Efficacy and safety of bosutinib in patients treated with prior imatinib and/or dasatinib and/or nilotinib: Subgroup analyses from the phase 4 BYOND study

The BYOND study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bosutinib 500 mg once daily in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant/intolerant to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These post-hoc analyses assessed the efficacy and safety of bosutinib by resistance or intolerance to prior TKIs (imatinib-resistant vs dasatinib/nilotinib-resistant vs TKI-intolerant), and cross-intolerance between bosutinib and prior TKIs (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib), in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase CML. Data are reported after ≥3 years' follow-up. Of 156 patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase CML, 53 were imatinib-resistant, 29 dasatinib/nilotinib-resistant, and 74 intolerant to all prior TKIs; cumulative complete cytogenetic response rates at any time were 83.7%, 61.5%, and 86.8%, and cumulative major molecular response rates at any time were 72.9%, 40.7%, and 82.4%, respectively. Of 141, 95, and 79 patients who received prior imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib, 64 (45.4%), 71 (74.7%), and 60 (75.9%) discontinued the respective TKI due to intolerance; of these, 2 (3.1%), 5 (7.0%), and 0 had cross-intolerance with bosutinib. The response rates observed in TKI-resistant and TKI-intolerant patients, and low cross-intolerance between bosutinib and prior TKIs, further support bosutinib use for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase CML resistant/intolerant to prior TKIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02228382.

Cross-intolerance with bosutinib after prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors for Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia: long-term analysis of a phase I/II study

Not available.

Elranatamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: phase 2 MagnetisMM-3 trial results

Elranatamab is a humanized B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-CD3 bispecific antibody. In the ongoing phase 2 MagnetisMM-3 trial, patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma received subcutaneous elranatamab once weekly after two step-up priming doses. After six cycles, persistent responders switched to biweekly dosing. Results from cohort A, which enrolled patients without prior BCMA-directed therapy (n = 123) are reported. The primary endpoint of confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review was met with an ORR of 61.0% (75/123); 35.0% ≥complete response. Fifty responders switched to biweekly dosing, and 40 (80.0%) improved or maintained their response for ≥6 months. With a median follow-up of 14.7 months, median duration of response, progression-free survival and overall survival (secondary endpoints) have not been reached. Fifteen-month rates were 71.5%, 50.9% and 56.7%, respectively. Common adverse events (any grade; grade 3-4) included infections (69.9%, 39.8%), cytokine release syndrome (57.7%, 0%), anemia (48.8%, 37.4%), and neutropenia (48.8%, 48.8%). With biweekly dosing, grade 3-4 adverse events decreased from 58.6% to 46.6%. Elranatamab induced deep and durable responses with a manageable safety profile. Switching to biweekly dosing may improve long-term safety without compromising efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04649359 .

Efficacy and safety of bosutinib in later-line patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): A sub-analysis from the phase 4 BYOND trial

e19055

Background: Bosutinib (BOS) is approved for pts with Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML resistant/intolerant to prior therapy and newly diagnosed pts in chronic phase. Methods: The BYOND trial (NCT02228382) evaluated the efficacy and safety of BOS in 163 pts with CML resistant/intolerant to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; Gambacorti-Passerini et al, Blood, 2021). We report a sub-analysis of 48 pts treated with 2 (3L) and 3 (4L) prior TKIs, categorized by resistance/intolerance to the last received TKI. This sub-analysis is based on the final Nov 23, 2020 database lock. Results: There were 18 and 30 pts resistant or intolerant to the last TKI who entered the study without complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) or major molecular response (MMR), respectively. Median (range) treatment duration was 10.6 mo (1.6–48.5) vs 28.3 mo (0.2–48.6) and median (range) dose intensity was 447.1 mg/d (131.3–520.4) vs 288.8 mg/d (79.7–500.0) for resistant vs intolerant pts. Prior TKIs included imatinib (88.9% vs 100.0%), dasatinib (88.9% vs 83.3%), and nilotinib (66.7% vs 63.3%) for resistant vs intolerant pts. Overall, 61.1% vs 66.7% of resistant vs intolerant pts discontinued BOS, mostly commonly due to adverse events (AEs) in 27.8% vs 16.7% pts; 16.7% vs 6.7% discontinued BOS due to insufficient clinical response. Rates of CCyR/MMR are shown in the table. Among responders (resistant vs intolerant pts), median (range) time to CCyR was 5.1 mo (2.8–8.8) vs 3.0 mo (2.7–6.1); median (range) time to MMR was 5.8 mo (2.8–9.4) vs 3.2 mo (2.8–9.3). In resistant vs intolerant pts, any grade treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported by 100.0% vs 96.7% pts; grade 3/4 TEAEs were reported by 72.2% vs 83.3% pts. Grade 3/4 TEAEs > 10% in resistant pts were thrombocytopenia (22.2%) and neutropenia (11.1%), and in intolerant pts were increased alanine aminotransferase (26.7%), diarrhea (23.3%), pleural effusion (13.3%), and rash (13.3%). Conclusions: This sub-analysis of resistant/intolerant pts without baseline CCyR or MMR shows BOS was active in heavily pretreated pts with resistance/intolerance to the last TKI. Despite a difference between resistant/intolerant pts, efficacy outcomes, though lower than the overall BYOND population, are encouraging, and safety was generally consistent with previous reports. Clinical trial information: NCT02228382. [Table: see text]

Bosutinib (BOS) in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): Gastrointestinal (GI), liver, effusion, and renal safety characterization in the BFORE trial

