Abstract 2255: Patient pharmacodynamic biomarker and pk evaluation results from an ongoing phase I dose-escalation study of q702, an axl, mer and csf1r kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background: Axl, Mer and CSF1 receptor tyrosine kinases play vital roles in promoting the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) by affecting myeloid functions (e.g., tumor associated macrophage [TAM], myeloid derived suppression cell [MDSC]) and promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Thus, simultaneous inhibition of Axl, Mer and CSF1R may be an effective strategy for TME modification. Q702 is a novel Axl/Mer/CSF1R kinase inhibitor that affects the immune components (modulating TAM and MDSC populations, inducing CD8+ T cell infiltration and increasing IFN-ɣ in CD8+ T cell) as well as changes in malignant cells such as increasing MHC I on the tumor cells of syngeneic mouse models. These nonclinical results suggest that Q702 monotherapy or Q702 combination with conventional therapies may have considerable potential as a novel treatment strategy for patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods: This is a Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-label, Dose-Escalation, Safety, Pharmacodynamic, Pharmacokinetic Study of Q702 with a Cohort Expansion at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors (NCT04648254). Q702 was administered orally for seven days every other week. Peripheral blood samples were obtained on days 1,8,15, and 21. Axl, Mer and CSF1R target engagement is assessed by the quantifications of soluble Axl, Mer and M-CSF in plasma by Luminex xMAP® technology or ELISA. The pharmacodynamic biomarker changes are measured by flow cytometry for immune cell population shifts and IFN-ɣ levels in specific immune cells.

Results: PK and PD biomarker samples from 22 patients with various tumor types (e.g. colon, pancreas, esophageal) from the dose escalation phase (4 mg to 240 mg) have been analyzed. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated dose proportional increase in Cmax and AUClast of Q702 and its two active metabolites which have activity against Axl and/or CSF1R. Axl and CSF1R target engagement by Q702 treatment is observed in a dose dependent manner. From the 60 mg cohort, target engagement for Axl and CSF1R reached a inhibitory level that was observed in nonclinical models. In the pharmacodynamic biomarker analysis, IFN-ɣ in CD8+ T cells and non-T cell populations is increased. Monocytes and M-MDSC population are decreased in peripheral blood.

Conclusion: Up to 240 mg, Q702 has demonstrated the intended pharmacologic activity with acceptable safety profile. In biomarker analysis, immune modulation activity is exerted by Axl/Mer/CSF1R inhibition. Further assessment of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and antitumor activity will be performed at the expansion phase at the RP2D in patients with selected advanced tumors.

Citation Format: Bae Jung Choi, Devalingam Devalingam, Angela Alistar, Anthony El-Khoueiry, Alain Mita, Hwankyu Kang, Jinho Choi, Hyunji Ahn, Jeongjun Kim, Seung-Joo Lee, Yeong-In Yang, Jiye Ahn, Borami Jeon, Jaeseung Kim, Kiyean Nam. Patient pharmacodynamic biomarker and pk evaluation results from an ongoing phase I dose-escalation study of q702, an axl, mer and csf1r kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2255.

Abstract CT549: Randomized Phase II trial of two different nutritional approaches for patients receiving treatment for their advanced pancreatic cancer

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by stromal fibrosis, hypoxia, and nutritional deprivation. PDAC tumors grow aggressively, diagnosis is typically made after metastasis and the disease remains associated with poor outcomes. The triplet chemotherapy regimen of gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel with cisplatin was associated with a median overall survival of 16.4 months in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in the first-line setting (Jameson et al., 2020). Nutritional, metabolic interventions offer an opportunity to fundamentally change the tumor microenvironment and improve outcomes for patients. A medically supervised ketogenic diet (MSKD) defined as lower carbohydrate, lower protein, and higher fat can significantly reduce glucose and insulin and increase metabolically active ketone bodies. A ketogenic diet combined with triplet chemotherapy (gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin) was shown to inhibit murine pancreatic KPC tumor growth and to triple the survival benefit of chemotherapy alone. The ketogenic diet combined with triple chemotherapy was associated with glucose depletion, altered TCA substrate usage, and NADH elevation.

