Treatment of Thoracic Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament with One-Stage 360 Degree Circumferential Decompression Assisted by Piezosurgery

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of One-Stage 360 degree circular decompression for thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (TOPLL) assisted by piezosurgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study enrolled 36 patients with TOPLL between August 2016 and February 2019. The average intraoperative bleeding volume of all 36 patients in this study is 1058.61 ±737.66 ml.

RESULTS

All patients did not experience any intraoperative complications such as spinal cord and nerve injuries, and 22 other complications related to decompression of OPLL cited in other literature; all of which were relieved after treatment. The resection time of single laminectomy was 3.43 ±0.49 min, and circular decompression was 42.06 ±14.22 min. At the last follow-up, the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score was 8.89 ±1.56, the recovery rate of spinal cord function was 64.2 ±21.2%, and the number of cases of spinal cord function deterioration was 0 (0%). The mJOA score of the last follow-up was negatively correlated with the time of circular decompression (r = 0.368, p ＜ 0.01) and age (r = 0.412, p = 0.026). The recovery rate of the spinal cord function was negatively correlated with the operation time of circular decompression (r = -0.325, p = 0.041) and the amount of intraoperative blood loss (r = -0.555, p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of piezosurgery can safely and effectively complete one-stage simple posterior TOPLL with 360-degree circular decompression. The incidence of complications is not high, and a good outcome can be obtained.

[Comparison of percutaneous pedicle screw placement under O-arm navigation with traditional percutaneous pedicle screw placement in patients with thoracolumbar fractures without neurological symptoms]

Objective: To investigate the accuracy and clinical efficacy of percutaneous pedicle screw placement under O-arm navigation and traditional fluoroscopy in patients with thoracolumbar fractures without neurological symptoms. Methods: From July 2016 to July 2018, 72 patients with thoracolumbar fractures in Peking University International Hospital without neurological symptoms were divided into two groups, group A and group B. In group A, 36 patients underwent the surgery of percutaneous pedicle screw implantation under traditional fluoroscopy and 168 pedicle screws were inserted. In group B, 36 patients underwent the surgery of percutaneous pedicle screw implantation under O-arm guided fluoroscopy and 164 pedicle screws were inserted by the same surgeon. The general condition, operation condition, radiation dose, fluoroscopy time of single screw, screw placement time and accuracy, visual analogue score (VAS) score, Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI), kyphosis Cobb's angle, anterior edge height of 1 week and 6 months after surgery were compared. The data were compared with paired t test between the two groups. Results: There was no significant differences between the two groups in general condition, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, VAS, ODI, kyphosis Cobb's angle, and anterior edge height of the injured vertebra (all P>0.05). The operation time was (99±14) min in group A and (75±10) min in group B, the average screw setting time was (15.8±2.6) min in group A and (11.8±3.3) min in group B, the fluoroscopy time of each screw was (38.0±2.0) s in group A and (28.5±2.8) s in group B, the radiation dose of each surgery was (563±163) cGy/cm(2) in group A and (378±70) cGy/cm(2) in group B; the above-mentioned data of group A were all superior to those in group B and the differences between the two groups were all statistically significant (t=8.48, 5.73, 16.30, 6.25, all P<0.05). Rampersaud grading in group A was better than group B, and the differences between the two groups was statistically significant(χ(2)=12.2, P<0.05). Conclusion: The O-arm navigation system could not only provide high-definition navigation images and achieve high-precision navigation operations, which is more accurate than traditional pedicle screws placement, but also contribute to the reconstruction of spinal stability and reduce radiation dose, pedicle screws placement and operating time.

Three-dimensional navigation (O-arm) versus fluoroscopy in the treatment of thoracic spinal stenosis with ultrasonic bone curette: A retrospective comparative study

Three-dimensional intraoperative navigation (O-arm) has been used for many years in spinal surgeries and has significantly improved its precision and safety. This retrospective study compared the efficacy and safety of spinal cord decompression surgeries performed with O-arm navigation and fluoroscopy. The clinical data of 56 patients with thoracic spinal stenosis treated from March 2015 to April 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Spinal decompression was performed with O-arm navigation and ultrasonic bone curette in 29 patients, and with ultrasonic bone curette and fluoroscopy in 27 patients. Patients were followed-up at postoperative 1 month, 3 months, and the last clinic visit. The neurologic functions were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. The accuracy of screw placement was examined using three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) on postoperative day 5. There was no significant difference in the incidences of intraoperative dural tear, nerve root injury, and spinal cord injury between the two groups. The two groups showed no significant difference in postoperative JOA scores (P > .05). The O-arm navigation group had significantly higher screw placement accuracy than the fluoroscopy group (P < .05). O-arm navigation is superior to fluoroscopy in the treatment of thoracic spinal stenosis with ultrasonic bone curette in terms of screw placement accuracy. However, the two surgical modes have similar rates of intraoperative complications and postoperative neurologic functions.