Impact microindentation in men with impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are at increased fracture risk, with bone mineral density (BMD) measurements underestimating risk. Impact microindentation (IMI), a technique that measures bone microindentation distances, expressed as bone material strength index (BMSi), may improve fracture risk estimation in individuals with T2DM. This study describes the relationship between BMSi and glycaemia status in men and makes a comparison with bone measures from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Participants were 340 men aged 33-96 yr from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) was defined using fasting plasma glucose (FPG) between 5.5 and 6.9 mmol/L. Diabetes was defined as FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, use of antihyperglycemic medication and/or self-report. Two participants with type 1 diabetes were excluded. BMSi was measured using an OsteoProbe. Femoral neck (FNBMD) and lumbar spine (LSBMD) were measured using DXA (Lunar Prodigy) and trabecular bone score (TBS) was calculated (TBS iNsight Version 2.2). Using linear regression techniques, the relationship between glycaemia status and BMSi was evaluated, adjusting for other potential confounders (including lifestyle factors, clinical measurements and FNBMD). Glycaemia status was also considered as a binary variable (T2DM vs normoglycaemia and IFG).

RESULTS

There were 234 (68.8%) men with normoglycaemia, 59 (17.4%) with IFG and 47 (13.8%) with diabetes. When considering glycaemia status as a binary variable, men with T2DM had lower mean BMSi compared to those without T2DM (normoglycaemia and IFG combined) (79.8; 95%CI 77.0-82.6 vs 83.0; 82.2-83.8 p = 0.043) and this difference in BMSi was independent of FNBMD. No differences were observed for either FNBMD or LSBMD; however, TBS was lower (1.177; 1.121-1.233 vs 1.256; 1.240-1.272, p = 0.015, independent of FNBMD). For glycaemia status considered in three groups, there were no differences in mean BMSi values between men with normoglycaemia, IFG and T2DM (82.9 (95%CI 82.0-83.8), 83.5 (81.8-85.2) and 79.8 (77.0-82.6), respectively; ANCOVA, p = 0.104).

CONCLUSIONS

Measures reflecting bone material properties and microarchitecture (BMSi and TBS) might be better than measures of bone mass (BMD) in identifying individuals with T2DM at risk of fracture.

Bone material strength index is associated with prior fracture in men with and without moderate chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for fracture. The ability of bone mineral density (BMD) to predict fractures in CKD patients has been inconsistent. Other measures such as trabecular bone score (TBS) and impact microindentation (IMI) may be more useful in this group. This study aimed to determine if TBS or IMI values differed between men with and without CKD and examine associations between prior fracture, TBS and IMI values.

METHODS

Men (n = 343, age 33-96 yr) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study were included. Femoral neck (FNBMD) and lumbar spine BMD (LSBMD) were measured using DXA (Lunar ProdigyPro). TBS was determined from lumbar spine scans (TBS iNsight software Version 2.2). IMI values (bone material strength index; BMSi) were measured using an OsteoProbe. CKD was defined as an eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m² (n = 53). Prior low trauma fractures (n = 37) were ascertained from radiological reports. Associations were examined using binary logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders. Interaction terms were tested in all models.

RESULTS

Men with CKD tended to have a higher likelihood of prior fracture (adjusted OR 2.27, 95%CI 1.02-5.01). Higher BMSi was associated with a lower likelihood of prior fracture (adjusted OR for 1SD increase: 0.70; 95%CI 0.51-0.97). This association was sustained after adjustment for FNBMD (OR 0.68; 95%CI 0.49-0.96) or LSBMD (OR 0.69; 95%CI 0.49-0.95). No interaction was detected between BMSi and CKD (p = 0.898). No associations were detected between FNBMD, LSBMD or TBS and prior fracture in either population and there were no interactions with CKD for FNBMD, LSBMD or TBS.

CONCLUSIONS

BMSi was associated with prior fracture in men with and without CKD, however, FNBMD, LSBMD and TBS were not. Lack of an interaction term suggests that BMSi performed similarly in identifying the likelihood of prior fracture, regardless of CKD status. IMI may have clinical utility for assessing fracture risk in patients with CKD.