7049

Background: Efficacy and safety of BOS vs imatinib (IMA) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML was assessed in the phase 3 BFORE trial. Here we characterize the safety profile of BOS after 5 yrs follow-up, with a focus on GI, liver, effusion and renal treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Methods: Pts who received ≥1 dose of BOS (n=268) or IMA (n=265) 400 mg/d in BFORE were included. Adverse events (AEs) of special interest were analyzed by selecting prespecified MedDRA terms to generate TEAE clusters. Final database lock: June 12, 2020. Results: Median duration of treatment (Tx) was 55 mo for pts receiving BOS or IMA; respective median (range) dose intensity was 393.6 (39–583) vs 400.0 (189–765) mg/d. Any grade TEAEs occurred in 98.9% and 98.9% of BOS- vs IMA-treated pts. Most common newly occurring TEAEs (any grade) after 12 mos were increased lipase (9.0%) with BOS, and diarrhea (8.3%) with IMA. In BOS- vs IMA-treated pts, 25.4% vs 14.3% had AEs leading to permanent Tx discontinuation; the majority discontinued in yr 1 (14.2% vs 10.6%). Most frequent AEs leading to discontinuation were increased ALT (overall, 4.9%; yr 1, 4.5%) with BOS vs thrombocytopenia (overall, 1.5%; yr 1, 1.5%) with IMA. GI, liver, effusion and renal TEAEs, respectively, occurred in 79.9%, 44.0%, 6.0% and 10.4% (maximum grade 3/4 [G3/4]: 9.0%, 26.9%, 1.1% and 2.2%) of BOS- vs 61.5%, 15.5%, 2.3% and 9.8% (G3/4: 1.1%, 4.2%, 0.4% and 0.8%) IMA-treated pts. One grade 5 renal TEAE occurred in the BOS arm and was not considered related to Tx. Cumulative rates per Tx yr are shown in the Table. Most common GI TEAEs were diarrhea (BOS vs IMA: 75.0% vs 40.4% [G3/4: 9.0% vs 1.1%]) with BOS, and nausea (37.3% vs 42.3% [G3/4: 0% vs 0%]) with IMA. In both arms, the most common liver, effusion and renal TEAEs, respectively, were increased ALT and/or AST (34.0% vs 8.3% [G3/4: 22.0% vs 2.3%]), pleural effusion (5.2% vs 1.9% [G3/4: 0.7% vs 0.4%]) and increased blood creatinine (6.7% vs 8.3% [G3/4: 0.4% vs 0.4%]). GI, liver, effusion and renal TEAEs infrequently led to Tx discontinuation (1.9%, 7.8%, 0.7% and 0.7% vs 1.1%, 0.8%, 0% and 0.4%). Conclusions: The safety profiles of BOS and IMA in BFORE were distinct, with no new safety signals identified after 5 yrs follow-up. Onset of TEAEs occurred primarily during yr 1 (eg, GI and liver), with an increased incidence of some TEAEs (eg, effusion and renal) in later yrs. Discontinuations due to AEs generally occurred early into Tx, with few due to GI, liver, effusion and renal AEs. These safety results support the use of first-line BOS as a standard of care in pts with CP CML. Clinical trial information: NCT02130557. [Table: see text]

Initial safety results for MagnetisMM-3: A phase 2 trial of elranatamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM)

8006

Background: Elranatamab (PF-06863135) is a humanized bispecific antibody that targets both BCMA-expressing MM cells and CD3-expressing T cells. MagnetisMM-3 (NCT04649359) is an open-label, multicenter, non-randomized, phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of elranatamab monotherapy in pts with R/R MM. Initial safety results are presented. Methods: MagnetisMM-3 enrolled pts who are refractory to at least 1 proteasome inhibitor, 1 immunomodulatory drug, and 1 anti-CD38 antibody. Pts were assigned to 1 of 2 independent, parallel cohorts: those naïve to BCMA-directed therapies (Cohort A) and those with previous exposure to BCMA-directed antibody-drug conjugates or CAR-T cells (Cohort B). Pts received subcutaneous elranatamab 76 mg QW on a 28-d cycle with a 2-step-up priming dose regimen administered during the first week. Dose modifications were permitted for toxicity. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were graded by CTCAE (v5.0), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) by ASTCT criteria. Results: As of the data cutoff on Dec 31, 2021, 60 pts in Cohort A had received ≥1 dose of elranatamab; the last pt’s first dose was ̃2 months prior to the cutoff. Median age was 69.0 y (range, 44−89), 48.3% were male, 63.3% were white, 18.3% were Asian and 11.7% were Black/African American. At baseline, 60.0% of pts had an ECOG performance status 1−2 and pts had received a median of 5 (range, 2−12) prior therapies. Median duration of elranatamab treatment was 9.57 wks (range, 0.1−46.1); median relative dose intensity was 87.4% (range, 23.1−101.4). TEAEs were reported in 100% (Grade [G] 3/4, 75.0%) of pts. Most common (≥30%) hematologic TEAEs were neutropenia (36.7% [G3/4, 35.0%]), anemia (36.7% [G3/4, 30.0%]) and thrombocytopenia (30.0% [G3/4, 21.7%]). Among pts who received the 2-step-up priming regimen (n = 56), CRS and ICANS, respectively, were reported in 58.9% (G3/4, 0%) and 3.6% (G3/4: 0%); of those pts, 57.6% (n = 19/33) and 100% (n = 2/2) received tocilizumab and/or steroids. Most common (≥30%) non-hematologic TEAE, other than CRS/ICANS, was fatigue (31.7% [G3/4, 3.3%]). Infections were reported in 46.7% (G3/4: 18.3%) of pts; most frequently reported were upper respiratory tract infections (11.7% [G3/4: 0%]). Discontinuations due to adverse events were reported in 5.0% of pts. No pts permanently discontinued treatment due to CRS or ICANS. There were 10 deaths; causes were MM progression (n = 8), septic shock (n = 1) and unknown (n = 1). Data will be updated at the time of presentation to include ̃90 pts. Conclusions: Preliminary results of MagnetisMM-3 in pts with R/R MM and no prior BCMA-targeted treatment suggest that 76 mg QW elranatamab with a 2-step-up priming regimen is well tolerated, with no G ≥3 CRS or ICANS observed. Clinical trial information: NCT04649359.

Bosutinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: final results from the BFORE trial

This analysis from the multicenter, open-label, phase 3 BFORE trial reports efficacy and safety of bosutinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) after five years’ follow-up. Patients were randomized to 400-mg once-daily bosutinib (n = 268) or imatinib (n = 268; three untreated). At study completion, 59.7% of bosutinib- and 58.1% of imatinib-treated patients remained on study treatment. Median duration of treatment and time on study was 55 months in both groups. Cumulative major molecular response (MMR) rate by 5 years was higher with bosutinib versus imatinib (73.9% vs. 64.6%; odds ratio, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.08–2.28]), as were cumulative MR⁴ (58.2% vs. 48.1%; 1.50 [1.07–2.12]) and MR^4.5 (47.4% vs. 36.6%; 1.57 [1.11–2.22]) rates. Superior MR with bosutinib versus imatinib was consistent across Sokal risk groups, with greatest benefit seen in patients with high risk. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were consistent with 12-month data. After 5 years of follow-up there was an increase in the incidence of cardiac, effusion, renal, and vascular TEAEs in bosutinib- and imatinib-treated patients, but overall, no new safety signals were identified. These final results support 400-mg once-daily bosutinib as standard-of-care in patients with newly diagnosed CP CML.

This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02130557.

Safety profile of bosutinib in Japanese versus non-Japanese patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: a pooled analysis

Bosutinib has been investigated in multiple clinical trials globally, including Japan, for treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). A pooled analysis of seven Pfizer-sponsored clinical trials evaluated the safety of bosutinib in Japanese (n = 138) vs non-Japanese (n = 1210) patients with CML. First-line bosutinib was administered in 54.3% vs 41.4% of patients, and second-line or later bosutinib in the remainder. Median treatment duration was 1.4 vs 2.3 years, and median relative dose intensity 78.1% vs 90.0%. Any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 100.0% vs 98.9% (grade ≥ 3: 81.9% vs 75.2%). In both groups, the most common TEAEs relevant to bosutinib were gastrointestinal (92.8% vs 84.7%), liver function (72.5% vs 34.8%), rash (63.8% vs 37.4%), and myelosuppression (55.1% vs 50.7%). TEAEs led to dose reduction in 65.2% vs 50.6%, dose interruption in 78.3% vs 68.8%, and permanent treatment discontinuation in 30.4% vs 25.4% of patients. The safety profile of bosutinib in Japanese patients was generally consistent with that in non-Japanese patients, despite a higher incidence of gastrointestinal, liver function, and rash events. TEAEs were largely manageable with dose modifications and supportive care in both groups. These data may help optimize TEAE management and outcomes in Japanese patients receiving bosutinib for CML. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02130557, NCT03128411, NCT00574873, NCT00261846, NCT01903733, NCT00811070, NCT02228382.

Second-line bosutinib (BOS) for patients (pts) with chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): Final 10-year results of a phase 1/2 study

7009

Background: BOS is approved for Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)+ CML resistant/intolerant to prior therapy and newly diagnosed Ph+ CP CML. In a phase 1/2 study, second-line BOS showed durable efficacy and manageable toxicity in pts with imatinib-resistant (IM-R) or -intolerant (IM-I) Ph+ CP CML. Methods: This final efficacy and safety analysis of the phase 1/2 study and extension study was based on ≥10 y of follow-up (FU). Ph+ CP CML pts who received BOS starting at 500 mg/d after prior treatment (Tx) with imatinib only were included. Results: 19% of pts were on BOS at y 10, and 13% were still on BOS at study completion after ≥10 y; 19% completed ≥10 y of FU. Median duration of Tx and FU were 26 and 54 mo, respectively. Median (range) dose intensity was 436 (87–599) mg/d. The most common primary reasons for permanent Tx discontinuation were lack of efficacy (unsatisfactory response or disease progression; 27%) and adverse events (AEs; 26%). In pts with a valid baseline assessment, cumulative complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR) and MR4 rates (95% CI), respectively, were 50% (43–56), 42% (35–49) and 37% (30–44) (IM-R: 48% [41–56], 46% [37–55] and 39% [31–48]; IM-I: 53% [41–64], 36% [25–48] and 33% [22–45]). Responses were durable, with estimated probabilities of maintaining CCyR, MMR and MR4 > 50% after ≥10 y (Table). At 10 y, cumulative incidence of on-Tx progression/death was 24% and Kaplan-Meier (K-M) overall survival 72% (Table); 55 deaths (IM-R: n = 41; IM-I: n = 14) occurred on study, none BOS-related. Any grade Tx-emergent AEs (TEAEs) in ≥40% of pts were diarrhea (86%), nausea (46%) and thrombocytopenia (42%). Pleural effusion, cardiac and vascular TEAEs occurred in 13%, 12% and 11% of pts, respectively. 28% of pts had AEs leading to permanent Tx discontinuation; most common (≥2% of pts) were thrombocytopenia (6%), neutropenia (2%) and alanine aminotransferase increased (2%). Conclusions: These 10-y data are consistent with prior results of durable efficacy and manageable toxicity with second-line BOS and support long-term BOS use in CP CML pts after imatinib failure. Clinical trial information: NCT00261846 and NCT01903733. [Table: see text]

Outcomes before and after dose reduction in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia receiving bosutinib or imatinib

