Randomised clinical trial of early specialist palliative care plus standard care versus standard care alone in patients with advanced cancer: The Danish Palliative Care Trial

BACKGROUND

Beneficial effects of early palliative care have been found in advanced cancer, but the evidence is not unequivocal.

AIM

To investigate the effect of early specialist palliative care among advanced cancer patients identified in oncology departments.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

The Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT) (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01348048) is a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing early referral to a specialist palliative care team plus standard care versus standard care alone. The planned sample size was 300. At five oncology departments, consecutive patients with advanced cancer were screened for palliative needs. Patients with scores exceeding a predefined threshold for problems with physical, emotional or role function, or nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnoea or lack of appetite according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) were eligible. The primary outcome was the change in each patient's primary need (the most severe of the seven QLQ-C30 scales) at 3- and 8-week follow-up (0-100 scale). Five sensitivity analyses were conducted. Secondary outcomes were change in the seven QLQ-C30 scales and survival.

RESULTS

Totally 145 patients were randomised to early specialist palliative care versus 152 to standard care. Early specialist palliative care showed no effect on the primary outcome of change in primary need (-4.9 points (95% confidence interval -11.3 to +1.5 points); p = 0.14). The sensitivity analyses showed similar results. Analyses of the secondary outcomes, including survival, also showed no differences, maybe with the exception of nausea/vomiting where early specialist palliative care might have had a beneficial effect.

CONCLUSION

We did not observe beneficial or harmful effects of early specialist palliative care, but important beneficial effects cannot be excluded.

Quality of life and symptoms in patients with malignant diseases admitted to a comprehensive cancer centre

PURPOSE

Quality of life and symptomatology in patients with malignancies admitted to comprehensive cancer centres are rarely investigated. Thus, this study aimed to investigate symptomatology and health-related quality of life of inpatients with cancer.

METHODS

A prospective, cross-sectional study was carried out on two occasions 5 weeks apart in haematology and oncology departments at a comprehensive cancer centre. Assessment included demographic data, WHO performance status (PS), EORTC QLQ-C30 and pain scales of brief pain inventory. Comparisons were analysed using Wilcoxon two-sample test, rank tests and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four patients were analysed, mean age=59 years (SD=13.7), 42% admitted to haematological department; lung cancer was the most frequent diagnosis (15%). Low health-related quality of life and severe symptom burden, especially fatigue and appetite loss, were observed among the inpatients. In addition, role and social functions appeared to be more impaired in haematology patients than in those admitted to oncology (P=0.0372 and 0.0167, respectively). On the other hand, pain and constipation were more severely affected in oncology patients (P=0.0194 and 0.0064, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the wards of haematology and oncology had pronounced symptomatology and low quality of life. A more systematic focus on the amelioration of problems with functioning and symptoms among inpatients with malignant diseases is warranted.

Symptomatology of cancer patients in palliative care: content validation of self-assessment questionnaires against medical records

To elucidate which symptoms or problems to measure when evaluating palliative care, we assessed the content validity of selected patient self-assessment questionnaires used to evaluate palliative care: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), the Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS), the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL) and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). The content of the questionnaires was compared against the symptoms and problems noted in the medical records of 171 consecutive cancer patients on their first admission to a department of palliative medicine. From the records, 63 different symptoms were listed. Two questionnaires covered almost all of the prevalent symptoms/problems: the EORTC QLQ-C30 covered 10 and the MSAS 11 of the 12 most frequent problems. Researchers selecting instruments for evaluating palliative care may use the present study and other reviews to examine to what degree a given selection of instruments cover the symptoms/problems targeted by palliative care physicians.

Symptom recognition in advanced cancer. A comparison of nursing records against patient self-rating

The aim of the study was to investigate the extent to which the symptoms experienced by advanced cancer patients were covered by the nursing records. On the day of the first contact with our palliative care department, a nursing record was taken, and on this or the following day, 56 patients filled in the questionnaires EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). In each patient, the symptomatology reported in the patient-completed questionnaires was compared with the symptomatology mentioned by the nurse in the nursing record. The analysis revealed good concordance concerning pain and poor physical functioning, but patients reported other symptoms or problems much more often than their nurses. Reasons for these discrepancies are discussed. It is suggested that the nurse's knowledge of the patient's symptomatology might gain from more systematic screening or from transfer of information from patient self-assessment questionnaires to the nursing records.

