Defining infertility: a qualitative interview study of patients and physicians

PURPOSE

To investigate if infertility patients and physicians apply a traditional biomedical model of disease in their conceptualisation of infertility, examine any contradictions and conflicts in conceptualisations, and examine areas of concordance and discordance between physicians and patients.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 infertility patients and 18 infertility physicians between September 2010 and April 2012. Interviews were analysed qualitatively to determine physician and patient conceptualisations of infertility, reactions to the definition of infertility as a disease, and potential benefits and concerns related to application of a disease label to the condition.

RESULTS

Most physicians (n = 14/18) and a minority of patients (n = 6/20) were supportive of defining infertility as a disease. Many of the patients who agreed with classifying infertility as a disease expressed that they had not personally defined it as such previously. Physicians (n = 14) and patients (n = 13) described potential benefits of a disease label, including increases in research funding, insurance coverage, and social acceptability. Some patients (n = 10) described potential stigma as a negative consequence. When describing appraisals of infertility, both physicians (n = 7) and patients (n = 8) invoked religious/spiritual concepts. The potential for religious/spiritual appraisal to contribute to stigmatising or de-stigmatising infertility was discussed.

CONCLUSION

Our findings contradict the assumption that infertility physicians and patients are fully supportive of defining infertility as a disease. While potential benefits of the disease label were recognised by both groups, caution against potential for stigmatisation and unsolicited invocation of religion/spirituality suggest a more holistic model may be appropriate.

OP0175 TYPE OF mRNA COVID-19 VACCINE AND TREATMENT INFLUENCE ANTIBODY KINETICS IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Background

Patients on immunomodulatory treatments mount an attenuated immune response following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, yet long-term studies of vaccine-induced anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody (Ab) kinetics are missing.

Objectives

In this prospective observational study, we mapped the humoral antibody response to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines up to 24 weeks post full vaccination in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). We aimed to assess differences due to treatment, age, past SARS-CoV-2 infection, and vaccine (BNT162b2 vs. mRNA-1273).

Methods

Adult patients from the SCQM cohort who assented to an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine were recruited between 3/21 – 9/21. Participants answered questionnaires via an app and received kits for the self-collection of capillary blood samples at baseline, 4, 12, and 24 weeks post full vaccination. Samples were tested for IgG Ab against the S1 domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (anti-S1-IgG) using the EUROIMMUN ELISA. To examine differences in Ab titres arising from the defined parameters, while accounting for inter-assay variability, mixed effects continuous outcome logistic regression models were applied at each timepoint.

Results

Samples were obtained from 570 patients: 67% female, mean age 53 y (SD 12 y) with 37% RA, 36% axSpA, 21% PsA, and 6% UA (undifferentiated arthritis), on no medication (no DMARDs & no glucocorticoids; 15%), csDMARDs (10%), TNFi (48%), IL-1/6/17/23i (14%), JAKi (6%), rituximab (RTX; 4%), or abatacept (ABA; 2%) in mono/combination therapy at the first vaccination. 10% of patients had a past SARS-CoV-2 infection, 54% received BNT162b2, 46% mRNA-1273.

For any Ab threshold, the odds of having a higher Ab titre at 4, 12, and 24 weeks post full vaccination were 3.3 – 4 times higher with mRNA-1273 compared to BNT162b2 (Table 1, Figure 1). TNFi, JAKi, RTX, and ABA as monotherapy resulted in significantly lower Ab levels compared to no medication at almost all timepoints. In combination therapy, TNFi, IL-1/6/17/23i, RTX, and csDMARDs led to consistently lower Ab titres at all timepoints compared to respective monotherapy.

Table 1.

The OR of being above a given Ab threshold, regardless of the threshold. Ref. levels: mean age, no medication, no past SARS-CoV-2 inf., BNT162b2. Included in model but not shown: diagnosis, infrequently used medication (all non-signif.)

Weeks post full vacc.41224OR (95% CI); pAge0.96 (0.94 – 0.97)****0.98 (0.96 – 0.996)*0.98 (0.97 – 1.00)mRNA-1273 (vs BNT162b2)3.28 (2.34 – 4.61)****3.96 (2.83 – 5.54)****3.94 (2.93 – 5.50)****Past COVID inf. (vs none)7.56 (4.32 – 13.2)****8.14 (4.78 – 13.86)****11.65 (6.62 – 20.50)****csDMARD†1.27 (0.67 – 2.41)1.78 (0.94 – 3.35)1.70 (0.86 – 3.36)TNFi†0.46 (0.28 – 0.71)****0.30 (0.19 – 0.48)****0.13 (0.081 – 0.22)****IL-1/6/17/23i†0.97 (0.54 – 1.75)1.04 (0.57 – 1.89)0.89 (0.49 – 1.64)JAKi†0.38 (0.16 – 0.91)*0.38 (0.16 – 0.91)*0.53 (0.22 – 1.28)RTX†0.078 (0.013 – 0.46)**0.078 (0.015 – 0.42)**0.16 (0.037 – 0.71)*ABA†0.14 (0.039 – 0.51)**0.087 (0.022 – 0.35)***0.068 (0.017 – 0.27)***Interactions§Age:vaccine‡1.04 (1.02 – 1.07)**1.02 (0.99 – 1.05)1.03 (1.0008 – 1.058)*csDMARD:combi0.12 (0.02 – 0.70)*0.17 (0.029 – 0.95)*0.11 (0.023 – 0.56)**TNFi:combi0.34 (0.20 – 0.59)***0.37 (0.22 – 0.61)***0.36 (0.21 – 0.62)***IL-1/6/17/23i:combi0.26 (0.09 – 0.78)*0.25 (0.085 – 0.70)**0.20 (0.071 – 0.58)**JAKi:combi1.76 (0.33 – 9.44)1.23 (0.32 – 4.70)0.95 (0.25 – 3.65)RTX:combi0.11 (0.01 – 0.87)*0.095 (0.012 – 0.73)*0.085 (0.0091 – 0.79)*ABA:combi1.75 (0.25 – 12.2)0.74 (0.096 – 5.75)0.51 (0.073 – 3.62)

* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001;

†Medication as monoth. vs no medication

‡Interaction terms showing how OR of mRNA-1273 (vs BNT162b2) increases with age

§Interaction terms with medications: medication in combination th. vs medication as monoth.

Conclusion

Compared to no medication, some immunomodulatory therapies resulted in markedly lower Ab levels at all timepoints. In IRD patients, a past SARS-CoV-2 infection resulted in strikingly increased immunogenicity, as did mRNA-1273 compared to BNT162b2.

Acknowledgements

This study is investigator-initiated and received independent financial support from Moderna Switzerland GmbH. The SCQM thanks the patients for their participation in this study. A list of rheumatology offices and hospitals that contribute to the SCQM registries can be found on www.scqm.ch/institutions. The SCQM is financially supported by pharmaceutical industries and donors. A list of financial supporters can be found on www.scqm.ch/sponsors.