Methods: In this Phase II randomized clinical trial (NCT04631445), we are evaluating a medically supervised ketogenic diet (MSKD) versus a standard diet when combined with the triplet therapy in patients with treatment-naive advanced pancreatic cancer. The primary endpoint is progression free survival for triplet therapy while on MSKD or non-MSKD. Secondary endpoints include disease control rate (PR+ CR+ SD for at least 9 weeks), change in CA 19-9 (or CA125, or CEA if not expressers of CA 19-9), average insulin levels, HbA1c, body weight, a comparison of gut microbial diversity, changes in serum metabolites and quality of life via the EORTC QLQ-C30 assessment. Unlike prior ketogenic intervention studies, the MSKD is being supported by a continuous care nutrition intervention through Virta Health Corp, that offers tracking of daily ketone and glucose levels, a web-based software application, education, and communication with a remote care team to ensure sustained nutritional ketosis. A total of 40 patients with untreated metastatic PDAC are planned for enrollment, 20 randomized to each arm. The trial opened for accrual November 2020.

Citation Format: Diana Hanna, Gayle S. Jameson, Drew W. Rasco, Angela Alistar, Richard C. Frank, Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, Julia E. Wiedmeier, Caroline Roberts, Brandon Fell, Sarah Hallberg, Denise Roe, Derek Cridebring, Joshua Rabinowitz, Stephen Thomas Gately, Daniel D. Von Hoff. Randomized Phase II trial of two different nutritional approaches for patients receiving treatment for their advanced pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT549.

Motixafortide and Pembrolizumab Combined to Nanoliposomal Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Folinic Acid in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: The COMBAT/KEYNOTE-202 Trial

PURPOSE

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is largely unresponsive to checkpoint inhibitors. Blockade of the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis increases intratumoral trafficking of activated T cells while restraining immunosuppressive elements. This study evaluates dual blockade of CXCR4 and PD1 with chemotherapy in PDAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Multicenter, single-arm, phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of motixafortide and pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with de novo metastatic PDAC and disease progression on front-line gemcitabine-based therapy (NCT02826486). Subjects received a priming phase of motixafortide daily on days 1-5, followed by repeated cycles of motixafortide twice a week; pembrolizumab every 3 weeks; and nanoliposomal irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin every 2 weeks (NAPOLI-1 regimen). The primary objective was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and tolerability.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients were enrolled. The ORR according to RECISTv1.1 was 21.1% with confirmed ORR of 13.2%. The DCR was 63.2% with median duration of clinical benefit of 5.7 months. In the intention-to-treat population, median PFS was 3.8 months and median OS was 6.6 months. The triple combination was safe and well tolerated, with toxicity comparable with the NAPOLI-1 regimen. Notably, the incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and infection was 7%, lower than expected for this chemotherapy regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple combination of motixafortide, pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy was safe and well tolerated, and showed signs of efficacy in a population with poor prognosis and aggressive disease.

Abstract CT177: A multi-center phase 2a trial of the CXCR4 inhibitor motixafortide (BL-8040) (M) in combination with pembrolizumab (P) and chemotherapy (C), in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC)