7039

Background: Bosutinib (BOS) is approved for patients (pts) with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), at a starting dose of 400 mg QD in newly diagnosed pts in chronic phase (CP). This analysis evaluated the impact dose reduction has on the outcomes of BOS and imatinib (IMA) in pts with CP CML. Methods: In the open-label BFORE trial, 536 pts with newly diagnosed CP CML were randomized to receive 400 mg QD BOS (N = 268) or IMA (N = 268; 3 untreated). Dose could be reduced to 300 mg QD for toxicity. Following sponsor approval, dose reduction to BOS 200 mg QD was permitted for 4 wks maximum; after this time, dose escalation or treatment discontinuation was required. Maintenance of response after dose reduction was defined as having a response > 6 mo after the first reduction. Database lock: June 12, 2020, 5 y after the last pt enrolled. Results: In the BOS arm, dose reduction to 300 (without further reduction) or 200 mg QD was seen in 82 (31%) and 33 (12%) pts, and median time to dose reduction was 85 and 205 d. In the IMA arm, 50 (19%) pts had a dose reduction to 300 mg QD, and median time to dose reduction was 92 d. Most common (≥2% of pts) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to dose reduction were increased alanine aminotransferase (8%), thrombocytopenia (7%), diarrhea (7%), increased lipase (6%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (4%), nausea (4%), neutropenia (3%), rash (3%) and abdominal pain (2%) with BOS, and neutropenia (4%) with IMA. Of the pts who remained on 400 mg QD BOS (n = 153) or IMA (n = 214), respectively, 120 (78%) and 139 (65%) achieved major molecular response (MMR). Among pts who had a BOS dose reduction to 300 mg QD, 51/82 (62%) had MMR > 6 mo after dose reduction: 14 (17%) maintained MMR before and after dose reduction and 37 (45%) achieved MMR for the first time after dose reduction. Seven (9%) pts had MMR before dose reduction but discontinued treatment before the next > 6 mo assessment. In the IMA arm, 32/50 (64%) pts had MMR > 6 mo after dose reduction: 9 (18%) maintained MMR before and after dose reduction and 23 (46%) achieved MMR for the first time after dose reduction. One (2%) pt had MMR before dose reduction but discontinued treatment before the next > 6 mo assessment and 1 (2%) pt lost a previously attained MMR after dose reduction. Among pts who had a BOS dose reduction to 200 mg QD, 12/33 (36%) had MMR > 6 mo after dose reduction: 7 (21%) maintained MMR before and after dose reduction and 5 (15%) achieved MMR for the first time after dose reduction. Six (18%) pts had MMR before dose reduction but discontinued treatment before the next > 6 mo assessment. Similar trends were seen for complete cytogenetic response. Conclusions: Management of TEAEs through BOS or IMA dose reduction enabled pts to continue treatment, with a substantial number of pts achieving MMR for the first time after dose reduction. Clinical trial information: NCT02130557.

The effect of body mass index on efficacy and safety of bosutinib or imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia

7037

Background: Bosutinib (BOS) is approved for the treatment (Tx) of Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant/intolerant to prior therapy and newly diagnosed Ph+ chronic phase (CP) CML. Body mass index (BMI) was shown to influence Tx response with front-line dasatinib vs imatinib (IMA). We report the efficacy and safety of BOS and IMA by BMI in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed CP CML. Methods: In the open-label BFORE trial, pts were randomized to receive 400 mg once daily BOS or IMA. Outcomes were assessed according to baseline BMI ≥25 or = 25 kg/m2. This post hoc analysis was based on the final 5-y analysis (database lock: June 12, 2020). Results: In the BOS and IMA arms, respectively, 149 (56.4%) vs 115 (43.6%) pts and 145 (54.3%) vs 122 (45.7%) pts had BMI ≥25 vs = 25. In both the BOS and IMA arms, median Tx duration and time on study was 55 mo for pts with BMI ≥25 or = 25; respective median dose intensity was 394 vs 393 mg/d and 400 vs 400 mg/d. Molecular response (MR) rates are shown in the table. Cumulative incidence of major MR was similar in pts with ≥25 vs = 25 receiving BOS (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.74−1.31) or IMA (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.81−1.47). Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 60 mo are shown in the table. Most common reasons for Tx discontinuation were adverse events (AEs) (BOS 28.2 vs 20.0%; IMA 13.3 vs 10.7%) and lack of efficacy (BOS 5.4 vs 5.2%; IMA 16.1 vs 19.8%). In pts with BMI ≥25 vs = 25, dose reductions and interruptions due to Tx-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 43.6 % vs 46.2% and 66.4% vs 69.7% of pts with BOS and 24.5% vs 24.6% and 40.6% vs 50.8% with IMA. Any grade TEAEs in ≥30% of pts with BMI ≥25 vs = 25 were diarrhea (73.8 vs 73.1%), nausea (40.9 vs 31.9%), thrombocytopenia (30.9 vs 41.2%), increased alanine (37.6 vs 28.6%) and aspartate aminotransferase (30.2 vs 20.2%) with BOS and diarrhea (49.0 vs 29.5%), nausea (46.2 vs 37.7%), muscle spasms (33.6 vs 26.2%), neutropenia (14.7 vs 32.0%) and thrombocytopenia (10.5% vs 30.3%) with IMA. Conclusions: Efficacy of BOS was consistent in pts with BMI ≥25 or = 25; however, with IMA a low (vs high) BMI appeared to be associated with worse survival outcomes. Differences in certain TEAEs were observed between BMI subgroups in both treatment arms. Clinical trial information: NCT02130557. [Table: see text]

An indirect comparison between bosutinib, nilotinib and dasatinib in first-line chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia

OBJECTIVE

Bosutinib, nilotinib and dasatinib are approved for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). In the absence of head-to-head comparisons between second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the objective of this study was to indirectly compare the efficacy of bosutinib with nilotinib and dasatinib in first-line (1L) CP-CML.

