1
|
Nedberg IH, Vik ES, Kongslien S, Mariani I, Valente EP, Covi B, Lazzerini M, Roda DD, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, de La Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Morano S, Chertok I, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Pumpure E, Rezeberga D, Jansone‐Šantare G, Jakovicka D, Vaska A, Knoka AR, Vilcāne KP, Liepinaitienė A, Kondrakova A, Mizgaitienė M, Juciūtė S, Arendt M, Tasch B, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Elden H, Sengpiel V, Linden K, Zaigham M, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H, Grylka S, Gemperle M, Mueller A. Quality of health care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study in Norway and trends over time. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:85-96. [PMID: 36530008 PMCID: PMC9877678 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe maternal perception of the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in facilities in Norway during the first year of COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Women who gave birth in a Norwegian facility from March 1, 2020, to October 28, 2021, filled out a structured online questionnaire based on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. Quantile regression analysis was performed to assess changes in QMNC index over time. RESULTS Among 3326 women included, 3085 experienced labor. Of those, 1799 (58.3%) reported that their partner could not be present as much as needed, 918 (29.8%) noted inadequate staff numbers, 183 (43.6%) lacked a consent request for instrumental vaginal birth (IVB), 1067 (34.6%) reported inadequate communication from staff, 78 (18.6%) reported fundal pressure during IVB, 670 (21.7%) reported that they were not treated with dignity, and 249 (8.1%) reported experiencing abuse. The QMNC index increased gradually over time (3.68 points per month, 95% CI, 2.83-4.53 for the median), with the domains of COVID-19 reorganizational changes and experience of care displaying the greatest increases, while provision of care was stable over time. CONCLUSION Although several measures showed high QMNC in Norway during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, and a gradual improvement over time, several findings suggest that gaps in QMNC exist. These gaps should be addressed and monitored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingvild Hersoug Nedberg
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health SciencesUiT The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway
| | - Eline Skirnisdottir Vik
- Department of Health and Caring SciencesWestern Norway University of Applied SciencesBergenNorway
| | - Sigrun Kongslien
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health SciencesUiT The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Costa R, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Covi B, Mariani I, Valente EP, Zaigham M, Vik ES, Grylka‐Baeschlin S, Arendt M, Santos T, Wandschneider L, Drglin Z, Drandić D, Radetic J, Rozée V, Elden H, Mueller AN, Barata C, Miani C, Bohinec A, Ruzicic J, de La Rochebrochard E, Linden K, Geremia S, de Labrusse C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Ponikvar BM, Sacks E, Lazzerini M. Quality of maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth for migrant versus nonmigrant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study in 11 countries of the WHO European region. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:39-53. [PMID: 36530012 PMCID: PMC9877819 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the perception of quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth among migrant and nonmigrant women in Europe. METHODS Women who gave birth at a health facility in 11 countries of the WHO European Region from March 2020 to July 2021 were invited to answer an online questionnaire including demographics and childbirth experience. Data were analyzed and compared for 1781 migrant and 20 653 nonmigrant women. RESULTS Migrant women who experienced labor perceived slightly more difficulties in attending routine antenatal visits (41.2% vs 39.4%; P = 0.001), more barriers in accessing facilities (32.9% vs 29.9%; P = 0.001), lack of timely care (14.7% vs 13.0%; P = 0.025), inadequate room comfort and equipment (9.2% vs 8.5%; P = 0.004), inadequate number of women per room (9.4% vs 8.6%; P = 0.039), being prevented from staying with their baby as they wished (7.8% vs 6.9%; P = 0.011), or suffering abuse (14.5% vs 12.7%; P = 0.022) compared with nonmigrant women. For women who had a prelabor cesarean, migrant women were more likely not to receive pain relief after birth (16.8% vs.13.5%; P = 0.039) and less likely to provide informal payment (1.8% vs 4.4%; P = 0.005) compared with nonmigrant women. Overall, the QMNC index was not significantly different for migrant compared with nonmigrant women. CONCLUSION Gaps in overall QMNC were reported by both migrant and nonmigrant women, with improvements to healthcare necessary for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Costa
- EPIUnit ‐ Instituto de Saúde PúblicaUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal,Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR)PortoPortugal,Lusófona University/HEI‐Lab: Digital Human‐environment Interaction LabsLisbonPortugal
| | - Carina Rodrigues
- EPIUnit ‐ Instituto de Saúde PúblicaUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal,Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR)PortoPortugal
| | - Heloísa Dias
- Regional Health Administration of the AlgarveLisbonPortugal
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Mehreen Zaigham
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyInstitution of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund and Skåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
| | - Eline Skirnisdottir Vik
- Department of Health and Caring SciencesWestern Norway University of Applied SciencesBergenNorway
| | - Susanne Grylka‐Baeschlin
- Research Institute of Midwifery, School of Health SciencesZHAW Zurich University of Applied SciencesWinterthurSwitzerland
