Abstract PR-004: Systemic and intratumoral immune profiling in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who received front-line FOLFIRINOX and were treated with combination immunotherapy with CTLA-4 blockade in the maintenance setting

Background: Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) has a dismal prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of 10%. For patients with metastatic PDA who respond to but cannot tolerate multi-agent chemotherapy, such as FOLFIRINOX, beyond 4-6 months, the optimal approach is unknown. Few studies have evaluated immunotherapy in the maintenance setting for PDA. Previously, a phase 2 trial in advanced PDA showed the promise of a GM-CSF-secreting allogeneic pancreatic tumor cell-based vaccine (GVAX) with CTLA-4 inhibitor, ipilimumab (IPI) [1]. Here we describe the first clinical testing of GVAX + IPI in the maintenance setting for patients with metastatic PDA who had ongoing response or stable disease after front-line FOLFIRINOX and evaluation of immune cell changes within the peripheral blood and tumor. Methods: From 40 vaccinated patients, we obtained paired peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) from 20 patients and metastatic PDA biopsies from 6 of these 20 patients at baseline and week 7 (after at least two doses of GVAX + IPI). Samples were stratified into “stable” or “progressive” cohorts based on disease status on first restaging scan. To profile peripheral immune responses to treatment, we performed mass cytometry (CyTOF) analysis using a T cell-focused panel on PBLs. To profile intratumoral immune responses, biopsies containing >30% tumor cellularity were chosen for 10-plex multiplex immunohistochemistry with T cell and myeloid cell-focused panels allowing us to examine changes in immune cell subsets after GVAX + IPI. Results. GVAX + IPI led to noticeable changes in PBLs including increases in T helper and cytotoxic effector memory cells and decrease in naïve cytotoxic T cells, regardless of disease status. Among co-inhibitory markers assayed on PBLs, GVAX + IPI upregulated TIM3 and PD-1 in most helper and cytotoxic T cells, while CTLA-4 was largely maintained. Interrogation of the metastatic tumor microenvironment at baseline and on-treatment revealed significant increases in CD8+ T cells and pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages and decrease in pro-tumor M2 macrophages. Based on the CD8+ T cell functional status, there were increases in late effector (EOMES-PD-1+) and memory (EOMES-PD-1-) CD8+ T cells in the metastatic tumor after immunotherapy. Conclusions: In summary, we have proposed a mechanism for our immunotherapy in the maintenance setting. GVAX may be inducing systemic and intratumoral activation of naïve T cells to antigen-specific T cells and promoting a decrease in immunosuppressive cells in the metastatic PDA microenvironment. Meanwhile, IPI may be blocking CTLA-4, which improves priming of T cells, but also may be leading to upregulation of regulatory markers TIM3 and PD-1 on T cell subsets as a compensatory mechanism. This trial highlights the challenge to inducing effective anti-tumor immune responses in metastatic PDA with inducible counterregulatory mechanisms. These compensatory increases could provide targets for the next generation of studies. 1Le DT, et al. J Immunother. 2013

Citation Format: Annie A. Wu, Katherine M. Bever, Won Jin Ho, Elana J. Fertig, Nan Niu, Lei Zheng, Rose M. Parkinson, Jennifer N. Durham, Beth Onners, Anna K. Ferguson, Cara Wilt, Andrew H. Ko, Andrea Wang-Gillam, Daniel A. Laheru, Robert A. Anders, Elizabeth D. Thompson, Elizabeth A. Sugar, Elizabeth M. Jaffee, Dung T. Le. Systemic and intratumoral immune profiling in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who received front-line FOLFIRINOX and were treated with combination immunotherapy with CTLA-4 blockade in the maintenance setting [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2020 Sep 29-30. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(22 Suppl):Abstract nr PR-004.

A Phase II Study of Allogeneic GM-CSF-Transfected Pancreatic Tumor Vaccine (GVAX) with Ipilimumab as Maintenance Treatment for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

PURPOSE

This phase II study tested granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-allogeneic pancreatic tumor cells (GVAX) and ipilimumab in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) in the maintenance setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with PDA who were treated with front-line chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) in the metastatic setting and had ongoing response or stable disease after 8-12 doses were eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1 to treatment with GVAX and ipilimumab given every 3 weeks for four doses then every 8 weeks (Arm A) or to FOLFIRINOX continuation (Arm B). The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) between the two arms.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were included in the final analysis (Arm A: 40; Arm B: 42). The study was stopped for futility after interim analysis. Median OS was 9.38 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.0-12.2] for Arm A and 14.7 months (95% CI, 11.6-20.0) for Arm B (HR, 1.75; P = 0.019). Using immune-related response criteria, two partial responses (5.7%) were observed in Arm A and four (13.8%) in Arm B. GVAX + ipilimumab promoted T-cell differentiation into effector memory phenotypes both in the periphery and in the tumor microenvironment and increased M1 macrophages in the tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

GVAX and ipilimumab maintenance therapy did not improve OS over continuation of chemotherapy and resulted in a numerically inferior survival in metastatic PDA. However, clinical responses and biological effects on immune cells were observed. Further study of novel combinations in the maintenance treatment of metastatic PDA is feasible.

