Post-traumatic stress disorder and post-traumatic stress symptoms in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVES

The COVID-19 outbreak led to an increase in mental disorders, particularly post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), in the general population and especially in high-risk populations such as patients with rheumatologic conditions. Although these latters are considered vulnerable to developing PTSD, few specific data have been particularly reported in the framework of the pandemic. The aim of the present study was to investigate PTSD and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in a sample of patients with systemic autoimmune disease (SAD), followed in the framework of a prospective observational study during the pandemic.

METHODS

The PERMAS project is a prospective observational study including patients with SAD and involving the Rheumatology and the Psychiatric Clinics of the Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana (AOUP, Pisa, Italy) and the Institute of Management of the Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (Pisa, Italy). The assessments included: a data-sheet for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics; the Trauma and Loss Spectrum-Self Report (TALS-SR) and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), for PTSD and PTSS; the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) to assess quality of life.

RESULTS

The total sample consisted of 252 patients with SAD, including 131 with connective tissue disease, 101 with arthritis and 20 with systemic vasculitis. The diagnostic groups differed significantly in age (p<0.001), gender (p<0.001), prevalence of full-blown and partial PTSD (p=0.001), and other psychopathologic variables. Connective tissue disease and SF-36 were significantly associated with the TALS-SR scores in both univariate (p<0.001) and multivariate (p<0.025; p<0.001) analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SAD, and, in particular, patients with connective tissue diseases reported an increased risk of developing stress-related psychopathological symptoms, indicating the need for special psychological monitoring of this high-risk group.

Long-term outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rare and complex connective tissue diseases: The ERN-ReCONNET VACCINATE study

Background

Vaccination is one of the most important measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for frail patients. VACCINATE is a multicentre prospective observational study promoted by the European Reference Network on Rare and Complex Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ERN ReCONNET) aimed at assessing the long-term outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with rare and complex connective tissue diseases (rcCTDs) in terms of efficacy and safety.

Methods

Adult rcCTDs patients were eligible for recruitment. Demographic, clinical and vaccination data were collected at enrolment. Follow-up visits were scheduled 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks after completion of the first vaccination cycle; data on adverse events, disease exacerbations and the occurrence of new SARS-CoV-2 infections were collected at these time-points.

Findings

365 rcCTDs patients (87 % female, mean age 51.8 ± 14.6 years) were recruited. Overall, 200 patients (54.8 %) experienced at least one adverse event, generally mild and in most cases occurring early after the vaccination. During follow-up, 55 disease exacerbations were recorded in 39 patients (10.7 %), distributed over the entire observation period, although most frequently within 4 weeks after completion of the vaccination cycle. The incidence of new SARS-CoV-2 infections was 8.9 per 1000 person-months, with no cases within 12 weeks from vaccine administration and an increasing trend of infections moving away from the primary vaccination cycle. Only one case of severe COVID-19 was reported during the study period.

Interpretation

COVID-19 vaccination seems effective and safe in rcCTDs patients. The rate of new infections was rather low and serious infections were uncommon in our cohort. No increased risk of disease flares was observed compared to previous disease history; however, such exacerbations may be potentially severe, emphasising the need for close monitoring of our patients.

Exploring patient's experience and unmet needs on pregnancy and family planning in rare and complex connective tissue diseases: a narrative medicine approach

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work is to explore patient' unmet needs of rare and complex rheumatic tissue diseases (rCTDs) patients during pregnancy and its planning by means of the narrative-based medicine (NBM) approach.

METHODS

A panel of nine rCTDs patients' representatives was identified to codesign a survey aimed at collecting the stories of rCTD patients who had one or more pregnancies/miscarriages. The results of the survey and the stories collected were analysed and discussed with a panel of patients' representatives to identify unmet needs, challenges and possible strategies to improve the care of rCTD patients.