| | - Maryse Arendt
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional Association of Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg)LuxembourgLuxembourg
| | - Teresa Santos
- Universidade EuropeiaLisbonPortugal,Plataforma CatólicaMed/Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde (CIIS) da Universidade Católica PortuguesaLisbonPortugal
| | - Lisa Wandschneider
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public HealthBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany
| | - Zalka Drglin
- National Institute of Public HealthLjubljanaSlovenia
| | | | | | - Virginie Rozée
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research UnitInstitut National d'Études Démographiques (INED)ParisFrance
| | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra GötalandSahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
| | - Antonia N. Mueller
- Research Institute of Midwifery, School of Health SciencesZHAW Zurich University of Applied SciencesWinterthurSwitzerland
| | - Catarina Barata
- Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
| | - Céline Miani
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public HealthBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany,Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research UnitInstitut National d'Études Démographiques (INED)ParisFrance
| | - Anja Bohinec
- National Institute of Public HealthLjubljanaSlovenia
| | | | - Elise de La Rochebrochard
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research UnitInstitut National d'Études Démographiques (INED)ParisFrance
| | - Karolina Linden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Sara Geremia
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Claire de Labrusse
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV)HES‐SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western SwitzerlandLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Stephanie Batram‐Zantvoort
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public HealthBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany
| | | | - Emma Sacks
- Department of International HealthJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Drandić D, Drglin Z, Mihevc Ponikvar B, Bohinec A, Ćerimagić A, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Kurbanović M, Covi B, Valente EP, Mariani I, Lazzerini M, Drandić D, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, de La Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, Mariani I, Morano S, Chertok I, Hefer E, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Pumpure E, Rezeberga D, Jansone‐Šantare G, Jakovicka D, Knoka AR, Vilcāne KP, Liepinaitienė A, Kondrakova A, Mizgaitienė M, Juciūtė S, Arendt M, Tasch B, Nedberg IH, Kongslien S, Vik ES, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Elden H, Sengpiel V, Linden K, Zaigham M, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H, Grylka S, Gemperle M, Mueller A. Women's perspectives on the quality of hospital maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study in Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:54-69. [PMID: 36530003 PMCID: PMC9877897 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in countries of the former Yugoslavia. METHOD Women giving birth in a facility in Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina between March 1, 2020 and July 1, 2021 answered an online questionnaire including 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. RESULTS A total of 4817 women were included in the analysis. Significant differences were observed across countries. Among those experiencing labor, 47.4%-62.3% of women perceived a reduction in QMNC due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 40.1%-69.7% experienced difficulties in accessing routine antenatal care, 60.3%-98.1% were not allowed a companion of choice, 17.4%-39.2% reported that health workers were not always using personal protective equipment, and 21.2%-53.8% rated the number of health workers as insufficient. Episiotomy was performed in 30.9%-62.8% of spontaneous vaginal births. Additionally, 22.6%-55.9% of women received inadequate breastfeeding support, 21.5%-62.8% reported not being treated with dignity, 11.0%-30.5% suffered abuse, and 0.7%-26.5% made informal payments. Multivariate analyses confirmed significant differences among countries, with Slovenia showing the highest QMNC index, followed by Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Serbia. CONCLUSION Differences in QMNC among the countries of the former Yugoslavia during the COVID-19 pandemic were significant. Activities to promote high-quality, evidence-based, respectful care for all mothers and newborns are urgently needed. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier: NCT04847336.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zalka Drglin
- National Institute of Public HealthLjubljanaSlovenia
| | | | - Anja Bohinec
- National Institute of Public HealthLjubljanaSlovenia
| | | | | | | | | | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pumpure E, Jakovicka D, Mariani I, Vaska A, Covi B, Valente EP, Jansone‐Šantare G, Knoka AR, Vilcāne KP, Rezeberga D, Lazzerini M, Roda DD, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, de La Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Morano S, Chertok I, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Liepinaitienė A, Kondrakova A, Mizgaitienė M, Juciūtė S, Arendt M, Tasch B, Nedberg IH, Kongslien S, Vik ES, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Elden H, Sengpiel V, Linden K, Zaigham M, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H, Grylka S, Gemperle M, Mueller A. Women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care in childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latvia: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:97-112. [PMID: 36530013 PMCID: PMC9878132 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latvia, comparing the years 2020 and 2021, among women who went into labor or had a prelabor cesarean. METHODS Women giving birth in healthcare facilities in