A rare variant of mullerian agenesis: a case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Menstruation is a developmental milestone and usually marks healthy and normal pubertal changes in females. Menarche refers to the onset of first menstruation in a female. The causes of primary amenorrhea include outflow tract abnormalities, resistant endometrium, primary ovarian insufficiency, and disorders of the hypothalamus, pituitary, or other endocrine glands. A rare variant of mullerian agenesis, which warrants an individualized approach to management, is presented here.

CASE REPORT

We present here the case of a 25-year-old Indian female with pain in the lower abdomen and primary amenorrhea. After a thorough history, clinical examination, imaging, and diagnostic laparoscopy, two small uteri, a blind upper half vagina, bilateral polycystic ovaries, and a blind transverse connection between the two uteri-a horseshoe band cervix-were detected, which confirmed the diagnosis of mullerian agenesis. There was evidence of adenomyosis in the mullerian duct element. This is a rare form of Müllerian abnormality with an unusual presentation.

CONCLUSION

Mullerian agenesis is the most common cause of primary amenorrhea with well-developed secondary sexual characteristics. There are various forms of mullerian agenesis. Most of the cases are managed by a multidisciplinary team. Rare variants warrant an individualized approach to management.

The importance of rotation to teach secure half-hitch sequences in surgery

Background

Knot security of half-knot (H) sequences varies with rotation, but half-knots risk destabilisation.

Objectives

To investigate the rotation of half-hitch (S) sequences on knot security.

Materials and Methods

The loop and knot security of symmetrical and asymmetrical sliding and blocking half-hitch sequences was measured using a tensiometer.

Results

Loop security of symmetrical sliding half-hitch sequences is much higher than asymmetrical sequences, increasing from 6+2 to 21+2 and from 27+6 to 48+5 Newton (N) for 2 and 4 half-hitches respectively (both P<0.0001). Symmetrical sliding sequences are more compact and remain in the same plane, squeezing the passive thread, while asymmetrical sequences rotate loosely around the passive end. Blocking sequences are superior when asymmetrical since changing the passive end acts like changing rotation, transforming the asymmetrical sliding into a symmetrical blocking half-hitch on the new passive thread. The knot security of 2 sliding and 1 blocking half-hitch doubles from 52+3 to 98+2 N for the worst (asymmetric sliding and symmetric blocking, SSaSsb) or best rotation sequences (SSsSab). Adding a second asymmetric blocking half-hitch (Sab) increases security further to 105+3 N. The overall knot security of four-throw, correctly rotated, half-hitch (SSsSabSab) or half-knot (H2H1sH1s, H2H2a and H2H2s) sequences is similar for four suture diameters.

Conclusion

Rotation affects the security of half-hitch sequences, which should be symmetrical when sliding, and asymmetrical when blocking.

What is new?

Half-hitch sequences are clinically superior to half-knot sequences. They do not risk destabilisation, and loop security improves approximation of tissues under traction, permitting tight knots.

Effect of Diameter and Type of Suture on Knot and Loop Security

The loop and knot securities of two polyfilament and two monofilament sutures of four diameters (3.0, 2.0, 0, 1) were evaluated with a tensiometer for four four-throw knots, known to be secure with a 2.0 polyfilament suture. Loop security of Monocryl 1 is low, being 14.7 ± 3.0 Newton (N) for a three-throw half-knot (H3) and 15.4 ± 2.4 N and 28.3 ± 10 N for two (SSs) and four (SSsSsSs) symmetrical sliding half-hitches. This is lower than 18, 24, and 46 N for similar knots with Vicryl. Polyfilament sutures have excellent knot security for all four diameters. Occasionally, some slide open with slightly lower knot security, especially for larger diameters, although this is not clinically problematic. Knot security of monofilament sutures was unpredictable for all four knots, especially for larger diameters, resulting in many clinically insecure knots. A secure monofilament knot requires a six-throw knot with two symmetrical sliding half-hitches or two symmetrical half-knots secured with four asymmetric blocking half-hitches. In conclusion, with polyfilament sutures, four- or five-throw half-knot or half-hitch sequences result in secure knots. For monofilament sutures, loop and knot security is much less, half-knot combinations should be avoided, and secure knots require six-throw knots with four asymmetric blocking half-hitches.

Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Loop and Knot Security, Varying with the Suture and Sequences, Throws, Rotation and Destabilization of Half-Knots or Half-Hitches

Surgical knots are sequences of half-knots (H) or half-hitches (S), defined by their number of throws, by an opposite or similar rotation compared with the previous one, and for half-hitches whether they are sliding (s) or blocking (b). Opposite rotation results in (more secure) symmetric (s) knots, similar rotation in asymmetric (a) knots, and changing the active and passive ends has the same effect as changing the rotation. Loop security is the force to keep tissue together after a first half-knot or sliding half-hitches. With polyfilament sutures, H2, H3, SSs, and SSsSsSs have a loop security of 10, 18, 28, and 48 Newton (N), respectively. With monofilament sutures, they are only 7, 16, 18, and 25 N. Since many knots can reorganize, the definition of knot security as the force at which the knot opens or the suture breaks should be replaced by the clinically more relevant percentage of clinically dangerous and insecure knots. Secure knots with polyfilament sutures require a minimum of four or five throws, but the risk of destabilization is high. With monofilament sutures, only two symmetric+4 asymmetric blocking half-hitches are secure. In conclusion, in gynecology and in open and laparoscopic surgery, half-hitch sequences are recommended because they are mandatory for monofilament sutures, adding flexibility for loop security with less risk of destabilization.

A proof of concept that experience-based management of endometriosis can complement evidence-based guidelines

Background

Management of endometriosis should be based on the best available evidence. The pyramid of evidence reflects unbiased observations analysed with traditional statistics. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the clinical interpretation of these data by experts. Unfortunately, traditional statistical inference can refute but cannot confirm a hypothesis and clinical experience is considered a personal opinion.

Objectives

A proof of concept to document clinical experience by considering each diagnosis and treatment as an experiment with an outcome, which is used to update subsequent management.

Materials and Methods

Experience and knowledge-based questions were answered on a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale (VAS) by surgery-oriented clinicians with experience of > 50 surgeries for endometriosis.

Results

The answers reflect the collective clinical experience of managing >10.000 women with endometriosis. Experience-based management was overall comparable as approved by >75% of answers rated ≥ 8/10 VAS. Knowledge-based management was more variable, reflecting debated issues and differences between experts and non-experts.

