[External assessment of the GEMA2009 recommendations by a multidisciplinary expert panel on asthma].
Arch Bronconeumol 2010;
46:411-9. [PMID:
20576341 DOI:
10.1016/j.arbres.2010.05.004]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2010] [Revised: 04/19/2010] [Accepted: 05/03/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To assess the level of agreement on the GEMA 2009 clinical recommendations by a Spanish expert panel on asthma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was divided into four stages: 1) establishment of a 9 member scientific committee (GEMA authors) for selection of GEMA recommendations to use in the survey; 2) formation of a panel of 74 professionals with expertise in this field (pulmonologists, allergists, family doctors, ear, nose and throat and paediatric specialists); 3) Delphi survey in two rounds, sent by mail, with intermediate processing of opinions and a report to the panel members; and 4) analysis and discussion of results for the Scientific Committee.
RESULTS
Seventy four participants completed the two rounds of survey. During the first round, a consensus was reached in 49 out of 56 questions analysed. Following discussion by the panel, the consensus was increased to a total of 53 items in the survey. With respect to the remaining questions, Insufficient consensus was obtained on the rest of the questions, due to differing views between sub-specialists, or lack of criteria by most of the experts.
CONCLUSIONS
The external analysis by asthma experts from different specialities showed a high level of professional agreement with the GEMA 2009 recommendations in Spain (96.5%). The disagreement shown in three recommendations reflect the lack of a high level evidence. These issues represent areas of interest for future research.
Collapse