Latvia from March 1, 2020, to October 28, 2021, answered an online questionnaire including 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. Descriptive and multivariate quantile regression analyses were performed to compare QMNC in 2020 and 2021. RESULTS 2079 women were included in the analysis: 1860 women who went into labor (group 1) and 219 with prelabor cesarean (group 2). Among group 1, 66.4% (n = 99/149) of women received fundal pressure in an instrumental vaginal birth, 43.5% (n = 810) lacked involvement in choices, 17.4% (n = 317) reported suffering abuse, 32.7% (n = 609) reported inadequate breastfeeding support while 5.2% (n = 96) lack of early breastfeeding. A significant reduction in QMNC due to the COVID-19 pandemic was reported by 29.5% (n = 219) and 25.0% (n = 270) of respondents in 2020 and 2021, respectively (P = 0.045). Multivariate analyses highlighted a significantly lower QMNC index for 2020 compared with 2021 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION This first study investigating QMNC in Latvia showed significant gaps in QMNC perceived by respondents, with slightly better results in 2021. Appropriate healthcare strategies to improve health care for women and newborns in Latvia are required. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier:NCT04847336.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabete Pumpure
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyRiga Stradins UniversityRigaLatvia,Riga Maternity HospitalRigaLatvia
| | | | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Gita Jansone‐Šantare
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyRiga Stradins UniversityRigaLatvia,Riga Maternity HospitalRigaLatvia
| | | | | | - Dace Rezeberga
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyRiga Stradins UniversityRigaLatvia,Riga Maternity HospitalRigaLatvia
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Labrusse C, Abderhalden‐Zellweger A, Mariani I, Pfund A, Gemperle M, Grylka‐Baeschlin S, Mueller AN, Valente E, Covi B, Lazzerini M, Drandić D, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, de La Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, Mariani I, Morano S, Chertok I, Hefer E, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Pumpure E, Rezeberga D, Jansone‐Šantare G, Jakovicka D, Knoka AR, Vilcāne KP, Liepinaitienė A, Kondrakova A, Mizgaitienė M, Juciūtė S, Arendt M, Tasch B, Nedberg IH, Kongslien S, Vik ES, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Elden H, Sengpiel V, Linden K, Zaigham M, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H, Grylka S, Gemperle M, Mueller A. Quality of maternal and newborn care in Switzerland during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study based on WHO quality standards. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:70-84. [PMID: 36530005 PMCID: PMC9877813 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in healthcare facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. METHODS Women giving birth in Switzerland answered a validated online questionnaire including 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. QMNC score was calculated according to linguistic region and mode of birth. Differences were assessed using logistic regression analysis adjusting for relevant variables. RESULTS A total of 1175 women were included in the analysis. Limitations in QMNC during the pandemic were reported by 328 (27.9%) women. Several quality measures, such as deficient communication (18.0%, n = 212), insufficient number of healthcare professionals (19.7%, n = 231), no information on the newborn after cesarean (26.5%, n = 91) or maternal and newborn danger signs (34.1%, n = 401 and 41.4% n = 487, respectively) suggested preventable gaps in QMNC. Quality measures significantly differed by linguistic region and mode of birth. Multivariate analysis established a significantly lower QMNC for women in French- and Italian-speaking regions compared with the German-speaking region. Moreover, in several quality indicators reflecting communication with healthcare providers, women who did not answer the questionnaire in one of the Swiss national languages had significantly worse scores than others. A significant lower QMNC was also found for young and primiparous women and for those who experienced cesarean or instrumental vaginal birth. CONCLUSION Women giving birth in Switzerland during the pandemic reported notable gaps in QMNC. Providers should be attuned to women who are younger, primiparous, and those who had an emergency cesarean or instrumental vaginal birth given the lower QMNC reported by these groups. Women who did not respond in a Swiss national language may need improved communication strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire de Labrusse
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV)HES‐SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western SwitzerlandLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Alessia Abderhalden‐Zellweger
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV)HES‐SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western SwitzerlandLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Anouck Pfund
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV)HES‐SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western SwitzerlandLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Michael Gemperle
- Research Institute for MidwiferyZHAW Zurich University of Applied SciencesWinterthurSwitzerland
| | | | - Antonia N. Mueller
- Research Institute for MidwiferyZHAW Zurich University of Applied SciencesWinterthurSwitzerland