Disclosure of Interests

Catherine Elizabeth Raptis Grant/research support from: The study presented in the abstract is investigator-initiated and received independent financial support from Moderna Switzerland GmbH. The SCQM is financially supported by pharmaceutical industries and donors. A list of financial supporters can be found on www.scqm.ch/sponsors, Diego Olivier Andrey: None declared, Christos Polysopoulos Grant/research support from: The study presented in the abstract is investigator-initiated and received independent financial support from Moderna Switzerland GmbH. The SCQM is financially supported by pharmaceutical industries and donors. A list of financial supporters can be found on www.scqm.ch/sponsors, Christoph Berger: None declared, Adrian Ciurea: None declared, Pierre Lescuyer: None declared, Tanja Maletic Grant/research support from: The study presented in the abstract is investigator-initiated and received independent financial support from Moderna Switzerland GmbH. The SCQM is financially supported by pharmaceutical industries and donors. A list of financial supporters can be found on www.scqm.ch/sponsors, Myriam Riek Grant/research support from: The study presented in the abstract is investigator-initiated and received independent financial support from Moderna Switzerland GmbH. The SCQM is financially supported by pharmaceutical industries and donors. A list of financial supporters can be found on www.scqm.ch/sponsors, Almut Scherer Grant/research support from: The study presented in the abstract is investigator-initiated and received independent financial support from Moderna Switzerland GmbH. The SCQM is financially supported by pharmaceutical industries and donors. A list of financial supporters can be found on www.scqm.ch/sponsors, Isabell von Loga Grant/research support from: The study presented in the abstract is investigator-initiated and received independent financial support from Moderna Switzerland GmbH. The SCQM is financially supported by pharmaceutical industries and donors. A list of financial supporters can be found on www.scqm.ch/sponsors, Judith Safford: None declared, Kim Lauper Speakers bureau: Kim Lauper reports consulting fees for Pfizer and speakers fees for Pfizer, Viatris and Celltrion outside of the submitted work., Consultant of: Kim Lauper reports consulting fees for Pfizer and speakers fees for Pfizer, Viatris and Celltrion outside of the submitted work., Burkhard Moeller: None declared, Nicolas Vuilleumier: None declared, Axel Finckh Speakers bureau: Axel Finckh has received consultancies or speaker honoraria for AbbVie, BMS, Eli-Lilly, Gilead, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB outside of the submitted work, Consultant of: Axel Finckh has received consultancies or speaker honoraria for AbbVie, BMS, Eli-Lilly, Gilead, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB outside of the submitted work, Grant/research support from: Axel Finckh has received research support from AbbVie, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, and Pfizer outside of the submitted work, Andrea Rubbert-Roth: None declared

POS1020 BIOLOGICAL DMARD TREATMENT IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS IS LIKEWISE EFFECTIVE IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH AND WITH LOW JOINT COUNTS – RESULTS FROM THE SWISS CLINICAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT (SCQM) FOR RHEUMATIC DISEASES COHORT STUDY

Background

Biological and targeted synthetic (b/tsDMARDs) may be used in absent remission in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) independent of a defined number of affected joints. However, minimum three swollen and three tender joints are a common inclusion criterion in trials of b/tsDMARDs, and less is currently known about their effectiveness in PsA patients with low joint counts.

Objectives

To characterize PsA patients with low or high joint counts (LJC/HJC), analyze their drug treatment in routine care, and estimate the effectiveness of a first bDMARD in LJC and HJC patients.

Methods

We defined patients with less than three tender or swollen joints as LJC, and those with at least three tender and swollen joints as HJC patients. Patients were twice categorized according to their joint counts at registration in the registry, and at start of a first bDMARD (Table 1). We compared HJC and LJC at registration for current and future DMARD therapies, and at start of a first bDMARD for treatment effectiveness, using drug retention in univariate and in multivariable Cox regression models.

Table 1.

Selected characteristics of bDMARD naïve PsA patients with a low and with a high number of affected joints at start of their first bDMARD.

VariableLevelsHJC% highLJC% lowN allpbDMARD typeTNFi17692.617588.8351=0.22OMA147.42211.236csDMARD cotherapyyes11761.69045.7207<0.01csDMARD historynaive2312.15527.978<0.01tsDMARD_historynaive17592.117789.8352=0.47Dactylitis historyyes11560.56030.5175<0.01HLA B27yes1211.52823.340=0.02MDAYes00.0178.617<0.01DAPSA remission00.0126.112<0.01DactylitisYes9349.03316.8126<0.01EnthesitisYes6361.85547.0118=0.03BMImean (SD)27.65(5.05)26.58(4.72)333=0.046MASESmean (SD)2.86(3.93)1.61(2.47)219=0.005HAQ-DImean (SD)0.77(0.58)0.60(0.50)292=0.010EQ-5dmean (SD)62.22(20.63)67.22(16.27)294=0.022Patient globalmean (SD)5.93(2.41)4.83(2.58)288<0.001Tender joint countmean (SD)10.15(8.93)4.92(8.17)387<0.001Swollen joint countmean (SD)7.16(4.91)1.37(2.15)387<0.001Patient painmean (SD)5.96(2.47)4.85(2.51)290<0.001

Abbreviations: DAPSA: Disease activity of PsA. BMI: Body mass index, EQ-5d: European Quality of Life Measurement in five dimensions. HAQ-DI. Health assessment questionnaire disability index. HJC: High joint count, LJC: Low joint count, MASES: Maastricht ankylosing spondylitis enthesitis score, MDA: minimal disease activity, OMA: other mode of action than TNFi.

Results

We followed DMARD therapies for median (IQR) 3.2 (1.6, 5.0) in 675 LJC patients and for 3.4 (1.8, 5.2) years in 334 HJC patients. LJC patients at registration as well as at start of a first bDMARD were less often female, with less severe skin, enthesitis, dactylitis and nail involvement. Furthermore, LJC patients had lower disability indices and a more favorable health related quality of life. When defined at registration, LJC were as frequent as HJC patients on csDMARDs, but less often on bDMARDs. During their follow-up, a csDMARD, a first and a second bDMARD were less often and on average later commenced in LJC than in HJC patients. However, when defined at start of a first bDMARD, drug retention did not significantly differ between LJC and HJC patients (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Multivariable adjusted Cox regression model for discontinuation of a first bDMARD. Abbreviation: JC_group_base: Low and high joint count groups at baseline.

Conclusion

The majority of Swiss PsA patients is in LJC status, which also means a better status in most PsA domains than in HJC patients. LJC status was associated with established bDMARD therapy and with slower treatment escalation. However, bDMARDs were likewise effective in bDMARD-naïve LJC and HJC patients, and should not withhold only for reasons of a low joint count.

References

[1]Gossec et al. 2020, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 79 (6): S700–712.

[2]Gladman et al. 2021, The Journal of Rheumatology 48 (12): 1824–29.

