Progression-free survival and safety at 3.5 years of follow-up: results from the randomized phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial of niraparib maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer - a plain language summary

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?

This PLSP provides a short summary of an original scientific article that presented results from the PRIMA study after 3.5 years of follow-up time. The original article was published in the European Journal of Cancer in 2023. The PRIMA study included adult patients with newly diagnosed advanced high-risk ovarian cancer whose tumors shrunk or became undetectable after treatment with chemotherapy with or without surgery. The PRIMA study evaluated how well the drug niraparib, also known as Zejula, worked at delaying or preventing ovarian cancer from coming back (recurring) or getting worse (progressing) compared with placebo (a substance with no effects that a doctor gives to a patient instead of a drug). The first results from the PRIMA study were published in 2019, when patients had participated in the PRIMA study for about 1.2 years. The article this PLSP is based on reports longer-term data from the PRIMA study, when patients had participated in the PRIMA study for about 3.5 years. Patients were monitored (or followed) for a longer time to understand how well niraparib continued to work and to evaluate whether the safety of niraparib changed with additional time being monitored.

WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?

Patients who took niraparib had more time before their cancer came back or got worse than patients who took placebo. In terms of safety, no new types of side effects with niraparib treatment were observed with additional time being monitored as part of the PRIMA study.

WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?

These results support that niraparib remains an important treatment option to help delay the cancer from coming back or getting worse in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to initial treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02655016 (PRIMA study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Guideline concordant care for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by disaggregated Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander groups: A National Cancer Database Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Despite the within-group heterogeneity, Asian American (AA) and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NH/PI) patients are often grouped together. We compared the patterns of guideline-concordant care for locally advanced cervical cancer for disaggregated AA and NH/PI patients.

METHODS

Patients with stage II-IVA cervical cancer between 2004 and 2020 were identified from the National Cancer Database. AA patients were disaggregated as East Asian (EA), South Asian (SA), and Southeast Asian (SEA). NH/PI patients were classified as a distinct racial subgroup. The primary outcome was the proportion undergoing guideline-concordant care, defined by radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy, brachytherapy, and completion of treatment within eight weeks.

RESULTS

Of 48,116 patients, 2107 (4%) were AA and 171 (<1%) were NH/PI. Of the AA patients, 36% were SEA, 31% were EA, 12% were SA, and 21% could not be further disaggregated due to missing or unknown data. NH/PI patients were more likely to be diagnosed at an early age (53% NH/PI vs. 30% AA, p < 0.001) and have higher rates of comorbidities (18% NH/PI vs. 14% AA, p < 0.001). Within the AA subgroups, only 82% of SEA patients received concurrent chemotherapy compared to 91% of SA patients (p = 0.026). SA patients had the longest median OS (158 months) within the AA subgroups compared to SEA patients (113 months, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Disparities exist in the receipt of standard of care treatment for cervical cancer by racial and ethnic subgroups. It is imperative to disaggregate race and ethnicity data to understand potential differences in care and tailor interventions to achieve health equity.

Health-related quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer treated with niraparib vs placebo: Results from the phase 3 randomized PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with ovarian cancer (OC) who received niraparib as first-line maintenance therapy.

METHODS

PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (NCT02655016) enrolled patients with newly diagnosed advanced OC who responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomized (2:1) to niraparib or placebo once daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or death. HRQoL was assessed as a prespecified secondary end point using patient-reported responses to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), the EORTC QLQ Ovarian Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OV28), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index (FOSI), and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. Assessments were collected at baseline and every 8 weeks (±7 days) for 56 weeks, beginning on cycle 1/day 1, then every 12 weeks (±7 days) thereafter while the patient received study treatment.

RESULTS

Among trial participants (niraparib, n = 487; placebo, n = 246), PRO adherence exceeded 80% for all instruments across all cycles. Patients reported no decline over time in HRQoL measured via EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QoL and FOSI overall scores. Scores for abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms (EORTC QLQ-OV28) and nausea and vomiting, appetite loss, and constipation (EORTC QLQ-C30) were higher (worse symptoms) in niraparib-treated patients than placebo-treated patients; except for constipation, these differences resolved over time. Patients did not self-report any worsening from baseline of fatigue, headache, insomnia, or abdominal pain on questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite some early, largely transient increases in gastrointestinal symptoms, patients with OC treated with niraparib first-line maintenance therapy reported no worsening in overall HRQoL.

Demographic reporting and language exclusion in gynecologic oncology clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Participation in clinical trials may help mitigate disparate cancer outcomes. Thus, ensuring equitable access to clinical trials is a major priority for national cancer organizations.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine clinical trial eligibility criteria that may adversely affect the enrollment of underrepresented groups and assess the availability of demographic information in published gynecologic oncology studies.

STUDY DESIGN

ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for gynecologic oncology studies conducted between 1997 and 2021. Each study's inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed to determine whether demographic factors were used for enrollment screening. For published studies, demographic variables that were reported were identified. The expected clinical trial enrollment based on disease incidence and mortality was compared with the observed trial enrollment based on race.

RESULTS

There were 1597 gynecologic oncology studies: 883 (55%) from ovarian cancer studies, 336 (21%) from cervical cancer studies, 262 (17%) from uterine cancer studies, and 116 (7%) from multisite gynecologic oncology studies. Of the 581 published studies, 554 (95%) reported age, 363 (63%) reported race, and 171 (29%) reported ethnicities. Cervical cancer studies were most likely to report demographic information, including race (P=.026) and ethnicity (P<.001). During the study period, 189 studies (12%) excluded patients based on the language spoken. Industry-sponsored trials (odds ratio, 0.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.30) and organization-sponsored trials (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.73) were less likely to exclude patients because of language than investigator-initiated trials. A minority of patients (37%) in cervical cancer trials were of White race, compared with 85% of patients in uterine cancer trials and 82% of patients in ovarian cancer trials.

CONCLUSION

Over the last 3 decades, 1 in 10 gynecologic oncology trials excluded patients because of language. Race and ethnicity were reported in more than half of the available studies. Initiatives to increase transparency in recruiting underrepresented patients and reporting demographic data are urgently needed.

Oral Selinexor as Maintenance Therapy After First-Line Chemotherapy for Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

PURPOSE

Selinexor inhibits exportin-1 (XPO1) resulting in nuclear accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins including p53 and has clinical activity in endometrial cancer (EC). The primary end point was to assess progression-free survival (PFS) with once-weekly oral selinexor in patients with advanced or recurrent EC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO was a randomized, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study at 107 sites in 10 countries. Patients 18 years or older with histologically confirmed EC were enrolled. All had completed a single line of at least 12 weeks of taxane-platinum combination chemotherapy and achieved partial or complete response. Patients were assigned to receive 80 mg oral selinexor once weekly or placebo with 2:1 random assignment (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03555422).