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Center for Maternal and Child HealthInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Costa R, Barata C, Dias H, Rodrigues C, Santos T, Mariani I, Covi B, Valente EP, Lazzerini M, Drandić D, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, de La Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, Mariani I, Morano S, Chertok I, Hefer E, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Pumpure E, Rezeberga D, Jansone‐Šantare G, Jakovicka D, Knoka AR, Vilcāne KP, Liepinaitienė A, Kondrakova A, Mizgaitienė M, Juciūtė S, Arendt M, Tasch B, Nedberg IH, Kongslien S, Vik ES, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Elden H, Sengpiel V, Linden K, Zaigham M, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H, Grylka S, Gemperle M, Mueller A. Regional differences in the quality of maternal and neonatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:137-153. [PMID: 36530002 PMCID: PMC9878220 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth across Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics 2 (NUTS-II) regions in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Women participating in the cross-sectional IMAgiNE EURO study who gave birth in Portugal from March 1, 2020, to October 28, 2021, completed a structured questionnaire with 40 key WHO standards-based quality measures. Four domains of QMNC were assessed: (1) provision of care; (2) experience of care; (3) availability of human and physical resources; and (4) reorganizational changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Frequencies for each quality measure within each QMNC domain were computed overall and by region. RESULTS Out of 1845 participants, one-third (33.7%) had a cesarean. Examples of high-quality care included: low frequencies of lack of early breastfeeding and rooming-in (8.0% and 7.7%, respectively) and informal payment (0.7%); adequate staff professionalism (94.6%); adequate room comfort and equipment (95.2%). However, substandard practices with large heterogeneity across regions were also reported. Among women who experienced labor, the percentage of instrumental vaginal births ranged from 22.3% in the Algarve to 33.5% in Center; among these, fundal pressure ranged from 34.8% in Lisbon to 66.7% in Center. Episiotomy was performed in 39.3% of noninstrumental vaginal births with variations between 31.8% in the North to 59.8% in Center. One in four women reported inadequate breastfeeding support (26.1%, ranging from 19.4% in Algarve to 31.5% in Lisbon). One in five reported no exclusive breastfeeding at discharge (22.1%; 19.5% in Lisbon to 28.2% in Algarve). CONCLUSION Urgent actions are needed to harmonize QMNC and reduce inequities across regions in Portugal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Costa
- EPIUnitInstituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal,Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR)PortoPortugal,Lusófona University/HEI‐Lab: Digital Human‐Environment Interaction LabsPortoPortugal
| | - Catarina Barata
- Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal,Associação Portuguesa Pelos Direitos da Mulher na Gravidez e PartoLisbonPortugal
| | - Heloísa Dias
- Administração Regional de Saúde do AlgarveAlgarvePortugal
| | - Carina Rodrigues
- EPIUnitInstituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal,Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR)PortoPortugal
| | - Teresa Santos
- Universidade EuropeiaLisbonPortugal,Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde (CIIS) da Universidade Católica PortuguesaLisbonPortugal
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating CenterInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating CenterInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating CenterInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating CenterInstitute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”TriesteItaly
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miani C, Wandschneider L, Batram-Zantvoort S, Covi B, Elden H, Nedberg IH, Drglin Z, Pumpure E, Costa R, Rozée V, Otelea MR, Drandić D, Radetic J, Abderhalden-Zellweger A, Ćerimagić A, Arendt M, Mariani I, Linden K, Ponikvar BM, Jakovicka D, Dias H, Ruzicic J, de Labrusse C, Valente EP, Zaigham M, Bohinec A, Rezeberga D, Barata C, Pfund A, Sacks E, Lazzerini M, Drandić Roda D, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, de La Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, Mariani I, Morano S, Chertok I, Hefer E, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Pumpure E, Rezeberga D, Jansone‐Šantare G, Jakovicka D, Knoka AR, Vilcāne KP, Liepinaitienė A, Kondrakova A, Mizgaitienė M, Juciūtė S, Arendt M, Tasch B, Nedberg IH, Kongslien S, Vik ES, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Elden H, Sengpiel V, Linden K, Zaigham M, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H, Grylka S, Gemperle M, Mueller A. Individual and country-level variables associated with the medicalization of birth: Multilevel analyses of IMAgiNE EURO data from 15 countries in the WHO European region. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 159 Suppl 1:9-21. [PMID: 36530006 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate potential associations between individual and country-level factors and medicalization of birth in 15 European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Online anonymous survey of women who gave birth in 2020-2021. Multivariable multilevel logistic regression models estimating associations between indicators of medicalization (cesarean, instrumental vaginal birth [IVB], episiotomy, fundal pressure) and proxy variables related to care culture and contextual factors at the individual and country level. RESULTS Among 27 173 women, 24.4% (n = 6650) had a cesarean and 8.8% (n = 2380) an IVB. Among women with IVB, 41.9% (n = 998) reported receiving fundal pressure. Among women with spontaneous vaginal births, 22.3% (n = 4048) had an episiotomy. Less respectful care, as perceived by the women, was associated with higher levels of medicalization. For example, women who reported having a cesarean, IVB, or episiotomy reported not feeling treated with dignity more frequently than women who did not have those interventions (odds ratio [OR] 1.37; OR 1.61; OR 1.51, respectively; all: P < 0.001). Country-level variables contributed to explaining some of the variance between countries. CONCLUSION We recommend a greater emphasis in health policies on promotion of respectful and patient-centered care approaches to birth to enhance women's experiences of care, and the development of a European-level indicator to monitor medicalization of reproductive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Miani
