Safety and efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in elderly patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed at describing the feasibility and oncological outcomes of standard cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (C-NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in patients aged ≥ 75 and assess the impact of baseline geriatric parameters.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with stage cT2-4NanyM0 MIBC aged 75 and older treated with ≥ 1 cycle of C-NAC from 2011 to 2021 at a high-volume academic center. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were chemotherapy feasibility (administration of ≥ 4 cycles), safety, and pathological downstaging.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included. Median age was 79 (range 75-90). C-NAC regimen was ddMVAC in 41 patients and GC in 15. Seventy-three percent of patients received ≥ 4 cycles of C-NAC. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was observed in 55% of patients. The febrile neutropenia rate was 7%. Thirty patients underwent cystectomy, and 13 underwent chemoradiotherapy. Three-year OS was 63%. Geriatric parameters polypharmacy, undernutrition, and age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 8 predicted worse OS.

CONCLUSION

Standard-of-care C-NAC and local treatments are feasible in selected elderly MIBC patients, with efficacy and safety findings similar to that observed in pivotal trials with younger patients. The prognostic impact of geriatric parameters underlines the need for specialized evaluation before treatment initiation.

Measuring Walking Speed Failed to Predict Early Death and Toxicity in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Selected for Undergoing First-Line Systemic Treatment: An Observational Exploratory Study

Walking speed (WS) has emerged as a potential predictor of mortality in elderly cancer patients, yet data involving non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are scarce. Our prospective exploratory study sought to determine whether WS would predict early death or toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first-line systemic intravenous treatment. Overall, 145 patients of ≥70 years were diagnosed with NSCLC over 19 months, 91 of whom displayed locally-advanced or metastatic cancer. As first-line treatment, 21 (23%) patients received best supportive care, 13 (14%) targeted therapy, and 57 (63%) chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Among the latter, 38 consented to participate in the study (median age: 75 years). Median cumulative illness rating scale for geriatrics (CIRS-G) was 10 (IQR: 8−12), and median WS 1.09 (IQR: 0.9−1.31) m/s. Older age (p = 0.03) and comorbidities (p = 0.02) were associated with Grade 3−4 treatment-related adverse events or death within 6 months of accrual. Overall survival was 14.3 (IQR: 6.1-NR) months for patients with WS < 1 m/s versus 17.3 (IQR: 9.2−26.5) for those with WS ≥ 1 m/s (p = 0.78). This exploratory study revealed WS to be numerically, yet not significantly, associated with early mortality in older metastatic NSCLC patients. Following these hypothesis-generating results, a larger prospective, multicenter study appears to be required to further investigate this outcome.

[The quality and quantity of life of the elderly person in oncology]

Combining quality and quantity of life is one of the challenges of geriatric oncology This requires early diagnosis and a full medical, psychological and social assessment of the patient. The aim of this assessment is to take a global approach to the patient's care management, to take into consideration his or her own opinion and to define a suitable treatment. Once the treatment has been established, the setting up of follow-up care for any comorbidities and symptoms, as well as the putting in place of help where needed, can help to improve quality of life.

[Anticipating the end of life]

For patients at the end of life, caregivers must sometimes make choices between prolonging life and quality of life. There are several tools to assist in the decision-making process and the implementation, notably with regard to the limiting of active treatment. The issues to consider include limiting or stopping treatment, Leonetti's law with advance directives and the fight against unreasonable obstinacy and, more recently, the "mandate for future protection". The patient must always remain the focus and be allowed to express their wishes, if they want to, directly or with the help of a third party.