Clinical course and surgical outcomes in middle-age adults with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Patients with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) present with a wide range of clinical manifestations, including ischemic symptoms (chest pain or dyspnea) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Studies have identified coronary anatomic characteristics associated with a higher risk of SCD. However, most of the published literature consists of studies in adolescents and young adults. There is a paucity of data regarding outcomes in middle-aged patients. Current guidelines reveal gaps in evidence for identification of adults are at risk for SCD, and for whom surgery is beneficial.

Purpose

To study the clinical course and rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in middle-aged adults with AAOCA based on presenting symptoms, coronary anatomy on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), stress test results, and surgical management.

Methods

We included all patients from January 2013 to December 2019 age > 18 at our institution who were found to have AAOCA.  Patients with the following were excluded to minimize confounding factors which could cause MACE: coronary artery disease (CAD) with >50% stenosis in any coronary vessel, CAD requiring revascularization, heart failure with ejection fraction <40%, history of heart transplant, and non-AAOCA congenital heart disease. All patient charts were reviewed for demographics, coronary anatomy on CCTA, presenting symptoms, rationale for pursuing stress testing and CCTA, nature of surgical interventions, post-surgical course, and MACE (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and need for coronary revascularization). All patients underwent PET as well as treadmill stress testing.

Results

Of 19,367 patients who underwent CCTA, 47 met inclusion criteria, with median age at diagnosis of 54 and median follow-up of 48 months. No patients suffered MACE. Twenty-five patients had AAORCA and 22 had AAOLCA (Table 1). Ten patients with AAORCA and 8 patients with AAOLCA presented with ischemic symptoms and had coronary anatomy characteristics associated with higher risk of SCD, as well as ischemia corresponding to the anomalous artery on stress testing and did not undergo surgery due to personal preference. Five symptomatic patients with stress-induced ischemia corresponding to the anomalous artery underwent surgery and all achieved symptom relief over a median follow up of 5 years.

Conclusion

As AAOCA is a significant cause of SCD in young adults, it is compelling to observe this adult cohort in which no patients experienced MACE, including 18 symptomatic patients with high-risk anatomy and stress-induced ischemia, as well as a Class I recommendations for surgery.  The results suggest that although surgery may be beneficial for symptom relief, it does not necessarily improve mortality over an intermediate follow-up period.  Future studies should examine surgical outcomes in middle-aged cohorts with larger sample sizes.

P339 Gradient adjusted cardiac power index does not improve prediction of survival post transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to cardiac power index alone

Funding Acknowledgements

None

Background

Cardiac Power Index (CPI) is an integrative hemodynamic measure of cardiac pumping capability and is the product of the simultaneously measured mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output (CO). In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), MAP is not reflective of mean systolic left ventricular (LV) pressure due to the transvalvular gradient. Non-invasive assessment of mean systolic LV pressure is challenging in severe aortic stenosis. CPI assessed using systemic MAP was previously shown to predict survival post transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Purpose

We evaluated the utility of a gradient adjusted CPI in predicting survival post TAVR compared to CPI alone

Methods

A retrospective study was performed including patients undergoing TAVR with 1 year follow-up. Baseline demographics, clinical, and echocardiographic data were abstracted from a cohort of 1,011 patients. CPI was calculated, (CO x MAP)/ (451 x BSA) Watts/m2. Gradient adjusted CPI was calculated using an augmented MAP i) adding aortic valve mean gradient(AVMG) to systolic blood pressure (CPI1); ii) adding aortic valve maximal instantaneous gradient to systolic blood pressure (CPI2) and iii) adding AVMG to MAP (CPI3). Patient survival score was calculated using a step up technique to identify the cut off value for CPI and gradient adjusted CPI to identify, where the maximum difference in mortality occurred. Multivariate cox-regression analysis was performed to adjust for baseline covariates. Receiver operator curves(ROC) for CPI and gradient adjusted CPI were calculated to predict survival post TAVR.

Results

The mortality rate at 1 yr was 16%. Mean age and AVMG of survivors was 81 +/- 9 yrs and 43 +/-14 mmHg vs 80 +/-9 yrs and 42 +/- 13 mmHg in the deceased group. Proportion of female patients was similar in both groups (p = 0.7). Patients in the deceased group at baseline had a higher prevalence of chronic lung disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure within 2-weeks of procedure, higher STS-PROM score, lower serum albumin level, higher prevalence of moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation, higher right ventricular systolic pressure and higher prevalence of dialysis. Both CPI and gradient adjusted CPI were independently associated with survival at 1 year. The area under ROC for CP, CP1, CP2 and CP3 were 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 - 0.72), 0.65 (95% CI 0.60 – 0.70), 0.66 (95% CI 0.61 – 0.71) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.58 – 0.68) respectively.

Conclusion

Gradient adjusted CPI did not improve accuracy of predicting post TAVR survival at 1 year compared to CPI alone.

Abstract P339 Figure. Area under ROC