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.,Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), Aubervilliers, France
| | - Lisa Wandschneider
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ingvild Hersoug Nedberg
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Zalka Drglin
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Elizabete Pumpure
- Riga Maternity Hospital, Riga, Latvia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Raquel Costa
- Epidemiology Research Unit (EPIUnit), Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal.,Lusófona University/HEI-Lab: Digital Human-Environment Interaction Labs, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Virginie Rozée
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), Aubervilliers, France
| | - Marina Ruxandra Otelea
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania.,SAMAS Association, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | | | - Alessia Abderhalden-Zellweger
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Maryse Arendt
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional association of the Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Karolina Linden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | - Heloisa Dias
- Administração Regional de Saúde do Algarve, Algarve, Portugal
| | | | - Claire de Labrusse
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | - Mehreen Zaigham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institution of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö and Lund, Sweden
| | - Anja Bohinec
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dace Rezeberga
- Riga Maternity Hospital, Riga, Latvia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Catarina Barata
- Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Anouk Pfund
- School of Health Sciences (HESAV), HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emma Sacks
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lazzerini M, Covi B, Mariani I, Drglin Z, Arendt M, Nedberg IH, Elden H, Costa R, Drandić D, Radetić J, Otelea MR, Miani C, Brigidi S, Rozée V, Ponikvar BM, Tasch B, Kongslien S, Linden K, Barata C, Kurbanović M, Ružičić J, Batram-Zantvoort S, Castañeda LM, Rochebrochard EDL, Bohinec A, Vik ES, Zaigham M, Santos T, Wandschneider L, Viver AC, Ćerimagić A, Sacks E, Valente EP. Corrections to “Quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: Online survey investigating maternal perspectives in 12 countries of the WHO European Region”. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2022; 19:100461. [PMID: 35891895 PMCID: PMC9306332 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
9
|
Lazzerini M, Covi B, Mariani I, Drglin Z, Arendt M, Nedberg IH, Elden H, Costa R, Drandić D, Radetić J, Otelea MR, Miani C, Brigidi S, Rozée V, Ponikvar BM, Tasch B, Kongslien S, Linden K, Barata C, Kurbanović M, Ružičić J, Batram-Zantvoort S, Castañeda LM, Rochebrochard EDL, Bohinec A, Vik ES, Zaigham M, Santos T, Wandschneider L, Viver AC, Ćerimagić A, Sacks E, Valente EP. Quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: online survey investigating maternal perspectives in 12 countries of the WHO European Region. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2022; 13:100268. [PMID: 34977838 PMCID: PMC8703114 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multi-country studies assessing the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as defined by WHO Standards, are lacking. METHODS Women who gave birth in 12 countries of the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020 - March 15, 2021 answered an online questionnaire, including 40 WHO Standard-based Quality Measures. FINDINGS 21,027 mothers were included in the analysis. Among those who experienced labour (N=18,063), 41·8% (26·1%- 63·5%) experienced difficulties in accessing antenatal care, 62% (12·6%-99·0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 31·1% (16·5%-56·9%) received inadequate breastfeeding support, 34·4% (5·2%-64·8%) reported that health workers were not always using protective personal equipment, and 31·8% (17·8%-53·1%) rated the health workers' number as "insufficient". Episiotomy was performed in 20·1% (6·1%-66·0%) of spontaneous vaginal births and fundal pressure applied in 41·2% (11·5% -100%) of instrumental vaginal births. In addition, 23·9% women felt they were not treated with dignity (12·8%-59·8%), 12·5% (7·0%-23·4%) suffered abuse, and 2·4% (0·1%-26·2%) made informal payments. Most findings were significantly worse among women with prelabour caesarean birth (N=2,964). Multivariate analyses confirmed significant differences among countries, with Croatia, Romania, Serbia showing significant lower QMNC Indexes and Luxemburg showing a significantly higher QMNC Index than the total sample. Younger women and those with operative births also reported significantly lower QMNC Indexes. INTERPRETATION Mothers reports revealed large inequities in QMNC across countries of the WHO European Region. Quality improvement initiatives to reduce these inequities and promote evidence-based, patient-centred respectful care for all mothers and newborns during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond are urgently needed. FUNDING The study was financially supported by the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy. STUDY REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847336.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Zalka Drglin
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maryse Arendt
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional association of the Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | | | - Helen Elden
- Institute of Health and Care sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska university hospital, Dept of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Raquel Costa
- EPIUnit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