Conclusions

The collective experience-based management of those with endometriosis is similar for surgery-oriented clinicians. Results do not conflict with EBM and are a Bayesian prior, to be confirmed, refuted or updated by further observations.

What is new?

Collective experience-based management can be measured and is more than a personal opinion. This might extend EBM trial results to the entire population and add data difficult to obtain in RCTs, such as many aspects of surgery.

The 10 "Cardinal Sins" in the Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometriosis: A Bayesian Approach

Evidence-based data for endometriosis management are limited. Experiments are excluded without adequate animal models. Data are limited to symptomatic women and occasional observations. Hormonal medical therapy cannot be blinded if recognised by the patient. Randomised controlled trials are not realistic for surgery, since endometriosis is a variable disease with low numbers. Each diagnosis and treatment is an experiment with an outcome, and experience is the means by which Bayesian updating, according to the past, takes place. If the experiences of many are similar, this holds more value than an opinion. The combined experience of a group of endometriosis surgeons was used to discuss problems in managing endometriosis. Considering endometriosis as several genetically/epigenetically different diseases is important for medical therapy. Imaging cannot exclude endometriosis, and diagnostic accuracy is limited for superficial lesions, deep lesions, and cystic corpora lutea. Surgery should not be avoided for emotional reasons. Shifting infertility treatment to IVF without considering fertility surgery is questionable. The concept of complete excision should be reconsidered. Surgeons should introduce quality control, and teaching should move to explain why this occurs. The perception of information has a personal bias. These are the major problems involved in managing endometriosis, as identified by the combined experience of the authors, who are endometriosis surgeons.

Predictive value of ultrasound imaging for diagnosis and surgery of deep endometriosis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To calculate the predictive value, and thus the clinical usefulness of transvaginal ultrasound imaging (TV-US) for the management of deep endometriosis, knowing that the positive predictive value (PPV) value varies with the prevalence and probably with the volume and location of the disease.

DATA SOURCES

After registration on Prospero (CRD42022366323) Pubmed was searched for all reports describing the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound imaging for deep endometriosis published between 1/1/2000 and 20/10/2022.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

The 536 articles on 'endometriosis AND ultrasound And diagnosis' were hand searched and 30 reports describing sensitivity and specificity of deep endometriosis were found. Besides sensitivity and specificity, the prevalence, localisation and size of deep endometriosis lesions were collected.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Prevalences of deep endometriosis were reported only twice as 12% and 32% by ultrasonographers. In women undergoing surgery, prevalences vary between 40% and 100% because of the variable inclusion criteria. Specificity is higher than sensitivity for all locations: rectovaginal (97%,86-100 versus 74%,31-95; P=0.0002), rectosigmoid (97%, 63-100 versus 88%,37-97, P=0.0082), vesicouterine (100%,97-100 versus 63%,22-100, P=0.0021) and uterosacrals (91%77-99 versus 68%, 18-83, P=0.0005). Notwithstanding improved equipment, accuracy did not vary over the last 20 years. . Sensitivities or specificities have not been stratified by the size of the lesion and the lower detection limits are thus not known. In the absence of blinding the usefulness for surgery could not be established.

CONCLUSION

The reported sensitivities and specificities of TV-US are not only those of imaging but include symptoms and clinical exams. In referral centres, the reported PPVs are high (94% to 100%) since prevalences are higher than 10% and specificities are over 95%. However, the extrapolation of the clinical use before surgical interventions should be considered with care, since PPVs for smaller lesions and the lower detection limit are unknown, and since surgeons were not blinded to US results.

Reconsidering evidence-based management of endometriosis

Background: Without an adequate animal model permitting experiments the pathophysiology of endometriosis remains unclear and without a non-invasive diagnosis, information is limited to symptomatic women. Lesions are macroscopically and biochemically variable. Hormonal medical therapy cannot be blinded since recognised by the patient and the evidence of extensive surgery is limited because of the combination of low numbers of interventions of variable difficulty with variable surgical skills. Experience is spread among specialists in imaging, medical therapy, infertility, pain and surgery. In addition, the limitations of traditional statistics and p-values to interpret results and the complementarity of Bayesian inference should be realised. Objectives: To review and discuss evidence in endometriosis management Materials and Methods: A PubMed search for blinded randomised controlled trials in endometriosis. Results: Good-quality evidence is limited in endometriosis. Conclusions: Clinical experience remains undervalued especially for surgery. What is new? Evidence-based medicine should integrate traditional statistical analysis and the limitations of P-values, with the complementary Bayesian inference which is predictive and sequential and more like clinical medicine. Since clinical experience is important for grading evidence, specific experience in the different disciplines of endometriosis should be used to judge trial designs and results. Finally, clinical medicine can be considered as a series of experiments controlled by the outcome. Therefore, the clinical opinion of many has more value than an opinion.

New Understanding of Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Endometriosis

For 100 years, pelvic endometriosis has been considered to originate from the implantation of endometrial cells following retrograde menstruation or metaplasia. Since some observations, such as the clonal aspect, the biochemical variability of lesions and endometriosis in women without endometrium, the genetic-epigenetic (G-E) theory describes that endometriosis only begins after a series of cumulative G-E cellular changes. This explains that the endometriotic may originate from any pluripotent cell apart from the endometrium, that 'endometrium-like cells' can harbour important G-E differences, and that the risk is higher in predisposed women with more inherited incidents. A consequence is a high risk after puberty which decreases progressively thereafter. Considering a 10-year delay between initiation and performing a laparoscopy, this was observed in the United Arab Emirates, Belgium, France and USA. The subsequent growth varies with the G-E changes and the environment but is self-limiting probably because of the immunologic reaction and fibrosis. That each lesion has a different set of G-E incidents explains the variability of pain and the response to hormonal treatment. New lesions may develop, but recurrences after surgical excision are rare. The fibrosis around endometriosis belongs to the body and does not need to be removed. This suggests conservative excision or minimal bowel without safety margins and superficial treatment of ovarian endometriosis. This G-E concept also suggests prevention by decreasing oxidative stress from retrograde menstruation or the peritoneal microbiome. This suggests the prevention of vaginal infections and changes in the gastrointestinal microbiota through food intake and exercise. In conclusion, a higher risk of initiating endometriosis during adolescence was observed in UAE, France, Belgium and USA. This new understanding and the limited growth opens perspectives for earlier diagnosis and better treatment.

