39%. The median time to response was 1.1 months in the ixazomib group and 1.9 months in the placebo group, and the corresponding median duration of response was 20.5 months and 15.0 months. At a median follow-up of approximately 23 months, the median overall survival has not been reached in either study group, and follow-up is ongoing. The rates of serious adverse events were similar in the two study groups (47% in the ixazomib group and 49% in the placebo group), as were the rates of death during the study period (4% and 6%, respectively); adverse events of at least grade 3 severity occurred in 74% and 69% of the patients, respectively. Thrombocytopenia of grade 3 and grade 4 severity occurred more frequently in the ixazomib group (12% and 7% of the patients, respectively) than in the placebo group (5% and 4% of the patients, respectively). Rash occurred more frequently in the ixazomib group than in the placebo group (36% vs. 23% of the patients), as did gastrointestinal adverse events, which were predominantly low grade. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy was 27% in the ixazomib group and 22% in the placebo group (grade 3 events occurred in 2% of the patients in each study group). Patient-reported quality of life was similar in the two study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of ixazomib to a regimen of lenalidomide and dexamethasone was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival; the additional toxic effects with this all-oral regimen were limited. (Funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals; TOURMALINE-MM1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01564537.).

Phase 1 study of ixazomib, an investigational proteasome inhibitor, in advanced non-hematologic malignancies

PURPOSE

Ixazomib is an investigational proteasome inhibitor with demonstrated antitumor activity in xenograft models of multiple myeloma (MM), lymphoma, and solid tumors. This open-label, phase 1 study investigated intravenous (IV) ixazomib, in adult patients with advanced non-hematologic malignancies.

METHODS

Patients received IV ixazomib twice-weekly for up to twelve 21-day cycles. The 0.125 mg/m(2) starting dose was doubled (one patient/dose) until 1.0 mg/m(2) based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1. This was followed by 3 + 3 dose-escalation and expansion at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Primary objectives included safety and MTD assessment. Secondary objectives included assessment of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and disease response.

RESULTS

Ixazomib was escalated from 0.125 to 2.34 mg/m(2) to determine the MTD (n = 23); patients were then enrolled to MTD expansion (n = 73) and pharmacodynamic (n = 20) cohorts. Five patients experienced DLTs (1.0 and 1.76 mg/m(2): grade 3 pruritic rash; 2.34 mg/m(2): grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 acute renal failure); thus, the MTD was 1.76 mg/m(2). Drug-related grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included thrombocytopenia (23 %), skin and subcutaneous (SC) tissue disorders (16 %), and fatigue (9 %). Among 92 evaluable patients, one (head and neck cancer) had a partial response and 30 had stable disease. Ixazomib terminal half-life was 3.8-7.2 days; plasma exposures increased dose-proportionally and drug was distributed to tumors. Inhibition of whole-blood 20S proteasome activity and upregulation of ATF-3 in tumor biopsies demonstrated target engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with solid tumors, ixazomib was associated with a manageable safety profile, limited antitumor activity, and evidence of downstream proteasome inhibition effects.

Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study

BACKGROUND

The combination of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is a highly effective therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Ixazomib is an investigational, oral, proteasome inhibitor with promising anti-myeloma effects and low rates of peripheral neuropathy. In a phase 1/2 trial we aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and activity of ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

METHODS

We enrolled patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma aged 18 years or older with measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and no grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy, and treated them with oral ixazomib (days 1, 8, 15) plus lenalidomide 25 mg (days 1-21) and dexamethasone 40 mg (days 1, 8, 15, 22) for up to 12 28-day cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with ixazomib alone. In phase 1, we gave patients escalating doses of ixazomib (1·68-3·95 mg/m(2)) to establish the recommended dose for phase 2. The primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose for phase 1, and the rate of very good partial response or better for phase 2. Safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug; efficacy analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug at the phase 2 dose, had measurable disease at baseline, and had at least one post-baseline response assessment. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01217957.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 22, 2010, and Feb 28, 2012, we enrolled 65 patients (15 to phase 1 and 50 to phase 2). Four dose-limiting toxic events were noted in phase 1: one at a dose of ixazomib of 2·97 mg/m(2) and three at 3·95 mg/m(2). The maximum tolerated dose of ixazomib was established as 2·97 mg/m(2) and the recommended phase 2 dose was 2·23 mg/m(2), which was converted to a 4·0 mg fixed dose based on population pharmacokinetic results. Grade 3 or higher adverse events related to any drug were reported in 41 (63%) patients, including skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (11 patients, 17%), neutropenia (eight patients, 12%), and thrombocytopenia (five patients, 8%); drug-related peripheral neuropathy of grade 3 or higher occurred in four (6%) patients. Five patients discontinued because of adverse events. In 64 response-evaluable patients, 37 (58%, 95% CI 45-70) had a very good partial response or better.

INTERPRETATION

The all-oral combination of weekly ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone was generally well tolerated and appeared active in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. These results support the phase 3 trial development of this combination for multiple myeloma.