RESULTS

Between January 2018 and December 2021, 263 patients were randomly assigned, with 174 allocated to selinexor and 89 to placebo. The median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.81 to 9.20) with selinexor versus 3.8 months (95% CI, 3.68 to 7.39) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.08]; two-sided P = .126), which did not meet the criteria for statistical significance in the intent-to-treat population. Incorrect chemotherapy response stratification data for 7 (2.7%) patients were identified. In a prespecified exploratory analysis of PFS in audited stratification data, PFS for selinexor met the threshold for statistical significance (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.499 to 0.996; two-sided P = .049). Furthermore, patients with the TP53 wild-type (wt) EC had a median PFS of 13.7 and 3.7 months with selinexor and placebo. The most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were nausea (9%), neutropenia (9%), and thrombocytopenia (7%).

CONCLUSION

The significance level for PFS was only met in the audited analysis. However, a preliminary analysis of a prespecified exploratory subgroup of patients with TP53wt EC showed promising results with selinexor maintenance therapy.

Concurrent uterine surgery and uptake of hormone therapy in patients undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for risk-reducing or therapeutic indications

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze factors associated with concurrent uterine surgery in patients undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) for risk reducing or therapeutic purposes. Additionally, trends in surgical choice and uptake of post-operative hormone therapy (HT) were examined.

METHODS

A 10-year retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent risk-reducing or therapeutic BSO at one institution. Multinomial regression analysis of patient and case characteristics was performed evaluating associations with surgery type (BSO, BSO and hysterectomy, or BSO and endometrial sampling). Trends in surgery type and uptake of HT post operatively are described.

RESULTS

Among the study sample of 643 patients, 140 (22%) patients underwent therapeutic BSO for a history of hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer, while the remainder underwent risk-reducing BSO due to a pathogenic variant and/or family history. Pathogenic variants included BRCA1 (141, 40%) BRCA2 (173, 49%), and Lynch syndrome genes (15, 4%). Regression analysis revealed significant associations between concurrent hysterectomy and Black race (RR = 3.55, CI = 1.51-8.38, p = 0.004), history of HR positive breast cancer (RR = 1.88, CI = 1.03-3.42, p = 0.04), and surgeon (Surgeon 1, RR = 2.43, CI = 1.36-4.35, p = 0.003). Among eligible patients under age 51, 36% initiated HT. Over the study period, concurrent hysterectomy rates declined while endometrial sampling increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of hysterectomy declined over the study period and slightly more than one-third of eligible patients utilized post-operative HT. Further research on concurrent uterine surgery is needed to establish standardized treatment recommendations in the risk-reducing and therapeutic BSO population. Additionally, education regarding the benefits of postoperative HT in eligible patients is warranted.

Safety, Efficacy, and Biomarker Analyses of Dostarlimab in Patients with Endometrial Cancer: Interim Results of the Phase I GARNET Study

PURPOSE

This interim report of the GARNET phase I trial presents efficacy and safety of dostarlimab in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC), with an analysis of tumor biomarkers as prognostic indicators.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 153 patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and 161 patients with mismatch repair proficient (MMRp)/microsatellite stable (MSS) EC were enrolled and dosed. Patients received 500 mg dostarlimab every 3 weeks for four cycles, then 1,000 mg every 6 weeks until progression. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR).

RESULTS

A total of 143 patients with dMMR/MSI-H EC and 156 patients with MMRp/MSS EC were evaluated for efficacy. ORR was 45.5% (n = 65) and 15.4% (n = 24) for dMMR/MSI-H EC and MMRp/MSS EC, respectively. Median DOR for dMMR/MSI-H EC was not met (median follow-up, 27.6 months); median DOR for MMRp/MSS EC was 19.4 months. The ORRs by combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 status were 54.9% and 21.7% for dMMR/MSI-H EC and MMRp/MSS EC, respectively. ORRs by high tumor mutational burden (≥10 mutations/Mb) were 47.8% (43/90) and 45.5% (5/11) for dMMR/MSI-H EC and MMRp/MSS EC, respectively. ORR in TP53mut or POLεmut molecular subgroups was 18.1% (17/94) and 40.0% (2/5), respectively. The safety profile of dostarlimab was consistent with previous reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Dostarlimab demonstrated durable antitumor activity and safety in patients with dMMR/MSI-H EC. Biomarkers associated with EC may identify patients likely to respond to dostarlimab. See related commentary by Jangra and Dhani, p. 4521.

Optimizing disease progression assessment using blinded central independent review and comparing it with investigator assessment in the PRIMA/ENGOT-ov26/GOG-3012 trial: challenges and solutions

OBJECTIVE

Progression-free survival is an established clinically meaningful endpoint in ovarian cancer trials, but it may be susceptible to bias; therefore, blinded independent centralized radiological review is often included in trial designs. We compared blinded independent centralized review and investigator-assessed progressive disease performance in the PRIMA/ENGOT-ov26/GOG-3012 trial examining niraparib monotherapy.

METHODS

PRIMA/ENGOT-ov26/GOG-3012 was a randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial; patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer received niraparib or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] v1.1), determined by two independent radiologists, an arbiter if required, and by blinded central clinician review. Discordance rates between blinded independent centralized review and investigator assessment of progressive disease and non-progressive disease were routinely assessed. To optimize disease assessment, a training intervention was developed for blinded independent centralized radiological reviewers, and RECIST refresher training was provided for investigators. Discordance rates were determined post-intervention.

RESULTS

There was a 39% discordance rate between blinded independent centralized review and investigator-assessed progressive disease/non-progressive disease in an initial patient subset (n=80); peritoneal carcinomatosis was the most common source of discordance. All reviewers underwent training, and as a result, changes were implemented, including removal of two original reviewers and identification of 10 best practices for reading imaging data. Post-hoc analysis indicated final discordance rates between blinded independent centralized review and investigator improved to 12% in the overall population. Median progression-free survival and hazard ratios were similar between blinded independent centralized review and investigators in the overall population and across subgroups.

CONCLUSION

PRIMA/ENGOT-ov26/GOG-3012 highlights the need to optimize blinded independent centralized review and investigator concordance using early, specialized, ovarian-cancer-specific radiology training to maximize validity of outcome data.

TP53 mutation and abnormal p53 expression in endometrial cancer: Associations with race and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This multi-center cohort study assessed associations between race, TP53 mutations, p53 expression, and histology to investigate racial survival disparities in endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS

Black and White patients with advanced or recurrent EC with Next Generation Sequencing data in the Endometrial Cancer Molecularly Targeted Therapy Consortium database were identified. Clinicopathologic and treatment variables were summarized by race and compared. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among all patients were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the association between race, TP53 status, p53 expression, histology, and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Black patients were more likely than White patients to have TP53-mutated (N = 727, 71.7% vs 49.7%, p < 0.001) and p53-abnormal (N = 362, 71.1% vs 53.2%, p = 0.003) EC. Patients with TP53-mutated EC had worse PFS (HR 2.73 (95% CI 1.88-3.97)) and OS (HR 2.20 (95% CI 1.77-2.74)) compared to those with TP53-wildtype EC. Patients with p53-abnormal EC had worse PFS (HR 2.01 (95% CI 1.22-3.32)) and OS (HR 1.61 (95% CI 1.18-2.19)) compared to those with p53-wildtype EC. After adjusting for TP53 mutation and p53 expression, race was not associated with survival outcomes. The most frequent TP53 variants were at nucleotide positions R273 (n = 54), R248 (n = 38), and R175 (n = 23), rates of which did not differ by race.