Acknowledgements

I acknowledge all patients, physicians and researchers of the Swiss Clinical Quality Management (SCQM) for rheumatic diseases Program, and Celgene for funding of this research.

Disclosure of Interests

Burkhard Moeller Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Synergy, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie and Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Celgene, Amgen, Vifor, Adrian Ciurea Speakers bureau: Abbvie and Novartis, Raphael Micheroli: None declared, Michael J. Nissen Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer, Eleftherios Papagiannoulis: None declared, Almut Scherer: None declared, Godehard Scholz: None declared, Nikhil Yawalkar Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer

POS0001 CAN SINGLE IMPUTATION TECHNIQUES FOR BASDAI COMPONENTS RELIABLY CALCULATE THE COMPOSITE SCORE IN AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS PATIENTS?

Background

In axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) is a key patient-reported outcome. However, one or more of its components may be missing when recorded in clinical practice.

Objectives

To determine whether an individual patient’s BASDAI at a given timepoint can be reliably calculated with different single imputation techniques and to explore the impact of the number of missing components and/or differences between missingness of individual components.

Methods

Real-life data from axSpA patients receiving tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) from 13 countries in the European Spondyloarthritis (EuroSpA) Research Collaboration Network were utilized [1]. We studied missingness in BASDAI components based on simulations in a complete dataset, where we applied and expanded the approach of Ramiro et al. [2]. After introducing one or more missing components completely at random, BASDAI was calculated from the available components and with three different single imputation techniques: possible middle value (i.e. 50) of the component and mean and median of the available components. Differences between the observed (original) and calculated scores were assessed and correct classification of patients as having BASDAI<40 mm was additionally evaluated. For the setting with one missing component, differences arising between missing one of components 1-4 versus 5-6 were explored. Finally, the performance of imputations in relation to the values of the original score was investigated.

Results

A total of 19,894 axSpA patients with at least one complete BASDAI registration at any timepoint were included. 59,126 complete BASDAI registrations were utilized for the analyses with a mean BASDAI of 38.5 (standard deviation 25.9). Calculating BASDAI from the available components and imputing with mean or median showed similar levels of agreement (Table 1). When allowing one missing component, >90% had a difference of ≤6.9 mm between the original and calculated scores and >95% were correctly classified as BASDAI<40 (Table 1). However, separate analyses of components 1-4 and 5-6 as a function of the BASDAI score suggested that imputing any one of the first four BASDAI components resulted in a level of agreement <90% for specific BASDAI values while imputing one of the stiffness components 5-6 always reached a level of agreement >90% (Figure 1, upper panels). As expected, it was observed that regardless of the BASDAI component set to missing and the imputation technique used, correct classification of patients as BASDAI<40 was less than 95% for values around the cutoff (Figure 1, lower panels).

Table 1.

Level of agreement between the original and calculated BASDAI and correct classification for BASDAI<40 mm

Level of agreement with Dif≤6.9 mm* (%)Correct classification for BASDAI<40 mm** (%)1 missing componentAvailable93.996.9Value 5073.996.3Mean94.296.8Median93.196.82 missing componentsAvailable83.794.8Value 5040.792.8Mean83.594.8Median82.894.73 missing componentsAvailable71.992.6Value 5028.187.3Mean72.292.6Median69.792.2

* The levels of agreement with a difference (Dif) of ≤6.9 mm between the original and calculated scores were based on the half of the smallest detectable change. Agreement of >90% was considered as acceptable. ** Correct classification of >95% was considered as acceptable.

Figure 1.

Level of agreement between the original and calculated BASDAI and correct classification for BASDAI<40 mm as a function of the original score

Conclusion

BASDAI calculation with available components gave similar results to single imputation of missing components with mean or median. Only when missing one of BASDAI components 5 or 6, single imputation techniques can reliably calculate individual BASDAI scores. However, missing any single component value results in misclassification of patients with original BASDAI scores close to 40.

References

[1]Ørnbjerg et al. (2019). Ann Rheum Dis, 78(11), 1536-1544.

[2]Ramiro et al. (2014). Rheumatology, 53(2), 374-376.

Acknowledgements

Novartis Pharma AG and IQVIA for supporting the EuroSpA collaboration.

Disclosure of Interests

Stylianos Georgiadis Grant/research support from: Novartis, Myriam Riek Grant/research support from: Novartis, Christos Polysopoulos Grant/research support from: Novartis, Almut Scherer Grant/research support from: Novartis, Daniela Di Giuseppe: None declared, Gareth T. Jones Speakers bureau: Janssen, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, UCB, Amgen, GSK, Merete Lund Hetland Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Janssen Biologics B.V, Lundbeck Fonden, MSD, Medac, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Biopies, Sandoz, Novartis, Mikkel Østergaard Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, BMS, Merck, Celgene, Novartis, Simon Horskjær Rasmussen Grant/research support from: Novartis, Johan K Wallman Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Bente Glintborg Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, BMS, Anne Gitte Loft Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Karel Pavelka Speakers bureau: Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Amgen, Egis, Roche, AbbVie, Consultant of: Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Amgen, Egis, Roche, AbbVie, Jakub Zavada Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Elli-Lilly, Sandoz, Novartis, Egis, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Elli-Lilly, Sandoz, Novartis, Egis, UCB, Merih Birlik: None declared, Ayten Yazici Grant/research support from: Roche, Brigitte Michelsen Grant/research support from: Novartis, Eirik kristianslund: None declared, Adrian Ciurea Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Michael J. Nissen Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssens, Novartis, Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssens, Novartis, Pfizer, Ana Maria Rodrigues Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Maria Jose Santos Speakers bureau: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Gary Macfarlane Grant/research support from: GSK, Anna-Mari Hokkanen Grant/research support from: MSD, Heikki Relas Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Pfizer, UCB, Viatris, Consultant of: Abbvie, Celgene, Pfizer, UCB, Viatris, Catalin Codreanu Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ewopharma, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ewopharma, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Corina Mogosan: None declared, Ziga Rotar Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Novartis, MSD, Medis, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, Lek, Janssen, Consultant of: Abbvie, Novartis, MSD, Medis, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, Lek, Janssen, Matija Tomsic Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Medis, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sandoz-Lek, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Medis, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sandoz-Lek, Björn Gudbjornsson Speakers bureau: Amgen, Novartis, Consultant of: Amgen, Novartis, Arni Jon Geirsson: None declared, Pasoon Hellamand Grant/research support from: Novartis, Marleen G.H. van de Sande Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Novartis, UCB, Janssen, Abbvie, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Novartis, UCB, Janssen, Abbvie, Grant/research support from: Eli Lilly, Novartis, UCB, Janssen, Abbvie, Isabel Castrejon: None declared, Manuel Pombo-Suarez Consultant of: Abbvie, MSD, Roche, Bruno Frediani: None declared, Florenzo Iannone Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg Grant/research support from: Novartis

POS0468 PREDICTION OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS DISEASE ACTIVITY BY AN ADAPTIVE DEEP NEURAL NETWORK: BETTER RESULTS IN SEROPOSITIVE PATIENTS WITH LONGER DISEASE DURATION

Background:

Deep neural networks learn from former experiences on a large scale and can be used to predict future disease activity as potential clinical decision support. AdaptiveNet is a novel adaptive recurrent neural network optimized to deal with missing clinical data. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) it is unknown how disease characteristics influence the predictability by deep learning in terms of classification (e.g. active disease yes/no) or regression (numeric values such as DAS28).