Laparoscopic management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a phase II prospective multicenter non-randomized trial (the CILOVE study)

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility and safety of the laparoscopic approach after neoadjuvant chemotherapy among selected chemosensitive patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The CILOVE study was a phase II prospective non-randomized multicenter study. It aimed to enroll 47 women with unresectable disease at the time of initial diagnosis (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV and/or diffuse extensive carcinomatosis for advanced FIGO stage IIIC or patients unfit to withstand radical primary surgery), in response to chemotherapy and fit to undergo laparoscopy.

RESULTS

Among the 48 patients enrolled in the trial, 44 (92%) patients underwent exploratory staging laparoscopy and, as a result, 41 patients were eligible for cytoreductive surgery. Among them, 32 were intended to be managed by laparoscopy and nine patients were managed by laparotomy. The conversion rate to laparotomy was 9.4% (3/32) and the reasons were multiple surgical adhesions (n=1), miliary carcinomatosis and adhesion to the intraperitoneal mesh (n=1), and poor laparoscopic evaluation of transverse colon involvement (n=1). All except one patient had optimal cytoreduction (97% complete cytoreduction, 3% incomplete cytoreduction (residual tumor <2.5 mm)). The median operative time was 267 min (range 146-415) and the median estimated blood loss was 150 mL (range 0-500). Two patients had intra-operative complications: one diaphragm rupture that was repaired during laparoscopy and one bradycardia. Six patients experienced early post-operative complications (<1 month), but there were no grade 3 and 4 complications (3 infections, 1 lymphoedema, 2 hemorrhage). After cytoreductive laparoscopy, the percentage of patients without progression at 12 months was 87.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Interval ovarian cytoreduction by a laparoscopic approach is safe and feasible for patients with a favorable response to chemotherapy. With the widespread use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of advanced ovarian cancer, a minimally invasive approach may be a potential option.

The severity and frequency distribution of endometriosis subtypes at different ages: a model to understand the natural history of endometriosis based on single centre/single surgeon data

Background and Objective

to study the natural history of endometriosis.

Materials and methods

the analysis of all women (n=2086) undergoing laparoscopy for pelvic pain and endometriosis between 1988 and 2011 at University Hospital Gasthuisberg.

Main outcome measures

the severity of subtle, typical, cystic and deep endometriosis in adult women, with or without a pregnancy, as estimated by their pelvic area and their volume.

Results

the number of women undergoing a laparoscopy increased up to 28 years of age and decreased thereafter. Between 24 and 44 years, the severity and relative frequencies of subtle, typical, cystic and deep lesions did not vary significantly. The number of women younger than 20 years was too small to ascertain the impression of less severe lesions. The severity of endometriosis lesions was not less in women with 1 or more previous pregnancies or with previous surgery. There was no bias over time since the type and severity of endometriosis lesions remained constant between 1988 and 2011.

Conclusions

severity of endometriosis does not increase between 24 and 44 years of age, suggesting that growth is limited by intrinsic or extrinsic factors. Severity was not lower in women with a previous pregnancy.

What is new

considering the time needed for lesions to become symptomatic together with the diagnostic delay, the decreasing number of laparoscopies after age 28 is compatible with a progressively declining risk of initiating endometriosis lesions after menarche, the remaining women being progessively less susceptible.

Surgical management of endometriosis-associated pain

Endometriosis and pelvic pain are associated. However, only half of the subtle and typical, and not all cystic and deep lesions are painful. The mechanism of the pain is explained by cyclical trauma and repair, an inflammatory reaction, activation of nociceptors up to 2.7 cm distance, painful adhesions and neural infiltration. The relationship between the severity of lesions and pain is variable. Diagnosis of the many causes requires laparoscopy and expertise. Imaging cannot exclude endometriosis. Surgical removal is the treatment of choice. Medical therapy without a diagnosis risks missing pathology and chronification of pain if not 100% effective. Indications and techniques of surgery are described as expert opinion since randomised controlled trials were not performed for ethical reasons, since not suited for multimorbidity while a control group is poorly accepted. Subtle endometriosis needs destruction since some cause pain or progress to more severe disease. Typical lesions need excision or vaporisation since depth can be misjudged by inspection. Painful cystic ovarian endometriosis needs adhesiolysis and either destruction of the lining or excision of the cyst wall, taking care to avoid ovarian damage. Cysts larger than 6cm need a 2 step technique or an ovariectomy. Excision of deep endometriosis is difficult and complication prone surgery involving bladder, ureter, and bowel surgery varying from excision and suturing, disc excision with a circular stapler and resection anastomosis. Completeness of excision, prevention of postoperative adhesions and recurrences of endometriosis, and the indication to explore large somatic nerves will be discussed.

Prevalence of Endometriosis and Peritoneal Pockets in Women with Infertility and/or Pelvic Pain

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of endometriosis and peritoneal pockets and to analyze whether these pockets are associated with pain.

METHODS

Analysis of prospectively registered data of all women undergoing laparoscopy for infertility or pelvic pain between 1988 and 2011 at KU Leuven University Hospital.

RESULTS

Of 4497 women, 191 had 238 pockets, with a prevalence of 4.7% in women with infertility only, 4.9% in women with infertility and pelvic pain, and 3.5% in women with pelvic pain only (P = 0.045 for all infertility vs. pelvic pain only). Prevalence did not vary by age. Pockets were associated with endometriosis (P < 0.0001), which was found in 77% of women with pockets. Among women with infertility only, the prevalence of endometriosis was higher in women with pockets (P = 0.0001) than in women without. The prevalence of endometriosis was similar in women with infertility and pelvic pain or pelvic pain only. Pelvic pain as an indication for surgery was associated simultaneously (through logistic regression) with endometriosis (P < 0.0001) and pockets (P = 0.040). Pelvic pain severity was associated simultaneously with pockets (P = 0.0026) and the severity of subtle (P = 0.001), typical (P = 0.030), cystic ovarian (P = 0.051), and deep endometriosis (P < 0.0001). Pelvic pain severity was not associated with endometriosis in the pockets or the diameter or location of pockets.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of pockets was low, at between 3.5% and 5%. Women with infertility only and pockets had more endometriosis than women without. Severe pelvic pain and pelvic pain as an indication for surgery were associated with the presence of pockets as well as the presence and severity of endometriosis.