CONCLUSIONS

Black patients are more likely to have TP53-mutated and p53-abnormal EC, which are associated with worse survival outcomes than TP53- and p53-wildtype EC. The higher frequency of these subtypes among Black patients may contribute to survival disparities.

Progression-free survival and safety at 3.5years of follow-up: results from the randomised phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial of niraparib maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To report updated long-term efficacy and safety from the double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study (NCT02655016).

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer with complete or partial response (CR or PR) to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy received niraparib or placebo once daily (2:1 ratio). Stratification factors were best response to first-line chemotherapy regimen (CR/PR), receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (yes/no), and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status (deficient [HRd]/proficient [HRp] or not determined). Updated (ad hoc) progression-free survival (PFS) data (as of November 17, 2021) by investigator assessment (INV) are reported.

RESULTS

In 733 randomised patients (niraparib, 487; placebo, 246), median PFS follow-up was 3.5years. Median INV-PFS was 24.5 versus 11.2months (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.68) in the HRd population and 13.8 versus 8.2months (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56-0.79) in the overall population for niraparib and placebo, respectively. In the HRp population, median INV-PFS was 8.4 versus 5.4months (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.87), respectively. Results were concordant with the primary analysis. Niraparib-treated patients were more likely to be free of progression or death at 4years than placebo-treated patients (HRd, 38% versus 17%; overall, 24% versus 14%). The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in niraparib patients were thrombocytopenia (39.7%), anaemia (31.6%), and neutropenia (21.3%). Myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukaemia incidence rate (1.2%) was the same for niraparib- and placebo-treated patients. Overall survival remained immature.

CONCLUSIONS

Niraparib maintained clinically significant improvements in PFS with 3.5years of follow-up in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer at high risk of progression irrespective of HRD status. No new safety signals were identified.

A plain language summary of results from the GARNET study of dostarlimab in patients with endometrial cancer

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?

Dostarlimab, also known by the brand name JEMPERLI, is a medicine that can be used to treat certain types of endometrial cancer. GARNET is an ongoing phase 1 clinical study that is testing the safety and side effects of dostarlimab and the best way to administer it to patients. The results presented in this summary are from a time point in the middle of the study.

WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?

The results from the GARNET study published in 2022 showed how well dostarlimab worked for people participating in the study. Dostarlimab was found to reduce the size of tumors in patients with certain types of endometrial cancer. The patients treated with dostarlimab had side effects that could be managed and few severe side effects.

WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?

The results of the GARNET study led to dostarlimab being approved to treat patients with certain types of endometrial cancer. For patients with advanced-stage endometrial cancer, or endometrial cancer that has come back after chemotherapy (recurrent), there are few treatment options. The results suggest that dostarlimab may provide long-term benefits for these patients.

Dostarlimab for Primary Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

BACKGROUND

Dostarlimab is an immune-checkpoint inhibitor that targets the programmed cell death 1 receptor. The combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy may have synergistic effects in the treatment of endometrial cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 3, global, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Eligible patients with primary advanced stage III or IV or first recurrent endometrial cancer were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either dostarlimab (500 mg) or placebo, plus carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve, 5 mg per milliliter per minute) and paclitaxel (175 mg per square meter of body-surface area), every 3 weeks (six cycles), followed by dostarlimab (1000 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 3 years. The primary end points were progression-free survival as assessed by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, and overall survival. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 494 patients who underwent randomization, 118 (23.9%) had mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR), microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. In the dMMR-MSI-H population, estimated progression-free survival at 24 months was 61.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.3 to 73.4) in the dostarlimab group and 15.7% (95% CI, 7.2 to 27.0) in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.50; P<0.001). In the overall population, progression-free survival at 24 months was 36.1% (95% CI, 29.3 to 42.9) in the dostarlimab group and 18.1% (95% CI, 13.0 to 23.9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.80; P<0.001). Overall survival at 24 months was 71.3% (95% CI, 64.5 to 77.1) with dostarlimab and 56.0% (95% CI, 48.9 to 62.5) with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.87). The most common adverse events that occurred or worsened during treatment were nausea (53.9% of the patients in the dostarlimab group and 45.9% of those in the placebo group), alopecia (53.5% and 50.0%), and fatigue (51.9% and 54.5%). Severe and serious adverse events were more frequent in the dostarlimab group than in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel significantly increased progression-free survival among patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, with a substantial benefit in the dMMR-MSI-H population. (Funded by GSK; RUBY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03981796.).

Improving genetic testing following abnormal mismatch repair immunohistochemistry results in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

Although universal mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in endometrial cancer began at our institution in July 2015, not all eligible patients were referred for genetic testing (GT). In April 2017, genetic counselors obtained IHC data and contacted physicians to approve genetic counseling referrals (GCRs) for Lynch Syndrome (LS) in eligible patients. We assessed if this protocol increased frequency of GCRs and GT in patients with abnormal MMR IHC.

METHODS

We retrospectively (7/2015-5/2022) identified patients with abnormal MMR IHC at a large urban hospital. GCRs and GT were compared between cases from 7/2015-4/2017 (pre-protocol) and 5/2017-5/2022 (post-protocol) with chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Of 794 patients with IHC testing, 177 (22.3%) had abnormal MMR results with 46 (26.0%) meeting criteria for LS screening with GT. Of 46 patients, 16 (34.8%) were identified prior to and 30 (65.2%) after the protocol initiation. GCRs significantly increased from 11/16 (68.8%) to 29/30 (96.7%) in the pre-protocol versus post-protocol groups, p = 0.02. There was no statistically significant difference in GT between groups (10/16, 62.5% vs 26/30, 86.7%, p = 0.07). Of 36 patients who underwent GT, 16 (44.4%) had LS: MSH6, 9; MSH2, 4; PMS2, 2; MLH1, 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased frequency of GCRs was observed following the change in protocol, which is important as LS screening has clinical implications for patients and their families. Despite this additional effort, approximately 15% who met criteria did not undergo GT; further efforts such as universal germline testing in patients with endometrial cancer should be considered.