A phase 2 study of GVAX colon vaccine with cyclophosphamide and pembrolizumab in patients with mismatch repair proficient advanced colorectal cancer

Background

Mismatch repair proficient (MMRp) colorectal cancer (CRC) has been refractory to single‐agent programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) inhibitor therapy. Colon GVAX is an allogeneic, whole‐cell, granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor ‐secreting cellular immunotherapy that induces T‐cell immunity against tumor‐associated antigens and has previously been studied in combination with low‐dose cyclophosphamide (Cy) to inhibit regulatory T cells.

Methods

We conducted a single‐arm study of GVAX/Cy in combination with the PD1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with advanced MMRp CRC. Patients received pembrolizumab plus Cy on day 1, GVAX on day 2, of a 21‐day cycle. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Secondary objectives included safety, overall survival, progression‐free survival, changes in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, and immune‐related correlates.

Results

Seventeen patients were enrolled. There were no objective responses, and the disease control rate was 18% by RECIST 1.1. The median progression‐free survival was 82 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 48‐97 days) and the median overall survival was 213 days (95% CI 179‐441 days). Biochemical responses (≥30% decline in CEA) were observed in 7/17 (41%) of patients. Grade ≥ 3 treatment‐related adverse events were observed in two patients (hemolytic anemia and corneal transplant rejection). Paired pre‐ and on‐treatment biopsy specimens showed increases in programmed death‐ligand 1 expression and tumor necrosis in a subset of patients.

Conclusions

GVAX/Cy plus pembrolizumab failed to meet its primary objective in MMRp CRC. Biochemical responses were observed in a subset of patients and have not previously been observed with pembrolizumab monotherapy in MMRp CRC, indicating that GVAX may modulate the antitumor immune response.

Piloting workshops to enhance hope among patients with advanced breast cancer and oncologists

137

Background: Hope is a modifiable entity that can be separated from cancer outcome. Increasing hopefulness in patients with advanced breast cancer and oncologists may be of intrinsic value. The feasibility and efficacy of a short intervention to increase hopefulness in these groups are unknown. Methods: We enrolled eligible participants at 2 medical centers into 2 cohorts- 1 for patients with advanced breast cancer and 1 for oncologists. The intervention, a half-day hope enhancement workshop (HEW), was conducted in groups of 10-15 participants within each cohort. Participants completed evaluations including the Adult Hope Scale (AHS) and Herth Hope Index (HHI) pre-workshop, post-workshop, and at 3 months. Mean scores were compared across time points within each cohort using paired t-tests. Results: Ten out of 13 consented patients (76.9%) and all 26 consented physicians (100%) participated in the HEW, meeting our feasibility threshold. In patients, the mean AHS score increased significantly from 50.60 (SD 4.88) pre-workshop to 56.50 (SD 4.74) post-workshop (t = 3.99, p = 0.003); the mean HHI score also increased but this trend was not significant. In oncologists, the increases in mean AHS and HHI scores post-workshop were smaller and not significant. A summary is shown in the table. Post-workshop, patients and physicians were inclined to apply what they learned. However, at 3 months, less than half of participants responded to the evaluation. Mean AHS and HHI scores in patients fell back to baseline values. Conclusions: A short intervention to enhance hope was feasible and associated with increased hopefulness in patients, which was not maintained. Next steps for patients include “maintenance hope therapy” with earlier follow-up and more sustained contact post-workshop. Among oncologists, we hypothesize that for those not grappling with poor prognoses, reframing hope may be less effective, and they may feel less urgency to augment their hopefulness. [Table: see text]

A phase II study of GVAX colon vaccine with cyclophosphamide and pembrolizumab in patients with mismatch repair–proficient (MMR-p) advanced colorectal cancer

563

Background: Mismatch repair proficient (MMRp) colorectal cancer (CRC) is refractory to single-agent programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) inhibitors. Cancer vaccines may prime the tumor microenvironment for anti-PD1 therapy. Colon GVAX is an allogeneic, whole-cell, GM-CSF-secreting vaccine that induces T-cell immunity against tumor-associated antigens. GVAX has previously been studied in combination with low-dose cyclophosphamide (Cy) to inhibit regulatory T cells. Methods: We conducted an open label, single-arm, phase 2 study of GVAX/Cy in combination with the PD1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with MMRp CRC who had received at least two prior lines of therapy in the metastatic setting. Patients received pembrolizumab plus Cy on day 1, GVAX on day 2, of a 21 day cycle through 4 cycles, and were then continued on a maintenance regimen of pembolizumab every 3 weeks with cy/GVAX given every 12 weeks. Results: Seventeen patients were enrolled. There were no objective responses, and the disease control rate was 18% by RECIST and 29% by irRC. The median progression free survival was 2.7 months and the median overall survival was 7.0 months. Biochemical responses (≥30% decline in CEA) were observed in 7/17 (41%) of patients. Two patients (12%) had grade 3/4 adverse events that were attributed to study therapy. To test the hypothesis that the induction of a humoral response against CEA protein had resulted in the observed biochemical responses, we measured patient titers of anti-CEA antibodies. Anti-CEA antibody titers increased 13 of 13 patients (100%) with available paired pre- and on-treatment research blood samples, but the change in anti-CEA antibody titers were similar among CEA responders and non-responders. Multiplex immunohistochemistry performed on pre- and post- biopsy specimens will be reported at the conference. Conclusions: GVAX/Cy plus pembrolizumab is well tolerated in advanced MMRp CRC and resulted in CEA responses but not radiographic responses. PFS and OS compare favorably to historical controls in this small cohort. CEA responses were not observed with PD1 monotherapy in MMRp CRC, suggesting GVAX can modulate the antitumor immune response. Clinical trial information: NCT02981524.

