On-Demand Preexposure Prophylaxis in Men at High Risk for HIV-1 Infection

BACKGROUND

Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis has been shown to reduce the risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in some studies, but conflicting results have been reported among studies, probably due to challenges of adherence to a daily regimen.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blind, randomized trial of antiretroviral therapy for preexposure HIV-1 prophylaxis among men who have unprotected anal sex with men. Participants were randomly assigned to take a combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) or placebo before and after sexual activity. All participants received risk-reduction counseling and condoms and were regularly tested for HIV-1 and HIV-2 and other sexually transmitted infections.

RESULTS

Of the 414 participants who underwent randomization, 400 who did not have HIV infection were enrolled (199 in the TDF-FTC group and 201 in the placebo group). All participants were followed for a median of 9.3 months (interquartile range, 4.9 to 20.6). A total of 16 HIV-1 infections occurred during follow-up, 2 in the TDF-FTC group (incidence, 0.91 per 100 person-years) and 14 in the placebo group (incidence, 6.60 per 100 person-years), a relative reduction in the TDF-FTC group of 86% (95% confidence interval, 40 to 98; P=0.002). Participants took a median of 15 pills of TDF-FTC or placebo per month (P=0.57). The rates of serious adverse events were similar in the two study groups. In the TDF-FTC group, as compared with the placebo group, there were higher rates of gastrointestinal adverse events (14% vs. 5%, P=0.002) and renal adverse events (18% vs. 10%, P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of TDF-FTC before and after sexual activity provided protection against HIV-1 infection in men who have sex with men. The treatment was associated with increased rates of gastrointestinal and renal adverse events. (Funded by the National Agency of Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis [ANRS] and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01473472.).

Challenges and opportunities for oral pre-exposure prophylaxis in the prevention of HIV infection: where are we in Europe?

Following US Food and Drugs Administration approval in July 2012 of daily oral tenofovir and emtricitabine for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV infection in high-risk individuals in the USA, there has been much controversy about the implementation of this PrEP regimen in other countries throughout the world, and in Europe in particular. In this review, we focus on the challenges and opportunities of a daily oral PrEP regimen to curb the rising incidence of HIV infection in high-risk groups, and particularly in men who have sex with men. A number of issues would need to be addressed before PrEP could be implemented, including assessing the real effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of daily PrEP, the sustainability of daily adherence, the risk of selecting resistance, the long-term safety, and the risk of change in sexual behavior that might offset the benefit of PrEP. Alternatives to a daily oral PrEP regimen are being explored.

High levels of atazanavir and darunavir in urine and crystalluria in asymptomatic patients

OBJECTIVES

Atazanavir has been associated with kidney stones and renal failure. We measured urine and plasma concentrations of recent protease inhibitors (PIs) and searched for PI crystals in the urine of asymptomatic patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of HIV-infected patients taking ritonavir-boosted atazanavir 300 mg/day (ATV300/r), unboosted atazanavir 400 mg/day (ATV400), ritonavir-boosted darunavir at either 800 mg/day (DRV800/r) or 1200 mg/day (DRV1200/r) or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir 800 mg/day was performed. Plasma and urine were collected and PI levels measured using HPLC. Crystals were detected and identified in urine using polarized microscopy.

RESULTS

PI levels were measured in 266 patients, 142 of whom were assessed for urinary crystals. Their mean age was 46 years. The mean duration of HIV infection was 10.5 years and the mean duration of the current PI-containing regimen was 22.5 months. The mean CD4 cell count was 494 cells/mm(3); 74% showed controlled HIV replication. Median urinary PI levels were 22.3, 14.3, 26.9 and 29.7 mg/L for ATV300/r, ATV400, DRV800/r and DRV1200/r, respectively, significantly higher than plasma levels, which were all <5 mg/L (P < 0.001). In contrast, median urinary lopinavir concentrrations did not significantly differ from plasma concentrations (4.2 and 6.4 mg/L, respectively; P = 0.7) and were significantly lower than those of other PIs (P < 0.001). Atazanavir crystals were found in 7/78 patients receiving ATV300/r (8.9%; 95% CI = 2.6%-15.2%) and darunavir crystals were found in 4/51 patients receiving darunavir (7.8%; 95% CI = 0.4%-15.2%). Longer exposure to atazanavir was the only risk factor associated with the presence of atazanavir crystalluria (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike lopinavir, atazanavir and darunavir reached high concentrations in urine. Urinary crystals were found in a few patients receiving ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or darunavir and may favour nephrolithiasis.

Factors associated with virological response in HIV-infected patients failing antiretroviral therapy: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the antiviral response to optimized therapy following genotypic resistance testing and to identify factors associated with virological response in HIV-1-infected patients failing antiretroviral therapy.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted in 344 HIV-1-infected patients who underwent genotypic resistance testing because of virological failure. Virological response was defined as a plasma HIV RNA level below 200 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL or a drop of plasma viral load from baseline of more than 1 log10. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with virological response.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 40 years, with a male to female ratio of 4:1. Fifty-one per cent of patients had received the three major classes of antiretrovirals and the median duration of previous antiretroviral therapy was 4.6 years. At baseline, the median plasma HIV RNA level was 4.4 log10 copies/mL and the median CD4 cell count was 274 cells/microL. At 3 months, 55% of patients (188 of 344) had a virological response, which was sustained at 6 months (53%). Predictors of virological response were exposure to two or fewer protease inhibitors [odds ratio (OR) 1.8; P=0.046], and use in optimized therapy of a new class of antiretrovirals (OR 2.9; P=0.006), of more than two new drugs (OR 3.0; P<0.0001), of abacavir (OR 1.9; P=0.03), or of lopinavir/ritonavir (OR 3.7; P=0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of patients achieved a short-term virological response in this cohort study. Patients with the least experience of protease inhibitor treatment and in whom a new class of antiretroviral, more than two new drugs, abacavir or lopinavir/ritonavir was used in optimized therapy had the best virological outcome.