Planning Target Volume Margin Quantification of Retroperitoneal Tumors Using Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy with Spine Tracking

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment (SBRT) is an effective modality for treating primary and oligometastatic malignant lesions. Appropriate planning target volume (PTV) margins are essential when delivering SBRT to maximize target prescription coverage while minimizing dose to surrounding organs-at-risk. Spine tracking uses boney spinal anatomy as a surrogate for tumor localization during treatment delivery on robotic linear accelerator platforms that employ intrafraction kV x-ray imaging. The aim of this study was to quantify the PTV margin needed when spine tracking was used for tumor localization when treating retroperitoneal metastatic lesions with robotic SBRT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A single institution chart review was performed and identified 16 patients with retroperitoneal tumors treated stereotactically over 19 courses in 103 fractions. Daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images that were registered based on tumor position at the time of treatment were analyzed. Rigid registrations were re-performed aligning the position of the spine on the CBCT relative to its position on the planning CT. Shifts from the treatment position were recorded and per-patient mean shifts and standard deviations were calculated. Van Herk's margin recipe was used to determine the additional PTV margin required if spine tracking was used instead of soft tissue alignment. Patient tumors were stratified and compared based on proximity to the vertebral column (≤1 cm vs >1 cm) and location within the retroperitoneum (superior vs inferior to the renal artery). Student's t-test was used to compare statistical differences of shifts based on location.

RESULTS

The additional margins calculated by van Herk's margin recipe to adequately cover the target volumes within the 95% isodose surface for 90% of the entire patient cohort in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions were 2.7, 2.8, and 2.8 mm, respectively. When tumors were stratified by proximity to the vertebral column, average longitudinal (p<0.001) and total shifts (p<0.001) were statistically significant. Isometric PTV expansions of 3, 4, and 5 mm would have encompassed 55%, 76%, and 86% of the maximum total shifts for lesions >1 cm from the vertebral column versus 94%, 100%, and 100% for lesions ≤1 cm. When stratified by location within the retroperitoneum, isometric PTV expansions of 3, 4, and 5 mm would have encompassed 82%, 94%, and 100% of the maximum total shifts for lesions superior to the renal artery versus 78%, 94%, and 98% for lesions inferior to the renal artery.

CONCLUSION

When treating retroperitoneal tumors with robotic SBRT, a minimum isometric margin expansion between 3 to 5 mm when creating the PTV is recommended if spine tracking is used for intrafraction tumor localization. Target volumes adjacent to the vertebral column may have PTV margins decreased to ≤4 mm without compromising target coverage.

Pentoxifylline and Vitamin E in Preventing Pneumonitis Using Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Previously Irradiated Patients

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Despite radiotherapeutic advancements, patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience recurrence rates from 30-40% (1) (2). For these cases, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is an attractive retreatment option as studies have reported upwards of 96% local control rates at 3 years follow up (3) (4). However, thoracic reirradiation poses threat for radiation-induced pneumonitis. Particularly, the rate of grade 3 pneumonitis from institutional data was 30% in patients undergoing SABR for recurrent thoracic malignancies (4). Prior studies have tried to mitigate SABR toxicities with administration of pentoxifylline (Ptx) and vitamin E (VE), which has reduced lung damage in breast cancer patients (5) (6). The addition of Ptx and VE in retreatment of NSCLC may similarly reduce radiation-induced pneumonitis. The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of Ptx and VE in reducing grade 3 pneumonitis in patients undergoing SABR with loco-regionally recurrent lung cancer or new lung primary tumors in the setting of prior thoracic radiation. We hypothesize that these patients will experience rates of grade 3 pneumonitis lower than 30% at 3, 6, and 12-months post-treatment follow up.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients who received radiation for a prior thoracic malignancy with a diagnosis of a recurrent or new NSCLC were recruited from our institution. Ptx and VE were administered at the time of simulation, approximately 1 week prior to starting treatment and continued for 12 weeks after the completion of treatment. SABR was delivered using standard stereotactic techniques to a dose of 5000 cGy at 1000 cGy per fraction over 2 weeks. The following demographic information was collected: baseline performance status, time interval between initial radiation and retreatment radiation, central or peripheral recurrent tumor, and pre-treatment FEV1. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically for grades of pneumonitis at 3, 6, and 12-months post treatment.