Does the medical record cover the symptoms experienced by cancer patients receiving palliative care? A comparison of the record and patient self-rating

The aim of this study was to investigate the extent to which the symptoms experienced by advanced cancer patients were covered by the medical records. Fifty-eight patients participated in the study. On the day of first encounter with our palliative care department, a medical history was taken, and on this or the following day, the patients completed the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The symptomatology reported in the patient-completed questionnaires was compared with the symptomatology mentioned by the physician in the medical record. The analysis revealed good concordance concerning pain, but most other symptoms or problems were reported much more often by patients than by their doctors. Reasons for these discrepancies are discussed. It is suggested that the doctor's knowledge of the patient's symptomatology might gain from more systematic screening and transfer of information from patient self-assessment questionnaires to the medical records.

A limited sampling method for estimation of the etoposide area under the curve

A limited sampling method for estimation of the etoposide area under the curve (AUC) is presented. The method was developed and validated in 23 patients (42 pharmacokinetic studies) with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), limited disease. The patients received 100 mg/m2 etoposide as a 90-min intravenous infusion in combination with carboplatin, allowing for etoposide dose modification at a following course (25% increase or decrease) due to high or low nadir values for leukocytes or thrombocytes. Of the 42 pharmacokinetic studies, 27 were used in the model development and 15 were used in the model validation. Single regression analyses of the AUC versus the fitted concentrations for the model data set were performed at several time points. The analyses demonstrated high and essentially identical correlation coefficients in the interval between 2 and 21 h, with a maximal value of 0.96 being recorded at 4 h. Multiple regression analysis was then performed using fitted concentrations corresponding to 0.08-21 h. The best model for one sample was AUC = 1.01 x (dose level divided by 100 mg/m2) + 799 x C4 h, that for two samples was AUC = 1.43 x (dose level divided by 100 mg/m2) + 544 x C4 h + 1756 x C21 h, and that for three samples was AUC = 0.07 x (dose level divided by 100 mg/m2) + 110 x C5 min + 474 x C4 h + 1759 x C21 h. Not unexpectedly, the model validation revealed that the one-sample model was less precise than the two- or three-sample model [percentage of root mean squared error (RMSE%) = 11.6%, 7.1%, and 5.4%, respectively]. All models proved to be unbiased in the validation [percentage of mean predictive error (MPE%) +/- SE = 4.2% +/- 11.0%, 7.9% +/- 6.1%, and 6.3% +/- 5.3%, respectively]. The models were subsequently validated in 14 pharmacokinetic studies of patients with metastatic germ-cell tumours who were receiving combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and bleomycin plus 100 mg/m2 etoposide as a 90-min infusion. The RMSE% was 13.4%, 10.8%, and 9.0% and the MPE% +/- SE was -1.0% +/- 11.9%, 1.7% +/- 10.5%, and 2.7% +/- 7.9% for the one-, two-, and three-sample models, respectively. The limited sampling methods presented herein may prove to be a most valuable tool for therapeutic drug monitoring in regimens in which etoposide is given in combination with carboplatin or with cisplatin and bleomycin.

[Dry bed--but how? A follow-up study of children with enuresis treated with a bed alarm]

At follow-up, 29 young adults treated previously (ages 7-14 years) for nocturnal enuresis by means of conditioning, mostly with a bed alarm, showed no excess of mental abnormalities, including psychosomatic symptoms. Most of the probands recollected the treatment as positive and effective. It is concluded that conditioning is effective in the treatment of nocturnal enuresis and that it does not seem to leave any undesirable after-effects. Nothing seems to indicate that omission of more intensive, conflict-solving psychotherapy has implied any disadvantage for the patient. Thus, the bed alarm method can still be recommended as the treatment of first choice.