Olutasidenib (FT-2102) in patients with relapsed or refractory IDH1-mutant glioma: A multicenter, open-label, phase Ib/II trial

BACKGROUND

Olutasidenib (FT-2102) is a highly potent, orally bioavailable, brain-penetrant and selective inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1). The aim of the study was to determine the safety and clinical activity of olutasidenib in patients with relapsed/refractory gliomas harboring an IDH1R132X mutation.

METHODS

This was an open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized, phase Ib/II clinical trial. Eligible patients (≥18 years) had histologically confirmed IDH1R132X-mutated glioma that relapsed or progressed on or following standard therapy and had measurable disease. Patients received olutasidenib, 150 mg orally twice daily (BID) in continuous 28-day cycles. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (cycle 1) and safety in phase I and objective response rate using the Modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria in phase II.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were enrolled and followed for a median 15.1 months (7.3‒19.4). No DLTs were observed in the single-agent glioma cohort and the pharmacokinetic relationship supported olutasidenib 150 mg BID as the recommended phase II dose. In the response-evaluable population, disease control rate (objective response plus stable disease) was 48%. Two (8%) patients demonstrated a best response of partial response and eight (32%) had stable disease for at least 4 months. Grade 3‒4 adverse events (≥10%) included alanine aminotransferase increased and aspartate aminotransferase increased (three [12%], each).

CONCLUSIONS

Olutasidenib 150 mg BID was well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory gliomas harboring an IDH1R132X mutation and demonstrated preliminary evidence of clinical activity in this heavily pretreated population.

A phase Ib/II study of olutasidenib in patients with relapsed/refractory IDH1 mutant gliomas: Safety and efficacy as single agent and in combination with azacitidine

2505

Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutations (mIDH1) are present in >70% of patients with Grade II/III gliomas resulting in production and accumulation of (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate causing DNA hypermethylation and promoting tumorigenesis. Olutasidenib is an oral, potent, brain penetrant (Kpuu=0.4 in intact rodent), and selective inhibitor of mutated IDH1 protein. Methods: Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mIDH1 gliomas received olutasidenib 150 mg BID, orally either as single agent (SA) or in combination (CO) with azacitidine in a dose confirmation phase Ib followed by efficacy evaluation phase II study (NCT: 03684811). Results: As of 31-Oct-2019, 29 pts with R/R mIDH1 glioma were treated with olutasidenib as SA (n=24) or CO (n=5). The median age was 45 yrs (range: 23-64) & 62% were male. WHO Glioma Grade (Gr) at study entry was: II (17%), III (52%) & IV (31%). Median number of prior treatments was 2 (1-5); 86% had received prior temozolomide. mIDH1 status was locally determined (IHC, NGS or PCR): R132H (86%), R132L (7%), R132C (3.5%) & unspecified (3.5%). The median duration of olutasidenib treatment for SA & CO was 4.8 (1-11.4) & 1 (0.2-2.3) months, respectively. Fifteen pts discontinued (disease progression [n=12], AE [n=1], withdrew consent [n=1], other [n=1]). For SA, the most common (>25%) TEAEs (all grades, regardless of attribution) were: fatigue (50%), nausea (50%), diarrhea (33%), ALT increase (29%) & headache (29%). For CO, TEAEs that occurred in ≥ 2 pts were: nausea (n=4), fatigue (n=2), neutropenia (n=2), ALT increase (n=2) & AST increase (n=2). There were 2 protocol defined DLTs in the CO cohort, 1 pt with Gr 4 ALT, Gr 3 AST & Gr 3 GGT elevations & 1 pt with Gr 3 ALT elevation. No pts experienced a TEAE of QTcF prolongation. SA best responses are shown in Table; CO pts are too early for response assessment. The median PFS for SA was 8.3 months. Twenty (87%) and 11 (48%) pts were alive and progression-free at 6 & 12 months, respectively. Conclusions: SA olutasidenib at 150 mg BID demonstrates acceptable safety and tolerability with preliminary clinical activity in glioma pts. Evaluation of CO is ongoing. Updated safety and clinical activity, as well as evaluations of serum/CSF PK/PD will be provided. Clinical trial information: NCT03684811 . [Table: see text]