Treatment options for molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer in 2023

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews treatment strategies in endometrial cancer by molecular subtype.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classifies four molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer - mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), copy number high (CNH)/p53abn, copy number low (CNL)/no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and POLEmut - which are validated and highly prognostic. Treatment consideration by subtype is now recommended. FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) include pembrolizumab and dostarlimab for previously treated dMMR/MSI-H EC, and pembrolizumab/lenvatinib for mismatch repair-proficient/microsatellite-stable endometrial cancer, including CNH/p53abn and CNL/NSMP. ICIs are being studied as first-line therapy in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer by MMR status, as well as in combination with other targeted agents. Trastuzumab is NCCN compendium listed for HER2-positive serous endometrial cancer, which are primarily p53-abnormal. Antibody-drug conjugates targeting low and high HER2 levels show promise in breast cancer, and are beginning to be studied in endometrial cancer. In addition to hormonal therapy, maintenance therapy with selinexor (XPO1-inhibitor) showed potential benefit in p53 -wildtype endometrial cancer and is being investigated prospectively. Multiple prospective trials are evaluating de-escalation of care for POLEmut endometrial cancer given favorable survival regardless of adjuvant therapy.

SUMMARY

Molecular subtyping has important prognostic and therapeutic implications and should be guiding patient management and clinical trial design in endometrial cancer.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Gynecologic Cancer

The present article reviews the current evidence for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in gynecologic cancer. ADCs consist of a highly selective monoclonal antibody for a tumor-associated antigen and a potent cytotoxic payload conjugated through a linker. Overall, the toxicity profiles of ADCs are manageable. Ocular toxicity is a known class effect of some ADCs and is managed with prophylactic corticosteroid and vasoconstrictor eye drops as well as dose interruptions/holds and dose modifications. In ovarian cancer, mirvetuximab soravtansine, an ADC targeting alpha-folate receptor (FRα), received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accelerated approval in November 2022 after data from the single-arm phase III SORAYA trial. A second ADC targeting FRα, STRO-002, received FDA fast track designation in August 2021. Multiple studies with upifitamab rilsodotin, an ADC comprising a NaPi2B-binding antibody, are underway. In cervical cancer, tisotumab vedotin, an ADC-targeting tissue factor, received FDA accelerated approval in September 2021 after the phase II innovaTV 204 trial. Tisotumab vedotin in combination with chemotherapy and other targeted agents is currently being evaluated. Although there are no currently approved ADCs for endometrial cancer, there are many under active evaluation, including mirvetuximab soravtansine. Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd), an ADC targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), is currently approved for HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer and shows promise in endometrial cancer. Like all anticancer treatments, the decision for a patient to undergo therapy with an ADC is a personal choice that balances the potential benefits with the side effects and requires thorough and compassionate support of their physician and care team and shared decision making.

Frequency of actionable germline pathogenic variants identified through tumor next-generation sequencing in a gynecologic cancer cohort

BACKGROUND

Tumor next-generation sequencing can identify potential germline pathogenic variants associated with cancer susceptibility.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency of tumor sequencing results that met European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) recommendations for further germline genetic testing, and the frequency of germline variants among a cohort with gynecologic cancer.

METHODS

Patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent tumor sequencing between September 2019 and February 2022 in a large healthcare system in New York City were retrospectively identified. Eligible patients with suspected germline pathogenic variants on tumor sequencing were identified based on ESMO guidelines. Logistic regression was used to explore variables associated with referral and completion of germline testing.

RESULTS

Of 358 patients with gynecologic cancers who underwent tumor sequencing, 81 (22.6%) had ≥1 suspected germline variant according to ESMO guidelines. Of the 81 patients with qualifying tumor sequencing results, 56 (69.1%) received germline testing: 41/46 (89.1%) eligible patients with ovarian cancer and 15/33 (45.5%) with endometrial cancer. In the endometrial cancer cohort, 11/33 (33.3%) eligible patients were not referred for germline testing and the majority of these patients had tumor variants in genes commonly known to cause hereditary cancer. Of the 56 patients who underwent germline testing, 40 (71.4%) had pathogenic germline variants. In multivariable analysis, race/ethnicity other than non-Hispanic white was associated with lower odds of germline testing referral and completion (OR=0.1, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.5 and OR=0.2, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.6, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Given the high rate of pathogenic germline variant detection and the importance of identifying such variants for both patients and their family, it is imperative that eligible patients undergo germline testing. Additional education for providers on multidisciplinary guidelines and development of clinical pathways to ensure germline testing of suspected pathogenic variants identified on tumor sequencing is warranted, especially in light of the racial/ethnic inequity observed.

Biomarker-driven therapy in endometrial cancer

This article reviews treatments and targets of interest in endometrial cancer by molecular subtype. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classifies four molecular subtypes-mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H); copy number high (CNH)/p53abn; copy number low (CNL)/no specific molecular profile (NSMP); and POLEmut-which are validated and highly prognostic. Treatment consideration by subtype is now recommended. In March and April 2022, respectively, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) fully approved and the European Medicines Agency adopted a positive opinion recommending the anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody pembrolizumab for advanced/recurrent dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer which has progressed on or following a platinum-containing therapy. A second anti-PD-1, dostarlimab, received accelerated approval by the FDA and conditional marketing authorization by the European Medicines Agency in this group. The combination of pembrolizumab/lenvatinib for mismatch repair proficient/microsatellite stable endometrial cancer, including p53abn/CNH and NSMP/CNL, received accelerated FDA approval in conjunction with Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration and Health Canada in September 2019. The FDA and European Medicines Agency made full recommendations in July 2021 and October 2021. Trastuzumab is National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) compendium listed for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive serous endometrial cancer, which is primarily within the p53abn/CNH subtype. In addition to hormonal therapy, maintenance therapy with selinexor (exportin-1 inhibitor) showed potential benefit in p53-wildtype cases in a subset analysis and is being investigated prospectively. Other treatment regimens being evaluated in NSMP/CNL are hormonal combinations with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors and letrozole. Ongoing trials are evaluating immunotherapy in combination with frontline chemotherapy and other targeted agents. Treatment de-escalation is being evaluated in POLEmut cases given its favorable prognosis with or without adjuvant therapy. Molecular subtyping has important prognostic and therapeutic implications, and should guide patient management and clinical trial design in endometrial cancer, which is a molecularly driven disease.