FUNDING

Millennium Pharmaceuticals, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical International Company.

Phase 1 study of weekly dosing with the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Proteasome inhibition is an effective treatment strategy for multiple myeloma. With improving survival, attention is increasingly focusing on ease of administration and toxicity profile. Ixazomib is an investigational, orally bioavailable 20S proteasome inhibitor. Sixty patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma were enrolled on this phase 1 trial to evaluate safety and tolerability and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of single-agent, oral ixazomib given weekly for 3 of 4 weeks. Upon MTD determination, patients were enrolled to 4 different cohorts based on relapsed/refractory status and prior bortezomib and carfilzomib exposure. The MTD was determined to be 2.97 mg/m(2). Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea in 2 patients, and grade 3 skin rash in 1 patient. Common drug-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (43%), diarrhea (38%), nausea (38%), fatigue (37%), and vomiting (35%). The observed rate of peripheral neuropathy was 20%, with only 1 grade 3 event reported. Nine (18%) patients achieved a partial response or better, including 8 of 30 (27%) evaluable patients treated at the MTD. Pharmacokinetic studies suggested a long terminal half-life of 3.6 to 11.3 days, supporting once-weekly dosing. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00963820.

Weekly MLN9708, an investigational oral proteasome inhibitor (PI), in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM): Results from a phase I study after full enrollment

8514

Background: MLN9708 is an investigational, orally bioavailable, potent, reversible, specific inhibitor of the 20S proteasome that has demonstrated antitumor activity in in vivo models of MM. We report safety, activity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of weekly oral MLN9708 in a phase 1 trial in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory MM after full enrollment (NCT00963820). Methods: Pts received MLN9708 (days 1, 8, 15; 28-day cycles) at 0.24–3.95 mg/m2 (dose-escalation phase) and at the MTD, 2.97 mg/m2, in relapsed and refractory (RR), bortezomib (btz)-relapsed, PI-naïve, and prior carfilzomib (CZ) expansion cohorts. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v3.0. Response was assessed by IMWG uniform criteria. Results: 60 pts (33 male, median age 64 yrs [40–79]) were enrolled, 32 in the dose-escalation phase and 31 to the expansion cohorts (11 RR, 10 btz-relapsed, 6 PI-naïve, 4 CZ; 2 RR and 1 btz-relapsed pts included from MTD dose-escalation cohort). Median time from MM diagnosis was 4.9 yrs (1.5–18.8). Median number of prior regimens was 6 (2–18), including btz, lenalidomide, thalidomide, and CZ in 83%, 95%, 52%, and 13%, respectively; 76% were refractory to last therapy (17% btz-refractory). At data cut-off (Nov 29, 2012) pts had received a median of 2 cycles (1–11); 5 pts remained on treatment. All-grade/grade ≥3 drug-related AEs were seen in 83%/52% of pts; common drug-related grade ≥3 AEs were thrombocytopenia (33%), diarrhea, neutropenia (17%), decreased appetite, fatigue, and lymphopenia (8%). 6 pts (10%) had drug-related PN (no grade ≥3). 5 pts discontinued due to drug-related AEs; 1 pt died on study due to an unrelated AE. By investigator assessment in 41 evaluable pts, responses included1 VGPR, 5 PR, 1 MR, and 15 with SD. MLN9708 was rapidly absorbed, with a terminal half-life of 4–12 days (supporting weekly dosing) and a proportional increase in plasma AUC with dose (0.8–3.95 mg/m2). PK data were similar across expansion cohorts. Conclusions: Current data suggest weekly oral MLN9708 is generally well tolerated with infrequent PN, and shows activity in this heavily pretreated population with prior exposure to immunomodulatory drugs and btz. Clinical trial information: NCT00963820.

Tumor drug distribution and target engagement of MLN9708, an investigational proteasome inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

3077

Background: MLN9708 is a potent investigational proteasome inhibitor, which upon intravenous (IV) administration immediately hydrolyzes to the active form MLN2238. MLN9708 is currently being evaluated in a phase 1 trial in solid tumors (NCT00830869). This trial has a dose-escalation arm and five expansion cohorts: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), soft tissue sarcoma, head and neck cancer, prostate cancer, and a tumor biopsy cohort of mixed histology. The purpose of the tumor biopsy cohort was to obtain pre- and post-dose biopsies to determine drug distribution and target engagement in post-dose tumor samples. The latter was measured by the increase in levels of ATF-3, a marker of unfolded protein response/endoplasmic reticulum stress, which is upregulated in response to proteasome inhibition. Methods: The tumor biopsy cohort included 20 patients dosed at the maximum tolerated dose who consented to core needle biopsies during screening and after either the first or second dose of MLN9708 (IV 1.76 mg/m2; 4–20 hours post-dose). Tumor biopsies were individually weighed, homogenized, and analyzed for the presence of MLN2238 using a quantified LC/MS/MS methodology. ATF-3 levels in tumors were determined by an immunohistochemical assay (IHC) on six sections for each tumor biopsy. Tumor area was identified using Aperio Genie, a machine learning program for pattern recognition, and the percentage of ATF-3 positive area in the tumor was measured. Results: Biopsies from 20 patients were collected for assessment of drug distribution and target engagement. Ten patients with paired pre- and post-dose biopsies of sufficient size were considered evaluable for PK analysis; MLN2238 was present in all 10 (100%) post-dose biopsies analyzed. Tumor pairs from 7 patients passed quality control by H&E staining for tumor content and were evaluable for ATF-3 IHC. Six of 7 paired samples (86%) showed a statistically significant (p<0.05) increase in post-dose ATF-3 levels. Conclusions: Overall, emerging data from MLN9708 phase 1 solid tumor analysis show that MLN2238 is present in tumors and demonstrates target engagement upon inhibition of the proteasome in tumor tissue biopsies.