RESULTS

129 replies were collected, and 112 stories were analysed. Several unmet needs in the management of pregnancy in rCTDs were identified, such as fragmentation of care among different centres, lack of education and awareness on rCTD pregnancies among midwifes, obstetricians and gynaecologists. The lack of receiving appropriate information and education on rCTDs pregnancy was also highlighted by patients and their families. The need for a holistic approach and the availability specialised pregnancy clinics with a multidisciplinary organisation as well as the provision of psychological support during all the phases around pregnancy was considered also a priority.

CONCLUSION

The adoption of the NBM approach enabled a direct identification of unmet needs, and a list of possible actions was elaborated to improve the care of rCTD patients and their families in future initiatives.

An overlook on the current registries for rare and complex connective tissue diseases and the future scenario of TogethERN ReCONNET

Background

Patient registries play a crucial role in supporting clinical practice, healthcare planning and medical research, offering a real-world picture on rare and complex connective tissue diseases (rCTDs). ERN ReCONNET launched the first European Registry Infrastructure with the aim to plan, upgrade and link registries for rCTDs, with the final goal to promote a harmonized data collection approach all over Europe for rCTDs.

Methods

An online survey addressed to healthcare professionals and patients' representatives active in the field of rCTDs was integrated by an extensive database search in order to build a mapping of existing registries for rCTDs.

Findings

A total of 140 registries were found, 38 of which include multiple diseases. No disease-specific registry was identified for relapsing polychondritis, mixed connective tissue disease and undifferentiated connective tissue disease.

Discussion

This overview on the existing registries for rCTDs provides a useful starting point to identify the gaps and the strengths of registries on the coverage of rCTDs, and to develop a common data set and data collection approach for the establishment of the TogethERN ReCONNET Infrastructure.

AB1410 IMPACT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON HEALTHCARE RESOURCE USE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN A COHORT OF PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES- AN INTERIM ANALYSIS FROM THE PER-MAS PROJECT

Background

Management of the health emergency caused by COVID-19 pandemic majorly disrupted the delivery of healthcare services to patients with chronic conditions like Systemic Autoimmune Diseases (SAD), both because resources were mainly channeled towards the care of infected patients, but also because patients tended to avoid seeking medical care for fear of becoming infected. PER-MAS is a 2-year project aimed at assessing the clinical, psychopathological, and socio-economic impact of COVID-19 in a cohort of patients with SAD.

Objectives

To assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on drug withdrawal, disease flares and hospitalizations for disease exacerbation in a cohort of patients with SAD through an interim analysis of data from the PER-MAS project.

Methods

A sample of 214 consecutive patients was recruited in a reference center for rare and complex autoimmune diseases from April 2021 to January 2022. Inclusion criteria were definite diagnosis of SAD (Connective Tissue Disease (CTD), Inflammatory Arthritis (IA) or Vasculitis), regular follow-up and at least 2 years of disease. Patients were asked to fill out an extensive self-administered questionnaire on disease activity and healthcare resource use during the pandemic (March 2020-moment of assessment). Pre-pandemic (March 2019-February 2020) and early pandemic (March 2020-February 2021) clinical data were recorded through retrospective chart review and patient interview.

Results

At enrolment, 119 patients were affected by CTDs (55.6%), 71 by IA (33.18%), 24 by vasculitis (11.21%), with mean age 50.44± 12.97, and mean disease duration 11.17 ± 8.94. 30.37% took steroids, 39.7% hydroxychloroquine, 61.68% DMARDs, and 9.3% vasoactive drugs.

Overall, disease course was similar in pre-pandemic and early pandemic phase: in the first period, rheumatologic condition was stable in 57.35% of patients, persistently active in 27.3% and 35.61% had ≥ 1 episode of disease exacerbation (mean 0.665±1.15, range 0-6); in the second period, 60.56% of patients was stable, 24.88% persistently active, and 39.44% had ≥1 exacerbation (mean 0.49 ±0.77, range 0-4). Mean number of visits (2.56±2.57 and 2.61±2.79), hospitalizations (0.168±0.698 and 0.14±0.473, p=0.6), number of patients with outpatient visits=0 (7.47 vs 7%), and number of patients with ≥ 1 hospital admission (10.28 vs 11.6%) were also similar, while the number of patients with hospital admissions for disease exacerbation was significantly higher in the second period (6.1 vs 11.21%, p=0.001).