Beyond BRCA: Patterns of risk-reducing surgery for non-BRCA, homologous recombination repair pathway gene variant carriers

OBJECTIVE

The real-world management of patients with non-BRCA, homologous recombination repair pathway variants with increased or uncertain risks of ovarian cancer is unknown. The objective was to determine the adoption of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) for carriers of variants with increased or uncertain risks of ovarian cancer beyond BRCA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients at three hospitals with non-BRCA, homologous recombination repair pathway variants with increased risk (BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D) and uncertain risk (ATM, BARD1, NBN, PALB2) of ovarian cancer. Outcomes of interest were adoption of RRSO and factors associated with adoption of RRSO. Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square, and logistic regression were performed with p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of 318 patients, 76 (24%) had pathogenic variants with increased risks of ovarian cancer (BRIP1, 45; RAD51C, 20; RAD51D, 11), and 242 (76%) had variants with uncertain risks of ovarian cancer (ATM, 145; PALB2, 69; NBN, 23; BARD1, 5). Of 64 patients eligible for RRSO by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria or family history, 31 (48%) underwent RRSO. Among eligible patients who did not undergo RRSO, 24 (73%) were not referred for gynecologic oncology consultation. Older age at testing (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.13) and referral to gynecologic oncology (aOR 33.48, CI 8.10-138.39) were associated with increased adoption of RRSO when adjusting for personal and family history of breast and ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSION

Half of RRSO-eligible patients by NCCN criteria beyond BRCA did not undergo RRSO. Opportunities exist for improving education to increase referrals to facilitate RRSO for these patients.

Missed opportunities in the real-world genetic testing in BRCA gene variant carriers with cancers meeting NCCN criteria

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of patients meeting the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)'s BRCA genetic testing criteria prior to a diagnosis of a BRCA-related cancer.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of patients with BRCA pathogenic variants and a diagnosis of a BRCA-related cancer. Patients were included if they had known dates of genetic testing and cancer diagnosis. NCCN criteria (version 2.2021) were applied to determine if patients met criteria for testing before a BRCA-related cancer diagnosis. The outcome of interest was the proportion of patients undergoing genetic testing following a diagnosis of a BRCA-related cancer who qualified for genetic testing based on NCCN criteria. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U test, and logistic regression were performed with significance at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of 270 patients with a BRCA-related cancer, 229 (85%) underwent genetic testing after a cancer diagnosis. Most patients (97%) met at least one NCCN criteria for BRCA testing; 166 (73%) of patients who were tested following a BRCA-related cancer diagnosis also met the criteria for testing by family history. Publicly insured or uninsured patients were three times more likely to undergo BRCA testing after a diagnosis of cancer (odds ratio [OR] 3.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-8.40). Patients with a family history of pathogenic variants were more likely to undergo testing before a cancer diagnosis (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.05-0.23).

CONCLUSION

Most patients with BRCA-associated cancers undergo genetic testing after their cancer diagnosis. Increased education on genetic testing criteria and novel methods to improve testing are desperately needed.

Clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and gynecologic cancer: A society of gynecologic oncology COVID-19 and gynecologic cancer registry study

OBJECTIVES

Patients with gynecologic malignancies may have varied responses to COVID-19 infection. We aimed to describe clinical courses, treatment changes, and short-term clinical outcomes for gynecologic oncology patients with concurrent COVID-19 in the United States.

METHODS

The Society of Gynecologic Oncology COVID-19 and Gynecologic Cancer Registry was created to capture clinical courses of gynecologic oncology patients with COVID-19. Logistic regression models were employed to evaluate factors for an association with hospitalization and death, respectively, within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis.

RESULTS

Data were available for 348 patients across 7 institutions. At COVID-19 diagnosis, 125 patients (36%) had active malignancy. Delay (n = 88) or discontinuation (n = 10) of treatment due to COVID-19 infection occurred in 28% with those on chemotherapy (53/88) or recently receiving surgery (32/88) most frequently delayed. In addition to age, performance status, diabetes, and specific COVID symptoms, both non-White race (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 3.93, 95% CI 2.06-7.50) and active malignancy (aOR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.30-4.20) were associated with an increased odds of hospitalization. Eight percent of hospitalized patients (8/101) died of COVID-19 complications and 5% (17/348) of the entire cohort died within 30 days after diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Gynecologic oncology patients diagnosed with COVID-19 are at risk for hospitalization, delay of anti-cancer treatments, and death. One in 20 gynecologic oncology patients with COVID-19 died within 30 days after diagnosis. Racial disparities exist in patient hospitalizations for COVID-19, a surrogate of disease severity. Additional studies are needed to determine long-term outcomes and the impact of race.

Quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease or toxicity and quality-adjusted progression-free survival with niraparib maintenance in first-line ovarian cancer in the PRIMA trial

Background:

The PRIMA phase 3 trial showed niraparib significantly prolongs median progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC) responsive to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, including those who had tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRd). This analysis of PRIMA examined the quality-adjusted PFS (QA-PFS) and quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease or toxicity (Q-TWiST) of patients on maintenance niraparib versus placebo.

Methods:

Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive once-daily maintenance niraparib (n = 487) or placebo (n = 246). QA-PFS was defined as the PFS of patients adjusted for their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) prior to disease progression, measured using European Quality of Life Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire index scores from the PRIMA trial. Q-TWiST was calculated by combining data on PFS, duration of symptomatic grade ⩾2 adverse events (fatigue or asthenia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and abdominal bloating) prior to disease progression, and EQ-5D index scores. Analyses used data collected up to the last date of PFS assessment (May 17, 2019).

Results:

The restricted mean QA-PFS was significantly longer with niraparib versus placebo in the HRd (n = 373) and overall intention-to-treat (ITT; n = 733) populations (mean gains of 6.5 [95% confidence interval; CI, 3.9–8.9] and 4.1 [95% CI, 2.2–5.8] months, respectively). There were also significant improvements in restricted mean Q-TWiST for niraparib versus placebo (mean gains of 5.9 [95% CI, 3.5–8.6] and 3.5 [95% CI, 1.7–5.6] months, respectively) in the HRd and ITT populations.

Conclusions:

In patients with advanced OC, first-line niraparib maintenance was associated with significant gains in QA-PFS and Q-TWiST versus placebo. These findings demonstrate that niraparib maintenance treatment is associated with a PFS improvement and that treatment benefit is maintained even when HRQoL and/or toxicity data are combined with PFS in a single measure.

Trial registration:

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02655016; trial registration date: January 13, 2016

Plain language summary

Background: In a large clinical trial called PRIMA, patients with advanced cancer of the ovary (ovarian cancer) were given either niraparib (a type of cancer medicine) or placebo (a pill containing no medicine/active substances) after having chemotherapy (another type of cancer medicine). Taking niraparib after chemotherapy is called maintenance therapy and aims to give patients more time before their cancer returns or gets worse than if they were not given any further treatment. In the PRIMA trial, patients who took niraparib did have more time before their cancer progressed than if they took placebo. However, it is important to consider patients’ quality of life, which can be made worse by cancer symptoms and/or side effects of treatment. Here, we assessed the overall benefit of niraparib for patients in PRIMA.

Methods: Both the length of time before disease progression (or survival time) and quality of life were considered using two different analyses:

● The first analysis was called quality-adjusted PFS (QA-PFS) and looked at how long patients survived with good quality of life.

● The second analysis was called quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease or toxicity (Q-TWiST) and looked at how long patients survived without cancer symptoms or treatment side effects.

Results: The PRIMA trial included 733 patients; 487 took niraparib and 246 took placebo. Around half of the patients in both groups had a type of ovarian cancer that responds particularly well to drugs like niraparib – they are known as homologous recombination deficiency (HRd) patients.