Pathogenesis Based Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometriosis

Understanding the pathophysiology of endometriosis is changing our diagnosis and treatment. Endometriosis lesions are clones of specific cells, with variable characteristics as aromatase activity and progesterone resistance. Therefore the GE theory postulates GE incidents to start endometriosis, which thus is different from implanted endometrium. The subsequent growth in the specific environment of the peritoneal cavity is associated with angiogenesis, inflammation, immunologic changes and bleeding in the lesions causing fibrosis. Fibrosis will stop the growth and lesions look burnt out. The pain caused by endometriosis lesions is variable: some lesions are not painful while other lesions cause neuroinflammation at distance up to 28 mm. Diagnosis of endometriosis is made by laparoscopy, following an experience guided clinical decision, based on history, symptoms, clinical exam and imaging. Biochemical markers are not useful. For deep endometriosis, imaging is important before surgery, notwithstanding rather poor predictive values when confidence limits, the prevalence of the disease and the absence of stratification of lesions by size, localization and depth of infiltration, are considered. Surgery of endometriosis is based on recognition and excision. Since the surrounding fibrosis belongs to the body with limited infiltration by endometriosis, a rim of fibrosis can be left without safety margins. For deep endometriosis, this results in a conservative excision eventually with discoid excision or short bowel resections. For cystic ovarian endometriosis superficial destruction, if complete, should be sufficient. Understanding pathophysiology is important for the discussion of early intervention during adolescence. Considering neuroinflammation at distance, the indication to explore large somatic nerves should be reconsidered. Also, medical therapy of endometriosis has to be reconsidered since the variability of lesions results in a variable response, some lesions not requiring estrogens for growth and some being progesterone resistant. If the onset of endometriosis is driven by oxidative stress from retrograde menstruation and the peritoneal microbiome, medical therapy could prevent new lesions and becomes indicated after surgery.

Preoperative imaging of deep endometriosis: pitfalls of a diagnostic test before surgery

The usefulness of a test is determined by the clinical interpretation of its sensitivity and specificity. The pitfalls of a test with a surgical endpoint are described in this article, taking the diagnosis of deep endometriosis by imaging as an example, without discussing the management of deep endometriosis. Laparoscopy is not a 100% accurate "gold standard". Since it is not performed in women without symptoms, results are valid only for the group of women as specified in the indication for surgery. The confidence limits of accuracy estimations widen when accuracy is lower and when observations are less. Since positive and negative predictive values are inaccurate when prevalence of the disease is low, prevalence figures in the group of women investigated should be available. The accuracy of imaging should be stratified by clinically important aspects such as localisation and size of the lesion. The use of other variables as soft markers during ultrasonographic examination should be specified. It should be clear whether the accuracy of the test reflects symptoms and clinical examination and imaging combined, or whether the accuracy of the added value of imaging which requires Bayesian analysis. When imaging is used as an indication for surgery, circular reasoning should be avoided and the number of symptomatic women not undergoing surgery because of negative imaging should be reported. In conclusion, imaging reports should permit the clinician to judge the validity of the accuracy estimations of a diagnostic test, especially when used as an indication for surgery and when surgery is the gold standard to diagnose a disease.

1 vs 3 days laparoscopic suturing courses: is it feasible to design a valid training curriculum?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic skills are unlikely to be achieved exclusively in the operating theatre, so simulation training has become mandatory to acquire specific psychomotor skills to be merged in a more complex procedure.

OBJECTIVE

To compare 3-day vs. 1-day laparoscopic suturing courses and to better address participants' needs according to their level of experience.

METHODS

Observational cohort study conducted between January 2017 and December 2018 including 107 participants amongst which 61 attended a 3-day and 46 the 1-day suturing course.

RESULTS

Data analysis showed no significant difference in the pre-test suturing scores between the two groups. On each course, when comparing the pre- and post-tests results, the participants reached a statistically significant improvement in both precision and knotting score (p< 0.01). However, when comparing the two types of courses, the data showed a better performance in the post-session test for those attending the 3-day course (p<0.05), as well as a higher mean score improvement (4.7 vs. 2.8; p<0.05) and time needed to complete exercises (-270s vs. -150s; p<0.05). Furthermore, grouping the participants according to their experience, the experts achieved a significantly better improvement attending the 3-day course, when compared to the beginners.

CONCLUSIONS

Both 3 and 1-day course are successful in improving laparoscopic suturing skills regardless of the participant's experience. However experienced participants benefit more from a longer course while the 1-day one should be dedicated to pre-surgical competences acquisition.

The epidemiology of endometriosis is poorly known as the pathophysiology and diagnosis are unclear

As the diagnosis requires a laparoscopy, we only have data in women with pain and/or infertility. Endometriosis has been considered to be a single disease defined as 'endometrium like glands and stroma outside the uterus'. However, subtle, typical, cystic ovarian and deep endometriosis lesions should be considered to be different pathologies which occur in all combinations and with different severities. All large datasets, especially those based on hospital discharge records, consider endometriosis to be a single disease without taking into account severity. In particular, the variable prevalence and recognition of subtle lesions is problematic. Reliable surgical data are small series not permitting multivariate analysis. Endometriosis is a hereditary disease. The oxidative stress of heavy menstrual bleeding with retrograde menstruation and an altered pelvic microbiome are probably associated with increasingly severe endometriosis. Whether the prevalence is increasing, or whether endometriosis is associated with fat intake or an increased risk of cardiovascular disease is unclear.

Stepwise Laparoscopic Myomectomy and the Baseball Closure

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the importance of planning all the steps of laparoscopic myomectomy, including incision, techniques to reduce blood loss, and suturing.

DESIGN

Step-by-step video demonstration of the technique, with narration in the background. The video was approved by the local institutional review board.

SETTING

Live surgery at Hospital PIO XII, Institute for Research into Cancer of the Digestive System and American Institute of Telesurgery, Barretos.