170 patients completed the survey: from March 2020 to enrolment, 18.2% suspended ≥1 anti-rheumatic drug (6.25% of them for fear of contracting COVID-19 disease, 15.6% for difficulty in obtaining medications), 20% self-managed ≥ 1 disease exacerbation, and 40% had ≥ 1 telemedicine consult. From March to July 2020, 41.76% had their visit rescheduled (35.23% for hospital access restrictions, 5.3% for travel restrictions, 1.17% for fear). Conversely, only 14.7% of patients had their visit rescheduled (8.23% for hospital access restrictions, 4.7% for other reasons) from July 2020 to enrolment.

Conclusion

In the early pandemic phase, overall disease course was similar to the pre-pandemic phase, but we observed an increase in the number of patients with ≥ 1 hospitalization for disease. Moreover, despite our efforts, patients reported a non-negligible rate of drug discontinuation for non-medical indication and difficulty to get access to rheumatologic consultation, highlighting the need of alternative organizational models in case of future pandemics.

Acknowledgements

Giulia Sacco for helping in patient recruitment and data management.

Disclosure of Interests

Francesca Trentin: None declared, Giovanni Fulvio: None declared, Gianni Andreozzi: None declared, Cosimo Cigolini: None declared, Mattia Da Rio: None declared, Valerio Dell’Oste: None declared, Elena Elefante: None declared, Federico Fattorini: None declared, Silvia Fonzetti: None declared, Valentina Lorenzoni: None declared, Michele Maffi: None declared, Inmaculada Concepción Navarro García: None declared, Ilaria Palla: None declared, Virginia Pedrinelli: None declared, Laura Scagnellato: None declared, Davide Schilirò: None declared, Anastasiya Valevich: None declared, Andrea Gaglioti: None declared, Claudia Carmassi: None declared, Chiara Tani: None declared, Liliana Dell’Osso: None declared, Giuseppe Turchetti: None declared, Marta Mosca Speakers bureau: Lilly, Astra Zeneca, GSK, Consultant of: Lilly, Astra Zeneca, GSK

OP0197 POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER AND SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM THE PERMAS STUDY

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic, with its uncertainties, fears of contagion, mass lockdowns and containment measures, has dramatically impacted on people’s everyday lives leading to an increased risk of mental disorders, particularly Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Despite evidence in general population and healthcare workers1,2, scant data emerged on vulnerable populations, such as of patients with chronic illness, particularly rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs)3,4, who also underwent difficulties in the management and treatment of their disorders.

Objectives

To assess PTSD and post-traumatic stress symptoms in a sample of patients with RMDs, during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.

Methods

PERMAS is a monocentric prospective observational study led by the Rheumatology Unit, the Psychiatric Clinic and the Institute of Management of the School of Advanced Studies. Patients with a RMD diagnosis, were consecutively enrolled from May 2021 to January 2022. During the visit, sociodemographic characteristics and psychopathological data were collected through online survey, whereas clinical data were collected by physician. The survey included the Trauma and Loss Spectrum- Self Report (TALS-SR) and the Impact of Event Scale- Revised (IES-R), aimed to assess symptomatological PTSD and post-traumatic stress symptoms related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results

A total of 194 eligible patients, with a mean age of 50.3±12.17 years, was included: 142 (73.19%) were females; 112 (57.74%) patients reported connective tissue diseases (CTD), 63 (32.47%) arthritis and 19 (9.8%) vasculitis. A total of 33 (17%) subjects reported a symptomatological PTSD by means of the TALS-SR. The prevalence of Partial PTSD (defined by at least 2 out of the 4 criteria for DSM-5 diagnosis of the disorder) was 56.7%, with significant higher rates among females (90, 81.8%) with respect to males (20, 18.2%) (p=.013). Accordingly, a IES-R mean total score of 21.90 ±15.98 was found in the total sample and a gender difference emerged, with higher mean scores among females rather than males (23.42 ±16.26 vs 21.90 ±15.98, p=.031).