● When information on quality of life (collected from patient questionnaires) and survival was combined in the QA-PFS analysis, HRd patients who took niraparib had approximately 6.5 months longer with a good quality of life before disease progression than those who took placebo. In the overall group of patients (including HRd patients and non-HRd patients), those who took niraparib had approximately 4 months longer than with placebo.

● Using the second analysis (Q-TWiST) to combine information on survival with cancer symptoms and treatment side effects, the HRd patients taking niraparib had approximately 6 months longer without cancer symptoms or treatment side effects (such as nausea or vomiting) than patients taking placebo. In the overall group of patients, those taking niraparib had approximately 3.5 months longer without these cancer symptoms/side effects than patients receiving placebo.

Conclusions: These results show that the survival benefits of niraparib treatment remain when accounting for patients’ quality of life. These benefits were seen not only in HRd patients who are known to respond better to niraparib, but in the overall group of patients who took niraparib.

Enhancing accrual to clinical trials of minority patients with gynecologic malignancy

e13535

Background: Central to improving survival of patients with gynecologic malignancy is participation in therapeutic, surgical and preventative clinical trials. Minority population accrual is particularly poor representing a disparity in cancer care. We sought to evaluate enrollment of minority populations at an urban NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center before and after the NCI call to action June 2020. Methods: Data on patient enrollment in gynecologic oncology clinical trials (14 therapeutic and 4 non-therapeutic) was obtained from Perlmutter NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Primary outcomes were the proportion of newly accrued patients by race participating in trials between January 2019 to September 2021. Results: Over the entire study period 154 total patients were enrolled in therapeutic and non-therapeutic clinical trials. Enrollment by cancer type included 100 (71.4%) ovarian, 16 (7.1%) uterine, 12 (7.9%) cervical and 26 (13.5%) solid tumor trials. White patients comprised 69% (69 of 100) of patients on ovarian cancer trials. Uterine cancer trials by race consisted of 50 % White, 37.5% Black, 6.2% Asian and 6.2% Other race patients. Eighty-eight patients were enrolled into clinical trial prior to the NCI alert. By race these patients were: White, 65.9% (58 of 88); Black, 3.4% (3 of 88); Asian, 11.4% (10 of 88) and Other race, 19.3% (17 of 88). Hispanic patients comprised 13.6% (12 of 88) of the population. Following the call to action an additional 66 patients were enrolled in clinical trial. This included 42 (63.6%) White, 14 (21.2%) Black, 5 (7.57%) Asian, 5 (7.6%) Other race and 8 (12.12%) Hispanic patients. The percentage of Black patients enrolled in clinical trial increased four -fold over the time period (3.4% vs 21.2%, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Overall during this time period we found an increase in number of Black patients accrued to clinical trial. This indicates disparities in clinical trial enrollment can be modified by institutional awareness. The role of patient education, financial and logistical barriers and language discordance to minority participation in clinical trials should be studied further.

Efficacy and safety of lucitanib + nivolumab in patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies: Phase 2 results from the LIO-1 study (NCT04042116; ENGOT-GYN3/AGO/LIO)

5517

Background: LIO-1 is assessing the oral antiangiogenic, multikinase inhibitor lucitanib in combination with the programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) inhibitor nivolumab. Individualized lucitanib dose titration is being explored to maximize lucitanib exposure and potential clinical benefit of the combination. Here, we present data from stage 1 of a Simon 2-stage design across 4 different types of advanced gynecologic cancers from the phase 2 part of LIO-1. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic endometrial cancer (EC, who received ≥1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy); cervical cancer (CC, who received ≥1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy ± bevacizumab); high-grade ovarian cancer (OC, who received ≥2 prior chemotherapies); or EC/OC with clear-cell histology (EOCC, who received ≥1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy + taxane) were enrolled. Prior PD-1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor treatment was excluded, except for up to 10 pts in the EC cohort. Pts received lucitanib at a starting dose of 6 mg once daily (QD), escalating to 8 mg QD and then 10 mg QD if safety-based titration criteria were met, plus intravenous nivolumab 480 mg every 28 days. The data cutoff was Jan 10, 2022. Results: Across cohorts, 100 pts were enrolled to stage 1; 27 (27%) remain on treatment. To date, 28 (28%) have escalated to lucitanib 8 mg, and 17 (17%) have escalated to the maximum dose of 10 mg. Confirmed responses per RECIST v1.1 have been reported in 5/22 (22.7%; 5 partial responses [PRs]) EC pts, 7/22 (31.8%; 2 complete responses [CRs], 5 PRs) CC pts, 4/33 (12.1%; 4 PRs) OC pts, and 5/23 (21.7%; 1 CR, 4 PRs) EOCC pts. Response duration ranges from 1.9+ to 13.1+ months. Of 5 pts with EC who received prior PD-1 inhibitor, there were 2 PRs, and 1 pt with ongoing stable disease of 7+ months. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) considered related to study treatment were reported in 43 (43%) pts, with hypertension the most frequent (n = 25 [25%]). Forty-six (46%) pts had a lucitanib-related TEAE that led to lucitanib interruption and 12 (12%) had one that led to lucitanib dose reduction. Eleven (11%) and 8 (8%) pts discontinued lucitanib and nivolumab, respectively, due to a treatment-related TEAE. Safety results were generally consistent across tumor cohorts. Conclusions: The combination of lucitanib + nivolumab is active in the treatment of advanced gynecological malignancies and has a manageable safety profile through effective dose titration. Stage 2 enrollment has continued in the CC cohort. Biomarker analysis is ongoing, and more mature efficacy and safety data will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT04042116.

Ensuring equal access: Language as exclusion criteria among clinical trials in gynecologic oncology

