The Mandate of the Collective: Apology Representativeness Determines Perceived Sincerity and Forgiveness in Intergroup Contexts

The sincerity of an apology is often critical for it to be viewed positively by victims. For collective apologies, we argue that sincerity takes on a particular meaning: It is a function of the apology's perceived representativeness for the offender group's will or sentiment. Consistent with this notion, when an apologetic (vs. nonapologetic) message was democratically chosen (Study 1) or explicitly endorsed by the majority of the offending outgroup (Study 2), it was considered more sincere and, through this, led to more forgiveness. Furthermore, while disagreement about an apology within the offender group reduced its perceived representativeness and sincerity, this was less so when the dissenters could be subtyped: when disagreement was correlated with an existing subgroup within the offending outgroup (Study 3) and in line with expectations for that subgroup (Study 4). This research shows that victim group members consider intragroup processes within the offending outgroup for attributions of sincerity.

Changes in von Willebrand factor and fibrinolysis following a post-exercise cool-down

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a post-exercise active cool-down on von Willebrand factor and fibrinolysis. Ten subjects performed two maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) tests followed by a 10-min passive (PC) or an active (AC) cool-down. Blood samples were obtained pre-exercise, post-exercise, post-PC/AC, and 1 h post-exercise and analyzed for von Willebrand factor antigen (vWf:Ag), tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) antigen and activity and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance. No significant differences were found between VO2max tests for treadmill time, VO2max, respiratory exchange ratio, maximal heart rate, or maximal blood lactate concentration. vWf:Ag was significantly elevated (P <0.05)following PC [198.4 (18.3)% normal] versus AC [174.5 (15.6)% normal] and remained elevated 1-h post-exercise [179.4 (16.4)% normal for PC vs 158.6 (13.8)% normal for AC]. There were no differences between tests for tPA or PAI-1 activity, although tPA antigen was significantly elevated following PC versus AC (P <0.05). Following the cool-down, hematocrit was higher (P <0.05) for the PC test [48.90 (0.36)] compared with AC [47.43 (0.51)]. An AC reduces post-exercise vWf:Ag and tPA antigen without affecting tPA or PAI-1 activity.

Multidisciplinary treatment of chronic pain patients: its efficacy in changing patient locus of control

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of multidisciplinary treatment in altering chronic pain patient locus of control beliefs.

DESIGN

A before-and-after treatment design including demographics.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-three chronic nonmalignant pain patients who completed study questionnaires both before and after treatment.

SETTING

Comprehensive, outpatient, multidisciplinary pain management program at a large Midwestern university medical center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain Locus of Control Scale and Survey of Pain Attitudes Control subscale.

RESULTS

Patients' perceptions of personal control over pain increased from pretreatment to posttreatment, and patients' perceptions of external control over pain, such as fate or powerful others. decreased from pretreatment to posttreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the efficacy of chronic pain management centers in altering patient beliefs about pain. The ability to increase patients' self-efficacy in their control over pain and to decrease external attributions are essential to successful pain management.