INTERVENTIONS

We describe a case of a 33-year-old woman with no pregnancy and diagnosed with endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain associated with a 5-cm posterior transmural myoma. We performed a laparoscopic myomectomy, with temporary clipping of the uterine arteries associated with the treatment of endometriosis lesions. Specimen extraction was performed inside a bag [1]. The patient was discharged the next day with no complications. Ten months after the procedure, the patient reported that there was no pain, and that her menses were normal.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic approach remains the gold standard for myomectomy [2]. Planning the steps before execution is fundamentally important to ensure the security of the procedure. A seromuscularis baseball suture associated with figure-of-8 knotting with an H3H2 sequence at the internal layers seems to be an adequate technique for myometrium closure [3]. Choosing the correct angle for the incision, clipping the uterine artery, and developing the suture in 2 layers results in less bleeding, reduced operating time, decrease in hospital length of stay, and fewer complications.

From complication to litigation: The importance of non-technical skills in the management of complications

Complications do occur in daily clinical life and can sometimes lead to litigation, which adversely affect the entire health care system, leading to a loss of confidence in medical providers, an increase in defensive medical practice and high professional indemnity insurance costs. Some complications are inevitable but can be minimised by completing a structured training programme. The likelihood of litigation can be reduced when adequate and clear information is given to the patient preoperatively. Non-technical skills are essential in complication management and crucial if confronted with litigation. Checklists and documentation of medication and surgical steps should be routine in all surgeries. Awareness of the complexity of the planned operation, theatre set-up and equipment are important in preventing complications. Mental preparation of surgeons is of the utmost importance in order to be able to confront any problem. When complications occur, remaining calm, calling for assistance, effective team leadership and harmony in the team are important in managing the situation. Good and effective communication with the patient and relatives, offering explanations, apologies and timely intervention without delays reduce the risk of litigation and strengthen any defence in court.

Infection as a potential cofactor in the genetic-epigenetic pathophysiology of endometriosis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The genetic-epigenetic theory postulates that endometriosis is triggered by a cumulative set of genetic-epigenetic (GE) incidents. Pelvic and upper genital tract infection might induce GE incidents and thus play a role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Thus, this article aims to review the association of endometriosis with upper genital tract and pelvic infections.

METHODS

Pubmed, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched for 'endometriosis AND (infection OR PID OR bacteria OR viruses OR microbiome OR microbiota)', for 'reproductive microbiome' and for 'reproductive microbiome AND endometriosis', respectively. All 384 articles, the first 120 'best match' articles in PubMed for 'reproductive microbiome' and the first 160 hits in Google Scholar for 'reproductive microbiome AND endomytriosis' were hand searched for data describing an association between endometriosis and bacterial, viral or other infections. All 31 articles found were included in this manuscript.

RESULTS

Women with endometriosis have a significantly increased risk of lower genital tract infection, chronic endometritis, severe PID and surgical site infections after hysterectomy. They have more colony forming units of Gardnerella, Streptococcus, Enterococci and Escherichia coli in the endometrium. In the cervix Atopobium is absent, but Gardnerella, Streptococcus, Escherichia, Shigella, and Ureoplasma are increased. They have higher concentrations of Escherichia Coli and higher concentrations of bacterial endotoxins in menstrual blood. A Shigella/Escherichia dominant stool microbiome is more frequent. The peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis contains higher concentrations of bacterial endotoxins and an increased incidence of mollicutes and of HPV viruses. Endometriosis lesions have a specific bacterial colonisation with more frequently mollicutes (54%) and both high and medium-risk HPV infections (11%). They contain DNA with 96% homology with Shigella. In mice transplanted endometrium changes the gut microbiome while the gut microbiome influences the growth of these endometriosis lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Endometriosis is associated with more upper genital tract and peritoneal infections. These infections might be co-factors causing GE incidents and influencing endometriosis growth.

Correction: Heterogeneity of endometriosis lesions requires individualisation of diagnosis and treatment and a different approach to research and evidence based medicine

Statistical significance is used to analyse research findings and is together with biased free trials the cornerstone of evidence based medicine. However traditional statistics are based on the assumption that the population investigated is homogeneous without smaller hidden subgroups. The clinical, inflammatory, immunological, biochemical, histochemical and genetic-epigenetic heterogeneity of similar looking endometriosis lesions is a challenge for research and for diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. The conclusions obtained by statistical testing of the entire group are not necessarily valid for subgroups. The importance is illustrated by the fact that a treatment with a beneficial effect in 80% of women but with exactly the same but opposite effect, worsening the disease in 20%, remains statistically highly significant. Since traditional statistics are unable to detect hidden subgroups, new approaches are mandatory. For diagnosis and treatment it is suggested to visualise individual data and to pay specific attention to the extremes of an analysis. For research it is important to integrate clinical, biochemical and histochemical data with molecular biological pathways and genetic-epigenetic analysis of the lesions.

Application of Indocyanine Green in Gynecology: Review of the Literature

The present review aims to analyze the current data available on the different applications of indocyanine green (ICG) in gynecology. A semantic review of English-language publications was performed by searching for MeSH terms and keywords in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The studies were finally selected by one author according to the aim of this review. ICG is a highly water-soluble tricarbocyanine dye that fluoresces in the NIR spectrum. Approved by the FDA in 1959, it can be administered either IV (usual dose of 5 mg) or locally/submucosally (usual dose of 5-6.25 mg) according to the pathology or indication. It is used most often in the setting of oncology, endometriosis and other gynecological conditions. In oncological applications, ICG is used to identify sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) using near-infrared light in endometrial, cervical and vulvar cancers. The main advantages that it offers include a reduction of surgical time, improved SLN detection rates, and the ability to avoid radioactivity. In cases of endometrial (submucosal or hysteroscopic applications) or cervical (intracervical administration) cancer, ICG can detect SLN at an accuracy of 95% to 98%. For vulvar cancer, the SLN detection rate can reach 100%. In endometriosis, the lack of good evidence hinders the final evaluation of this method in both diagnostic and therapeutic scenarios. An analytical, well-designed, prospective study is currently underway.

Effect of Anterior Compartment Endometriosis Excision on Infertility

Background and Objectives:

Laparoscopic surgical excision of bladder nodules has been demonstrated to be effective in relieving associated painful symptoms; the data are lacking concerning the impact of anterior compartment endometriosis on infertility. We conducted this study to evaluate whether or not the surgical excision of deep endometriosis affecting the anterior compartment plays a role in restoring fertility.

Methods:

This multicentre, retrospective study included a group of 55 patients presenting with otherwise-unexplained infertility who had undergone laparoscopic excision of anterior compartment endometriosis with histological confirmation. Patient medical records and operative reports were reviewed. Telephone interviews were conducted for long-term followup of fertility outcomes.

