Endoscopic dilatation/incision of primary obstructive megaureter. A systematic review. On behalf of the EAU paediatric urology guidelines panel

INTRODUCTION

Historically, ureteral reimplantation (UR) has been the gold standard for treatment of primary obstructive megaureter (POM) with declining renal function, worsening obstruction, or recurrent urinary tract infections. In infants, open surgery with reimplantation of a grossly dilated ureter into a small bladder, can be technically challenging with significant morbidity. Therefore, less invasive endoscopic management such as dilatation or incision of the ureter-vesical junction, has emerged as an alternative to reimplantation during the last decades.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the effectivity, safety, and potential benefits of endoscopic treatment (dilatation with or without balloon or incision) of POM in comparison to UR.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomized comparative studies (NRSs), and single-arm case series including a minimum of 20 participants and a mean follow-up more than 12 months were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

Of 504 articles identified, 8 articles including 338 patients were eligible for inclusion (0 RCTs, 1 NRSs, and 7 case series). Age at time of surgery was minimum 15 days to a maximum of 192 months. Indications for endoscopic treatment (ET) included patients with loss of split renal function (>10%) and worsening of hydroureteronephrosis. The studies analysed reported a success rate ranging from 35% to 97%. Success was defined as stabilization of differential renal function without further procedures. A post-operative complication rate of 23-60% was reported (mostly transient haematuria, urinary tract infections and stent migration or intolerance). In 14% of the cases salvage UR following initial ET, was performed due to relapse of symptomatic POM.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic treatment for persistent or progressive POM in children is a minimally invasive alternative to UR with a long-term modest success rate. Additionally, it can be performed within a wide age span, with equal success rate and complication rates.

Thulium Laser for the Treatment of Posterior Urethral Valves in Infants

Objective: Thulium laser (ThL) has become popular in urology, because of its powerful action on tissue, achieving optimal ablation and hemostasis. Aim of our article was to evaluate efficacy of ThL in infants affected by posterior urethral valve (PUV) ablation. Patients and Methods: Clinical charts of 25 infants (age ≤12 months) who underwent PUV ablation were retrospectively reviewed. According to our protocol, all patients performed voiding cystourethrography and cystoscopy 6 to 8 months after initial treatment. Several factors, including age and weight at surgery, operative time, postoperative bleeding, catheterization period, postoperative urinary retention, retreatment for valve remnants, and stricture at follow-up, were evaluated. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed. Results: Mean age at primary surgery was 4.5 months (5 days-10.5 months) and mean weight at primary surgery was 5.7 kg (2.5-10.3 kg). Mean operative time was 29.5 minutes (range 15-50 minutes). None of the patients experienced intraoperative and postoperative bleeding. In all cases, postoperative catheterization period was 1 day. Residual valves were found in 6 of 25 (24%) patients. No cases of urethral stricture were registered during follow-up (48.4 months, range: 11-95). Analyzing literature data using other techniques, complication rate of ThL PUV ablation seems lower than standard treatments (electrofulguration, cold knife) and comparable with those reported with other laser techniques. Conclusion: PUV ablation with ThL has proven to be feasible and safe in infants. Further studies are needed to define the real effectiveness of this laser technology in PUV ablation. Miniaturized instruments and ThL technology make early PUV treatment feasible also in low body weight newborns.