Background: Improving outcomes of PDAC with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have been ineffective, underscoring the need to co-target alternative pathways. Preclinical data showed that CXCR4-SDF1 axis modulates the tumor microenvironment (TME) in PDAC and that CXCR4 inhibition enhances T cell access to the TME, increasing tumor sensitivity to CPIs. This was confirmed in the COMBAT Cohort 1 (CC1) study showing that the dual combination M+P increases activated CD8+ T cells and decreases myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) within the TME. Moreover, our pre-clinical studies showed that adding C to M+P resulted in improved efficacy vs C alone. The COMBAT Cohort 2 (CC2) aims to test the safety and efficacy of the triple combination of M+P+C in 2L mPDAC. Methods: Single arm phase 2a study in mPDAC. In cohort 2, patients with stage IV PDAC at diagnose who had progressed to 1L gemcitabine-based C received 5 days M priming, followed by M BIW + P Q3W plus C [Irinotecan liposomal injection/5-FU/LV (OFL)] Q2W. The primary endpoint was RR. Results: A total of 43 patients with stage 4 PDAC, 98% of whom were diagnosed with stage 4 disease, were enrolled. Median age was 68 (40-85) and 74.4% had liver disease. The safety profile was consistent with the individual profiles of each treatment alone. Of note, the incidence of ≥G3 neutropenia (G3Neu) was 7% and ≥G3 infection was 7%, which is lower than expected for C (OFL) alone (20% and 17%, respectively). The levels of T-cells increased during M priming and returned to normal values, which remained stable across the study despite the OFL treatment. For the evaluable patients (N=38) the ORR was 21.1% with a 13.2% confirmed ORR (defined as two consecutive assessments showing PR) and a 63.2% DCR (PR+SD). Median duration of clinical benefit was 5.6 months. Median OS and PFS were 6.5 months and 4.0 months, respectively (6.6 months and 3.8 months, respectively, for the ITT population). Conclusions: The triple combination of M+P+C is tolerable and shows encouraging results with cORR 13.2%, mPFS 4.0 months and mOS 6.5 months (compared to 7.7%, ~3 months and 4.7 months, respectively, on a historical basis for OFL alone in the stage 4 diagnosis subpopulation). SD of 42.1% and DCR of 63.2% were also higher than historical data on SoC chemotherapy used in 2L patients. The incidence of severe neutropenia and infections is lower than the historical data on C. The results from the CC2 suggest that M+P may expand the efficacy and safety benefit of OFL in PDAC, and warrants further investigation in a randomized study.

Citation Format: Manuel Hidalgo, Teresa Macarulla, Valerya Semenisty, Erkut Borazanci, Jaime Feliu, Mariano Ponz-Sarvise, David Gutierrez Abad, Paul Oberstein, Angela Alistar, Andres Muñoz, Ravit Geva, Carmen Guillén-Ponce, Mercedes Salgado Fernandez, Amnon Peled, Marya Chaney, Irit Glicko-Kabir, Liron Shemesh-Darvish, Debby Ickowicz, Ella Sorani, Shaul E. Kadosh, Abi Vainstein-Haras, Bruno Bockorny. A multi-center phase 2a trial of the CXCR4 inhibitor motixafortide (BL-8040) (M) in combination with pembrolizumab (P) and chemotherapy (C), in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT177.

Safety and tolerability of the first-in-class agent CPI-613 in combination with modified FOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: a single-centre, open-label, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial

Background

Pancreatic cancer statistics are dismal, with a five-year survival of less than 10%, and over 50% of patients presenting with metastatic disease. Metabolic reprogramming is an emerging hallmark of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, including aerobic glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, glutaminolysis, lipogenesis and lipolysis, autophagic status, and anti-oxidative stress. CPI-613 is a novel anti-cancer agent that selectively targets the altered form of mitochondrial energy metabolism in tumor cells, causing changes in mitochondrial enzyme activities and redox status which lead to apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy of tumor cells.

Methods

This is a phase 1 study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of CPI-613 when used in combination with modified FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin at 65 mg/m² and irinotecan at 140 mg/m², and fluorouracil 400 mg/m² bolus and 2400 mg/m² over 46 h) in combination with CPI-613 in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma with good bone marrow, liver and kidney function and good performance status (NCT01835041 – closed to recruitment). A two-stage dose-escalation scheme (single patient and traditional 3+3 design) was applied. In the single patient stage, one patient was accrued per dose level. The starting dose of CPI-613 was 500 mg/m²/day; the dose level was then escalated by doubling the previous dose if there was no toxicity greater than Grade 2 within 4 weeks attributed as probably or definitely related to CPI-613. The traditional 3+3 dose-escalation stage was triggered if toxicity attributed as probably or definitely related to CPI-613 was ≥ Grade 2. The dose level for CPI-613 for the first cohort in the traditional dose-escalation stage was the same as used in the last cohort of the single patient dose-escalation stage. Secondary objectives were safety, preliminary efficacy, and tissue collection for future analyses. Response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival data were assessed in the patients treated at the MTD.

