Control of contextual memory through interneuronal α5-GABAA receptors

γ-Aminobutyric acid type A receptors that incorporate α5 subunits (α5-GABA_ARs) are highly enriched in the hippocampus and are strongly implicated in control of learning and memory. Receptors located on pyramidal neuron dendrites have long been considered responsible, but here we report that mice in which α5-GABA_ARs have been eliminated from pyramidal neurons (α5-pyr-KO) continue to form strong spatial engrams and that they remain as sensitive as their pseudo-wild-type (p-WT) littermates to etomidate-induced suppression of place cells and spatial engrams. By contrast, mice with selective knockout in interneurons (α5-i-KO) no longer exhibit etomidate-induced suppression of place cells. In addition, the strength of spatial engrams is lower in α5-i-KO mice than p-WT littermates under control conditions. Consistent with the established role of the hippocampus in contextual fear conditioning, α5-i-KO mice resisted etomidate's suppression of freezing to context, but so too did α5-pyr-KO mice, supporting a role for extra-hippocampal regions in the development of contextual fear memory. Overall, our results indicate that interneuronal α5-GABA_ARs serve a physiological role in promoting spatial learning and that they mediate suppression of hippocampus-dependent contextual memory by etomidate.

Changes in Memory, Sedation, and Receptor Kinetics Imparted by the β2-N265M and β3-N265M GABAA Receptor Point Mutations

Point mutations in the β2 (N265S) and β3 (N265M) subunits of γ-amino butyric acid type A receptors (GABAARs) that render them insensitive to the general anesthetics etomidate and propofol have been used to link modulation of β2-GABAARs to sedation and β3-GABAARs to surgical immobility. These mutations also alter GABA sensitivity, and mice carrying the β3-N265M mutation have been reported to have impaired baseline memory. Here, we tested the effects of the β2-N265M and β3-N265M mutations on memory, movement, hotplate sensitivity, anxiety, etomidate-induced sedation, and intrinsic kinetics. We found that both β2-N265M and β3-N265M mice exhibited baseline deficits in the Context Preexposure Facilitation Effect learning paradigm. Exploratory activity was slightly greater in β2-N265M mice, but there were no changes in either genotype in anxiety or hotplate sensitivity. β2-N265M mice were highly resistant to etomidate-induced sedation, and heterozygous mice were partially resistant. In rapid solution exchange experiments, both mutations accelerated deactivation two- to three-fold compared to wild type receptors and prevented modulation by etomidate. This degree of change in the receptor deactivation rate is comparable to that produced by an amnestic dose of etomidate but in the opposite direction, indicating that intrinsic characteristics of GABAARs are optimally tuned under baseline conditions to support mnemonic function.

Dose-dependent suppression of hippocampal contextual memory formation, place cells, and spatial engrams by the NMDAR antagonist (R)-CPP

We recently reported that the competitive NMDAR antagonist (R,S)-3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP) does not suppress NMDAR-mediated field EPSPs (fEPSPNMDA) or long-term potentiation (LTP) in vitro at concentrations that block contextual conditioning in vivo. Here we tested one possible explanation for the mismatch - that the hippocampus is relatively resistant to CPP compared to other brain structures engaged in contextual fear conditioning. Using the context pre-exposure facilitation effect (CPFE) paradigm to separate the hippocampal and extra-hippocampal components of contextual learning, we found that the active enantiomer (R)-CPP suppressed the hippocampal component with an IC50 of 3.1 mg/kg, a dose that produces brain concentrations below those required to block fEPSPNMDA or LTP. Moreover, using in-vivo calcium imaging of place cells and spatial engrams to directly assess hippocampal spatial coding, we found that (R)-CPP dose-dependently reduced the development of place cells and interfered with the formation of stable spatial engrams when it was administered prior to exposing mice to a novel context. Both effects occurred at doses that interfered with freezing to context in CPFE experiments. We conclude that (R)-CPP blocks memory formation by interfering with hippocampal function, but that it does so by modulating NMDARs at sites that are not engaged in vitro in the same manner that they are in vivo - perhaps through interneuron circuits that do not contribute to fEPSPs and are not required to elicit LTP using standard induction protocols in vitro, but are essential for successful mnemonic function in vivo.