Incidence and risk factors for dupilumab associated ocular adverse events: a real-life prospective study

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is approved for use in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and as an add-on maintenance treatment in patients suffering from severe asthma with type 2 inflammation. Ocular adverse events (OAEs) have been reported with dupilumab almost exclusively in patients treated for AD.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to describe the incidence and nature of dupilumab-induced OAEs and to assess the potential predisposing factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective, single-centre, real-life study in adult AD patients treated with dupilumab, who were systematically examined by an ophthalmologist before and during treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included prospectively with a median age of 41.1 years and a median initial SCOring Atopic Dermatitis of 46.0 (IQR: 34.5-55.5). OAEs concerned 34.8% of patients and were mostly of mild to moderate severity. Two patients had to discontinue treatment due to OAE. The majority of patients developed or aggravated dry eye disease, with superficial punctate keratitis (SPK). Six patients developed conjunctivitis. Dupilumab-induced OAEs were associated with the following pre-existing parameters: dry eye disease with SPK (Odds ratio (OR); 6.3 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-31.6]), eyelid eczema (OR: 8.7 [95%CI: 1.8-40.6]), history of food allergy (OR 3.8 (95% CI: 1.002-14,070) and IgE serum level> 1000 kU/L (OR:10.6 [CI 95%: 1.2-91.3]).

CONCLUSION

Atopic dermatitis patients with eyelid eczema or dry eye disease symptoms may be referred to an ophthalmologist before starting dupilumab to consider initiating preventive eye hydration measures. Further multicentric and translational studies are warranted to better explain OAEs pathophysiology.

Integrated multidisciplinary approach to hidradenitis suppurativa in clinical practice,

Background

The European hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary approach for patients with HS and management of comorbidities.

Objective

We aimed to describe the organization of a multidisciplinary HS program and characterize the patient population.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of patients with HS undergoing prospectively defined multidisciplinary work-up including examinations by a dermatologist, plastic surgeon, smoking specialist, and nutritionist in our outpatient unit between October 2015 and January 2017.

Results

The study included 49 patients with a sex ratio of 1:1. A total of 73.4% of patients were smokers, 20.4% were overweight, 48.9% were obese, and 30.6% had symptoms of depression. The mean Sartorius score was 30.4 (±17.6). The outcome of plastic surgery consultation was as follows: 16 patients had operations, 5 were excluded based on medical history, 9 refused surgery, and 16 remained undecided. The refusal rates for consulting with the smoking cessation and nutrition specialists were 55.8% and 69.5%, respectively. Twelve patients received antibiotics, 9 received biologics, 9 underwent medico-surgical treatment, 9 underwent surgery, and 10 were lost to follow-up. The mean visual analogue scale score for satisfaction was 8.3 (±1.6; n = 28).

Conclusion

An integrated multidisciplinary care model for HS is associated with high patient satisfaction. Adherence to the proposed comorbidity management was higher in female patients and related to empathetic interactions with physicians.