Conclusion

The present findings point out high prevalence rates of symptomatological PTSD among patients suffering from RMDs, highlighting the potentially traumatic burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in this particular population, especially among females, suggesting the need of further investigations to address tailored prevention and intervention strategies.

References

[1]Fiorillo A, Sampogna G, Giallonardo V, Del Vecchio V, Luciano M, Albert U, Carmassi C, Carrà G, Cirulli F, Dell’Osso B, Nanni MG, Pompili M, Sani G, Tortorella A, Volpe U. Effects of the lockdown on the mental health of the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: Results from the COMET collaborative network. Eur Psychiatry 2020; 63(1), e87.

[2]Carmassi C, Dell’Oste V, Bui E, Foghi C, Bertelloni CA, Atti AR, Buselli R, Di Paolo M, Goracci A, Malacarne P, Nanni MG, Gesi C, Cerveri G, Dell’Osso L. The interplay between acute post-traumatic stress, depressive and anxiety symptoms on healthcare workers functioning during the COVID-19emergency: A multicenter study comparing regions with increasing pandemic incidence. J Affect Disord 2022; 298(Pt A), 209-216.

[3]Garrido-Cumbrera M, Marzo-Ortega H, Christen L, Plazuelo-Ramos P, Webb D, Jacklin C, Irwin S, Grange L, Makri S, Frazão Mateus E, Mingolla S, Antonopoulou K, Sanz-Gómez S, Correa-Fernández J, Carmona L, Navarro-Compán V. Assessment of impact of the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in Europe: results from the REUMAVID study (phase 1). RMD 2021; 7(1), e001546. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001546

[4]Wang XA, Duculan R, Mancuso CA. Coping Mechanisms Mitigate Psychological Stress in Patients With Rheumatologic Diseases During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Clin Rheumatol 2021. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001757

Disclosure of Interests

Giovanni Fulvio: None declared, Virginia Pedrinelli: None declared, Gianni Andreozzi: None declared, Francesca Trentin: None declared, Sara Fantasia: None declared, Silvia Fonzetti: None declared, Chiara Fustini: None declared, Mattia Da Rio: None declared, Gabriele Cappellato: None declared, Cosimo Cigolini: None declared, Davide Schilirò: None declared, Michele Maffi: None declared, Laura Scagnellato: None declared, Anastasiya Valevich: None declared, Federico Fattorini: None declared, Inmaculada Concepción Navarro García: None declared, Ilaria Palla: None declared, Valentina Lorenzoni: None declared, Andrea Gaglioti: None declared, Claudia Carmassi: None declared, Chiara Tani: None declared, Giuseppe Turchetti: None declared, Liliana Dell’Osso: None declared, Marta Mosca Speakers bureau: Lillly, Astra Zeneca, GSK, Consultant of: Lillly, Astra Zeneca, GSK

An Opportunity to Harmonise the Approach to Patients' Care Pathways for Rare and Complex Diseases: RarERN Path™