Findings

Twenty patients were enrolled April 22, 2013 – January 8, 2016. The MTD of CPI-613 was 500 mg/m². The median number of treatment cycles administered at the MTD was 11 (interquartile range, 4–19). Two patients enrolled at a higher dose (1000 mg/m²) both experienced a DLT (dose limiting toxicity). There were 2 unexpected serious adverse events (SAEs), both for the first patient enrolled: 1) possible leaching due to infusion of CPI-613 via non-PVC tubing, and 2) the patient re- accessed her port at home after accidental de-access. Neither incident resulted in a negative clinical outcome. Expected SAEs were: thrombocytopenia, anemia and lymphopenia (all for Patient #2, with anemia and lymphopenia being a DLT); hyperglycemia (Patient #7); hypokalemia, hypoalbuminemia and sepsis (Patient #11); and neutropenia (Patient #20). There was no grade 5 toxicity. For the 18 patients treated at the MTD, the most common Grade 3–4 toxicities were hypokalemia (6/18, 33%), diarrhea (5/18, 28%) and abdominal pain (4/18, 22%). Sensorial neuropathy (17/18, 94%) was managed with dose de-escalation or discontinuation per standard of care. None of the patients experienced grade 4 or 5 neuropathy. No patients died while on active treatment; 11 study participants died, with cause of death as terminal pancreatic cancer.

Among the 18 patients treated with the MTD, there were 3 patients with a complete response (CR), 1 with a non-CR/non-progressive disease, 7 with a partial response (PR), 3 with stable disease, and 4 with PD. The partial + complete response rate was 61% (11/18).

Interpretation

The treatment was well tolerated and all end points were met. The intriguing signal of efficacy will require validation in a phase 2 study.

Funding

Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for brain metastases from gastrointestinal primary

INTRODUCTION

In this study, we assessed clinical outcomes of patients with brain metastases from a gastrointestinal (GI) primary cancer and patterns of failure after stereotactic radiosurgery including failure within the radiosurgical volume, distant failure and leptomeningeal failure (LMF). We also assessed other factors associated with the patients' neurologic and extraneuraxial disease that may affect clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed our institutional series of 62 consecutive patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery, which included 17 patients with oesophageal, 44 patients with colorectal and one patient with anal canal primary. The median marginal dose to the radiosurgery volume was 17 Gy (range 10-24 Gy). Thirteen patients were treated with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) prior to GKS.

RESULTS

The median dose delivered to the margin of the tumour was 17 Gy (range: 10-24 Gy). The median largest tumour diameter was 2.7 cm (range: 0.60-6.1 cm). The median overall survival (OS) was 7.1 months with a median follow-up of 6.1 months and a range of 0-31.7 months. Freedom from local failure was 86.5% and 62.2% at 6 and 12 months respectively. Freedom from distant failure was 73.2% and 42.2% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, and 40% of patients died of neurologic death. LMF occurred in seven patients, all of whom had colorectal primaries. Multivariate analysis revealed that craniotomy for resection of brain metastasis (HR = 2.63, P < 0.02), an absence of extracranial disease (HR = 2.28, P < 0.03), and prolonged time to distant brain failure (HR = 2.85, P < 0.01) predicted for improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Colorectal cancer metastases tend to have a higher rate of leptomeningeal failure than other types of GI cancer metastases. Radiosurgical management of brain metastases from GI primary represents an acceptable management option. Neurologic death remains problematic.