- Hei-Lab:Digital Human-Environment Interaction Lab. Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports, Lusófona University, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Marina Ruxandra Otelea
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
- SAMAS Association, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Céline Miani
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Serena Brigidi
- Department of Anthropology, Philosophy and Social Work. Medical Anthropology Research Center (MARC). Rovira i Virgili University (URV), Tarragona, Spain
| | - Virginie Rozée
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d’Études Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
| | | | - Barbara Tasch
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional association of the Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Neonatal intensive care unit, KannerKlinik, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Sigrun Kongslien
- Department of health and care sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
| | - Karolina Linden
- Institute of Health and Care sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Catarina Barata
- Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | | | - Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Elise de La Rochebrochard
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d’Études Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
| | - Anja Bohinec
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Eline Skirnisdottir Vik
- Department of health and caring sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway
| | - Mehreen Zaigham
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Teresa Santos
- Universidade Europeia, Lisboa, Portugal
- Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde (CIIS) da Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lisa Wandschneider
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | | | - Emma Sacks
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - IMAgiNE EURO study group
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Beruffsverband vun de Laktatiounsberoderinnen zu Lëtzebuerg asbl (Professional association of the Lactation Consultants in Luxembourg), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Department of community medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
- Institute of Health and Care sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska university hospital, Dept of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gothenburg, Sweden
- EPIUnit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
- Hei-Lab:Digital Human-Environment Interaction Lab. Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sports, Lusófona University, Porto, Portugal
- Roda – Parents in Action, Zagreb, Croatia
- Centar za mame, Belgrade, Serbia
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
- SAMAS Association, Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
- Department of Anthropology, Philosophy and Social Work. Medical Anthropology Research Center (MARC). Rovira i Virgili University (URV), Tarragona, Spain
- Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Research Unit, Institut National d’Études Démographiques (INED), Paris, France
- Neonatal intensive care unit, KannerKlinik, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Department of health and care sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
- Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
- Faculty of Health Studies, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
- Institut Català de la Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain
- Department of health and caring sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Norway
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Universidade Europeia, Lisboa, Portugal
- Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Saúde (CIIS) da Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Institut Català d'Antropologia (ICA), Barcelona, Spain
- NGO Baby Steps, Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lazzerini M, Covi B, Mariani I, Giusti A, Valente EP, Ćerimagić A, Drandić D, Kurbanović M, Virginie R, Rochebrochard E, Löfgren K, Miani C, Batram‐Zantvoort S, Wandschneider L, Verardi G, Zanin B, Morano S, Chertok I, Artzi‐Medvedik R, Pumpure E, Rezeberga D, Vaska A, Jakovicka D, Rudzīte P, Ērmane E, Vilcāne KP, Arendt M, Tasch B, Nedberg IH, Kongslien S, Vik ES, Baranowska B, Tataj‐Puzyna U, Węgrzynowska M, Costa R, Barata C, Santos T, Rodrigues C, Dias H, Otelea MR, Yarotskaya E, Radetić J, Ružičić J, Drglin Z, Ponikvar BM, Bohinec A, Brigidi S, Castañeda LM, Viver AC, Elden H, Linden K, Zaigham M, Sengpiel V, De Labrusse C, Abderhalden A, Pfund A, Thorn H. Quality of care at childbirth: findings of IMAgiNE EURO in Italy during the first year of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 157:405-417. [PMID: 35092692 PMCID: PMC9087757 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective Investigate the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during childbirth in the first year of COVID‐19 pandemic in Italy, from the mothers' perspective, as key service users. Methods Women who gave birth in an Italian facility from March 1, 2020 to February 29, 2021 answered an online questionnaire including 40 WHO Standard‐based Quality Measures. Descriptive and multivariate quantile regression analyses were performed. Results In total, 4824 women were included, reporting heterogeneity of practices across regions: among 3981 women who underwent labour 78.4% (63.0%–92.0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 44.6% (28.9%–53.3%) had difficulties in attending routine antenatal visits, 36.3% (24.9%–61.1%) reported inadequate breastfeeding support, 39.2% (23.3%–62.2%) felt not involved in medical choices, 33.0% (23.9%–49.3%) experienced unclear communication from staff, 24.8% (15.9%–39.4%) were not always treated with dignity and 12.7% (10.1%–29.3%) reported abuses. Findings in the group of women who did not experience labour were substantially similar. Multivariate analyses confirmed a significant lower QMNC index for regions in southern Italy compared to North and Central regions. Conclusion Mothers reported substantial inequities in the QMNC across Italian regions. Future studies should monitor QMNC over time. Meanwhile, actions to ensure high QMNC for all mothers and newborns across Italy are urgently required. Mothers giving birth in the first year of the COVID‐19 pandemic reported substantial inequities across Italian regions in the QMNC around the time of childbirth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Lazzerini