Objectives:

To investigate in which clinical RA subtypes AdaptiveNet achieves the best results for the prediction of individual disease activity

Methods:

Demographic and disease characteristics from over 9500 patients and 65.000 visits from the Swiss Quality Management (SCQM) database were used to train and evaluate the network. Patient characteristics, clinical and patient reported outcomes, laboratory values and medication were used as input features. DAS28-BSR served as a target to predict active RA and future numeric individual disease activity by classification and regression. Feature importance was determined by a Random Forest to define the relative importance of variables for disease prediction.

Results:

AdaptiveNet predicted active disease defined as DAS28-BSR >2.6 at the next visit with an overall accuracy of 75.6% (SD +- 0.7%) and a sensitivity and specificity of 84.2% (SD +- 1.6%) and 61.5% (SD +- 3.6%), respectively. The performance of the prediction for correct disease status was significantly higher in patients with a disease duration >3 years and positive rheumatoid factor. Regression allowed forecasting individual DAS28-BSR values with a Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.9 (SD +- 0.05). Compared to Linear Regression, Random Forests and Support Vector Machines, AdaptiveNet showed an increased performance of 7% in MSE. MSE was significantly lower in patients with disease duration > 3 years and with positive anti-CCP antibodies. Feature importance identified number of painful joints, longer disease duration and age as most relevant factors for prediction of remission, whereas medication played a smaller role.

Conclusion:

Predictability of disease activity in RA by this deep neural network was stronger in patients with a longer disease history and a positive auto-antibody status, potentially due to a more stable disease course. Generally, AdaptiveNet had a superior capacity to predict numeric RA disease activity compared to classical machine learning architectures, however all investigated models had limitations in low specificity.

References:

[1]Hügle M, Kalweit G, Hügle T, Boedecker J. Dynamic Deep Neural Network For Multimodal Clinical Data Analysis. Stud Comput Intell: Springer Verl. 2020.

Acknowledgements:

We thank all rheumatologists and their patients for participation to SCQM.The entire SCQM staff was instrumental for data management and support.

A list of rheumatology practices and hospitals that are contributing to the SCQM registries can be found on http://www.scqm.ch/institutions.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS1168 SELF-REPORTED SARS-CoV2 TESTING AND COVID-19 DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS, AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS AND PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS IN A SWISS OBSERVATIONAL COHORT

Background:

Since the beginning of the pandemic in Switzerland, immunosuppressed people were strongly advised to be tested for SARS-CoV2 when symptomatic as it was conjectured that they might be more at risk for infection and/or severe disease. While patients with autoimmune diseases might be indeed more at risk of death from COVID-191, it remains unknown, whether there are differences in infection or complication rates between patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), and whether this relates to their disease or their treatment. Additionally, the prevalence of SARS-CoV2 testing in this population is not known.

Objectives:

This study aimed to assess and compare the rate of COVID-19 and SARS-CoV2 testing in patients with RA, AxSpA and PsA, the potential association with their treatment and, for testing, the number of symptoms.

Methods:

We included patients with RA, AxSpA and PsA from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management register (SCQM) using a smartphone app (mySCQM) to record information between March and December 2020. The outcomes of interest were self-reported SARS-CoV2 testing, symptoms compatible with COVID-19 during the previous month and confirmed COVID-19 through PCR nasopharyngeal swab. Outcomes were evaluated over the complete length of the aforementioned period (i.e. the outcome has been reported at least once during the period). Outcomes were compared between diseases groups, using logistic regression. We also evaluated the association of baseline treatment (TNF-inhibitors, b/tsDMARDs with other modes of action (OMA), no b/tsDMARDs) on the odds of symptoms and testing and the association of the number of symptoms (0-9) on the odds of testing. The analyses of SARS-CoV2 testing and COVID-19 symptoms were additionally adjusted for age, gender, glucocorticoids and csDMARDs. Confirmed cases were not adjusted for treatment and other covariates considering the low number of events.

Results:

We included 927 patients with RA, 805 with AxSpa and 453 with PsA (Table 1). 1010 patients reported COVID-19-like symptoms (mostly fever, runny nose and cough), but only 455 of them (45%) reported being tested. 151 patients were tested without symptoms. In between March and December 2020, 7.6% of RA, 8.5% of AxSpA and 10.5% of PsA patients were tested positive for COVID-19 (p=0.678). The odds of testing, symptoms and confirmed COVID-19 were similar between diseases and not associated with treatment for testing and symptoms (Figure 1). The number of symptoms was associated with the odds of testing (OR 1.43, 95%CI 1.37-1.50 by symptom).

Table 1.RAaxSpAPsApn 927 805 453Age (mean, SD)56.4 (13)47.1 (12)52.7 (11)<0.001Genderfemale 705 (76) 403 (50) 230 (51)<0.001TreatmentTNFi 272 (29) 498 (62) 174 (38)<0.001OMA 355 (38) 71 (9) 137 (30)No b/tsDMARDs 300 (32) 236 (29) 142 (31)csDMARDs use 476 (51) 111 (14) 147 (33)<0.001Steroids use 93 (10) 11 (1) 19 (4)<0.001Disease duration14.2 (10)17.4 (11)14.8 (12)<0.001Testing for COVID-19All patients258 (28)231 (29)117 (26) 0.550Patients with symptoms189/427 (44)179/392 (46)87/191 (46) 0.911Presence of COVID-19 symptoms427 (46)392 (49)191 (42) 0.082Positive COVID-19 test* 18/237 (8) 19/223 (9) 11/105 (11) 0.678

N, % when not specified otherwise. *Missing data on test results in 41 patients χ2 test for categorical and t-test for continuous variables.

Figure 1.

Conclusion:

Prevalence of COVID-19 symptoms and confirmed cases was similar between diseases, and for symptoms, was not associated with treatment. Despite strong advice from health authorities, less than 50% of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and COVID-19 symptoms were tested. This proportion was not significantly different between diseases and not influenced by type of treatment. Efforts should be made to improve rates of SARS-CoV2 testing in patients with rheumatic diseases.

References:

[1]Williamson, E. J. et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature 584, 430–436 (2020).

Acknowledgements:

This study was supported by Pfizer, Sanofi, Novartis, Gilead, Biogen and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

We thank all the patients and health professionals contributing to SCQM.