A Phase II Clinical Trial of CPI-613 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a common lung cancer which presents with extensive stage disease at time of diagnosis in two-thirds of patients. For treatment of advanced disease, traditional platinum doublet chemotherapy induces response rates up to 80% but with few durable responses. CPI-613 is a novel anti-cancer agent that selectively inhibits the altered form of mitochondrial energy metabolism in tumor cells.

Methods

We evaluated CPI-613 with a single-arm, open-label phase II study in patients with relapsed or refractory SCLC. CPI-613 was given at a dose of 3,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 4 of weeks 1–3 of 4 week cycle. The primary outcome was response rate as assessed by CT imaging using RECIST v1.1 criteria. Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Twelve patients were accrued (median age 57yo) who had previously received between 1 and 4 lines of chemotherapy (median 1) for SCLC with a treatment-free interval of less than 60 days in 9 of the 12 patients.

Results

No complete or partial responses were seen. Ten patients (83%) progressed as best response and 2 (17%) were not evaluable for response. Median time to progression was 1.7 months (range 0.7 to 1.8 months). Eleven patients (92%) died with median overall survival of 4.3 months (range 1.2 to 18.2 months). The study was closed early due to lack of efficacy. Of note, three out of three patients who progressed after CPI-613 and were subsequently treated with standard topotecan then demonstrated treatment response with survival for 18.2, 7.4, and 5.1 months. We conducted laboratory studies which found synergy in-vitro for CPI-613 with topotecan.

Conclusions

Single agent CPI-613 had no efficacy in this study. Further study of CPI 613 in combination with a topoisomerase inhibitor is warranted.

Immunogenic Subtypes of Breast Cancer Delineated by Gene Classifiers of Immune Responsiveness

The abundance and functional orientation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer is associated with distant metastasis-free survival, yet how this association is influenced by tumor phenotypic heterogeneity is poorly understood. Here, a bioinformatics approach defined tumor biologic attributes that influence this association and delineated tumor subtypes that may differ in their ability to sustain durable antitumor immune responses. A large database of breast tumor expression profiles and associated clinical data was compiled, from which the ability of phenotypic markers to significantly influence the prognostic performance of a classification model that incorporates immune cell-specific gene signatures was ascertained. Markers of cell proliferation and intrinsic molecular subtype reproducibly distinguished two breast cancer subtypes that we refer to as immune benefit-enabled (IBE) and immune benefit-disabled (IBD). The IBE tumors, comprised mostly of highly proliferative tumors of the basal-like, HER2-enriched, and luminal B subtypes, could be stratified by the immune classifier into significantly different prognostic groups, while IBD tumors could not, indicating the potential for productive engagement of metastasis-protective immunity in IBE tumors, but not in IBD tumors. The prognostic stratification in IBE was independent of conventional variables. Gene network analysis predicted the activation of TNFα/IFNγ signaling pathways in IBE tumors and the activation of the transforming growth factor-β pathway in IBD tumors. This prediction supports a model in which breast tumors can be distinguished on the basis of their potential for metastasis-protective immune responsiveness. Whether IBE and IBD represent clinically relevant contexts for evaluating sensitivity to immunotherapeutic agents warrants further investigation. Cancer Immunol Res; 4(7); 600-10. ©2016 AACR.

Everolimus and pasireotide for advanced and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Few treatment options are available for patients with advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Based on preclinical and early clinical efficacy signals and lack of overlapping toxicity, we undertook this multicenter phase II trial to estimate efficacy and safety of everolimus and pasireotide in advanced HCC.

METHODS

Patients with advanced HCC not amenable to locoregional therapy and Child-Pugh A cirrhosis received everolimus 7.5 mg PO daily and pasireotide LAR 60 mg IM every 28 days. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP), with 26 events needed to evaluate if everolimus + pasireotide improved TTP from 2.8 to 4.4 months, with 80% power and an alpha of 0.05. Secondary endpoints included response as measured by RECIST modified for HCC, treatment-emergent adverse events, and overall survival.