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health ‐ IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” ‐ WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health Trieste Italy
| | - Benedetta Covi
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health ‐ IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” ‐ WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health Trieste Italy
| | - Ilaria Mariani
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health ‐ IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” ‐ WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health Trieste Italy
| | - Angela Giusti
- National Centre for Diseases Prevention and Health Promotion National Institute of Health Rome Italy
| | - Emanuelle Pessa Valente
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health ‐ IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo” ‐ WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health Trieste Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Takač I, Belak U, Gorjup D, Kavšek G, Macun E, Medved R, Mihevc Ponikvar B, Mole H, Mujezinović F, Najdenov P, Prelec A, Premru Sršen T, Mikluš M, Serdinšek T, Sobočan M, Steblovnik L, Tičar Z, Horvat M, Jamšek T, Arko D. Planned home birth in Slovenia-Are we ready? Int J Health Plann Manage 2019; 34:e1961-e1967. [PMID: 31436355 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Nowadays, women want a more intimate and familiar atmosphere during labour, which results in increased planned home birth rates. Every woman has the autonomy to decide where she will give birth; however, it is important that she is informed of risks and advantages beforehand. Home births can be distinguished between planned and unplanned home births. Planned home births can be conducted by professional birth attendants (licensed midwives) or birth assistants (doulas, etc). The rates of Slovenian women who decided to deliver at home are increasing year by year. Researches on home births still present discordant data about home birth safety. Their findings have shown that the main advantage of home birth is a spontaneous birth without medical interventions, especially in multiparous low-risk women. The main disadvantage, however, is a higher risk for neonatal death, in particular on occurrence of complications requiring a transfer to hospital and surgical intervention. Global guidelines emphasize careful selection of candidates suitable for home birth, well-informed pregnant women, education of birth attendants, and strict formation of transfer indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iztok Takač
- Division of Gynaecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Urška Belak
- Division of Gynaecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Denis Gorjup
- Rescue Station, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Gorazd Kavšek
- Department of Perinatology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Eva Macun
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, General Hospital Jesenice, Jesenice, Slovenia
| | - Robert Medved
- Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Helena Mole
- Paediatrician, office-based doctor participating in the publicly-funded health care network, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Faris Mujezinović
- Division of Gynaecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Peter Najdenov
- Department of Paediatrics, General Hospital Jesenice, Jesenice, Slovenia
| | - Anita Prelec
- Nurses and Midwives Association of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tanja Premru Sršen
- Department of Perinatology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Milena Mikluš
- Division of Gynaecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Tamara Serdinšek
- Division of Gynaecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Monika Sobočan
- Division of Gynaecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Lili Steblovnik
- Department of Perinatology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Zdenka Tičar
- Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Martina Horvat
- National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tina Jamšek
- Ministry of Health of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Darja Arko
- Division of Gynaecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Premru-Srsen T, Verdenik I, Mihevc Ponikvar B, Hugh O, Francis A, Gardosi J. Customised birthweight standard for a Slovenian population. J Perinat Med 2019; 47:270-275. [PMID: 30653469 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2018-0219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective To produce a customised birthweight standard for Slovenia. Methods This retrospective study used a cohort from the National Perinatal Information System of Slovenia (NPIS). Prospectively collected information from pregnancies delivered in all of Slovenia's 14 maternal hospitals between 1st January 2003 and 31st December 2012 was included. Coefficients were derived using a backward stepwise multiple regression technique. Results A total of 126,627 consecutive deliveries with complete data were included in the multivariable analysis. Maternal height, weight in early pregnancy and parity as well as the baby's sex were identified as physiological variables, with coefficients comparable to findings in other countries. The expected 280-day birthweight, free from pathological influences, of a standard size mother (height 163 cm, weight 64 kg) in her first pregnancy was 3451.3 g. Pathological influences on birthweight within this population included low and high maternal age, low and high body mass index (BMI), smoking, pre-existing and gestational diabetes and pre-existing and gestational hypertension. Conclusion The analysis confirmed the main physiological variables that affect birthweight in studies from other countries, and was able to quantify additional pathological factors of maternal age and gestational diabetes. Development of a country-specific customised birthweight standard will aid clinicians in Slovenia with the distinction between normal and abnormal small-for-gestational age (SGA) fetuses, thus avoiding unnecessary interventions and improving identification of at risk pregnancies, and long-term outcomes for infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Premru-Srsen