METHODS

Cross-trial heterogeneity in terms of patient baseline characteristics and imatinib dose escalation are difficult to adjust for in network meta-analyses and anchored matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparisons (MAICs). Therefore, an unanchored MAIC was performed using patient level data from bosutinib (BFORE trial) and published aggregated data from nilotinib (ENESTnd) and dasatinib (DASISION) trials. After matching, cytogenetic and molecular responses, and disease progression, after a minimum follow-up of 24 months were compared between nilotinib versus bosutinb and dasatinib versus bosutinib.

RESULTS

The comparison of nilotinib versus bosutinib resulted in no statistically significant differences for MMR at and by 24 months, MR4 by 24 months, MR4.5 at and by 24 months, CCyR by 24 months, and disease progression, however, a decreased odds of MR4 at 24 months in favor of bosutinib versus nilotinib was observed. The comparison of dasatinib versus bosutinib by 24 months resulted in no statistically significant differences for MMR, disease progression, and CCyR, however a decreased odds of MR4.5 in favor of bosutinib versus dasatinib was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, in these analyses bosutinib demonstrates equivalent efficacy to nilotinib and dasatinib in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML.

Efficacy and safety of bosutinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in the Asian subpopulation of the phase 3 BFORE trial

Bosutinib is approved in the United States, Europe, Japan, and other countries for treatment of newly diagnosed chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and CML resistant/intolerant to prior therapy. In the phase 3 BFORE trial (Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02130557), patients were randomized 1:1 to first-line bosutinib or imatinib 400 mg once daily. We examined efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of bosutinib vs imatinib and pharmacokinetics of bosutinib in the Asian (n = 33 vs 34) and non-Asian (n = 235 vs 234) subpopulations of BFORE followed for at least 24 months. At the data cutoff date, 72.7 vs 66.7% of Asian and 70.6 vs 66.4% of non-Asian patients remained on treatment. The major molecular response rate at 24 months favored bosutinib vs imatinib among Asian (63.6 vs 38.2%) and non-Asian (60.9 vs 52.6%) patients, as did the complete cytogenetic response rate by 24 months (86.7 vs 76.7%, 81.5 vs 76.3%). Treatment-emergent adverse events in both subpopulations were consistent with the primary BFORE results. Trough bosutinib concentration levels tended to be higher in Asian patients. Health-related quality of life was maintained after 12 months of bosutinib in both subpopulations. These results support bosutinib as a first-line treatment option in Asian patients with CP CML.

Bosutinib for pretreated patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: primary results of the phase 4 BYOND study

Bosutinib is approved for newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and for Ph+ CP, accelerated (AP), or blast (BP) phase CML after prior treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In the ongoing phase 4 BYOND study (NCT02228382), 163 CML patients resistant/intolerant to prior TKIs (n = 156 Ph+ CP CML, n = 4 Ph+ AP CML, n = 3 Ph-negative/BCR-ABL1+ CML) received bosutinib 500 mg once daily (starting dose). As of ≥1 year after last enrolled patient (median treatment duration 23.7 months), 56.4% of Ph+ CP CML patients remained on bosutinib. Primary endpoint of cumulative confirmed major cytogenetic response (MCyR) rate by 1 year was 75.8% in Ph+ CP CML patients after one or two prior TKIs and 62.2% after three prior TKIs. Cumulative complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) rates by 1 year were 80.6% and 70.5%, respectively, in Ph+ CP CML patients overall. No patient progressed to AP/BP on treatment. Across all patients, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhea (87.7%), nausea (39.9%), and vomiting (32.5%). The majority of patients had confirmed MCyR by 1 year and MMR by 1 year, further supporting bosutinib use for Ph+ CP CML patients resistant/intolerant to prior TKIs.

Bosutinib (BOS) for chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) after imatinib (IMA) failure: ≥8-y update of a phase I/II study

7549

Background: BOS is approved for newly diagnosed CP CML and CML resistant/intolerant to prior therapy. In a phase I/II study, BOS showed durable efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients (pts) with CP CML after IMA failure. We report an ≥8-y update of this phase I/II and ongoing extension study. Methods: Pts with CP CML resistant/intolerant to IMA (CP2L) or IMA + dasatinib and/or nilotinib (CP3L) or with accelerated/blast phase (AP/BP) CML or Philadelphia chromosome+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia with prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy (ADV) received BOS starting at 500 mg/d. Results: 54/284 (19%) CP2L pts were still on BOS after ≥9 y and 8/119 (7%) CP3L and 5/167 (3%) ADV pts after ≥8 y; 61 CP2L pts discontinued BOS since y 5 and 21 CP3L and 12 ADV pts since y 4. Overall, the most common reason for discontinuation was disease progression/lack of efficacy in CP2L (27%), CP3L (42%) and ADV (50%) pts; last dose before discontinuation was ≥500 mg/d in 59 (21%), 28 (24%) and 46 (28%) pts, respectively. In CP2L pts, median (range) of follow-up was 54 (1–155) mo, treatment duration 26 (<1–155) mo and dose intensity 438 (87–599) mg/d; responses were durable (Table) and overall survival (OS) at 9 y was 74% vs 84% at 5 y. OS at 8 y was 69% in CP3L, 54% in AP CML and 23% in BP CML pts vs 78%, 59% and 23% at 4 y. 55 CP2L, 29 CP3L and 98 ADV pts died on study (10, 3 and 2 since the 4/5-y reports); 15, 5 and 3 had on-treatment transformations to AP/BP. Most common new treatment-emergent adverse events since y 5 in CP2L pts were pleural effusion (n=13), arthralgia (n=12) and increased blood creatinine (n=11). Conclusions: After ≥8 y, BOS continued to show durable efficacy and no new safety signals in pts with CP CML on long-term treatment, providing further support for BOS use after prior TKIs. Clinical trial information: NCT00261846 and NCT01903733 . [Table: see text]