Disclosure of Interests:

Eleftherios Papagiannoulis: None declared, Adrian Ciurea Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Diana Dan: None declared, Axel Finckh: None declared, Benoit GILBERT: None declared, Isabell von Loga Consultant of: Deloitte Consulting AG., Cathy Melong Pianta Taleng: None declared, Almut Scherer Consultant of: Pfizer, Employee of: BMS (2007-2008), Kim Lauper Consultant of: Gilead Galapagos, Grant/research support from: AbbVie. The SCQM foundation is supported by different companies https://www.scqm.ch/en/sponsoren/.

Comparative effectiveness of antitumour necrosis factor agents, biologics with an alternative mode of action and tofacitinib in an observational cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Switzerland

Background

Multiple biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) are approved for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including TNF inhibitors (TNFi), bDMARDs with other modes of action (bDMARD-OMA) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Combination of b/tsDMARDs with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) is recommended, yet monotherapy is common in practice.

Objective

To compare drug maintenance and clinical effectiveness of three alternative treatment options for RA management.

Methods

This observational cohort study was nested within the Swiss RA Registry. TNFi, bDMARD-OMA (abatacept or anti-IL6 agents) or the JAKi tofacitinib (Tofa) initiated in adult RA patients were included. The primary outcome was overall drug retention. We further analysed secondary effectiveness outcomes and whether concomitant csDMARDs modified effectiveness, adjusting for potential confounding factors.

Results

4023 treatment courses of 2600 patients were included, 1862 on TNFi, 1355 on bDMARD-OMA and 806 on Tofa. TNFi was more frequently used as a first b/tsDMARDs, at a younger age and with shorter disease duration. Overall drug maintenance was significantly lower with TNFi compared with Tofa [HR 1.29 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.47)], but similar between bDMARD-OMA and Tofa [HR 1.09 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.24)]. TNFi maintenance was decreased when prescribed without concomitant csDMARDs [HR: 1.27 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.49)], while no difference was observed for bDMARD-OMA or Tofa maintenance with respect to concomitant csDMARDs.

Conclusion

Tofa drug maintenance was comparable with bDMARDs-OMA and somewhat higher than TNFi. Concomitant csDMARDs appear to be required for optimal effectiveness of TNFi, but not for bDMARD-OMA or Tofa.

Structural, Pro-Inflammatory and Calcium Handling Remodeling Underlies Spontaneous Onset of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in JDP2-Overexpressing Mice

BACKGROUND

Cardiac-specific JDP2 overexpression provokes ventricular dysfunction and atrial dilatation in mice. We performed in vivo studies on JDP2-overexpressing mice to investigate the impact of JDP2 on the predisposition to spontaneous atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

JDP2-overexpression was started by withdrawal of a doxycycline diet in 4-week-old mice. The spontaneous onset of AF was documented by ECG within 4 to 5 weeks of JDP2 overexpression. Gene expression was analyzed by real-time RT-PCR and Western blots.

RESULTS

In atrial tissue of JDP2 mice, besides the 3.6-fold increase of JDP2 mRNA, no changes could be detected within one week of JDP2 overexpression. Atrial dilatation and hypertrophy, combined with elongated cardiomyocytes and fibrosis, became evident after 5 weeks of JDP2 overexpression. Electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings revealed prolonged PQ-intervals and broadened P-waves and QRS-complexes, as well as AV-blocks and paroxysmal AF. Furthermore, reductions were found in the atrial mRNA and protein level of the calcium-handling proteins NCX, Cav1.2 and RyR2, as well as of connexin40 mRNA. mRNA of the hypertrophic marker gene ANP, pro-inflammatory MCP1, as well as markers of immune cell infiltration (CD68, CD20) were increased in JDP2 mice.

CONCLUSION

JDP2 is an important regulator of atrial calcium and immune homeostasis and is involved in the development of atrial conduction defects and arrhythmogenic substrates preceding paroxysmal AF.

SAT0039 ADAPTIVE DEEP LEARNING FOR THE PREDICTION OF INDIVIDUAL DISEASE ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) lacks reliable biomarkers that predict disease evolution on an individual basis, potentially leading to over- and undertreatment. Deep neural networks learn from former experiences on a large scale and can be used to predict future events as a potential tool for personalized clinical assistance.

Objectives:

To investigate deep learning for the prediction of individual disease activity in RA.

Methods:

Demographic and disease characteristics from over 9500 patients with 65.000 visits from the Swiss Quality Management (SCQM) database were used to train and evaluate an adaptive recurrent neural network (AdaptiveNet). Patient and disease characteristics along with clinical and patient reported outcomes, laboratory values and medication were used as input features. DAS28-BSR was used to predict active disease and future numeric individual disease activity by classification and regression, respectively.

Results:

AdaptiveNet predicted active disease defined as DAS28-BSR>2.6 at the next visit, with an overall accuracy of 75.6% and a sensitivity and specificity of 84.2% and 61.5%, respectively. Apart from DAS28-BSR, the most influential characteristics to predict disease activity were joint pain, disease duration, age and medication. Longer disease duration, age >50 or antibody positivity marginally improved prediction performance. Regression allowed forecasting individual DAS28-BSR values with a mean squared error of 0.9.

Conclusion:

Deep neural networks have the capacity to predict individual disease outcome in RA. Low specificity remains challenging and might benefit from alternative input data or outcome targets.

References:

[1] Hügle M, Kalweit G, Hügle T, Boedecker J. A Dynamic Deep Neural Network For Multimodal Clinical Data Analysis. Be Publ Stud Comput Intell Springer Verl. 2020.

Figure 1.

Examples of true disease activity and corresponding predictions of AdaptiveNet by regression analysis. Predictions are made step to step from the current to next visit.

Disclosure of Interests:

Maria Hügle Paid instructor for: Lilly, Gabriel Kalweit: None declared, Ulrich Walker Grant/research support from: Ulrich Walker has received an unrestricted research grant from Abbvie, Consultant of: Ulrich Walker has act as a consultant for Abbvie, Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Phadia, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and ThermoFisher, Paid instructor for: Abbvie, Novartis, and Roche, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Phadia, Roche, Sandoz, and ThermoFisher, Axel Finckh Grant/research support from: Pfizer: Unrestricted research grant, Eli-Lilly: Unrestricted research grant, Consultant of: Sanofi, AB2BIO, Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, Speakers bureau: Sanofi, Pfizer, Roche, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rudiger Muller Consultant of: AbbVie, Nordic, Sandoz, Almut Scherer: None declared, Joschka Boedecker: None declared, Thomas Hügle Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Novartis, Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Lilly, BMS

OP0075 SPINAL RADIOGRAPHIC PROGRESSION IN AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS AND THE IMPACT OF CLASSIFICATION AS NONRADIOGRAPHIC VERSUS RADIOGRAPHIC DISEASE

Background:

Data on spinal radiographic progression is more limited in nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) than in the radiographic disease state (r-axSpA). It remains unclear, whether radiographic sacroiliitis is by itself associated with progression of spinal structural damage.