Results:

The pregnancy rate following surgical excision of endometriotic lesions was 44% (n = 11) among those with anterior compartment involvement alone and 50% (n = 15) in case of posterior lesions association without any significant difference. The symptoms related to bladder endometriosis resolved in the 84.2% of the cases with a recurrence rate of 1.8% at the 2-year followup not requiring further surgery.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic excision of anterior compartment endometriosis is effective in restoring fertility in patients with otherwise-unexplained infertility and in treating endometriosis-related symptoms.

Heterogeneity of endometriosis lesions requires individualisation of diagnosis and treatment and a different approach to research and evidence based medicine

Statistical significance is used to analyse research findings and is together with biased free trials the cornerstone of evidence based medicine. However traditional statistics are based on the assumption that the population investigated is homogeneous without smaller hidden subgroups. The clinical, inflammatory, immunological, biochemical, histochemical and genetic-epigenetic heterogeneity of similar looking endometriosis lesions is a challenge for research and for diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. The conclusions obtained by statistical testing of the entire group are not necessarily valid for subgroups. The importance is illustrated by the fact that a treatment with a beneficial effect in 80% of women but with exactly the same but opposite effect, worsening the disease in 20%, remains statistically highly significant. Since traditional statistics are unable to detect hidden subgroups, new approaches are mandatory. For diagnosis and treatment it is suggested to visualise individual data and to pay specific attention to the extremes of an analysis. For research it is important to integrate clinical, biochemical and histochemical data with molecular biological pathways and genetic-epigenetic analysis of the lesions.

Pathogenesis of endometriosis: the genetic/epigenetic theory

OBJECTIVE

To study the pathophysiology of endometriosis.

DESIGN

Overview of observations on endometriosis.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

None.

INTERVENTIONS(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The hypothesis is compatible with all observations.

RESULT(S)

Endometriosis, endometrium-like tissue outside the uterus, has a variable macroscopic appearance and a poorly understood natural history. It is a hereditary and heterogeneous disease with many biochemical changes in the lesions, which are clonal in origin. It is associated with pain, infertility, adenomyosis, and changes in the junctional zone, placentation, immunology, plasma, peritoneal fluid, and chronic inflammation of the peritoneal cavity. The Sampson hypothesis of implanted endometrial cells following retrograde menstruation, angiogenic spread, lymphogenic spread, or the metaplasia theory cannot explain all observations if metaplasia is defined as cells with reversible changes and an abnormal behavior/morphology due to the abnormal environment. We propose a polygenetic/polyepigenetic mechanism. The set of genetic and epigenetic incidents transmitted at birth could explain the hereditary aspects, the predisposition, and the endometriosis-associated changes in the endometrium, immunology, and placentation. To develop typical, cystic ovarian or deep endometriosis lesions, a variable series of additional transmissible genetic and epigenetic incidents are required to occur in a cell which may vary from endometrial to stem cells. Subtle lesions are viewed as endometrium in a different environment until additional incidents occur. Typical cystic ovarian or deep endometriosis lesions are heterogeneous and represent three different diseases.

CONCLUSION(S)

The genetic epigenetic theory is compatible with all observations on endometriosis. Implications for treatment and prevention are discussed.

Preserving Fertility by Treating the 3 Compartments: Laparoscopic Approach to Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To describe a laparoscopic technique for the resection of deep endometriosis, treating the 3 compartments.

DESIGN

Educational video.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center in Strasbourg, France PATIENT: A 37-year-old primiparous woman.

INTERVENTION

Adenomyomectomy, partial cystectomy, and bowel resection. Fertility preservation was mandatory because of the patient's desire for future pregnancy.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A 37-year-old primiparous woman presented with main symptoms of dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia associated with pollakiuria and macroscopic menstrual hematuria (with emission of endometriotic tissue on analysis). She also complained of dyschezia. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed an endometriotic nodule in the vesicouterine space with an involvement of the anterior wall of the uterus and a suspicion of bladder adenomyosis. There were lateral spicules attracting the ovaries toward the midline and an infiltration of the round ligaments and nodules related to the rectovaginal space's endometriosis. A possible invasion was noted underneath the rectal mucosa. The patient expressed her desire preserve fertility. The local institutional review board has approved the video. Initially, an ultrasonography was performed showing the adenomyoma invading the bladder. The second step was a cystoscopic evaluation by means of a double J probe and a bladder catheter. After surgery the bladder catheter was left in place for 15 days and the double J stents for 6 weeks. The first step was the dissection of the vesicouterine space to dissect the anterior adenomyoma from the bladder. A partial cystectomy was then performed to remove the bladder nodule. The adenomyoma was resected at its uterine portion and the uterus sutured. Surgery was then performed in the posterior compartment. Ureterolysis was performed bilaterally, and the pararectal fossas were then opened. The rectovaginal space was dissected. A rectosigmoid resection was mandatory to remove the bowel nodule. Patient follow-up included regular consultations and a hysterosonography at 6 weeks after surgery. Hysterosonography demonstrated an adequate patency. No adhesions to the uterus were found. We recommended to wait for 6 months to allow pregnancy according to the department's protocols. A clinical improvement was observed. Today, at 8 months she has not attempted pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

A complete surgery is feasible for severe and deep endometriosis with a multicompartmental disease, using a laparoscopic approach aiming to preserve fertility.

The definition of Endometriosis Expert Centres

Endometriosis is a common condition that causes pain and infertility. It can lead to absenteeism and also to multiple surgeries with a consequent risk of impaired fertility, and constitutes a major public health cost. Despite the existence of numerous national and international guidelines, the management of endometriosis remains suboptimal. To address this issue, the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) and the Society of Gynaecological and Pelvic Surgery (SCGP) convened a committee of experts tasked with defining the criteria for establishing a system of care networks, headed by Expert Centres, covering all of mainland France and its overseas territories. This document sets out the criteria for the designation of Expert Centres. It will serve as a guide for the authorities concerned, to ensure that the means are provided to adequately manage patients with endometriosis.

[Definition of endometriosis expert centres]

OBJECTIVES

The Collège national des gynécologues obstétriciens français (CNGOF), in agreement with the Société de chirurgie gynécologique et pelvienne (SCGP), has set up a commission in 2017 to define endometriosis expert centres, with the aim of optimizing endometriosis care in France.