Bosutinib in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia intolerant to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Analyses from the BYOND study

7551

Background: Bosutinib (BOS) is approved for patients (pts) with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)+ chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant/intolerant to prior therapy and in newly diagnosed pts in chronic phase (CP). Methods: The ongoing phase 4 BYOND study is further evaluating efficacy and safety of BOS (starting dose 500 mg/d) for CML resistant/intolerant to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We report findings in pts intolerant to all prior TKIs. Data are reported ≥1 y after the last enrolled pt (~85% TKI-intolerant pts had ≥2 y follow-up). Results: Of 163 pts who received BOS, 156 had Ph+ CP CML. 73 pts entered the study due to intolerance; 29, 26 and 18 had 1 (CP2L), 2 (CP3L) and 3 (CP4L) prior TKIs, respectively. After a median follow-up of 30.4 mo, median treatment duration across all 3 cohorts (CP2L, CP3L, CP4L, respectively) was 25.3 mo (29.2, 24.6, 17.6) and median dose intensity was 292.0 mg/d (304.5, 284.8, 272.1). Across CP CML cohorts (CP2L, CP3L, CP4L, respectively), 84.9% of patients (82.8%, 88.5%, 83.3%) had ≥1 dose reduction and 83.6% (79.3%, 84.6%, 88.9%) had ≥1 dose interruption due to adverse events (AEs). At the data cutoff, 53.4% (CP2L 65.5%, CP3L 42.3%, CP4L 50.0%) were still receiving BOS. The most common reason for discontinuation was AEs (28.8%). The most common ( > 40%) treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were diarrhea (87.7%) and nausea (43.8%). Grade 3/4 TEAEs in > 10% of pts were diarrhea (16.4%), increased alanine aminotransferase (19.2%) and increased lipase (12.3%). Most pts with a valid baseline assessment achieved major molecular responses (MMR) across therapy lines (Table). Deaths occurred in 4 pts (CP2L 1, CP3L 3, CP4L 0); none were related to BOS or CML. Overall survival rate (95% CI) at 2 y in TKI-intolerant pts was 97.2% (89.2–99.3); rates were 96.4% (77.2–99.5), 96.0% (74.8–99.4) and 100% (100–100) in CP2L, CP3L and CP4L pts, respectively. Conclusions: A long duration of treatment and high response rate were observed in TKI-intolerant pts treated with BOS. Despite being intolerant to all prior therapies, ≥50% of pts in the overall intolerant cohort remained on BOS treatment at the data cutoff and > 80% achieved/maintained MMR. These results further support BOS use in pts with Ph+ CP CML and intolerance to all prior TKIs. Clinical trial information: NCT02228382 . [Table: see text]

Relationship between molecular response and quality of life with bosutinib or imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia

Patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP CML) can be effectively treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and achieve a lifespan similar to the general population. The success of TKIs, however, requires long-term and sometimes lifelong treatment; thus, patient-assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an increasingly important parameter for treatment selection. Bosutinib is a TKI approved for CP CML in newly diagnosed adults and in those resistant or intolerant to prior therapy. In the Bosutinib Trial in First-Line Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Treatment (BFORE), bosutinib demonstrated a significantly higher major molecular response rate compared with imatinib, with maintenance of HRQoL (measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu) questionnaire), after 12 months of first-line treatment. We examined relationships between molecular response (MR) and HRQoL. MR values were represented by a log-reduction scale (MRLR; a continuous variable). A repeated-measures longitudinal model was used to estimate the relationships between MRLR as a predictor and each FACT-Leu domain as an outcome. Effect sizes were calculated to determine strength of effects and allow comparisons across domains. The majority of FACT-Leu domains (with the exception of social well-being and physical well-being) demonstrated a significant relationship with MRLR (p < 0.05). Our results showed variable impact of clinical improvement on different dimensions of HRQoL. For patients who achieved MR⁵, emotional well-being and leukemia-specific domains showed the greatest improvement, with medium differences in effect sizes, whereas social well-being and physical well-being had the weakest relationship with MR.

Primary results of the phase 4 BYOND study of bosutinib (BOS) for pretreated chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)

7012

Background: The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) BOS is approved for patients (pts) with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)+ CML resistant/intolerant to prior therapy and newly diagnosed pts in CP. Methods: The ongoing phase 4 BYOND study is further evaluating efficacy and safety of BOS (starting dose 500 mg/d) for CML resistant/intolerant to prior TKIs. Primary endpoint (not powered) in Ph+ CP CML cohorts is cumulative confirmed major cytogenetic response (MCyR) by 1 y. Results: Of 163 pts who received BOS, 156 had Ph+ CP CML (46, 61 and 49 after 1, 2 and 3 prior TKIs, respectively). Across Ph+ CP CML cohorts, 51.9% of pts were male; median age was 61 y. As of 1 y after last enrolled pt (median follow-up 30.4 mo), 56.4% remained on BOS. Median BOS duration was 23.7 mo and median dose intensity after adjustment due to adverse events (AEs) 313 mg/d. Of 144 evaluable pts with a valid baseline assessment, cumulative confirmed MCyR by 1 y was 71.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63.4–78.7). Cumulative complete cytogenetic response rate anytime on treatment was 81.3% (95% CI 73.9–87.3). Cumulative molecular response (MR) rates were high across lines of therapy (Table). 10 deaths occurred (5 on treatment); 1-y overall survival rate was 98.0%. No pt progressed to accelerated/blast phase on treatment. 25.0% discontinued BOS due to AEs and 5.1% due to insufficient response. Most common treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were diarrhea (87.8%) and nausea (41.0%). Grade 3/4 TEAEs in > 10% of pts were diarrhea (16.7%) and increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT; 14.7%). The only TEAE leading to discontinuation in > 5% of pts was increased ALT (5.1%). Conclusions: Most pretreated pts with Ph+ CP CML had MCyR by 1 y with BOS; a substantial proportion achieved or preserved major MR (MMR) and deep MR in all therapy lines. Results further support BOS use for Ph+ CP CML resistant/intolerant to prior TKIs. Clinical trial information: NCT02228382. [Table: see text]