Objectives:

To investigate whether spinal radiographic progression relates to structural damage at the sacroiliac level in axSpA by means of statistical mediation analyses in a large prospective real-life cohort of patients with axSpA.

Methods:

Patients from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort were included if they fulfilled the ASAS classification criteria and could be classified as nr-axSpA or r-axSpA after central scoring of pelvis radiographs. Spinal radiographs performed every 2 years were scored according to the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). The relationship between classification status and spinal progression over 2 years was investigated using binomial generalized estimating equations models with adjustment for sex, ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor treatment. Baseline spinal damage was considered an intermediate variable and included in sensitivity analyses, as were additional variables potentially influencing radiographic progression.

Results:

In total, 88 nr-axSpA and 418 r-axSpA patients contributed to data for 725 radiographic intervals (Table 1). Mean (SD) mSASSS change over 2 years was 0.16 (0.62) units in nr-axSpA and 0.92 (2.78) units in r-axSpA, p=0.01. Nr-axSpA was associated with a significantly lower progression over 2 years (defined as an increase in ≥2 mSASSS units) in adjusted analyses (OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.13; 0.83), confirmed with progression defined as the formation of ≥1 syndesmophyte. Mediation analyses revealed that sacroiliitis exerted its effect on spinal progression indirectly by being associated with the appearance of a first syndesmophyte (OR 0.09, 95%CI 0.02; 0.36 for nr-axSpA vs r-axSpA) (Fig. 1 and 2). Baseline syndesmophytes were predictors of further progression.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics at first radiograph.

ParameterN506nr-axSpAN = 88r-axSpAN = 418PFemale sex, %50654.533.7<0.001Age, y50639.5±11.140.4±11.00.52Symptom duration, y49810.0±9.914.0±9.8<0.001HLA-B27 positive, %45271.680.70.09BASDAI4274.6±2.04.2±2.30.26ASDAS4082.8±0.92.8±1.10.74Elevated CRP, %42230.640.60.14BASFI4332.8±2.23.1±2.50.71BASMI4351.1±1.42.2±2.0<0.001mSASSS5060.9±1.56.8±12.7<0.001Syndesmophytes, %5069.135.2<0.001On TNFi, %50619.336.40.002Fig. 1.

Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) for individual patients plotted as a function of duration since symptom onset.

Fig. 2.

Two-year mSASSS progression depicted in a cumulative probability plot. Progression was defined as an increase in mSASSS of at least 2 units (dotted line) in 2 years.

Conclusion:

Spinal structural damage is mainly restricted to patients with r-axSpA, leading to relevant prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Disclosure of Interests:

Monika Hebeisen: None declared, Raphael Micheroli: None declared, Almut Scherer: None declared, Xenofon Baraliakos Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Werfen, Manouk de Hooge: None declared, Désirée van der Heijde Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB Pharma; Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV, Robert B.M. Landewé Consultant of: AbbVie; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly & Co.; Galapagos NV; Novartis; Pfizer; UCB Pharma, Kristina Buerki: None declared, Michael Nissen Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Consultant of: Novartis, Lilly, Abbvie, Celgene and Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Novartis, Lilly, Abbvie, Celgene and Pfizer, Burkhard Moeller: None declared, Pascal Zufferey: None declared, Pascale Exer: None declared, Adrian Ciurea Consultant of: Consulting and/or speaking fees from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Pfizer.

THU0383 GENDER DIFFERENCES IN NONRADIOGRAPHIC AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS: FROM CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS TO EFFECTIVENESS OF TNF INHIBITORS

Background:

While a male predominance is found in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA), an equal male to female distribution was repeatedly reported for the nonradiographic disease form (nr-axSpA). Some important differences in clinical manifestations and response to treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) between the sexes have been delineated for r-axSpA. It remains unclear, whether comparable sex differences can be assumed for nr-axSpA. Indeed, existing data on gender differences in nr-axSpA is limited to subgroups and is particularly scarce regarding effectiveness of treatment.

Objectives:

To investigate sex differences with regard to demographics, clinical manifestations and response to TNFi in nr-axSpA after exclusion of patients with co-morbid fibromyalgia (FM).

Methods:

Response to a first TNFi was assessed in 85 women and 78 men with nr-axSpA and without concomitant FM in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Cohort. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a 40% improvement in the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society criteria (ASAS40) at 1 year. Additional response outcomes were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Patients having discontinued TNFi were considered nonresponders. Logistic regression analyses were adjusted for baseline differences (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Maastricht ankylosing spondylitis enthesitis score (MASES), diagnostic delay, body mass index (BMI)).

Results:

Baseline characteristics of women and men are shown in Table 1. Significant differences were restricted to diagnostic delay, BASDAI, MASES and BMI. An ASAS40 response was achieved by 17% of women and 38% of men (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.12; 0.93, p=0.02). A lower response rate in women was confirmed in the adjusted analysis (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05; 0.62, p=0.009) as well as for the other outcomes assessed (Table 2).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of women and men with nr-axSpA starting a first TNFi (after exclusion of patients with co-morbid FM).

ParameterN163MenN = 78WomenN = 85pAge, years16335.6±10.839.1±11.40.10Age at onset, years16227.9±8.628.1±8.50.66Diagnostic delay, years1624.1±7.67.8±9.90.005HLA-B27 positive, %14975.768.00.36Prior MRI sacroiliitis, %15470.868.30.86BASDAI1485.3±2.06.3±1.60.003ASDAS1403.3±1.03.4±0.70.29Elevated CRP, %15442.538.30.62BASFI1483.6±2.43.8±2.50.54BASMI1411.2±1.11.4±1.20.42EQ-5D14154.8±22.855.8±18.30.79Peripheral arthritis,%15941.652.40.20Enthesitis, %15880.585.20.53MASES1572.3±2.53.9±3.30.002csDMARDs ever, %16334.642.40.34Taking NSAIDs, %15092.986.20.29Current smoking, %13928.322.80.55BMI16025.9±4.224.0±4.4<0.001Table 2.

Response rates of women versus men after 1 year of treatment with a first TNFi.

Unadjusted analysesAdjusted analysesOutcomeWomen%Men%OR95% CIPOR95% CIPASAS4017380.340.12; 0.930.020.190.05; 0.620.009BASDAI5023500.300.11; 0.770.0070.190.05; 0.580.005ASDAS improv. ≥1.128580.290.10; 0.780.0080.260.08; 0.750.02ASDAS <2.127490.390.15; 1.000.030.180.04; 0.650.01ASDAS improv. ≥24260.130.01; 0.680.0050.040.00; 0.270.003ASDAS <1.38290.230.05; 0.820.010.070.01; 0.390.005

Conclusion:

Despite only few sex differences in patient characteristics in nr-axSpA, response rates to TNFi are significantly lower in women than in men.

