Patterns of gene mutations in bile duct cancers: is it time to overcome the anatomical classification?
HPB (Oxford) 2019;
21:1648-1655. [PMID:
31122820 DOI:
10.1016/j.hpb.2019.04.002]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Two recent studies based on multi-omics data analysis identified distinct subtypes of bile-duct cancers (BDC) with important implications in terms of disease classification and patients' treatment.
METHODS
Patients with mutations in KRAS, NRAS, TP53, and ARID1A genes were classified in KRAS/TP53 group while patients with mutations in IDH1-2, BAP1, and PBRM1 were classified in IDH1-2/BAP1/PBRM1 group. The aim of this study was to define long-term outcomes among patients stratified by patterns of genes mutated.
RESULTS
Among 105 patients who underwent surgical resection for BDCs, 71 (68%) patients were classified in two groups based on patterns of genes mutated. While in IDH1-2/BAP1/PBRM1 group there were 58%, 22%, and 10% of patients with intrahepatic-cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), perihilar-cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC), and gallbladder cancer (GBC), in KRAS/TP53 group there were 42%, 78%, and 90% of patients with ICC, PHCC, and GBC (p = 0.003), respectively. Patients in IDH1-2/BAP1/PBRM1 group had a 5-year OS of 40% compared with 13% for KRAS/TP53 group (p = 0.032). In a multivariable model adjusted for margins, lymph-node status, microvascular invasion, and tumor grade, patients in KRAS/TP53 group had a 2.1-fold increased risk of death compared with patients in IDH1-2/BAP1/PBRM1 group (p = 0.028).
CONCLUSIONS
Genetic data were able to overcome the clinical based staging system in predicting patients' prognosis.
Collapse