First natural breeding of the endangered dusky gopher frog (Lithobates sevosus) in captivity

To date, all captive breeding of the dusky gopher frog, Lithobates sevosus, a federally listed endangered species, has been accomplished using in vitro fertilization (IVF). Here, we describe multievent and highly fecund captive reproduction of dusky gopher frogs driven solely by natural environmental factors. Six pairs of L. sevosus were kept in a 3.7 × 4.4 m² outdoor enclosure designed to resemble their natural breeding habitat, which included a pool and three artificial burrows. Modifications to the enclosure that simulated temperatures and conditions within their natural range during winter were added in October and removed in late February. Following a warm, rainy period, five egg masses were laid between March 5 and 11, 2020. The number of oocytes per egg mass was 2300 ± 409 (range = 1341–3565), with the total across all five egg masses being 11,501. Of these oocytes, the hatching rate was 68.58 ± 10.05% (range = 37.53%–95.59%), with a total of 7887 successful hatchlings overall. Clutch sizes were similar to those in the wild and greater than those typically produced using IVF; thus, natural breeding can substantially increase the number of frogs available for reintroduction programs. Although assisted reproductive technologies such as IVF will continue to be useful for ensuring the success of strategic genetic pairings of captive L. sevosus, the new tool of nonassisted reproduction in specifically designed outdoor enclosures is an important advancement for the conservation and recovery of this endangered species.

The first captive breeding of the dusky gopher frog, Lithobates sevosus, triggered by environmental factors rather than assisted laboratory technologies is reported. Natural breeding increased recruitment into captive and in situ populations.

OUP accepted manuscript

Zoos and natural history museums are both collections-based institutions with important missions in biodiversity research and education. Animals in zoos are a repository and living record of the world's biodiversity, whereas natural history museums are a permanent historical record of snapshots of biodiversity in time. Surprisingly, despite significant overlap in institutional missions, formal partnerships between these institution types are infrequent. Life history information, pedigrees, and medical records maintained at zoos should be seen as complementary to historical records of morphology, genetics, and distribution kept at museums. Through examining both institution types, we synthesize the benefits and challenges of cross-institutional exchanges and propose actions to increase the dialog between zoos and museums. With a growing recognition of the importance of collections to the advancement of scientific research and discovery, a transformational impact could be made with long-term investments in connecting the institutions that are caretakers of living and preserved animals.