Disclosure of Interests:

Regula Neuenschwander: None declared, Monika Hebeisen: None declared, Raphael Micheroli: None declared, Kristina Buerki: None declared, Pascale Exer: None declared, Karin Niedermann Schneider: None declared, Michael Nissen Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Consultant of: Novartis, Lilly, Abbvie, Celgene and Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Novartis, Lilly, Abbvie, Celgene and Pfizer, Almut Scherer: None declared, Adrian Ciurea Consultant of: Consulting and/or speaking fees from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Pfizer.

Pediatric cervical epidural abscess in a 4-year-old patient: a case-based update

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to review a case comprised of a cervical spinal epidural abscess, cervical and thoracic paraspinous edema, and widening of the right thoracic neural foramen secondary to a phlegmon.

METHODS

We reviewed the case of a spinal epidural abscess managed medically in a 4-year-old male and performed a review of the literature with 15 other cases that have previously been reported.

RESULTS

The current mainstay of treatment is largely variant but generally falls into a laminectomy-based surgical approach or longstanding antibiotics. Our review of the literature concluded that there are currently no clear guidelines established to recommend treatment, and current practice is largely based on the discretion of the pediatric neurosurgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the literature review, and our personal case illustration, we conclude that an antibiotic-based treatment is a valid approach for therapy if initiated promptly in a pediatric patient with no neurological deficit.

The occurrence of overload at work and musculoskeletal pain in young physiotherapists

BACKGROUND

A job requiring stooping, lifting, carrying loads and multiple repetitions of the same movement patterns leads to overloading the musculoskeletal system.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the work-related load experienced by physiotherapists and the occurrence of the musculoskeletal system overload.

METHODS

The study included 108 young physiotherapists, 69 women and 39 men, aged from 25 to 35 years (mean 27.12 ± 3.72 years). The study used an anonymous questionnaire and Quick Exposure Check.

RESULTS

The most common musculoskeletal complaints were as follows: 70 physiotherapists (64.8%) reported low back pain, 60 (55.6%) cervical pain, and 34 (31.5%) pain in the wrists and fingers. Statistically significant positive correlations were revealed between the number of years worked in the profession and shoulder pain. The number of hours of work per week was positively correlated with the occurrence of pain in all analyzed body areas. Professional experience was negatively correlated with the level of stress felt. Physiotherapists dealing with manual therapy and exercise physiotherapy were particularly vulnerable to musculoskeletal overload.

CONCLUSIONS

Popularization of knowledge regarding ergonomics among physiotherapists could reduce the occurrence of musculoskeletal overload.

The Human Proteome Organization Chromosome 6 Consortium: integrating chromosome-centric and biology/disease driven strategies

The Human Proteome Project (HPP) is designed to generate a comprehensive map of the protein-based molecular architecture of the human body, to provide a resource to help elucidate biological and molecular function, and to advance diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Within this framework, the chromosome-based HPP (C-HPP) has allocated responsibility for mapping individual chromosomes by country or region, while the biology/disease HPP (B/D-HPP) coordinates these teams in cross-functional disease-based groups. Chromosome 6 (Ch6) provides an excellent model for integration of these two tasks. This metacentric chromosome has a complement of 1002-1034 genes that code for known, novel or putative proteins. Ch6 is functionally associated with more than 120 major human diseases, many with high population prevalence, devastating clinical impact and profound societal consequences. The unique combination of genomic, proteomic, metabolomic, phenomic and health services data being drawn together within the Ch6 program has enormous potential to advance personalized medicine by promoting robust biomarkers, subunit vaccines and new drug targets. The strong liaison between the clinical and laboratory teams, and the structured framework for technology transfer and health policy decisions within Canada will increase the speed and efficacy of this transition, and the value of this translational research.

BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Canada has been selected to play a leading role in the international Human Proteome Project, the global counterpart of the Human Genome Project designed to understand the structure and function of the human proteome in health and disease. Canada will lead an international team focusing on chromosome 6, which is functionally associated with more than 120 major human diseases, including immune and inflammatory disorders affecting the brain, skeletal system, heart and blood vessels, lungs, kidney, liver, gastrointestinal tract and endocrine system. Many of these chronic and persistent diseases have a high population prevalence, devastating clinical impact and profound societal consequences. As a result, they impose a multi-billion dollar economic burden on Canada and on all advanced societies through direct costs of patient care, the loss of health and productivity, and extensive caregiver burden. There is no definitive treatment at the present time for any of these disorders. The manuscript outlines the research which will involve a systematic assessment of all chromosome 6 genes, development of a knowledge base, and development of assays and reagents for all chromosome 6 proteins. We feel that the informatic infrastructure and MRM assays developed will place the chromosome 6 consortium in an excellent position to be a leading player in this major international research initiative. This article is part of a Special Issue: Can Proteomics Fill the Gap Between Genomics and Phenotypes?

[Internet resources for radiologists : a positive selection]

In radiology the use of internet resources is part of the daily routine. The critical selection of but not the access to radiologically relevant information is the key topic in internet use. We offer a selection of reviewed internet sources for radiologists. We present sources that offer guidance in decision-making in daily routine as well as internet sources on technical topics in radiology. Case selection and radiological search engines are helpful sites to begin an internet research. Online anatomy sites can be of assistance for interpretation of findings in radiology. Writing and publishing scientific works in radiology requires access to numerous internet services, a positive selection of which are reviewed in the present article. A variety of freeware is available on the internet, some of which may be a substantial benefit to projects in radiology.

Combining crystallography and EPR: crystal and solution structures of the multidomain cochaperone DnaJ

Hsp70 chaperones assist in a large variety of protein-folding processes in the cell. Crucial for these activities is the regulation of Hsp70 by Hsp40 cochaperones. DnaJ, the bacterial homologue of Hsp40, stimulates ATP hydrolysis by DnaK (Hsp70) and thus mediates capture of substrate protein, but is also known to possess chaperone activity of its own. The first structure of a complete functional dimeric DnaJ was determined and the mobility of its individual domains in solution was investigated. Crystal structures of the complete molecular cochaperone DnaJ from Thermus thermophilus comprising the J, GF and C-terminal domains and of the J and GF domains alone showed an ordered GF domain interacting with the J domain. Structure-based EPR spin-labelling studies as well as cross-linking results showed the existence of multiple states of DnaJ in solution with different arrangements of the various domains, which has implications for the function of DnaJ.

[Case-based interactive PACS learning: introduction of a new concept for radiological education of students]

PURPOSE

Medical curricula are currently being reformed in order to establish superordinated learning objectives, including, e.g., diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive competences. This requires a shifting from traditional teaching methods towards interactive and case-based teaching concepts. Conceptions, initial experiences and student evaluations of a novel radiological course Co-operative Learning In Clinical Radiology (CLICR) are presented in this article.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A novel radiological teaching course (CLICR course), which combines different innovative teaching elements, was established and integrated into the medical curriculum. Radiological case vignettes were created for three clinical teaching modules. By using a PC with PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System) access, web-based databases and the CASUS platform, a problem-oriented, case-based and independent way of learning was supported as an adjunct to the well established radiological courses and lectures. Student evaluations of the novel CLICR course and the radiological block course were compared.