METHODS

The committee included members from university and general hospitals as well as private facilities, representing medical, surgical and radiological aspects of endometriosis care. Opinion of endometriosis patients' associations was obtained prior to writing this work. The final text was presented and unanimously validated by the members of the CNGOF Board of Directors at its meeting of October 13, 2017.

RESULTS

Based on analysis of current management of endometriosis and the last ten years opportunities in France, the committee has been able to define the contours of endometriosis expert centres. The objectives, production specifications, mode of operation, missions and funding for these centres were described. The following missions have been specifically defined: territorial organization, global and referral care, communication and teaching as well as research and evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Because of its daily impact for women and its economic burden in France, endometriosis justifies launching of expert centres throughout the country with formal accreditation by health authorities, ideally as part of the National Health Plan.

Safety of Vaginal Mesh Surgery Versus Laparoscopic Mesh Sacropexy for Cystocele Repair: Results of the Prosthetic Pelvic Floor Repair Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic mesh sacropexy (LS) or transvaginal mesh repair (TVM) are surgical techniques used to treat cystoceles. Health authorities have highlighted the need for comparative studies to evaluate the safety of surgeries with meshes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rate of complications, and functional and anatomical outcomes between LS and TVM.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Multicenter randomized controlled trial from October 2012 to April 2014 in 11 French public hospitals. Women with cystocele stage ≥2 (pelvic organ prolapse quantification), aged 45-75 yr, without previous prolapse surgery.

INTERVENTION

Synthetic nonabsorbable mesh placed in the vesicovaginal space, sutured to the promontory (LS) or maintained by arms through pelvic ligaments (TVM).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Rate of surgical complications ≥grade II according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification at 1 yr. Secondary outcomes were reintervention rate, and functional and anatomical results.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 130 women were randomized in LS and 132 in TVM; five women withdrew before intervention, leaving 129 in LS and 128 in TVM. The rate of complications ≥grade II was lower after LS than after TVM, but did not meet statistical significance (17% vs 26%, treatment difference 8.6% [95% confidence interval, CI -1.5 to 18]; p=0.088). The rate of complications of grade III or higher was nonetheless significantly lower after LS (LS=0.8%, TVM=9.4%, treatment difference 8.6% [95% CI 3.4%; 15%]; p=0.001). LS was converted to TVM in 6.3%. The total reoperation rate was lower after LS but did not meet statistical significance (LS=4.7%, TVM=10.9%, treatment difference 6.3% [95% CI -0.4 to 13.3]; p=0.060). There was no difference in symptoms, quality of life, improvement, composite definition of success, anatomical results rates between groups except for the vaginal apex and length, and dyspareunia (in favor of LS).

CONCLUSIONS

LS is a valuable option for primary repair of cystocele in sexually active patients. LS is safer than TVM, but may not be feasible in all cases. Both techniques offer same functional outcomes, success rates, and anatomical outcomes, but sexual function is better preserved by LS.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Our study demonstrates that laparoscopic sacropexy (LS) is a valuable option for primary repair of cystocele. LS offers equivalent success rates to vaginal mesh procedures, but is safer with a lower rate of complications and reoperations, and sexual function is better preserved.

Retroperitoneal Lumboaortic Lymphadenectomy Using a Vessel-Sealing Device in 10 Steps

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Lumboaortic lymphadenectomy is frequently performed in the surgical management of different gynecologic pelvic malignancies: cervical endometrial and ovarian cancer. The retroperitoneal access presents a real advantage, allowing direct access to vascular axes, thus avoiding bowel segments. The use of a vessel-sealing device could facilitate the technique by providing an ergonomic alternative to conventional tools such as a bipolar grasper and scissors. Here the surgical technique of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lumboaortic lymphadenectomy using a vessel-sealing device in 10 steps is described.

DESIGN

Educative video (Canadian Task Force classification III).

SETTING

Tertiary referral center in Strasbourg, France.

PATIENTS

Women undergoing lumboaortic lymphadenectomy.

INTERVENTION

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lumboaortic lymphadenectomy using a vessel-sealing device. The local institutional review board approved the video.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The surgeon and assistant are positioned on the left of the patient and the column is placed in front. After peritoneal exploration 3 trocars are introduced in the left flank according to a very precise arrangement. We use a camera scope with a zero-degree view angle. After development of the extraperitoneal space and identification of the vascular landmarks, lymphadenectomy using a vessel-sealing device involves several steps in an anticlockwise direction starting from the left common iliac group. We first start with the lateroaortic group of lymph nodes. We then continue with the preaortic, interaorticocaval, and precaval supramesenteric group. After that, we perform the inframesenteric dissection of lymph nodes, the bifurcation of the aorta, and finally the right common iliac group. At the end of the procedure, in the absence of signs of metastatic lymph nodes, we open the peritoneum.

CONCLUSION

Retroperitoneal lumboaortic lymphadenectomy using a vessel-sealing device is useful because of better ergonomics of the multitasking instrument, avoiding alternating between scissors and bipolar forceps. The surgeon will be able to use both hands for exposure and for surgery. The presence of a metastatic ganglion is an important and decisive factor in the choice of adjuvant or neoadjuvant management of cancers, especially for cervical cancer.

Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in 10 Steps

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic transperitoneal lymphadenectomy has a few advantages. First, it is a minimally invasive approach, and the transperitoneal approach is also the best option when intra-abdominal surgery is indicated. Although the procedure was described more than 2 decades ago, there is a lack of diffusion of the technique. The main objective of this video is standardization and a simple description of the technique. We described this procedure in 10 logical steps, which should help to understand and perform this procedure.

METHODS

This video presents a systematic approach to transperitoneal lumboaortic lymphadenectomy, which is clearly divided in 10 steps ordered in a counterclockwise direction.

RESULTS

The 10 steps are as follows: step 1, retroperitoneal access; step 2, creating a space for subsequent lymphadenectomy and identification of anatomic landmarks; step 3, left common iliac lymph node dissection; step 4, right common iliac lymph node dissection; step 5, presacral lymph node dissection; step 6, lateroaortal lymph node dissection; step 7, laterocaval lymph node dissection; step 8, aortocaval lymph node dissection; step 9, vaginal extraction of bags with specimens; and step 10, vaginal suture.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic transperitoneal access to lumboaortic lymph nodes is an effective method of lymphadenectomy, which may bring benefits to a patient and physician. The presented 10 steps help to perform each part of surgery in a logical sequence, making the procedure ergonomic and easier to adopt and learn. Standardization of laparoscopic techniques could help to reduce the learning curve.