Weekly dosing of the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM): A phase I study

8034

Background: Phase 1 studies are evaluating IV and oral dosing of the reversible proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 in multiple tumor types. We report the safety, MTD, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and preliminary responses with weekly oral MLN9708 in pts with relapsed/refractory MM (NCT00963820). Methods: Pts aged ≥18 yrs received MLN9708 on d 1, 8, and 15 of 28-d cycles. In the dose-escalation phase, pts required ≥2 prior therapies (including bortezomib, thalidomide/lenalidomide, and corticosteroids). At the MTD, pts were to be enrolled to relapsed and refractory (RR), bortezomib-relapsed (VR), proteasome inhibitor (PI) naïve, and carfilzomib (CZ) expansion cohorts. Results: 36 pts have been enrolled to date (data cut-off: Dec 1, 2011), 32 in the dose-escalation phase (0.24–3.95 mg/m2) and 8 to expansion cohorts (2 RR, 5 VR, 1 PI naïve; RR and VR cohorts each include 2 pts from MTD dose-escalation cohort). Median age was 64.5 yrs (range 40–79), 53% were male, and median number of prior lines of therapy was 3.5 (range 1-13), including 92%, 92%, 56%, and 8% who had prior bortezomib, lenalidomide, thalidomide, and carfilzomib, respectively. Pts have received a median of 2 cycles (range 1–11); 5 pts remain on treatment. Among 24 DLT-evaluable pts, 3 DLTs were seen: 2 at 3.95 mg/m2 (1 grade 3 rash, 1 grade 3 GI AEs) and 1 at 2.97 mg/m2 (grade 3 GI AEs). The MTD was determined as 2.97 mg/m2. Overall, 69% of pts had drug-related AEs, and 28% had related grade ≥3 AEs, including thrombocytopenia (17%), diarrhea (11%), nausea, neutropenia, and fatigue (each 8%). Only 3 (8%) pts had drug-related peripheral neuropathy (PN; no grade ≥3). 2 pts discontinued due to AEs. In 18 response-evaluable pts, 1 had a VGPR at 3.95 mg/m2, 1 had a PR at 2.97 mg/m2, and 8 have achieved SD durable for up to 9.5 mos. PK analyses showed linear plasma PK (0.8–3.95 mg/m2), Tmax of 0.5-2 hr, and terminal half-life of 7 d for MLN2238 (biologically active hydrolysis product). There was a trend for a dose-dependent increase in whole blood 20S proteasome inhibition. Conclusions: Current data suggest weekly oral MLN9708 is generally well tolerated with infrequent PN, and shows early signs of antitumor activity.

MLN9708, an investigational proteasome inhibitor, in patients (pts) with solid tumors: Updated phase I results

e13603

Background: MLN9708 is a potent, reversible, orally bioavailable, and specific 20S proteasome inhibitor. This study (NCT00830869) assessed the safety, MTD, PK, PD, and antitumor activity of intravenous (IV) MLN9708 in pts with solid tumors. Methods: Pts aged ≥18 yrs (ECOG PS 0–2) received increasing doses of IV MLN9708 (starting at 0.125 mg/m2) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-day cycles, for up to 12 cycles. MTD expansion cohorts included head and neck (H&N) cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, prostate cancer, and a tumor PD expansion cohort. Plasma PK and blood PD data were analyzed by a non-compartmental method using WinNonlin software v5.3. The candidate PD biomarker ATF-3 was assessed using IHC. Results: 113 pts were enrolled; 23 in dose escalation and 96 in MTD expansion (includes 6 from dose escalation) cohorts. Median age of these heavily pretreated pts was 58 yrs (range 29–80). MTD was established as 1.76 mg/m2. Pts have received a median of 2 cycles (range 1–12) to date (data cut-off Dec 1, 2011); 22 received ≥4 cycles. 88% had ≥1 drug-related AE; most common drug-related AEs included fatigue (40%), thrombocytopenia (39%), rash (high level term) (33%), and nausea (32%). 52% of pts experienced grade ≥3 drug-related AEs, including thrombocytopenia (20%) and rash (9%). Drug-related peripheral neuropathy (PN) was seen in 13% of pts; 2 pts had grade 3 PN. 25% had drug-related SAEs, 15% discontinued due to AEs; 7 pts died, all unrelated to treatment. Of 75 response-evaluable pts, 26 achieved SD. A partial response (PR) was observed in a pt in the H&N cohort; response was achieved after 4 cycles and maintained through 8 cycles. Change in ATF-3 levels in tumor tissue post treatment was seen in 6 patients with tumor biopsy samples, indicating proteasome inhibition. PK data showed three-exponential plasma disposition, half-life of ~4–8 days, and dose linearity from 0.5–2.34 mg/m2. At MTD, maximal 20S proteasome inhibition in blood was approximately 60% at 0.08 hours. Whole blood PD effect was immediate and dose dependent. Conclusions: These data suggest that twice-weekly IV MLN9708 has a generally manageable safety profile and potential clinical utility; updated results will be presented.

