Neoadjuvant botensilimab plus balstilimab response pattern in locally advanced mismatch repair proficient colorectal cancer

In patients with locally advanced cancer without distant metastases, the neoadjuvant setting presents a platform to evaluate new drugs. For mismatch repair proficient/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) colon and rectal cancer, immunotherapy has shown limited efficacy. Herein, we report exceptional responses observed with neoadjuvant botensilimab (BOT), an Fc-enhanced next-generation anti-CTLA-4 antibody, alongside balstilimab (BAL; an anti-PD-1 antibody) in two patients with pMMR/MSS colon and rectal cancer. The histological pattern of rapid immune response observed ("inside-out" (serosa-to-mucosa) tumor regression) has not been described previously in this setting. Spatial biology analyses (RareCyte Inc.) reveal mechanisms of actions of BOT, a novel innate-adaptive immune activator. These observations have downstream implications for clinical trial designs using neoadjuvant immunotherapy and potentially sparing patients chemotherapy.

Role of Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Management of Gastroesophageal Cancers

PURPOSE

This article reviews the essential clinical trials that have led to these immunotherapy approvals and explores the use of predictive biomarkers, such as PD-L1 expression and MSI status, to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from immunotherapies.

METHODS

This case review series describe findings from different clinical trials and contribute to the evolving understanding of the role of CPIs in managing advanced gastroesophageal cancers and may lead to improved treatment options and patient outcomes. Ongoing clinical trials also hold promise for expanding treatment options and improving patient outcomes in the future.

METHODS

The systematic review followed the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The protocol has not been registered. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify relevant clinical trials and studies that describe the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in managing advanced gastroesophageal cancers. Electronic database (PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov, Society of Immunotherapy of Cancer, Aliment Pharmacology & Therapeutics, BMC cancer, Molecular Cancer Research, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, American Association for Cancer Research, Science, Nature, Cancer Discovery, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Advanced Immunology, Oncotarget, Nature Medicine, Nature Genetics, Gut, Pathology and Oncology Research, Journal of Clinical Oncology, The New England Journal of Medicine, Gastrointestinal oncology, JAMA Oncology, Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Current Oncology, Annals of Oncology, The Lancet, JCO Oncology Practice, Future Oncology, Gastric Cancer, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, American Journal of Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, International Journal of Epidemiology, Helicobacter, Gastroenterology Review) were searched using a combination of relevant keywords and MESH terms. The search encompassed articles published up to 5/2023. Additionally, manual searches of reference lists of selected articles and pertinent review papers were conducted to ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant studies. Studies were included if they provided insights into clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of CPIs in treating advanced gastroesophageal cancers. Relevant case reviews and trials exploring combination therapies involving CPIs were also considered. Articles discussed in the utilization of predictive biomarkers were included to assess their impact on treatment outcomes. Data from selected studies were extracted to inform the narrative review. Key findings were summarized, including clinical trial designs, patient populations, treatment regimens, response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. The role of predictive biomarkers, particularly PD-L1 expression and MSI status, in identifying patients likely to benefit from CPIs was critically evaluated based on study results. Ongoing clinical trials investigating novel combination strategies and exploring the broader scope of CPIs in gastroesophageal cancers were also highlighted. The collected data were synthesized to provide a comprehensive overview of the crucial clinical trials that have contributed to the approval of CPIs for advanced gastroesophageal cancers. The role of CPIs in different lines of therapy, including first-line regimens, was discussed. Furthermore, the evolving landscape of predictive biomarkers was examined, emphasizing their potential significance in optimizing patient selection for CPI therapy. Ongoing clinical trials were reviewed to underscore the continuous efforts in expanding treatment options and improving patient outcomes in the future.

Long COVID in Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study of 1-year Mortality and Long COVID Prevalence Among Patients With Cancer Who Survived an Initial Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection

OBJECTIVES

The long-term effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) infection in patients with cancer are unknown. We examined 1-year mortality and prevalence of long COVID in patients with and without cancer after initial hospitalization for acute COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

We previously studied 585 patients hospitalized from March to May 2020 with acute COVID-19 infection at Weill Cornell Medicine (117 patients with cancer and 468 age, sex, and comorbidity-matched non-cancer controls). Of the 456 patients who were discharged, we followed 359 patients (75 cancer and 284 non-cancer controls) for COVID-related symptoms and death, at 3, 6, and 12 months after initial symptom onset. Pearson χ 2 and Fisher exact tests were used to determine associations between cancer, postdischarge mortality, and long COVID symptoms. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for potential confounders were used to quantify the risk of death between patients with and without cancer.

