Clinical-radiological study on the role of biostimulating materials in iatrogenic furcation lesions.
REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALA A SOCIETATII DE MEDICI SI NATURALISTI DIN IASI 2012;
116:907-913. [PMID:
23272551]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED
Root perforation is an unwanted incident which may occur at any stage of endodontic treatment and can adversely affect tooth prognosis.
AIM
To compare the recovery rate after treatment of root perforations in the interradicular area of the molars, using two different materials: MTA and ceramic nanoparticles mineral cement DiaRoot BioAggregate, by a clinical-radiological and statistical analysis over a period of up to 24 months.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The study was conducted on 28 molars from patients of both sexes, mean age 33.29 +/- 6.2DS, with iatrogenic perforation of pulp chamber floor. The teeth were divided into 2 groups according to the applied material: group 1--gray MTA (ProRoot MTA, Dentsply, Tulsa Dental), and group 2--BioAggregate (Diadent Group International, Vancouver). Patients included in the study were monitored and assessed by radiological examinations at 6, 12 and 18 months.
RESULTS
Pulp chamber floor perforations are significantly associated with tooth location (chi2 = 35.60, r = 0.67, p = 0.00359, 95% CI). Both when the perforation was repaired with MTA and BioAggregate, the clinical improvement was significant (chi2 = 17.608, r = 0.58, p = 0.0035, 95% CI).
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of this study, both MTA and BioAggregate are excellent materials for root perforation repair.
Collapse