Oral weekly MLN9708, an investigational proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients (pts) with previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM): A phase I/II study

8033

Background: MLN9708 is an oral, reversible 20S proteasome inhibitor. The feasibility of combining a proteasome inhibitor with an immunomodulatory drug and a steroid in previously untreated MM has been demonstrated with the RVD regimen. This is the first study of MLN9708 in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (NCT01217957). Here we report the phase (Ph) 1 MTD and preliminary Ph 2 results. Methods: Pts with previously untreated MM, aged ≥18 yrs with measurable disease received oral MLN9708 (phase 1: 1.68–3.95 mg/m2) days 1, 8, and 15, lenalidomide 25 mg days 1–21, and dexamethasone 40 mg days 1, 8, 15, and 22, for up to twelve 28-day cycles. Primary objectives were determination of safety, MTD, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) (Ph 1), and CR+VGPR rate (Ph 2). Results: At data cut-off (Dec 1, 2011), 29 pts had been enrolled (15 Ph 1, 14 Ph 2). Median age was 64 yrs (range 40–82); 69% ISS stage II/III. In Ph 1, the MLN9708 MTD was determined as 2.97 mg/m2 and the RP2D as 2.23 mg/m2; for Ph 2, the RP2D was converted to a 4.0 mg fixed dose based on population PK results. Ph 1 pts have received a median of 6 treatment cycles (range 1–11), 8 received ≥6 cycles; 6 stopped to receive ASCT, 7 are ongoing. Ph 2 pts received a median of 1 (range 1–2), all are ongoing. Grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity was reversible and included anemia (n=2) and thrombocytopenia (n=1). Grade ≥3 nonhematologic toxicity included erythematous rash, syncope, and vomiting (2 pts each). All-grade drug-related peripheral neuropathy was seen in 6 pts (21%), including grade 2 with pain in 2 (both Ph 1 at doses above the MTD). Two pts discontinued due to AE; there were 5 pts who had serious drug-related AE (all Ph 1). Of 19 response-evaluable pts (Ph 1 + Ph 2), all achieved ≥PR, including 5 CR (1 sCR), 4 VGPR, and 10 PR; all remain in response with duration of confirmed response of up to 9.5 months. Of 4 response-evaluable Ph 2 pts, 1 has achieved VGPR and 3 PR to date. Conclusions: Oral MLN9708 plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone appears well tolerated with manageable toxicity. These data show antitumor activity at the RP2D in pts with previously untreated MM, with ≥PR in all pts to date.

MLN9708, an investigational proteasome inhibitor, in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory lymphoma: Emerging data from a phase I dose-escalation study

8064

Background: MLN9708 is a reversible, orally bioavailable, specific 20S proteasome inhibitor. This study (NCT00893464) studied the safety and determined the MTD of IV MLN9708 in pts with relapsed/refractory lymphoma, and characterized pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Methods: Pts aged ≥18 yrs who had failed ≥2 chemotherapeutic regimens received IV MLN9708 on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. One pt was enrolled at the 0.125 mg/m2 starting dose; dose doubling proceeded with 1 pt at each dose up to 1.0 mg/m2. Dose escalation occurred in ≤40% increments using a standard 3+3 scheme based on DLT occurrence in cycle 1. Blood samples were collected at multiple time points after dosing on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 for PK/PD analyses. Results: At data cut-off (Dec 1 2011), 21 pts had been enrolled and treated: 1 each at 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/m2, 4 at 1.4 mg/m2, 7 at 1.76 mg/m2, and 6 at 2.34 mg/m2. Median age was 57 yrs (range 23–78); 57% were male. Median number of prior therapies was 5; 29% had prior radiation, 24% prior stem cell transplant. Histologies included T-cell lymphoma (n=5), Hodgkin lymphoma (n=3), follicular lymphoma (n=2), DLBCL (n=1) and other indolent B-cell lymphoma (n=7). Pts had received a median of 2 cycles (range 1–22); 2 DLTs were seen (neutropenia at 1.76 and 2.34 mg/m2). All pts experienced drug-related AEs, including fatigue (48%), nausea (29%), diarrhea (29%), pyrexia, thrombocytopenia, and vomiting (each 24%). 43% had drug-related grade ≥3 AEs, 1 pt discontinued due to drug-related grade 3 neutropenia (2.34 mg/m2). Three pts had drug-related peripheral neuropathy (1 grade 1, 2 grade 2). There were no on-study deaths. Of 18 response-evaluable pts, 3 achieved PR (including 2 who remain in response and on-study for >1 yr) and 4 SD. PK analyses showed linear PK (0.5–2.34 mg/m2) and a terminal half-life of ~6–9 days. There was a dose-dependent increase in maximal whole blood 20S proteasome inhibition. Conclusions: These data suggest IV MLN9708 is generally well tolerated, with infrequent PN, and is clinically active in pretreated lymphoma pts. The trial is ongoing and updated data will be presented.