- Department of Perinatology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Ivan Verdenik
- Department of Perinatology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Premru-Srsen T, Verdenik I, Ponikvar BM, Steblovnik L, Geršak K, Cerar LK. Infant mortality and causes of death by birth weight for gestational age in non-malformed singleton infants: a 2002-2012 population-based study. J Perinat Med 2018; 46:547-553. [PMID: 28599397 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2017-0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Accepted: 04/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the associations between birth weight for gestational age (GA) and infant mortality as well as causes of infant death. STUDY DESIGN A population-based observational study conducted between 2002 and 2012 included 203,620 non-malformed singleton live births from Slovenia. Poisson regression analyses were performed to estimate the crude relative risk (RR) and adjusted RR (aRR) for infant mortality by birth weight percentiles stratified by the GA subgroups term, moderate-to-late preterm, very preterm and extremely preterm. RESULTS Compared with appropriate for GA (AGA) term infants (referent-AGA), infant mortality was significantly higher in small for GA (SGA) term infants [aRR=2.79 (1.41-5.50)], with significant cause-specific infant mortality risk for neuromuscular disorders [RR=10.48 (2.62-41.91)]. The differences in infant mortality and cause-specific infant mortality in preterm subgroups between referent-AGA and SGA were insignificant. CONCLUSIONS In the Slovenian population, birth weight for GA is significantly associated with infant mortality only in infants born at term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Premru-Srsen
- Department of Perinatology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Ivan Verdenik
- Department of Perinatology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Lili Steblovnik
- Department of Perinatology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Ksenija Geršak
- Department of Perinatology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Lilijana Kornhauser Cerar
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Perinatology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Lubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jančar N, Mihevc Ponikvar B, Tomšič S. Cold-knife conisation and large loop excision of transformation zone significantly increase the risk for spontaneous preterm birth: a population-based cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 203:245-9. [PMID: 27359080 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Revised: 06/02/2016] [Accepted: 06/11/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our aim was to explore the association between cold-knife conisation and large loop excision of transformation zone (LLETZ) with spontaneous preterm birth in a large 10-year national sample. We wanted to explore further the association of these procedures with preterm birth according to gestation. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a population based retrospective cohort study, using data from national Medical Birth Registry. The study population consisted of all women giving birth to singletons in the period 2003-2012 in Slovenia, excluding all induced labors and elective cesarean sections before 37 weeks of gestation (N=192730). We compared the prevalence of spontaneous preterm births (before 28 weeks, before 32 weeks, before 34 weeks and before 37 weeks of gestation) in women with cold-knife conisation or LLETZ compared to women without history of conisation, calculating odds ratios (OR), adjusted for potential confounders. Chi-square test was used for descriptive analysis. Logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate crude odds ratio (OR) and adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) with two-sided probability (p) values. RESULTS A total of 8420 (4.4%) women had a preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation, 2250 (1.2%) before 34 weeks of gestation, 1333 (0.7%) before 32 weeks of gestation and 603 (0.3%) before 28 weeks of gestation. A total of 4580 (2.4%) women had some type of conisation in their medical history: 2083 (1.1%) had cold-knife conisation and 2498 (1.3%) had LLETZ. In women with history of cold-knife conisation, the adjusted OR for preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation was 3.13 (95% CI; 2.74-3.57) and for preterm birth before 28 weeks of gestation 5.96 (95% CI; 4.3-8.3). In women with history of LLETZ, the adjusted OR was 1.95 (95% CI; 1.68-2.25) and 2.88 (95% CI; 1.87-4.43), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Women with cervical excision procedure of any kind have significantly increased odds for preterm birth, especially for preterm birth before 28 weeks and before 32 weeks of gestation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Jančar
- Department of Human Reproduction, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| | - Barbara Mihevc Ponikvar
- Health Survey and Health Promotion Department, National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Sonja Tomšič
- Health Survey and Health Promotion Department, National Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|