Cardiac, vascular, and hypertension safety of bosutinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in the BFORE trial

7051

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy has been linked to cardiac and vascular events. Cardiac, vascular and hypertension treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with bosutinib or imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia were analyzed. Methods: Patients (pts) who received ≥1 dose of bosutinib (n = 268) or imatinib (n = 265) 400 mg/d in the phase 3 BFORE trial were included. Prespecified MedDRA terms comprised the clusters of investigator assessed TEAEs. Exposure-adjusted TEAE rate was defined as the number of pts with TEAEs / total pt-yr (pt-yr = sum of total time to first TEAE for pts with TEAEs and treatment duration for pts without TEAEs). Results: After ≥36 mo follow-up, 65% vs 62% of pts in the bosutinib vs imatinib arm were still on treatment. Rates of TEAEs, treatment withdrawals and drug-related TEAEs in the clusters of interest were low in both arms (Table). The most common cardiac, vascular and hypertension TEAEs, respectively, were sinus bradycardia (2%), angina pectoris (3%) and hypertension (7%) vs prolonged QT (3%), peripheral coldness (1%) and hypertension (9%) with bosutinib vs imatinib; corresponding grade 3/4/5 TEAE rates in the respective clusters were 3%, 3% and 4% vs 1%, 0.4% and 4%. Hypertension was the only grade 3/4 TEAE occurring in ≥1% of pts in either arm (4% each); 1 grade 5 TEAE each was noted for bosutinib (cardiac failure) and imatinib (cerebrovascular accident). Exposure-adjusted rates of cardiac, vascular and hypertension TEAEs, respectively, were 0.04, 0.03 and 0.04 vs 0.03, 0.01 and 0.04 (grade 3/4/5 only: 0.01, 0.01 and 0.02 vs 0.01, 0.002 and 0.02) for bosutinib vs imatinib. Conclusions: Cardiac, vascular and hypertension TEAE rates were low with bosutinib and imatinib. A majority of TEAEs were low grade and few led to treatment withdrawal. Clinical trial information: NCT02130557. [Table: see text]

Functional PTGS2 polymorphism-based models as novel predictive markers in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving first-line sunitinib

Sunitinib is the currently standard treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Multiple candidate predictive biomarkers for sunitinib response have been evaluated but none of them has been implemented in the clinic yet. The aim of this study was to analyze single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes linked to mode of action of sunitinib and immune response as biomarkers for mRCC. This is a multicenter, prospective and observational study involving 20 hospitals. Seventy-five mRCC patients treated with sunitinib as first line were used to assess the impact of 63 SNPs in 31 candidate genes on clinical outcome. rs2243250 (IL4) and rs5275 (PTGS2) were found to be significantly associated with shorter cancer-specific survival (CSS). Moreover, allele C (rs5275) was associated with higher PTGS2 expression level confirming its functional role. Combination of rs5275 and rs7651265 or rs2243250 for progression free survival (PFS) or CSS, respectively, was a more valuable predictive biomarker remaining significant after correction for multiple testing. It is the first time that association of rs5275 with survival in mRCC patients is described. Two-SNP models containing this functional variant may serve as more predictive biomarkers for sunitinib and could suppose a clinically relevant tool to improve the mRCC patient management.

Abstract P6-11-02: Inhibition of mTOR and Fatty Acid Synthase (FASN) overcome acquired resistance to Trastuzumab, Lapatinib and both in HER2+ breast cancer

Introduction: Resistance to dual biological blockade of HER2 positive breast cancer arises as a novel therapeutic challenge with high clinical relevance. We have shown that inhibition of fatty acid synthase (FASN) has anticancer activity and enhances the effect of chemotherapy and anti-HER2 drugs in pre-clinical breast cancer models. Furthermore, our group has recently observed that inhibition of FASN can reverse resistance to anti-HER2 therapies.

The development of FASN inhibitors has consequently appeared as a novel anti-target modality for treating cancer. However, the clinical use of FASN inhibitors, such as Cerulenin, C75 and Epigallocatechin 3-gallate (EGCG) is limited by anorexia and induced body weight loss or by its low in vivo potency and stability. We synthesized novel EGCG-related inhibitors to improve their use as anti-tumor agents. Within these, G28UCM was selected for its inhibitory effect of FASN activity and selective cytotoxicity in tumor cells.

Recently, it has been reported that mTOR blockade acts synergistically with HER2 inhibition to induce cell death and tumor regression in resistant breast cancer models.

Materials and Methods: We have developed long term HER2+/ FASN+ breast cancer cell lines (SKBr3) resistant to the HER2-monoclonal antibody Trastuzumab (SKTR), the EGFR/HER2-tyrosine kinase inhibitor Lapatinib (SKLR) or both (SKLTR). Once established, we have characterized these cells by studying a panel of EGF receptors signaling proteins with western blot analysis, changes in adherence to extracellular matrix proteins and invasion capacity with colorimetric assays. Using MTT assay, we have assessed the effect of the mTOR-inhibitor, Temsirolimus, and G28UCM on viability of parental and resistant cells. The isobologram method has been used to estimate the possible synergistic effect between both treatments.

Results: Resistant cells maintained downstream HER2 pathway activation by stimulating the expression/activation of alternative EGF family receptors and/or those specific ligands. Moreover, these cells increased adherence to extracellular matrix proteins and invasion capacity.