Phase I study of twice-weekly dosing of the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM)

8017

Background: MLN9708 is the first oral proteasome inhibitor to enter clinical investigation in MM. This study (NCT00932698) assessed safety, MTD, and response rate with twice-weekly oral MLN9708 in pts with relapsed and/or refractory MM, and characterized plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) and blood pharmacodynamics. Methods: Pts aged ≥18 yrs with measurable MM received MLN9708 on d 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-d cycles. In the dose-escalation phase, pts required ≥2 prior therapies (including bortezomib, thalidomide/lenalidomide, and corticosteroids). At the MTD (2.0 mg/m2), pts were enrolled to relapsed and refractory [RR], bortezomib-relapsed [VR], proteasome-inhibitor [PI] naïve, and carfilzomib [CZ] expansion cohorts. Results: 57 pts (53% M) were enrolled, 37 to the expansion cohorts (16 RR, 14 VR, 6 PI naïve, 1 CZ). Median age was 65 yrs (range 50-86). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 4 (range 1-28); 88%, 84%, 61%, and 5% had prior bortezomib, lenalidomide, thalidomide, and carfilzomib, respectively. Pts have received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-24) to date (data cut-off Dec 1, 2011); 7 (12%) have received ≥13 cycles. Drug-related AEs were seen in 89% of pts, including fatigue (46%), thrombocytopenia (40%), and nausea (30%); 63% had drug-related grade ≥3 AEs, including thrombocytopenia (33%), neutropenia (14%), fatigue (9%), and rash (7%). Only 6 (11%) pts had drug-related peripheral neuropathy (PN; no grade ≥3). 7 pts discontinued due to AEs. 2 pts died on study, due to PD and an unrelated cardiac disorder. Of 46 response-evaluable pts, 6 have achieved ≥PR, with 1 sCR (PI naïve cohort) and 5 PRs (2 in dose-escalation, 1 in RR, 2 in VR cohorts), and 1 VR pt has achieved MR, with duration of disease control of up to 18.6 mo. PK analyses showed MLN2238 (biologically active hydrolysis product) has linear plasma PK (0.8-2.23 mg/m2), Tmax of 0.5-1.25 hr, and terminal half-life of 4-6 d. A dose-dependent increase in whole blood 20S proteasome inhibition was observed. Conclusions: Current data suggest MLN9708 has clinical activity in heavily pretreated MM pts, with durable responses/disease control, and is generally well tolerated with infrequent low-grade PN.

PDK1 attenuation fails to prevent tumor formation in PTEN-deficient transgenic mouse models

PDK1 activates AKT suggesting that PDK1 inhibition might suppress tumor development. However, while PDK1 has been investigated intensively as an oncology target, selective inhibitors suitable for in vivo studies have remained elusive. In this study we present the results of in vivo PDK1 inhibition through a universally applicable RNAi approach for functional drug target validation in oncogenic pathway contexts. This approach, which relies on doxycycline-inducible shRNA expression from the Rosa26 locus, is ideal for functional studies of genes like PDK1 where constitutive mouse models lead to strong developmental phenotypes or embryonic lethality. We achieved more than 90% PDK1 knockdown in vivo, a level sufficient to impact physiological functions resulting in hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia. This phenotype was reversible on PDK1 reexpression. Unexpectedly, long-term PDK1 knockdown revealed a lack of potent antitumor efficacy in 3 different mouse models of PTEN-deficient cancer. Thus, despite efficient PDK1 knockdown, inhibition of the PI3K pathway was marginal suggesting that PDK1 was not a rate limiting factor. Ex vivo analysis of pharmacological inhibitors revealed that AKT and mTOR inhibitors undergoing clinical development are more effective than PDK1 inhibitors at blocking activated PI3K pathway signaling. Taken together our findings weaken the widely held expectation that PDK1 represents an appealing oncology target.