RESULTS

The cancer cohort had higher mortality after hospitalization (23% vs 5%, P < 0.001), a hazard ratio of 4.7 (95% CI: 2.34-9.46) for all-cause mortality, after adjusting for smoking and oxygen requirement. Long COVID symptoms were observed in 33% of patients regardless of cancer status. Constitutional, respiratory, and cardiac complaints were the most prevalent symptoms in the first 6 months, whereas respiratory and neurological complaints (eg, "brain fog" and memory deficits) were most prevalent at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cancer have higher mortality after hospitalization for acute severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections. The risk of death was highest in the first 3 months after discharge. About one-third of all patients experienced long COVID.

False-Positive Liquid Biopsy Assays Secondary to Overlapping Aberrant Methylation from Non-Cancer Disease States

Introduction

Liquid biopsies are increasingly being adopted in the care of patients with cancer. Not only in patients with metastatic disease but the utility is also being recognized in earlier phases of the journey of a patient with cancer. More recently, methylated platforms are offering another lens of looking at the same question more so in minimal residual disease (MRD) and early detection settings. While false positives secondary to clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) are recognized as one entity to consider when interpreting these assays, and advanced CHIP filtering bioinformatics platforms can prevent this, false positives secondary to aberrant methylation are not described.

Case Presentation

Herein, we report a case of a patient with hepatitis C-related viremia and a very high viral load that had a false-positive plasma-only colorectal MRD assay. The colorectal MRD assay spontaneously cleared on hepatitis C virus therapy which led to clearance of the virus.

Conclusion

As these assays are increasingly applied in real-world settings, it would be of value to consider non-cancer chronic disease states that may lead to aberrant methylation that could lead to a false-positive assay.

Favorable response to second-line atezolizumab and bevacizumab following progression on nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report demonstrating that anti-VEGF therapy overcomes resistance to checkpoint inhibition

RATIONALE

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a deadly disease in part due to decades of limited therapeutic options. With recent advances in our understanding of the tumor biology, several promising treatment strategies involving targeted and immunotherapies have emerged. However, enhancing their modest efficacy in HCC and other gastrointestinal malignancies is essential to improving survival.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A man in his late 50s with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus and morbid obesity initially presented with progressive abdominal pain and anorexia prompting an abdominal computed tomography scan that revealed a large solitary liver mass with extensive local involvement.

DIAGNOSES

Although there were features consistent with a primary gastric tumor on subsequent endoscopic evaluation leading to early diagnostic uncertainty, his clinical picture, including a dominant liver mass, immunohistochemical staining profile, and significantly elevated alpha fetoprotein ultimately favored HCC.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient received palliative systemic therapy with infusional fluorouracil for a presumed gastric primary, however restaging scans after 3 cycles demonstrated disease progression. The consensus from a multidisciplinary discussion was that his pathology was more consistent with primary HCC. He was subsequently started on nivolumab with a partial response, although after 5 months, he progressed prompting initiation of second-line atezolizumab and bevacizumab with a favorable response.

OUTCOMES

The addition of atezolizumab and bevacizumab led to a sustained biochemical and radiographic response that appeared to overcome the resistance to nivolumab monotherapy. Aside from several mild immune-related adverse effects, his quality of life has greatly improved and he has tolerated treatment well to date.

LESSONS

Our findings suggest that vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition can overcome resistance to checkpoint inhibition in advanced HCC by resulting in a unique synergy that has never before been described in patients. The biological rationale for this response is likely attributable to the immunomodulatory effects of antiangiogenic agents, promoting an immunostimulatory microenvironment that can be exploited by immune checkpoint inhibitors for more effective antitumor activity. Given the considerable benefit patients may derive following progression on first-line treatment, it is important to consider this strategic combination of therapies which can ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes.

COVID-19 Severity and Outcomes in Patients With Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study

PURPOSE

SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a systemic infection. Patients with cancer are immunocompromised and may be vulnerable to COVID-related morbidity and mortality. The objectives of this study were to determine if patients with cancer have worse outcomes compared with patients without cancer and to identify demographic and clinical predictors of morbidity and mortality among patients with cancer.