RESULTS

After 24 patients were enrolled, results of a randomized trial showing no benefit of everolimus in HCC were released prompting an unplanned interim analysis that found the conditional probability of rejecting the null hypothesis based on events in those patients was 0.08. Therefore accrual was halted. Patients had a median age of 59 years, 21 (88%) had BCLC stage C cancer, and 11 (46%) metastatic disease. Median TTP was 3.5 months (95% CI 2-5.8) and median survival 6.7 months (95% CI 6-infinity). Best response was stable disease in ten patients. Grade 3 hyperglycemia occurred in 6 (25%). There were no grade 4 treatment-emergent events.

CONCLUSION

Despite promising early efficacy signals, we found no benefit for the combination of everolimus and pasireotide in HCC.

Dual roles for immune metagenes in breast cancer prognosis and therapy prediction

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer leads to considerable variability in clinical responses, with only 10 to 20% of cases achieving complete pathologic responses (pCR). Biological and clinical factors that determine the extent of pCR are incompletely understood. Mounting evidence indicates that the patient's immune system contributes to tumor regression and can be modulated by therapies. The cell types most frequently observed with this association are effector tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), such as cytotoxic T cells, natural killer cells and B cells. We and others have shown that the relative abundance of TILs in breast cancer can be quantified by intratumoral transcript levels of coordinately expressed, immune cell-specific genes. Through expression microarray analysis, we recently discovered three immune gene signatures, or metagenes, that appear to reflect the relative abundance of distinct tumor-infiltrating leukocyte populations. The B/P (B cell/plasma cell), T/NK (T cell/natural killer cell) and M/D (monocyte/dendritic cell) immune metagenes were significantly associated with distant metastasis-free survival of patients with highly proliferative cancer of the basal-like, HER2-enriched and luminal B intrinsic subtypes.

METHODS

Given the histopathological evidence that TIL abundance is predictive of neoadjuvant treatment efficacy, we evaluated the therapy-predictive potential of the prognostic immune metagenes. We hypothesized that pre-chemotherapy immune gene signatures would be significantly predictive of tumor response. In a multi-institutional, meta-cohort analysis of 701 breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, gene expression profiles of tumor biopsies were investigated by logistic regression to determine the existence of therapy-predictive interactions between the immune metagenes, tumor proliferative capacity, and intrinsic subtypes.

RESULTS

By univariate analysis, the B/P, T/NK and M/D metagenes were all significantly and positively associated with favorable pathologic responses. In multivariate analyses, proliferative capacity and intrinsic subtype altered the significance of the immune metagenes in different ways, with the M/D and B/P metagenes achieving the greatest overall significance after adjustment for other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Gene expression signatures of infiltrating immune cells carry both prognostic and therapy-predictive value that is impacted by tumor proliferative capacity and intrinsic subtype. Anti-tumor functions of plasma B cells and myeloid-derived antigen-presenting cells may explain more variability in pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than previously recognized.

Clinical pathways for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) represent a group of diseases that pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their clinical and pathological heterogeneity as well as the limited number of patients available for clinical trials. Over the last couple of decades, a major progress in understanding tumor biology led to the discovery of new potential targets for the medical treatment of these tumors.

DISCUSSION

There are numerous novel targeted agents in various stages of preclinical and clinical development that offer considerable promise as monotherapy or combination therapy for PNETs. The question of whether traditional clinical research methods are appropriate for the development of novel, targeted anticancer agents has been the subject of many discussions. Major challenges include identifying a valid target, the most effective agent within a target class, the right subset of population to benefit from the drug, and the most appropriate setting to use the drug. As new agents emerge, oncologists are faced with making clinical decisions sometimes before having a high level of evidence. In this review, we attempt to address some of the management steps involved in treating patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, particularly well to moderately differentiated tumors. The purpose of this review is to offer a therapeutic sequence including surgery, liver-directed therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy for this disease.