Migrants' access to COVID-19 vaccination in Japan: Progress and challenges

Objectives

This study aimed to review the progress and challenges of COVID-19 vaccine roll-out for migrants in Japan and discuss the approaches to address the challenges and better prepare for future waves of COVID-19 and other pandemics.

Methods

We conducted a literature review using an assessment framework which we developed building upon existing frameworks and tools on access to health services and COVID-19 vaccination among migrants.

Results

COVID-19 vaccination coverage among foreigners might be lower than that of nationals although the data on foreigners were not widely available. A gap appeared to exist between the government's efforts to disseminate vaccine-related information through multi-lingual websites and migrant communities as recipients. A series of barriers for migrants were identified at different stages of the vaccination process. While efforts were made by different units of local governments, NGOs, migrant communities, and international exchange associations, linkages across sectors and scaling-up appeared to be an issue. No foreigners were explicitly excluded from the entitlements of COVID-19 vaccination. The national level guidance, however, allowed sub-national levels to make a decision on whether or not undocumented foreigners should be reported to the immigration office or law enforcement when providing the services. In consequence, units in charge of public health and vaccination of some municipalities did not offer vaccination to those in need.

Conclusion

Migrants, especially those unregistered face various barriers in accessing COVID-19 vaccination. It is critical to assess and address challenges concerning channels of information dissemination, pathways to access services, obstacles for vulnerable migrants, and data for evidence-based actions.

Social support as a bridge: A rapid realist review of migrant inclusion in the Japanese response to the COVID-19 pandemic

•

Inclusion of migrants in public health policy in Japan is rare.

•

We synthesized the evidence on migrant inclusion during COVID-19.

•

Vulnerability derived from movement restrictions and socioeconomic background.

•

Access to support programs was conceptually equal, yet structurally inequitable.

•

Structural gaps were bridged with social support from host society.

Government policy to address the COVID-19 pandemic has been complex with profound impacts on vulnerable minorities like international migrants. In Japan migrants are an important and growing community but their consideration in health policy is rare. We conducted a rapid realist review about ‘what works’ for the equitable inclusion of migrants during the pandemic as a case study for other public health emergencies. Due to the time-sensitive needs of policy-makers in the ongoing COVID-19 emergency, our evidence search was purposive, yet exploratory and iterative in nature. We assessed academic and gray literature sources, published in either English or Japanese, that examined the policy response to COVID-19 in Japan and its impact on migrants. A panel of external stakeholders was also consulted during the review process. This evidence synthesis suggests that, rather than illness alone, restrictions on movement and socioeconomic background lead to the considerable impact of policy on the well-being of migrants. Many policy responses, while conceptually inclusive and flexible, were often structurally inequitable for migrants. Poor outcomes included confusion about changing virus-related regulations and need for technical assistance to access support. Social support from volunteers and non-profit organizations were consistently left to connect migrants with unmet needs to available services. Using the diverse international community of Japan as an example, we show that, during public health emergencies, social support from civil society remains crucial for bridging structural inequities. For equitable inclusion of migrants, evidence-informed policy will be key for governments to better protect migrants’ right to health and well-being in future emergencies.

Evaluating Local Multilingual Health Care Information Environments on the Internet: A Pilot Study

For foreign-born populations, difficulty in finding health care information in their primary language is a structural barrier to accessing timely health care. While such information may be available at a national level, it may not always be relevant or appropriate to the living situations of these people. Our objective was to explore the quality of online multilingual health information environments by pilot-testing a framework for assessing such information at the prefectural level in Japan. The framework consisted of five health care domains (health system, hospitals, emergency services, medical interpreters, and health insurance). Framework scores varied considerably among prefectures; many resources were machine-translated. These scores were significantly associated with foreign population proportion and the number of hospitals in each prefecture. Our multilingual health care information environment (MHCIE) framework provides a measure of health access inclusivity, which has not been quantified before. It is adaptable to other international contexts, but further validation is required.