METHODS

We used data from adult patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and were admitted to two New York-Presbyterian hospitals between March 3 and May 15, 2020. Patients with cancer were matched 1:4 to controls without cancer in terms of age, sex, and number of comorbidities. Using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test, we compared morbidity (intensive care unit admission and intubation) and mortality outcomes between patients with cancer and controls. Among those with cancer, we identified demographic and clinical predictors of worse outcomes using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

We included 585 patients who were COVID-19 positive, of whom 117 had active malignancy, defined as those receiving cancer-directed therapy or under active surveillance within 6 months of admission. Presenting symptoms and in-hospital complications were similar between the cancer and noncancer groups. Nearly one half of patients with cancer were receiving therapy, and 45% of patients received cytotoxic or immunosuppressive treatment within 90 days of admission. There were no statistically significant differences in morbidity or mortality (P = .894) between patients with and without cancer.

CONCLUSION

We observed that patients with COVID-19 and cancer had similar outcomes compared with matched patients without cancer. This finding suggests that a diagnosis of active cancer alone and recent anticancer therapy do not predict worse COVID-19 outcomes and therefore, recommendations to limit cancer-directed therapy must be considered carefully in relation to cancer-specific outcomes and death.

Abstract S10-01: COVID-19 severity and outcomes in hospitalized patients with cancer at a New York City tertiary medical center: A matched cohort study

Background: New York City has been at the epicenter of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. Immunocompromised cancer patients may be more vulnerable to COVID-related morbidity and mortality. The objectives of this study were to determine if patients with cancer have worse outcomes compared to their noncancer counterparts and to identify potential demographic and clinical predictors of morbidity and mortality among cancer patients.

Methods: We used data from a retrospective observational cohort of adult patients who tested positive for COVID-19 at New York-Presbyterian hospitals between March 3 and April 25, 2020. Patients with active cancer were matched 1:4 to noncancer controls on age, gender, and diabetes status. Using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test, we compared morbidity (intensive care unit admission and intubation) and mortality outcomes between cancer patients and controls. We identified demographic and clinical predictors of worse outcomes using Cox Proportional Hazard models. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for all estimates.

Results: We included 445 COVID-19 positive adult patients of whom 89 had active malignancy. Among cancer patients, the median age was 72 years, 54% were male, and 52% were non-white. Presenting symptoms were similar between cancer and noncancer groups. Nearly half of cancer patients were on active treatment including cytotoxic and immunosuppressive therapy, and 40.9% of patients received cytotoxic treatment within 90 days of admission. Both patients with and without cancer received hydroxychloroquine in similar proportions (64% vs. 65.5%), and more cancer patients received remdesivir (7.9% vs. 3.7%). Overall, age (HR 1.14; 95% CI 1.00-1.29; p=0.049), male sex (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.04-1.96, p=0.07), dyspnea on presentation (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.3-2.58; p=0.0005), and bilateral lung infiltrates (HR 1.94; 95% CI 1.30-2.89; p=0.001) were associated with worse outcomes. Observed complications were similar for cancer and noncancer patients, including myocardial infarction (3.4% vs. 4.2%), vasopressor requirements (24.7% vs. 26.2%), bacteremia (9% vs. 10.4%), and venous thromboembolic events (7.9% vs. 7.3%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in morbidity or mortality between cancer and noncancer patients (p=0.287).

Conclusion: We demonstrate that COVID-19 hospitalized patients with active malignancies have comparable morbidity and mortality to patients without cancer. In contrast to previous findings, we observed no differences in risk of ICU admission, intubation, or death between cancer and noncancer patients. Our findings suggest that active malignancy may not be a contributive risk factor in comparison to other significant comorbidities that may be more responsible for the unfavorable prognosis of COVID-19 in cancer patients. We should consider the consequences of limiting care for cancer patients on cancer-specific outcomes and mortality in the context of COVID-19.

Citation Format: Gagandeep Brar, Laura C. Pinheiro, Michael Shusterman, Brandon Swed, Evgeniya Reshentnyak, Orysya Soroka, Frank Chen, Samuel Yamshon, John Vaughn, Peter Martin, Doru Paul, Manuel Hidalgo, Manish A. Shah. COVID-19 severity and outcomes in hospitalized patients with cancer at a New York City tertiary medical center: A matched cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Meeting: COVID-19 and Cancer; 2020 Jul 20-22. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(18_Suppl):Abstract nr S10-01.