Aromatic L-Amino Acid Decarboxylase Gene Therapy Enhances Levodopa Response in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

As Parkinson's disease progresses, levodopa treatment loses efficacy, partly through the loss of the endogenous dopamine-synthesizing enzyme L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC). In the phase I PD-1101 study, putaminal administration of VY-AADC01, an investigational adeno-associated virus serotype-2 vector for delivery of the AADC gene in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, was well tolerated, improved motor function, and reduced antiparkinsonian medication requirements.

OBJECTIVES

This substudy aimed to determine whether the timing and magnitude of motor response to intravenous levodopa changed in PD-1101 patients after VY-AADC01 administration.

METHODS

Participants received 2-hour threshold (0.6 mg/kg/h) and suprathreshold (1.2 mg/kg/h) levodopa infusions on each of 2 days, both before and approximately 6 months after VY-AADC01. Infusion order was randomized and double blinded. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor scores, finger-tapping speeds, and dyskinesia rating scores were assessed every 30 minutes for 1 hour before and ≥3 hours after start of levodopa infusion.

RESULTS

Of 15 PD-1101 patients, 13 participated in the substudy. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score area under the curve responses to threshold and suprathreshold levodopa infusions increased by 168% and 67%, respectively, after VY-AADC01; finger-tapping speeds improved by 162% and 113%, and dyskinesia scores increased by 208% and 72%, respectively, after VY-AADC01. Adverse events (mild/moderate severity) were reported in 5 participants during levodopa infusions pre-VY-AADC01 and 2 participants post-VY-AADC01 administration.

CONCLUSIONS

VY-AADC01 improved motor responses to intravenous levodopa given under controlled conditions. These data and findings from the parent study support further clinical development of AADC gene therapy for people with Parkinson's disease. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Pulmonary Safety and Tolerability of Inhaled Levodopa (CVT-301) Administered to Patients with Parkinson's Disease

Background: CVT-301, an inhaled levodopa (LD) formulation, is under development for relief of OFF periods in Parkinson's disease (PD). Previously, we reported that CVT-301 improved OFF symptoms relative to placebo. In this study, we evaluate pulmonary function in patients treated with a single dose of CVT-301 or placebo for 3 hours, or received multiple doses/day for 4 weeks.

Methods: As part of two phase 2 studies, pulmonary safety and tolerability of CVT-301 were evaluated in PD patients experiencing motor fluctuations (≥2 hours OFF/day), Hoehn and Yahr stage 1–3, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity ratio ≥75% of predicted (in ON state). In study A, patients received single doses of oral carbidopa/LD and each of the following via the inhaled route: placebo and 25 and 50 mg LD fine particle dose (FPD) CVT-301. In study B, patients received up to 3 inhaled doses/day of 35 mg (weeks 1–2) and 50 mg LD FPD CVT-301 (weeks 3–4) versus placebo. Assessments included spirometry and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

Results: In study A, (n = 24) mean age ± standard deviation was 61.3 ± 7.4 years, mean time since diagnosis was 10.5 ± 4.6 years, and mean duration of LD treatment 8.4 ± 3.7 years. Assessment of pulmonary function (predose to 3 hours postdose) showed that spirometry findings were within normal ranges, regardless of treatment groups, or motor status at screening. In study B, (n = 86) mean age was 62.4 ± 8.7 years, time since PD diagnosis was 9.4 ± 3.9 years, and duration of LD treatment 7.8 ± 3.9 years. Longitudinal assessment of pulmonary function over 4 weeks showed no significant difference in spirometry between CVT-301 versus placebo groups. In both studies, the most common CVT-301 TEAE was mild-to-moderate cough (study A: 21%; study B: 7% vs. 2% in placebo). Other common TEAEs in study B were dizziness and nausea.

Conclusion: Acute and longitudinal assessment of pulmonary function showed that CVT-301 treatment was not associated with acute airflow obstruction in this population. CVT-301 was generally safe and well tolerated.