Pathway-based identification of biomarkers for targeted therapeutics: personalized oncology with PI3K pathway inhibitors

Although we have made great progress in understanding the complex genetic alterations that underlie human cancer, it has proven difficult to identify which molecularly targeted therapeutics will benefit which patients. Drug-specific modulation of oncogenic signaling pathways in specific patient subpopulations can predict responsiveness to targeted therapy. Here, we report a pathway-based phosphoprofiling approach to identify and quantify clinically relevant, drug-specific biomarkers for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway inhibitors that target AKT, phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1), and PI3K-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). We quantified 375 nonredundant PI3K pathway-relevant phosphopeptides, all containing AKT, PDK1, or mitogen-activated protein kinase substrate recognition motifs. Of these phosphopeptides, 71 were drug-regulated, 11 of them by all three inhibitors. Drug-modulated phosphoproteins were enriched for involvement in cytoskeletal reorganization (filamin, stathmin, dynamin, PAK4, and PTPN14), vesicle transport (LARP1, VPS13D, and SLC20A1), and protein translation (S6RP and PRAS40). We then generated phosphospecific antibodies against selected, drug-regulated phosphorylation sites that would be suitable as biomarker tools for PI3K pathway inhibitors. As proof of concept, we show clinical translation feasibility for an antibody against phospho-PRAS40(Thr246). Evaluation of binding of this antibody in human cancer cell lines, a PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted from chromosome 10)-deficient mouse prostate tumor model, and triple-negative breast tumor tissues showed that phospho-PRAS40(Thr246) positively correlates with PI3K pathway activation and predicts AKT inhibitor sensitivity. In contrast to phosphorylation of AKT(Thr308), the phospho-PRAS40(Thr246) epitope is highly stable in tissue samples and thus is ideal for immunohistochemistry. In summary, our study illustrates a rational approach for discovery of drug-specific biomarkers toward development of patient-tailored treatments.

Abstract 5560: Biomarker Discovery and Pathway Mapping using Differential Phosphoprofiling of PI3K-Pathway Inhibitors: PRAS40 Correlates with AKT Activation, but not PTEN Expression in Lung and Breast Cancer

Protein phosphorylation plays a key role in cell signaling and pathophysiological alterations in protein kinases and phosphatases contribute to human diseases. We used stable isotope labeling by amino acids (SILAC) in cell culture combined with phospho-antibody based enrichment for quantitative mass-spectrometry-based identification of differentially phosphorylated proteins in response to small-molecule PI3K-pathway inhibition. We quantified over 500 non-redundant serine/threonine phosphopeptides (NSTPs) containing either the AKT-, MAPK-substrate, or PDK1-docking motif. Of these NSTPs, 71 phosphoproteins were modulated by inhibitors targeting either AKT, PDK1 or PI3K/mTOR and a common set of 11 were modulated by all three drugs. Bioinformatics analysis of the regulated phosphoproteins identified core components of the canonical PI3K pathway and showed enrichment in adaptor and scaffolding molecules involved in cell polarity (PAK4), cytoskeletal reorganization (Filamin, Stathmin, Dynamin) vesicle transport (LARP1, VPS13D, SLC20A1), protein translation (S6RP and PRAS40), and transcription (EIF4BP-1). These results have guided the rational selection of antibodies for biomarker and patient stratification assays and a newly developed phosphor-specific antibody against PRAS40T246 shows specificity for oncogenic PI3K-pathway activation in PTEN-deficient mouse prostate tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry. In addition, the phospho-PRAS40T246 biomarker was evaluated across a panel of 67 breast and 96 lung cancer cell lines and in triple negative human breast tumor tissue. In these datasets, phopspho-PRAS40T246 positively correlates with phospho-AKTS473, but not PTEN protein expression. As such, we have positioned PRAS40T246 as a clinically relevant biomarker for the identification of PI3K-pathway activated tumors to enable individualized cancer therapy.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5560.

Abstract 3478: PI3K suppression by the mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus and the AKT inhibitor MK-2206 is associated with enhanced anti-tumor activity and hyperglycemia in preclinical models

The PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling axis is hyperactivated in subsets of many cancers, providing a strong rationale to therapeutically target this pathway. Strategies that target multiple nodes within this pathway may effectively suppress PI3K signaling and prevent inadvertent de-repression (often noted with single PI3K node inhibition) of negative regulatory loops that serve to restrain pathway activity. For example, mTOR inhibitors may in some settings relieve negative regulation of the oncogene AKT. Thus, co-targeting mTOR and AKT may simultaneously suppress PI3K pathway activity and eliminate feedback activation, ultimately leading to greater efficacy. To address these concepts, the mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus (AP23573, MK-8669) and the allosteric AKT inhibitor MK-2206 were tested alone and in combination in various in vitro and in vivo assays. Combination treatment inhibited proliferation better than either agent alone within large panels of lung (n= 93) and breast (n= 65) cancer cell lines, and correlated with multi-nodal PI3K pathway suppression, as measured by AKT, S6K, and S6RP phosphorylation levels. Within the breast panel, the ER+ subset was particularly responsive to the combination. In vivo, ridaforolimus alone in three lung cancer xenograft models (A549, H2122, and H460) resulted in elevated tumor levels of phosphorylated AKT and its substrate PRAS40, an effect which was abrogated by the addition of MK-2206. The combination also most effectively suppressed cell division (histone H3) and protein translation (S6RP) for a longer duration than either single agent. Ridaforolimus (1 mg/kg) alone had significant anti-tumor activity (%T/C range for the three models 47-61), while MK-2206 alone exhibited a dose-dependent effect (%T/C for 100 mg/kg: 61-83; %T/C for 200 mg/kg: 40-72). Combination therapy resulted in a significant improvement of anti-tumor activity over single agents in 2 of 3 models, achieving %T/C values of 39-48 and 25-38 for the low and high MK-2206 dose combinations, respectively. The highest combination group had a mean body weight loss of 11% compared to 1.5% for vehicle over the three week period. Blood glucose levels were significantly elevated in mice receiving the combination therapy over vehicle or single agents, an effect consistent with profound PI3K pathway blockade. In summary, combination therapy caused profound and sustained inhibition of the PI3K pathway that was associated with increased anti-tumor activity and hyperglycemia in preclinical models.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3478.