Different combination regiment of Temsirolimus with G28UCM displayed a strong synergistic effect in inducing cell death of both, parental and resistant HER2+ breast cancer cells.

Overcoming docetaxel resistance in advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): A phase I/II trial of the combination of temsirolimus and docetaxel

250

Background: Mechanisms of resistance to docetaxel (D) are not fully understood. Preclinical work showed that administration of temsirolimus (T) between courses of D delays the growth of PTEN deficient tumors in xenografts. (Wu et al. Cancer Res 2005) The current study aims to determine the recommended phase II dose (RPTD), toxicity, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary activity of D in combination with T in CRPC patients (pts).

Methods: Pts aged ≥ 18 with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy, ECOG ≤2, adequate bone marrow and renal function were eligible. D was given once q. 3 weeks along with T on days 2, 9 &16. The protocol was later amended and day 9 of T omitted due to excessive myelotoxicity. A 3+3 rule dose escalation was used with the next dose levels (DL) planned: DL1: D 50mg/m2, T 15 mg; DL2: D 65mg/m2, T 15 mg; DL3: D 75mg/m2, T 15 mg; DL4: D 75mg/m2, T 25 mg. An expanded cohort for pts with CRPC who have progressed to D will enroll pts once the RPTD has been defined.

Results: To date 13 pts have been enrolled, median age = 65 (range 35–76), 9 male and 8 ECOG 0, Forty-seven cycles (median: 2; range: 1–9) were administered. The most frequent related adverse events (AEs) of all grades expressed as % of cycles were: leucopenia (80.8%), hyperglycemia (70.2%), anemia (68.1%) and hypercholesterolemia (65.9%). The most common Grade 3–4 AEs as % of cycles were: leucopenia (27.6%), neutropenia (29.7%), and hypophosphatemia (23%). Two pts in DL2 experienced dose limiting toxicities (DLT) consisting of intolerable grade 2 mucositis and febrile neutropenia respectively. DL1 was expanded and 3 additional pts treated with no DLTs. No drug-drug PK interactions were observed. Among 13 pts evaluable for response, 6 (2 pancreas, 2 CRPC, 1 rectal and 1 sarcoma) achieved stable disease. One pt with CRPC who had previously progressed on docetaxel received 9 cycles of treatment with sustained clinical benefit. The expanded cohort for CRPC patients is opened and recruiting.

Conclusions: T and D can be safely combined at reduced doses of both agents with no PK interaction. Preliminary antitumor activity has been observed in CRPC patients. Data on the expanded cohort will be presented.

Abstract C65: Overcoming docetaxel resistance through m-TOR inhibition: A phase I study of the combination of docetaxel and temsirolimus

Background: Mechanisms of resistance to docetaxel (D) are not well defined. Preclinical work has shown that the administration of the mTOR inhibitor Temsirolimus (T) between courses of D delays the growth of PTEN deficient tumors in xenografts. (Wu et al. Cancer Res 2005) The current study aims to determine the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of D in combination with T, their toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary clinical activity. Methods: Patients (pts) aged ≥ 18 with any advanced solid tumor refractory to standard therapy, ECOG ≤2 with adequate bone marrow, renal, pulmonary and hepatic functions were eligible. D was given once every 3 weeks with T administered initially on days 2, 9 and 16. However, the protocol was later amended and day 9 of T was omitted due to excessive hematological toxicity. A 3+3 rule dose escalation was used with the following dose levels (DL) planned: DL1: D 50mg/m2, T 15 mg; DL2: D 65mg/m2, T 15 mg; DL3: D 75mg/m2, T 15 mg; DL4: D 75mg/m2, T 25 mg. Blood samples were collected for PK studies, using a validated LC-QqQ-MS procedure. An expanded cohort for patients with castration resistance prostate cancer (CRPC) who have progressed to D is planned once the RPTD has been reached.

Results: To date 13 pts have been enrolled with median age = 65 (range 35–76), 9 were male and 8 had ECOG 0, Forty-seven cycles (median: 2; range: 1–9) have been administered. The most frequent related adverse events (AEs) of all grades expressed as % of cycles were: leucopenia (80.8%), hyperglycemia (70.2%), anemia (68.1%), hypercholesterolemia (65.9%), neutropenia (53.2%) hypertriglyceridemia (53.2%) and asthenia (44.7%). The most common Grade 3–4 AEs as % of cycles were: leucopenia (27.6%), neutropenia (29.7%), hypophosphatemia (23%) and lymphopenia (17.0%). Two pts in DL2 experienced dose limiting toxicities (DLT) consisting of intolerable grade 2 mucositis and febrile neutropenia respectively. DL1 was expanded and 3 additional patients were treated with no DLTs. Clearance (litres/h) and volume of distribution (litres) for D, T, and sirolimus (S) were (mean, SD): D, 196.5 (126.1), 2345.0 (1984.0); T, 25.3 (13.3), 128.8 (60.4); S, 24.1 (23.7), 456.3 (131.9). No drug-drug PK interactions were observed. Among 13 pts evaluable for response, 6 (2 pancreatic, 2 prostate, 1 rectal and 1 sarcoma) achieved stable disease. One patient with CRPC who had previously progressed on docetaxel received 9 cycles of treatment with sustained clinical benefit.

Conclusions: The combination of D and T seems clinically tolerable at reduced doses of both agents and presents no PK interactions. Additive haematological toxicity and mucositis are the limiting factors to progress on dose escalation. The RPTD is D 50 mg/m2 on day 1 with T 15 mg on days 2 and 16 of a three-weekly schedule. Preliminary antitumor activity has been observed and an expanded cohort for patients with CRPC will start recruitment soon.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr C65.