RESULTS

Student evaluations of the novel CLICR course were significantly better compared to the conventional radiological block course. Of the participating students 52% gave the highest rating for the novel CLICR course concerning the endpoint overall satisfaction as compared to 3% of students for the conventional block course. The innovative interactive concept of the course and the opportunity to use a web-based database were favorably accepted by the students. Of the students 95% rated the novel course concept as a substantial gain for the medical curriculum and 95% also commented that interactive working with the PACS and a web-based database (82%) promoted learning and understanding.

CONCLUSION

Interactive, case-based teaching concepts such as the presented CLICR course are considered by both students and teachers as useful extensions to the radiological course program. These concepts fit well into competence-oriented curricula.

Gene expression is differently affected by pimecrolimus and betamethasone in lesional skin of atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors are well-known treatments of atopic dermatitis (AD) but differ in their efficacy and side effects. We recently showed that betamethasone valerate (BM) although clinically more efficient impaired skin barrier repair in contrast to pimecrolimus in AD.

OBJECTIVE

This study elucidates the mode of action of topical BM and pimecrolimus cream in AD.

METHODS

Lesional AD skin samples after topical treatment with either BM or pimecrolimus were subjected to gene expression profile analysis.

RESULTS

Betamethasone valerate resulted in a significant reduction in mRNA levels of genes encoding markers of immune cells and inflammation, dendritic cells, T cells, cytokines, chemokines, and serine proteases, whereas pimecrolimus exerted minor effects only. This corroborates the clinical finding that BM reduces inflammation more effectively than pimecrolimus. Genes encoding molecules important for skin barrier function were differently affected. Both BM and pimecrolimus normalized the expression of filaggrin and loricrin. BM, but not pimecrolimus, significantly reduced the expression of rate-limiting enzymes for lipid synthesis and the expression of involucrin and small proline-rich proteins, which covalently bind ceramides. This may explain the lack of restoration of functional stratum corneum layers observed after BM treatment.

CONCLUSION

The gene expression profiles are consistent with our previous findings that corticosteroids may exert a more potent anti-inflammatory effect but may impair the restoration of the skin barrier. Corticosteroids are still the main treatment for severe and acutely exacerbated AD; pimecrolimus may be preferable for long-term treatment and stabilization.

Do insulin-like growth factor associated proteins qualify as a tumor marker? Results of a prospective study in 163 cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, -2 and Insulin like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBP) are involved in the proliferation and differentiation of cells. It has never been evaluated, if the IGF-system can serve as a tumor marker in neoplasms.

METHODS

In our prospective study 163 patients with colorectal cancer (22), prostate cancer (21), head and neck tumors (17), lymphomas (20), lung cancer (34) and other entities (49) were analysed for their IGF and IGFBP serum levels at the beginning and the end of radiotherapy and compared to 13 healthy people. Subgroups of patients with local tumor disease versus metastatic disease, primary and recurrent therapy and curative versus palliative therapy were compared.

RESULTS

The serum levels of IGF-2 were significantly elevated in patients with prostate and colorectal cancer. However, sensitivity and specificity were only 70%. IGFBP-2 serum levels were elevated in patients with head and neck tumors. Again sensitivity and specificity were only 73%. A difference between local disease and metastatic disease could not be found. A difference between IGF serum levels before and after radiotherapy could not be detected.

CONCLUSION

The IGF-system cannot serve as a new tumor marker. The detected differences are very small, sensitivity and specificity are too low. IGF measurement is not useful for the evaluation of the success of radiotherapy in malignancies.

Trimodal therapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Patients with ESCC (squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus) are most commonly diagnosed with locally advanced tumor stages. Early metastatic disease and late diagnosis are common reasons responsible for this tumor's poor clinical outcome. The prognosis of esophageal cancer is very poor because patients usually do not have symptoms in early disease stages. Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus frequently complicates patients with multiple co-morbidities and these patients often require interdisciplinary diagnosis and treatment procedures. At present time, neoadjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy followed by surgery are regarded as the international standard of care. Meta-analyses have confirmed that this approach provides the patient with better local tumor control and an increased overall survival rate. It is recommended that patients with positive tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy and who are poor surgical candidates should consider definitive radiochemotherapy without surgery as a treatment option. In future, EGFR antibodies may also be administered to patients during therapy to improve the current treatment effectiveness. Positron-emission tomography proves to be an early response-imaging tool used to evaluate the effect of the neoadjuvant therapy and could be used as a predictive factor for the survival rate in ESCC. The percentage proportions of residual tumor cells in the histopathological analyses represent a gold standard for evaluating the response rate to radiochemotherapy. In the future, early response evaluation and molecular biological tests could be important diagnostic tools in influencing the treatment decisions of ESCC patients.

[Multimodal therapy in locally advanced gastric cancer]

Locally advanced gastric cancers are characterized by poor prognosis. Clinical outcome can be improved if surgery becomes part of a multimodal treatment approach. The purpose of neoadjuvant treatment includes downsizing of the primary tumor, improvement of the T- and N- categories, and early therapy of micrometastasis. Several controlled clinical trials showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as neoadjuvant combined radio-chemotherapy, especially for tumors of the gastroesophageal junction, can improve the rate of primary R0 resections, relapse-free survival, and overall survival. While patients with locally advanced tumors clearly benefit from this strategy, the approach is still controversial in patients with early stage disease. Nonresponders do not benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. Therefore, response evaluation and response prediction are of great importance. After successful neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients should undergo gastrectomy with D(2)-lymphadenectomy because of a high probability of lymph node metastasis. This article summarizes current developments in this field.

[Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental cardiac findings in non-ECG-gated chest CT scans]

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of incidental cardiac findings in non-ECG-gated chest CT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Non-ECG-gated chest CT examinations of 300 patients were retrospectively analyzed for incidental cardiac findings. Subsequently, these findings were evaluated for their clinical relevance by a cardiologist.

RESULTS

A total of 107 out of 300 examined patients had 174 incidental cardiac findings including coronary calcification (90), aortic/mitral valve calcification (42), iatrogenic changes (23), pericardial effusion (6), dilatation of the heart (4), myocardial changes (3), thrombus in the left ventricle (2), constrictive pericarditis (2) and atrial myxoma (1). Of the cardiac findings 51% were described in the written report and in 53 out of the 107 patients the cardiac findings were unknown. Newly detected incidental findings from 8 patients were rated as clinically significant: pericardial effusion (4), constrictive pericarditis (1), thrombus in the left ventricle (1), atrial myxoma (1) and dilatation of the heart (1).

CONCLUSION

Incidental cardiac findings are frequent in non-ECG-gated chest CT and may have a high clinical relevance.