Abstract 284: FGFR2 is required for growth and survival in a rare subset of FGFR2 amplified colorectal cancer

FGFR2 amplification has been reported in subsets of gastric cancer and breast cancer. We describe FGFR2 amplification in a cell line derived from a colorectal carcinoma arising in a young patient with ulcerative colitis. The cell line has features of endocrine differentiation, representing a rare (&lt; 1%) subset of colorectal cancer. FGFR2 amplification in this cell line results in an overexpressed and highly activated FGFR2 kinase. The FGFR selective inhibitor PD173074 blocked FGFR2 phosphorylation and inhibited Erk, Akt, and S6 ribosomal protein phosphorylation. FGFR2 inhibition resulted in profound cell death as measured by robust accumulation of cells in subG1 by flow cytometry and PARP cleavage by western analysis. A structurally unrelated FGFR2 inhibitor, MK2461, also caused cell death and inhibited downstream signaling pathways. RTK arrays revealed coactivation of EGFR family kinases, and a functional role for these kinases is being investigated. Interestingly, an FGFR2 isoform in this cell line migrated at 160kD, in contrast to the 140kD isoform observed in SNU16 and other cell lines. However, C-terminal FGFR2 antibodies did not react with the 160kD FGFR2 isoform, suggesting that it has a C-terminal deletion similar to the FGFR2 isoform in OCUM2M and KatoIII cell lines. We are currently defining the frequency of FGFR2 overexpression and activation in colon cancer tissue microarrays. The strong growth inhibition and induction of cell death observed in vitro suggests that colorectal cancer tumor cells harboring FGFR2 amplification / activation may show similar response to FGFR inhibitor therapy.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 284.

Abstract C249: Down-regulation of the HIF pathway enhances anti-tumor effects of the mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus in the Her2/Neu mouse model of breast cancer

The Hypoxia-inducible Factor (HIF) pathway is a unique target in cancer because it controls multiple processes involved in tumor progression including neovascularization, tumor cell metabolism, invasion and metastasis. Hypoxia is elevated in a variety of tumor types and associated with resistance to therapeutics resulting in poor prognoses for patients. While a variety of tumor xenograft tumor models have demonstrated sensitivity to HIF pathway inhibition, studies in transgenic mouse models may provide a better understanding of the response as it more closely resembles the disease. Here we evaluate the role of HIF pathway in the MMTV-Neu transgenic (NeuT) breast cancer model and influence of the HIF pathway on response to the mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus/MK-8669. A HIF regulated neuT model was generated by crossing NeuT transgenic mouse with one expressing a doxycyline-inducible HIF1β shRNA (NeuT-HIF1β) (Taconic-Artemis, Cologne, Germany). HIF1β is the obligate heterodimerization partner for the HIFα subunits and is required for HIF pathway activity. Upon derepression of the HIF1β shRNA by doxycycline treatment, greater than 80% knockdown is observed in most tissues. After 21-days of shRNA induction, tumor growth suppression was observed in the doxycyline-treated NeuT-HIF1β mice, but not NeuT littermate control mice. Growing evidence suggests that in hypoxia mTOR activity is often inhibited by HIF dependent and independent mechanisms. To evaluate the effect of hypoxia on the sensitivity of cells to a mTOR inhibitor, four cell lines (C786; U251; H1915; SKLU1) were treated with ridaforolimus cultured under normoxic (21% oxygen) and hypoxic (0.1% oxygen) conditions, the later oxygen concentration observed in hypoxic region of tumors. Under normoxia, the growth rate for all four cell lines was reduced by ridaforolimus. Under hypoxia, two lines were unaffected (786; U251) by ridaforolimus, while the other (H1915; SKLU1) remained sensitive. Histological analysis of the neuT tumors revealed that PI3K/mTOR and HIF pathways activities are mutually exclusive in these tumors. PI3K/mTOR pathway activity was detected in normoxic regions and HIF pathway activity present only in hypoxic regions. Thus we hypothesized targeting both pathways should achieve a far greater effect than each treatment separately. Treatment of mice with HIF1β knockdown or ridaforolimus resulted in 2-fold reduction in tumor growth and the combination resulted in a 4-fold decrease when both two pathways were targeted together. Histological analysis of these tumors will be discussed. In conclusion these data demonstrate that the effect of ridaforolimus on tumor growth can be improved by combining treatment that reduces the level of HIF pathway activity in tumors.

Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):C249.

SUMO-Specific Proteases and the Cell Cycle

Post-translational modification by SUMO is a dynamic and reversible process and several SUMO-specific proteases that remove SUMO from substrates have been identified. We have recently described the activities of a new SUMO-specific protease, SENP5. We found that SENP5 discriminates between SUMO-1 and SUMO-2/3 and cells depleted of SENP5 by RNAi failed to proliferate. Our findings support the idea that differential substrate selection by the mammalian SUMO-specific proteases underlies their regulation of distinct biological processes. Furthermore, our finding of a nonredundant function for SENP5 in cell proliferation provides further support for the model that, analogous to phosphorylation, cycles of SUMOylation and deSUMOylation regulate orderly progression through cell division.

The SUMO-specific protease SENP5 is required for cell division

Posttranslational modification of substrates by the small ubiquitin-like modifier, SUMO, regulates diverse biological processes, including transcription, DNA repair, nucleocytoplasmic trafficking, and chromosome segregation. SUMOylation is reversible, and several mammalian homologs of the yeast SUMO-specific protease Ulp1, termed SENPs, have been identified. We demonstrate here that SENP5, a previously uncharacterized Ulp1 homolog, has SUMO C-terminal hydrolase and SUMO isopeptidase activities. In contrast to other SENPs, the C-terminal catalytic domain of SENP5 preferentially processed SUMO-3 compared to SUMO-1 precursors and preferentially removed SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 from SUMO-modified RanGAP1 in vitro. In cotransfection assays, SENP5 preferentially reduced high-molecular-weight conjugates of SUMO-2 compared to SUMO-1 in vivo. Full-length SENP5 localized to the nucleolus. Deletion of the noncatalytic N-terminal domain led to loss of nucleolar localization and increased de-SUMOylation activity in vivo. Knockdown of SENP5 by RNA interference resulted in increased levels of SUMO-1 and SUMO-2/3 conjugates, inhibition of cell proliferation, defects in nuclear morphology, and appearance of binucleate cells, revealing an essential role for SENP5 in mitosis and/or cytokinesis. These findings establish SENP5 as a SUMO-specific protease required for cell division and suggest that mechanisms involving both the catalytic and noncatalytic domains determine the distinct substrate specificities of the mammalian SUMO-specific proteases.

The crystal structure of CREG, a secreted glycoprotein involved in cellular growth and differentiation

The cellular repressor of E1A-stimulated genes (CREG) is a secreted glycoprotein that inhibits proliferation and enhances differentiation of human embryonal carcinoma cells. CREG binds to the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate (M6P)/insulin-like growth factor II (IGF2) receptor (IGF2R) (M6P/IGF2R), and this receptor has been shown to be required for CREG-induced growth suppression. To better understand CREG function in cellular growth and differentiation, we solved the 3D crystal structure of this protein to 1.9-A resolution. CREG forms a tight homodimeric complex, and CREG monomers display a beta-barrel fold. The three potential glycosylation sites on CREG map to a confined patch opposite the dimer interface. Thus, dimerization of glycosylated CREG likely presents a bivalent ligand for the M6P/IGF2R. Closely related structural homologs of CREG are FMN-binding split-barrel fold proteins that bind flavin mononucleotide. Our structure shows that the putative flavin mononucleotide-binding pocket in CREG is sterically blocked by a loop and several key bulky residues. A mutant of CREG lacking a part of this loop maintained overall structure and dimerization, as well as M6P/IGF2R binding, but lost the growth suppression activity of WT CREG. Thus, analysis of a structure-based mutant of CREG revealed that binding to M6P/IGF2R, while necessary, is not sufficient for CREG-induced growth suppression. These findings indicate that CREG utilizes a known fold for a previously undescribed function [corrected]

The secreted glycoprotein CREG inhibits cell growth dependent on the mannose-6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor II receptor

Secreted proteins and their cognate receptors are implicated in a myriad of activities that regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and development. CREG, a cellular repressor of E1A-stimulated genes, is a secreted glycoprotein that antagonizes cellular transformation by E1A and ras. We have previously shown that CREG expression is induced very early during differentiation of pluripotent cells and, even in the absence of other inducers, CREG promotes neuronal differentiation of human teratocarcinoma NTERA-2 cells. Here we show that ectopic expression of CREG in NTERA-2 cells results in a delay of the G1/S phase transition of the cell cycle and growth inhibition. We show that CREG binds directly to the mannose-6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor II receptor (M6P/IGF2R) dependent on CREG glycosylation. The M6P/IGF2R is a tumor suppressor that functions to control cell growth through interactions with multiple ligands. By analysing CREG activity in cells lacking M6P/IGF2R expression, we show that this receptor is required for CREG-induced growth inhibition. These studies reveal that CREG inhibits cell growth dependent on the M6P/IGF2R and suggest that interactions between CREG and a well-characterized tumor suppressor may contribute to regulation of proliferation and differentiation in multiple lineages.