e18587

Background: Enrolling a diverse patient population into clinical trials may help mitigate disparities and ensure generalizability of results. We aimed to assess clinical trial eligibility criteria that may adversely impact enrollment of underrepresented groups. Methods: We searched clinicaltrials.gov for gynecologic cancer studies between 1997 and 2021. Studies were excluded if they included non-gynecologic or multiple sites of disease; hereditary gynecologic cancer syndromes were included. The inclusion and exclusion criteria of each study were reviewed to determine if demographic factors were used for enrollment screening. Our outcome of interest was the characterization of inclusion and exclusion factors that may adversely impact enrollment of historically underrepresented groups. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests, logistic regression, and Cochrane-Armitage test of trends. Results: A total of 1614 studies were included; 902 (56%) were ovarian, 357 (22%) were cervical, and 355 (22%) were uterine cancer studies. The majority (86%, n = 1394) were therapeutic trials, 38% (n = 608) were phase 2, and 8% (n = 123) were phase 3. Ovarian cancer trials were most likely to be industry-sponsored (252, 28%), compared to only 12% of cervical and endometrial cancers (n = 44 each, p < 0.001). Overall, 190 gynecologic cancer studies (12%, n = 190) excluded patients based on language. Cervical cancer studies were the most likely to exclude patients based on language (n = 67, 19%), compared to endometrial cancer (n = 45, 13%) and ovarian cancer (n = 78, 9%, p < 0.001). Compared to investigator-initiated trials, industry-sponsored trials (adjusted OR [aOR] 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.29) and organizational/government-sponsored trials (aOR 0.37, CI 0.21-0.66) were less likely to exclude based on language. Compared to drug/device trials, behavior/quality of life studies (aOR 31.63, CI 18.50-54.09) and prevention/diagnosis trials (aOR 5.14, 2.81-9.41) were more likely to exclude based on language. During the study period, the number of studies using language as exclusion criteria increased over time (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Over the last three decades, one in ten gynecologic cancer trials excluded patients based on language. Studies focused on cervical cancer, investigator-initiated, and behavior/quality of life studies were most likely to exclude on the basis of language. Eliminating language as an exclusion criterion in clinical trial eligibility could improve understanding of the health-related quality of life among all patients with gynecologic cancer and help achieve equity in clinical trial enrollment.

ROSELLA: A phase 3 study of relacorilant in combination with nab-paclitaxel versus investigator’s choice in advanced, platinum-resistant, high-grade epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian-tube cancer

TPS5620

Background: Chemotherapy resistance is a major concern in the treatment of advanced platinum-resistant and platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. One mechanism of resistance is driven by cortisol, which can suppress the apoptotic pathways that chemotherapy agents rely upon, eg, suppression of BCL2 and FOXO3a pathways. Preclinical and clinical data indicate that glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonism may reverse the anti-apoptotic effects of cortisol, thereby restoring the efficacy of cytotoxic agents. Relacorilant is a selective GR modulator that has shown promise in overcoming resistance when combined with taxanes (particularly nab-paclitaxel) in preclinical models (Greenstein & Hunt 2021) and early-phase clinical studies (Munster et al. 2019) in various solid tumors. A randomized, controlled phase 2 study of relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel found clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR) without increased side effect burden in patients with recurrent, platinum-refractory and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (Colombo et al. 2021). The aim of this phase 3 study is to confirm these phase 2 findings in a larger patient population. Methods: ROSELLA (EudraCT 2022-000662-18, NCT pending) is a phase 3, randomized, 2-arm, open-label, multicenter study of relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel compared to investigator’s choice of chemotherapy agents in patients with confirmed high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. The trial is being conducted at multiple sites in North America and Europe and has a planned enrollment of 360 patients. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either relacorilant (150 mg the day before, day of, and day after nab-paclitaxel infusion) + nab-paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle) or investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, topotecan, or nab-paclitaxel). Randomization is stratified by prior lines of therapy (1 vs > 1), region of world (North America vs Europe), and prior bevacizumab (yes/no). Adult female patients with platinum-resistant disease (progression within 6 months of completion of platinum-containing therapy), excluding patients with primary platinum refractory disease, who have received 1–3 lines of prior systemic anticancer therapy and at least 1 prior line of platinum therapy are being enrolled. Life expectancy ≥3 months, adequate organ function, and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 are required. The primary study endpoint is PFS by blinded independent central review. Key secondary endpoints include overall survival, PFS by investigator, overall response rate, best overall response, DOR, clinical benefit rate, safety, quality of life, CA-125, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics. Clinical trial information: 2022-000662-18.

Dostarlimab in advanced/recurrent (AR) mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability–high or proficient/stable (dMMR/MSI-H or MMRp/MSS) endometrial cancer (EC): The GARNET study

5509

Background: Dostarlimab is a programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor approved in the U.S. as a monotherapy in patients (pts) with dMMR AR EC that has progressed on or after treatment with a platinum-containing regimen or dMMR solid tumors that have progressed on or after prior treatment, with no satisfactory alternative treatment options; and in the E.U. as a monotherapy in pts with dMMR/MSI-H AR EC that has progressed on or after treatment with a platinum-containing regimen. Here, we report on efficacy and safety in the 2 expansion cohorts of the GARNET trial that enrolled pts with EC. Methods: GARNET is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase 1 study. Pts were assigned to cohort A1 (dMMR/MSI-H EC) or cohort A2 (MMRp/MSS EC) based on local assessment. Pts received 500 mg of dostarlimab IV Q3W for 4 cycles, then 1,000 mg Q6W until disease progression, discontinuation, or withdrawal. The primary endpoints are ORR and DOR by blinded independent central review using RECIST v1.1. Results: For this third interim analysis, 153 dMMR/MSI-H and 161 MMRp/MSS pts were enrolled and dosed. Of these, 143 dMMR/MSI-H and 156 MMRp/MSS pts had measurable disease at baseline and ≥ 6 mo of follow-up and were included in the efficacy-evaluable population. ORRs were 45.5% (dMMR/MSI-H) and 15.4% (MMRp/MSS; Table). Median (m) DORs were not reached (NR; dMMR/MSI-H) and 19.4 mo (MMRp/MSS). Probability of PFS at 6, 9, and 12 mo was 49.5%, 48.0%, and 46.4% in dMMR/MSI-H EC and 35.8%, 31.3%, and 29.4% in MMRp/MSS EC, respectively. mOS was NR (dMMR/MSI-H) and 16.9 mo (MMRp/MSS). Overall, 27 pts (8.6%) discontinued treatment because of a treatment-related adverse event (TRAE; 13 dMMR/MSI-H, 14 MMRp/MSS). The majority of TRAEs were grade 1 or 2. The most common any-grade TRAEs were fatigue (56; 17.8%), diarrhea (46; 14.6%), and nausea (43; 13.7%). No deaths were attributed to dostarlimab in the EC cohorts. Hypothyroidism (12; 8%) was the most common any-grade immune-related TRAE. Conclusions: Dostarlimab demonstrated durable antitumor activity in both dMMR/MSI-H and MMRp/MSS AR EC. dMMR/MSI-H was associated with better outcomes: a higher response rate and longer PFS and OS. Safety was consistent with other PD-1 antibodies. Clinical trial information: NCT02715284. [Table: see text]

Utility of germline multi-gene panel testing in patients with endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

Patients with germline mutations in mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) associated with Lynch syndrome (LS) have an increased lifetime risk of endometrial cancer (EC). Multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) is a recent hereditary cancer risk tool enabling next-generation sequencing of numerous genes in parallel. We determined the prevalence of actionable cancer predisposition gene mutations identified through MGPT in an EC patient cohort.