A phase I trial of ipilimumab (ipi) in patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) after hypomethylating agent (HMAs) failure

7010

Background: Pts with HR-MDS after HMA failure have a poor overall survival (OS) of < 6 months. Immune escape is associated with resistance to HMAs in MDS. We hypothesized that CTLA-4 blockade in these pts would be tolerable and lead to clinical responses. Methods: This investigator-initiated, CTEP-sponsored, multi-center phase 1b study enrolled pts after failure of HMAs. In dose-escalation, ipi monotherapy was given at 2 dose levels (DL): 3 and 10mg/kg. Four doses (every 3 weeks) were administered followed by a maintenance phase (4 doses every 3 months) for non-porgressors. Toxicities and responses were evaluated with CTCAE4 and IWG2006 criteria, respectively. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The impact on T-cells were studied by flow cytometry and TCR sequencing. Results: 29 pts from 7 centers were enrolled. Mean age (SD) was 67 (8) years. Most had IPSS high/int-2 (55%), 45% had int-1. Three of 6 pts in DL1 and 4 of 5 pts in DL2 experienced grade [G]2-4 immune-related adverse events [IRAEs] that were reversible with drug discontinuation or systemic steroids. The DL1 (3mg/kg) was expanded with no G2-4 IRAEs reported in the 18 additional pts. A total of 15 deaths occurred due to disease progression or other complications but none attributed to ipilimumab. In total, 52% received all 4 induction doses, and 24% received ≥1 maintenance dose. Best objective responses were 2 marrow complete responses (mCR, 7%). Prolonged stable disease (PSD) for ≥46 weeks occurred in 6 pts (21%) and for ≥54 weeks in 3 pts (10%). Five pts (17%) subsequently underwent allogeneic transplantation (alloSCT) without evidence of excessive toxicity. Median OS (censoring at alloSCT) was 294 days (95%CI, 240-671+) and 400 days (95%CI, 240-671+) for those who received maintenance (n = 7). Pts who achieved PSD and mCR had significantly increased expression of ICOS, a marker of T-cell activation. Conclusions: Immune checkpoint blockade with ipi is tolerable and can lead to PSD/mCR in a proportion of pts. However, ipi monotherapy efficacy is limited after HMA failure and combination-based approaches should be considered. Increased frequencies of ICOS expression might predict clinical benefit. Clinical trial information: NCT01757639.

Sequencing the genome of hope

234

Background: Hope is widely regarded as essential to the emotional health of cancer pts, yet remains under-studied. We sought to explore the concept of hope and develop a teaching module to educate providers about the importance of hope in optimizing oncology care. Methods: We audio recorded interviews with oncology patients. Questions focused on what hope means, the role it plays in their ability to manage their illness, and ways in which they felt oncology providers could engender hope and positively impact their experience. We also interviewed oncology providers, including physicians, nurses, and social workers. Questions focused on the role they feel hope plays for their pts, whether or not they have received training in how to discuss hope, and tools they use to discuss hope with their pts. Common themes were extracted to form the backbone of a webcast-style teaching module. Results: A total of 24 volunteers were enrolled in an IRB approved protocol. One half of the subjects were pts and the other half were oncology providers (n = 6 physicians, 3 nurses, 3 social workers). Hope emerged as an important element to good quality of life in 12/12 (100%) pts.. The overwhelming majority (11/12, 92%) further expressed that feeling “well cared for” as well as receiving clear, honest information about their disease greatly increased their hopefulness. Hope also was recognized as essential to pts’ wellness and ability to manage their illness by all 12 (100%) of the providers. Although all providers recognized hope as essential to their pts, only the social workers reported that they had received some level of training in how to discuss hope, while the physicians and nurses felt that they had received little to no training. All providers expressed desire to contribute positively to their pts’ sense of hope. Conclusions: Both pts and providers view hope as a vital element in how oncology pts manage their illness. This point of connection between providers and their pts offers a mechanism to enhance the care of patients and impact their overall experience with cancer, yet most providers have little to no training in how to discuss hope. Development of an education module is underway to help increase awareness of the importance of hope and teach providers strategies to better engage with their pts on the subject of hope.