RESULTS

Demographic and follow-up data were collected from the initial cohort of 40 patients. There were no statistically significant correlations between pretreatment characteristics and pneumonitis. 92% of participants were medication compliant. Crude rates of pneumonitis at any time point were grade 1 (23%), grade 2 (10%), and grade 3 (2%). Only one of our patients experienced grade 3 pneumonitis. The rate of grade 3 pneumonitis in our Ptx and vitamin E treated cohort was significantly less than 30% at 3-months (p = 0.001), 6-months (p = 0.001), and 12-months (p = 0.014) post-treatment.

CONCLUSION

Thus, we conclude that Ptx and VE are safe interventions that may prophylactically reduce rates of grade 3 pneumonitis for patients receiving subsequent SABR for recurrent NSCLC. Additional studies should be performed to evaluate the use in of Ptx and VE in the retreatment setting.

Comparison of Bayesian-derived and first-order analytic equations for calculation of vancomycin area under the curve

INTRODUCTION

Consensus guidelines recommend targeting a vancomycin area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC₂₄ :MIC) ratio of 400-600 to improve therapeutic success and reduce nephrotoxicity. Although guidelines specify either Bayesian software or first-order equations may be used to estimate AUC₂₄ , there are currently no large studies directly comparing these methods.

OBJECTIVE

To compare calculated vancomycin AUC₂₄ using first-order equations with two-drug concentrations at steady state to Bayesian two- and one-concentration estimations.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of 978 adult hospitalized patients receiving intravenous vancomycin between 2017 and 2019. Patients were included if they received at least 72 h of vancomycin and had two-serum drug concentrations obtained. AUC₂₄ was calculated using first-order analytic (linear), Bayesian two-concentration, and Bayesian one-concentration methods for each patient. The InsightRx™ software platform was used to calculate Bayesian AUC₂₄ . Pearson's correlation and clinical agreement (based on AUC₂₄  classified as subtherapeutic, therapeutic, or supratherapeutic) were used to assess agreement between methods. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess mean difference (MD) and 95% limits of agreement (LOA).

RESULTS

Excellent agreement was observed between linear and Bayesian two-concentration methods (r = 0.963, clinical agreement = 87.4%) and Bayesian two-concentration and one-concentration methods (r = 0.931, clinical agreement = 88.5%); however, a degree of variability was noted with 95% LOA -99 to 76 (MD = -11.5 mg*h/L) and -92 to 113 (MD = -10.4 mg*h/L), for the respective comparisons. The agreement between linear and Bayesian one-concentration approaches was less than prior comparisons (r = 0.823, clinical agreement = 76.8%) and demonstrated the greatest amount of variability with 95% LOA -197 to 153 (MD = -21.9 mg*h/L).

CONCLUSIONS

Linear and Bayesian two-concentration methods demonstrated high-level agreement with acceptable variability and may be considered comparable to estimate vancomycin AUC₂₄ . As linear and Bayesian one-concentration methods demonstrated significant variability and suboptimal agreement, concerns exist surrounding the interchangeability of these methods in clinical practice, particularly at higher extremes of AUC₂₄ .

Identifying bias in CCR1 antagonists using radiolabelled binding, receptor internalization, β-arrestin translocation and chemotaxis assays

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Investigators have suggested that the chemokine receptor CCR1 plays a role in multiple myeloma. Studies using antisense and neutralizing antibodies to CCR1 showed that down-regulation of the receptor altered disease progression in a mouse model. More recently, experiments utilizing scid mice injected with human myeloma cells demonstrated that the CCR1 antagonist BX471 reduced osteolytic lesions, while the CCR1 antagonist MLN-3897 prevented myeloma cell adhesion to osteoclasts. However, information is limited regarding the pharmacology of CCR1 antagonists in myeloma cells.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We compared several well-studied CCR1 antagonists including AZD4818, BX471, CCX354, CP-481715, MLN-3897 and PS899877 for their ability to inhibit binding of [(125)I]-CCL3 in vitro using membranes prepared from RPMI 8226 cells, a human multiple myeloma cell line that endogenously expresses CCR1. In addition, antagonists were assessed for their ability to modulate CCL3-mediated internalization of CCR1 and CCL3-mediated cell migration using RPMI 8226 cells. As many GPCRs signal through β-arrestin-dependent pathways that are separate and distinct from those driven by G-proteins, we also evaluated the compounds for their ability to alter β-arrestin translocation.

KEY RESULTS

There were clear differences between the CCR1 antagonists in their ability to inhibit CCL3 binding to myeloma cells, as well as in their ability to inhibit G-protein-dependent and -independent functional responses.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Our studies demonstrate that tissue phenotype seems to be relevant with regards to CCR1. Moreover, it appears that for CCR1 antagonists, inhibition of β-arrestin translocation is not necessarily linked to chemotaxis or receptor internalization.