As a matter of fact, organisation always matters when discussing about healthcare, since it is fundamental in order to ensure the delivery of the most appropriate care to patients in the most appropriate way. Unfortunately, the pandemic brought by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) imposed a huge reorganisation of the healthcare systems, with several repercussions on the care of several chronic conditions, that were in many cases discontinued. This was the case of rare diseases (RDs), conditions that even under normal circumstances can experience diagnostic delays and difficulties in receiving appropriate care. The context of the European Reference Networks (ERNs) represents one of the most appropriate settings for the creation of organisational reference models for patient care pathways (PCP). As a matter of fact, the main mission of ERNs is to improve the care of patients with RDs in Europe through a patient-centred approach, thanks to real multistakeholder involvement. For this reason, in the last years, an extensive effort has been made towards the creation of a methodological approach aimed at providing organisational reference models for PCP in RDs across the different Member States. In fact, in order to develop the reference model, a structured methodology was created to enable the design of the PCP based on a deep sharing of expertise on high-quality care and characterised by a strong patient-centred approach: RarERN Path™. Among the different stakeholders that need to be involved in planning strategic actions to ensure care also during an emergency, patients' representatives, healthcare professionals, hospital managers, and experts in healthcare organisations play a crucial role.

Being a caregiver of a Behçet's syndrome patient: challenges and perspectives during a complex journey

BACKGROUND

As often seen in many chronic diseases, the disease impact on patients also induces a significant impact on the quality of life (QoL) of caregivers. Caregivers are the ones who are really willing to offer care in the general approach of many aspects of the disease, including the awareness of the diseases itself, the daily management of therapy, and all the potential challenges that living with a chronic disease can include. The main objectives of the study were to explore the perspectives and views of caregivers of Behçet's syndrome (BS) patients, to study their level of awareness on the disease and the impact that BS may have on their lives by means of a survey co-designed with caregivers and patients with this purpose. A survey was entirely co-designed with a panel of caregivers of patients living with BS patients.

RESULTS

Results show that BS caregivers organise their life according to the needs of the patient, that they (79%) considered themselves as helpful for the patient and 53% of them replied that they can freely express their emotions. Notably, 70% and 68% of the respondents reported they renounced with a variable frequency to sexual relationships due to concerns regarding the health of the partner or to the partner's illness, respectively. The majority (79%) of respondents indicated that they are familiar with the treatment taken by the patients and that 68% deal with the administration of some medicines. In terms of awareness, a good percentage (64%) of respondents reported to understand the illness and, in terms of education, 68% of participants are willing to take part in training programmes dedicated to BS.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this survey contribute to provide new information on BS caregivers and on their important role, and to identify areas in which new initiatives could provide BS caregivers (and therefore patients) with tools and knowledge that can empower them in reducing the burden of the disease on their lives, on families, and on the patient.

Being a caregiver of a Behçet's syndrome patient: challenges and perspectives during a complex journey

Background

As often seen in many chronic diseases, the disease impact on patients also induces a significant impact on the quality of life (QoL) of caregivers. Caregivers are the ones who are really willing to offer care in the general approach of many aspects of the disease, including the awareness of the diseases itself, the daily management of therapy, and all the potential challenges that living with a chronic disease can include. The main objectives of the study were to explore the perspectives and views of caregivers of Behçet’s syndrome (BS) patients, to study their level of awareness on the disease and the impact that BS may have on their lives by means of a survey co-designed with caregivers and patients with this purpose. A survey was entirely co-designed with a panel of caregivers of patients living with BS patients.

Results

Results show that BS caregivers organise their life according to the needs of the patient, that they (79%) considered themselves as helpful for the patient and 53% of them replied that they can freely express their emotions. Notably, 70% and 68% of the respondents reported they renounced with a variable frequency to sexual relationships due to concerns regarding the health of the partner or to the partner’s illness, respectively. The majority (79%) of respondents indicated that they are familiar with the treatment taken by the patients and that 68% deal with the administration of some medicines. In terms of awareness, a good percentage (64%) of respondents reported to understand the illness and, in terms of education, 68% of participants are willing to take part in training programmes dedicated to BS.

Conclusions

The results of this survey contribute to provide new information on BS caregivers and on their important role, and to identify areas in which new initiatives could provide BS caregivers (and therefore patients) with tools and knowledge that can empower them in reducing the burden of the disease on their lives, on families, and on the patient.