Complications and management of excessive phallic turgor following gender-affirming phalloplasty

Gender-affirming phalloplasty involves flap tubularization, placing unique stresses on the vascularity of the flap. Tubularization renders the flap susceptible to postoperative edema that can lead to excessive turgor that, if left untreated, can compromise perfusion and threaten the viability of the phallic reconstruction. This phenomenon has not been formally described in our literature. We aim to define this entity, described here as "Excessive Phallic Turgor" (EPT), and to outline its incidence, frequency of its underlying etiologies, and sequelae. We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of all phalloplasty operations involving flap transfer performed from December 2016 to May 2023. All patients requiring emergent intervention (bedside suture release, reoperation, or both) due to excessive phallic swelling and impending flap compromise were considered to have EPT. Variables compared between groups included underlying etiology (categorized as congestion, hematoma or swelling), patient demographics, flap type and size, management, length of stay, and postoperative outcomes. Over the study period, 147 phalloplasty operations involving flap transfer for shaft creation were performed. Of those, 15% developed EPT. Age, BMI, flap length, flap circumference, flap surface area, single vs multistage operation, flap tubularization (shaft-only vs tube-within-tube), and flap donor site were not significantly different between the cohort that developed EPT and that which did not. Development of EPT was associated with higher rates of phallic hematoma, surgical site infection, shaft fistula requiring repair, and longer inpatient stays. When EPT develops, prompt diagnosis and alleviation of intraphallic pressure are paramount for mitigating short- and long-term morbidity.

What is "Nonbinary" and What Do I Need to Know? A Primer for Surgeons Providing Chest Surgery for Transgender Patients

BACKGROUND

Most transgender research focuses on patients who identify within the gender binary of either trans-male or trans-female. This largely omits understanding of the "nonbinary" gender identity as it pertains to surgical care.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to describe a single-institution experience of chest-affirming procedures performed in nonbinary patients, including patient characteristics, surgical techniques, practice pearls, and outcomes.

METHODS

This was an observational study of nonbinary patients who underwent "chest-affirming surgery" from 2012 to 2017. Demographic and surgical data were collected. A postoperative questionnaire assessing quality of life and body image outcomes was administered.

RESULTS

A total of 458 patients with gender dysphoria underwent chest surgery; 58 (13%) patients were nonbinary. All nonbinary patients indicated female sex was assigned at their birth (100%). The most commonly performed procedure was the double incision technique with nipple grafts (72%), followed by the double incision technique without nipple grafts (19%). On a Likert scale, patients reported improved quality of life (4.88, SD ± 0.34), comfort with exercise (4.07, SD ± 0.98), sex life (4.02, SD ± 0.92), and comfort with physical appearance with (4.97, SD ± 0.18) and without clothes (4.69, SD ± 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Chest surgery for nonbinary patients comprises a considerable proportion of transgender surgery practice, and surgeons who provide affirming care should be familiar with the unique characteristics and treatment options for this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) score outcomes after septorhinoplasty

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The time interval at which Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores stabilize after functional septorhinoplasty has not been determined. Our goal was to characterize longitudinal trends of patient-reported outcomes of nasal obstruction using the NOSE survey instrument following functional septorhinoplasty.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal cohort study.

METHODS

Adult patients (≥18 years) with nasal obstruction who underwent functional septorhinoplasty by three different surgeons at a single academic, tertiary referral center were identified. NOSE scores were obtained preoperatively and prospectively during three postoperative intervals defined as early (1-3 months), middle (4-6 months), and late (≥10 months.) Longitudinal analysis included repeated measures analysis of variance and adjustments for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients met inclusion criteria. For the total cohort, mean NOSE scores significantly improved between preoperative and early postoperative evaluations (71.4, standard deviation [SD] ± 17.0 vs. 24.2, SD ± 19.5; P < .001) but did not significantly change between early and middle (20.6, SD ± 19.1; P = .543) or middle and late (23.1, SD ± 24.9; P > .999) time intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with nasal obstruction who undergo functional septorhinoplasty can be expected to have significant improvement in self -reported nasal obstruction as early as 1 to 3 months postoperatively with a continued, durable, long-standing benefit lasting at least 10 months after surgery. Future studies can consider the 3-month time frame as a proxy for 1 year outcomes to help reduce survey burden.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2c Laryngoscope, 129:841-846, 2019.