Spigelian hernia in gynaecology

Background

A Spigelian hernia is a rare hernia through the Spigelian fascia between the rectus muscle and the semilunar line. This hernia is well known in surgery. Symptoms vary from insidious to localised pain, an intermittent mass and/or a bowel obstruction.

Results

The Spigelian hernia is poorly known in gynaecology. Spigelian hernias may be causally related to secondary trocar insertion. This review is written to increase awareness in gynaecology and is illustrated by a case report in which the diagnosis was missed for 4 years even by laparoscopy. Smaller hernias risk not to be diagnosed and will thus not be treated. Even larger Spigelian hernias might not be recognised and treated appropriately.

Conclusions

The gynaecologist should consider a Spigelian hernia in women with localised pain in the abdominal wall lateral of the rectus muscle some 5 cm below the umbilicus. Smaller hernias can be closed by laparoscopy without a mesh. Larger hernias require a mesh repair.

Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: The "6-Points" Technique

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To illustrate laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse, a new method using a simplified mesh fixation technique, with only 6 fixing points.

DESIGN

Step-by-step explanation of the surgery using video (educative video). The video was approved by the local institutional review board.

SETTING

University Hospital of Strasbourg, France (Canadian Task Force Classification III).

PATIENTS

Women with multicompartment prolapse.

INTERVENTION

We first dissected the promontorium and vertically incise the posterior parietal peritoneum on the right pelvic sidewall up the pouch of Douglas. We then dissect the rectovaginal septum up to the anal cap, laterally exposing the puborectalis muscle on each side. Middle rectal vessels can be coagulated and cut without increasing the risk of digestive disorders (especially constipation), but it is preferable to conserve them if the space is sufficient for suture. Then, we dissect the vesicovaginal space and realized the subtotal hysterectomy. Finally, we realized the fastening of the anterior and posterior meshes. The particularity is that we performed only 6 points for fixing the meshes: 1 on the puborectalis muscle on each side without tension (to reduce the risk of mesh contracture, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain), 1 for the fixing of the anterior mesh on the anterior vaginal wall at the level of the bladder neck, and 1 on each side of the cervix for the reconstitution of the pericervical ring gathering together the anterior mesh, the pubocervical fascia, and the insertion of the uterosacral ligament at the level of the cervix and the posterior mesh. The sixth stitch fastened 1 of 2 meshes to the anterior paravertebral ligament at the level of the sacral promontory. We finished with the peritonization.

MAIN RESULTS

The duration of surgery lasts approximately 120 minutes in well-experienced hands. Based on our experience the 6-point technique was relatively simple (few laparoscopic stiches) with few operative difficulties and was also associated with a low rate of reintervention.

CONCLUSION

Surgical management of middle compartment prolapse could be performed quickly and efficiently under laparoscopy with the "6-points" technique.

Retroperitoneal primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET): case report and review of literature

Primitive Neuroectodermal tumor belongs to the family of Ewing's tumor and is characterized by at (11;22) (q24;ql2) or at (21;22) (q22;ql2) translocation. Retroperitoneal primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) are rare, usually affect young adults, and are often diagnosed late. There is no specific characteristics for imaging. The diagnosis is made on histological examination of the surgical spec- imen or biopsies. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy complete the treatment. The authors report the case of a 26-year-old patient who only had pelvic discomfort. Diagnostic laparoscopy showed a retroperitoneal and retrovesical mass of five centimeters. The patient benefited from adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. She is free of disease 30 months after treatment.

Gynaecological endoscopic surgical education and assessment. A diploma programme in gynaecological endoscopic surgery

In recent years, training and education in endoscopic surgery has been critically reviewed. Clinicians, both surgeons as gynaecologist who perform endoscopic surgery without proper training of the specific psychomotor skills, are at higher risk to increased patient morbidity and mortality. Although the apprentice-tutor model has long been a successful approach for training of surgeons, recently, clinicians have recognised that endoscopic surgery requires an important training phase outside the operating theatre. The Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment programme (GESEA) recognises the necessity of this structured approach and implements two separated stages in its learning strategy. In the first stage, a skill certificate on theoretical knowledge and specific practical psychomotor skills is acquired through a high-stake exam; in the second stage, a clinical programme is completed to achieve surgical competence and receive the corresponding diploma. Three diplomas can be awarded: (a) the Bachelor in Endoscopy, (b) the Minimally Invasive Gynaecological Surgeon (MIGS) and (c) the Master level. The Master level is sub-divided into two separate diplomas: the Master in Laparoscopic Pelvic Surgery and the Master in Hysteroscopy. The complexity of modern surgery has increased the demands and challenges to surgical education and the quality control. This programme is based on the best available scientific evidence, and it counteracts the problem of the traditional surgical apprentice-tutor model. It is seen as a major step toward standardisation of endoscopic surgical training in general.

Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment. A diploma programme in gynaecological endoscopic surgery

In recent years, training and education in endoscopic surgery has been critically reviewed. Clinicians, both surgeons as gynaecologist who perform endoscopic surgery without proper training of the specific psychomotor skills are at higher risk to increased patient morbidity and mortality. Although the apprentice-tutor model has long been a successful approach for training of surgeons, recently, clinicians have recognised that endoscopic surgery requires an important training phase outside the operating theatre. The Gynaecological Endoscopic Surgical Education and Assessment programme (GESEA), recognises the necessity of this structured approach and implements two separated stages in its learning strategy. In the first stage, a skill certificate on theoretical knowledge and specific practical psychomotor skills is acquired through a high stake exam; in the second stage, a clinical programme is completed to achieve surgical competence and receive the corresponding diploma. Three diplomas can be awarded: (a) the Bachelor in Endoscopy; (b) the Minimally Invasive Gynaecological Surgeon (MIGS); and (c) the Master level. The Master level is sub-divided into two separate diplomas: the Master in Laparoscopic Pelvic Surgery and the Master in Hysteroscopy. The complexity of modern surgery has increased the demands and challenges to surgical education and the quality control. This programme is based on the best available scientific evidence and it counteracts the problem of the traditional surgical apprentice tutor model. It is seen as a major step toward standardization of endoscopic surgical training in general.