Preclinical and clinical evaluation of German-sourced ONC201 for the treatment of H3K27M-mutant diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma

Background

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a fatal childhood brainstem tumor for which radiation is the only treatment. Case studies report a clinical response to ONC201 for patients with H3K27M-mutant gliomas. Oncoceutics (ONC201) is only available in the United States and Japan; however, in Germany, DIPG patients can be prescribed and dispensed a locally produced compound—ONC201 German-sourced ONC201 (GsONC201). Pediatric oncologists face the dilemma of supporting the administration of GsONC201 as conjecture surrounds its authenticity. Therefore, we compared GsONC201 to original ONC201 manufactured by Oncoceutics Inc.

Methods

Authenticity of GsONC201 was determined by high-resolution mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biological activity was shown via assessment of on-target effects, in vitro growth, proliferation, and apoptosis analysis. Patient-derived xenograft mouse models were used to assess plasma and brain tissue pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and overall survival (OS). The clinical experience of 28 H3K27M+ mutant DIPG patients who received GsONC201 (2017–2020) was analyzed.

Results

GsONC201 harbored the authentic structure, however, was formulated as a free base rather than the dihydrochloride salt used in clinical trials. GsONC201 in vitro and in vivo efficacy and drug bioavailability studies showed no difference compared to Oncoceutics ONC201. Patients treated with GsONC201 (n = 28) showed a median OS of 18 months (P = .0007). GsONC201 patients who underwent reirradiation showed a median OS of 22 months compared to 12 months for GsONC201 patients who did not (P = .012).

Conclusions

This study confirms the biological activity of GsONC201 and documents the OS of patients who received the drug; however, GsONC201 was never used as a monotherapy.

DIPG-29. PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL-4,5-BISPHOSPHATE 3-KINASE (PI3K) INHIBITION DRIVES PROTEIN KINASE C ACTIVATION (PKC) IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA (DIPG)

Recurring somatic mutations and gene amplifications to members of the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling axis are overarching contributors to the aggressive growth and survival of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG). However, targeting PI3K has thus far failed to improve outcomes for patients in the clinic. To identify the mechanisms underpinning PI3K/AKT/mTOR treatment failure in DIPG, we have employed high-resolution quantitative phosphoproteomic profiling in patient-derived DIPG cell lines harboring H3K27M and PI3K mutations, +/- the blood-brain barrier permeable PI3K inhibitor, paxalisib (previously “GDC-0084”, currently in Phase I trials - NCT03696355) and rapamycin. Paxalisib was significantly more potent than rapamycin at inducing PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibition, however, both simultaneously activated protein kinase C signaling (pT500PKCβ +8.2 and +4.5 fold, respectively). PKC lies directly upstream of myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate (MARCKs), which was phosphorylated at Ser170 by +9.4 and +4.7 fold, respectively; promoting actin cytoskeletal remodeling and cellular migration. Indeed, activation of PKC signaling using phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), increased DIPG cell growth and migration by >3 fold. Targeting PKC using midostaurin (FDA-approved for acute myeloid leukemia), and enzastaurin (blood-brain barrier penetrant inhibitor of PKCβ), in combination with paxalisib was highly synergistic (CI=<0.9), reducing proliferation and driving apoptosis. Mechanistically, compensatory activation of PKC signaling following PI3K inhibition was regulated by the accumulation of Ca+2 ions, as chelation using BAPTA-AM significantly reduced PKC activity following PI3K inhibition. These data highlight the power of phosphoproteomic profiling for the rational design of drug combination strategies, which need to be tested in vivo prior to clinical trials for DIPG.

Can Hemp Help? Low-THC Cannabis and Non-THC Cannabinoids for the Treatment of Cancer

Cannabis has been used to relieve the symptoms of disease for thousands of years. However, social and political biases have limited effective interrogation of the potential benefits of cannabis and polarised public opinion. Further, the medicinal and clinical utility of cannabis is limited by the psychotropic side effects of ∆⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆⁹-THC). Evidence is emerging for the therapeutic benefits of cannabis in the treatment of neurological and neurodegenerative diseases, with potential efficacy as an analgesic and antiemetic for the management of cancer-related pain and treatment-related nausea and vomiting, respectively. An increasing number of preclinical studies have established that ∆⁹-THC can inhibit the growth and proliferation of cancerous cells through the modulation of cannabinoid receptors (CB1R and CB2R), but clinical confirmation remains lacking. In parallel, the anti-cancer properties of non-THC cannabinoids, such as cannabidiol (CBD), are linked to the modulation of non-CB1R/CB2R G-protein-coupled receptors, neurotransmitter receptors, and ligand-regulated transcription factors, which together modulate oncogenic signalling and redox homeostasis. Additional evidence has also demonstrated the anti-inflammatory properties of cannabinoids, and this may prove relevant in the context of peritumoural oedema and the tumour immune microenvironment. This review aims to document the emerging mechanisms of anti-cancer actions of non-THC cannabinoids.