METHODS

A single center retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients with EC who had a clinical indication for genetic testing and who underwent MGPT as part of standard of care treatment between 2012 and 2021. Pathogenic mutations were identified and actionable mutations were defined as those with clinical management implications. Additionally, the number of individuals identified with LS was compared between MGPT and tumor-based screening.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 224 patients. Thirty-three patients [14.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.4-20.1] had actionable mutations. Twenty-one patients (9.4%, 95% CI = 5.9-14.0) had mutations in LS genes (4 MLH1, 5 MSH2, 7 MSH6, 4 PMS2, 1 Epcam-MSH2). MGPT revealed two patients with LS (9.5% of LS cases) not identified through routine tumor-based screening. Thirteen patients (5.8%, 95% CI = 3.1-9.7) had at least one actionable mutation in a non-Lynch syndrome gene (6 CHEK2, 2 BRCA2, 2 ATM, 2 APC, 1 RAD51C, 1 BRCA1).

CONCLUSIONS

Germline MGPT is both feasible and informative as it identifies LS cases not found on tumor testing as well as additional actionable mutations in patients with EC.

Safety and antitumor activity of dostarlimab in patients with advanced or recurrent DNA mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) or proficient/stable (MMRp/MSS) endometrial cancer: interim results from GARNET—a phase I, single-arm study

Background

Dostarlimab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to PD-1, resulting in inhibition of binding to PD-L1 and PD-L2. We report interim data from patients with endometrial cancer (EC) participating in a phase I trial of single-agent dostarlimab.

Methods

GARNET, an ongoing, single-arm, open-label, phase I trial of intravenous dostarlimab in advanced solid tumors, is being undertaken at 123 sites. Two cohorts of patients with EC were recruited: those with dMMR/MSI-H disease (cohort A1) and those with proficient/stable (MMRp/MSS) disease (cohort A2). Patients received dostarlimab 500 mg every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then dostarlimab 1000 mg every 6 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) per RECIST V.1.1, as assessed by blinded independent central review.

Results

Screening began on April 10, 2017, and 129 and 161 patients with advanced EC were enrolled in cohorts A1 and A2, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 16.3 months (IQR 9.5–22.1) for cohort A1 and 11.5 months (IQR 11.0–25.1) for cohort A2. In cohort A1, ORR was 43.5% (95% CI 34.0% to 53.4%) with 11 complete responses and 36 partial responses. In cohort A2, ORR was 14.1% (95% CI 9.1% to 20.6%) with three complete responses and 19 partial responses. Median DOR was not reached in either cohort. In the combined cohorts, the majority of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1–2 (75.5%), most commonly fatigue (17.6%), diarrhea (13.8%), and nausea (13.8%). Grade≥3 TRAEs occurred in 16.6% of patients, and 5.5% discontinued dostarlimab because of TRAEs. No deaths were attributable to dostarlimab.

Conclusion

Dostarlimab demonstrated durable antitumor activity in both dMMR/MSI-H (ORR 43.5%) and MMRp/MSS EC (ORR 14.1%) with a manageable safety profile.

Trial registration number

NCT02715284.

COVID-19 outcomes of patients with gynecologic cancer in New York City: An updated analysis from the initial surge of the pandemic

Background

Despite significant increase in COVID-19 publications, characterization of COVID-19 infection in patients with gynecologic cancer remains limited. Here we present an update of COVID-19 outcomes among people with gynecologic cancer in New York City (NYC) during the initial surge of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]).

Methods

Data were abstracted from gynecologic oncology patients with COVID-19 infection among 8 NYC area hospital systems between March and June 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to estimate associations between factors and COVID-19 related hospitalization and mortality.

Results

Of 193 patients with gynecologic cancer and COVID-19, the median age at diagnosis was 65.0 years (interquartile range (IQR), 53.0–73.0 years). One hundred six of the 193 patients (54.9%) required hospitalization; among the hospitalized patients, 13 (12.3%) required invasive mechanical ventilation, 39 (36.8%) required ICU admission. Half of the cohort (49.2%) had not received anti-cancer treatment prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. No patients requiring mechanical ventilation survived. Thirty-four of 193 (17.6%) patients died of COVID-19 complications. In multivariable analysis, hospitalization was associated with an age ≥ 65 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11, 4.07), Black race (OR 2.53, CI 1.24, 5.32), performance status ≥2 (OR 3.67, CI 1.25, 13.55) and ≥ 3 comorbidities (OR 2.00, CI 1.05, 3.84). Only former or current history of smoking (OR 2.75, CI 1.21, 6.22) was associated with death due to COVID-19 in multivariable analysis. Administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy within 90 days of COVID-19 diagnosis was not predictive of COVID-19 hospitalization (OR 0.83, CI 0.41, 1.68) or mortality (OR 1.56, CI 0.67, 3.53).

Conclusions

The case fatality rate among patients with gynecologic malignancy with COVID-19 infection was 17.6%. Cancer-directed therapy was not associated with an increased risk of mortality related to COVID-19 infection.

370 Time course of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) during dostarlimab therapy in the GARNET trial

Background

Dostarlimab is a humanized programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor monoclonal antibody that blocks interaction with the ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. Dostarlimab is approved as a monotherapy in adult patients (pts) with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR; US) or dMMR/microsatellite-instability high (EU) recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer that has progressed progressing on or following prior treatment with a platinum-containing regimen. GARNET is a phase 1 study assessing antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in pts with solid tumors.

Methods

Pts with dMMR solid tumors, mismatch repair proficient endometrial cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer that progressed on or after prior therapy received 500 mg of dostarlimab IV every 3 weeks (Q3W) for 4 cycles, then 1000 mg IV every 6 weeks (Q6W) for up to 2 years or until disease progression or discontinuation. Here, we report TRAEs by cycle.

Results

A total of 515 pts were included. Of these pts, 60 (11.7%) experienced TRAEs leading to treatment interruption, and 25 (4.9%) experienced TRAEs leading to discontinuation. TRAEs of any grade with overall incidence of ≥10% of pts are shown (table 1). The majority of TRAEs occurred during cycles 1–3, with highest incidence during cycle 1. Grade 3 or 4 TRAEs were rare; those seen in ≥1% of pts are shown. Immune-related (ir) TRAEs of any grade with overall incidence of ≥2% of pts are shown. Most cases (96.9%) of irTRAEs occurred during cycles 1–8. The peak incidence of hypothyroidism occurred during cycle 4; in addition, frequency was increased during cycles 5–8, compared with cycles 1–4. No deaths were attributed to dostarlimab.

Abstract 370 Table 1

Time course of adverse events in the GARNET trial

Conclusions

No new safety signals were detected with dostarlimab compared to other anti–PD-1 inhibitors. Most TRAEs were low grade. The majority of TRAEs and grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in the first 3 cycles (first 12 weeks), but some cases occurred later, suggesting a need for ongoing monitoring. Few increases in the incidence of TRAEs were seen during cycle 5 following the transition to the 1000-mg Q6W dosing schedule; the TRAEs with increased incidence after the transition were fatigue and lipase increased. An increase in the frequency of the irTRAE hypothyroidism was seen after transitioning to the 1000-mg Q6W schedule.