The current state of transplant advanced practice providers: results of the advanced practice provider practice survey

Advanced practice providers (APPs) are trained, licensed health care providers. The American Society of Transplant APP community of practice developed an electronic survey to investigate transplant APP demographics, scope of practice, and academic activities. We defined the top of scope of practice as delivering health care to the fullest extent of APP education and training as allowed by state laws and regulations. From July 11, 2020, to August 31, 2020, 307 invitations were e-mailed and survey links were distributed electronically on the community of practice hub and social media. Two hundred fifty-three APPs responded. APPs practice in inpatient and outpatient settings. Among the respondent APPs, 11.5% assist in the operating room (OR), 46.3% of inpatient and 46.6% of outpatient APPs perform procedures, and 17.8% run specialized APP clinics. 26.2% feel they do not function at the top of their scope of practice and 29.7% were expected to function as a coordinator some or all of the time. Forty-three percent gave invited lectures, 41.5% have published, and 69.2% teach physician trainees. 74.7% and 35.1%, respectively, would like to participate in research and teach but are limited by time, opportunity, and experience. APPs should practice at the top of their scope of practice. Clinical workloads and lack of time limit the ability of APP to teach and contribute to evidence-based practice.

Risk factors and outcomes for delayed kidney graft function in simultaneous heart and kidney transplant recipients: A UNOS/OPTN database analysis

There are no prior studies assessing the risk factors and outcomes for kidney delayed graft function (K-DGF) in simultaneous heart and kidney (SHK) transplant recipients. Using the OPTN/UNOS database, we sought to identify risk factors associated with the development of K-DGF in this unique population, as well as outcomes associated with K-DGF. A total of 1161 SHK transplanted between 1998 and 2018 were included in the analysis, of which 311 (27%) were in the K-DGF (+) group and 850 in the K-DGF (-) group. In the multivariable analysis, history of pretransplant dialysis (OR: 3.95; 95% CI: 2.94 to 5.29; p < .001) was significantly associated with the development of K-DGF, as was donor death from cerebrovascular accident and longer cold ischemia time of either organ. SHK recipients with K-DGF had increased mortality (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.52 to 2.60; p < .001) and death censored kidney graft failure (HR: 3.51; 95% CI: 2.29 to 5.36; p < .001) in the multivariable analysis. Similar outcomes were obtained when limiting our study to 2008-2018. Similar to kidney-only recipients, K-DGF in SHK recipients is associated with worse outcomes. Careful matching of recipients and donors, as well as peri-operative management, may help reduce the risk of K-DGF and the associated detrimental effects.

Outcomes of Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients Stratified by Histologic Biopsy Findings

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of graft failure. We studied the histologic findings among adult kidney transplant recipients transplanted between January 2000 and June 2015 who had DGF and had a kidney biopsy within 14 days of transplant. Death censored graft failure (DCGF) and death at 1 and 3 years after transplant were examined. A total of 269 transplant recipients fulfilled our selection criteria, of which 152 (56.51%) had acute tubular necrosis (ATN), 44 (16.4%) had acute rejection (AR), mainly T-cell mediated rejection (n = 31), 35 (13%) had ATN with AR (mainly T-cell mediated rejection, n = 26), and 38 (14.1%) had other pathology. Compared with those with ATN alone, kidney transplant recipients with AR alone had a significantly higher risk of DCGF at 1 year post transplant (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.70; 95% confidence interval 1.5-9.5; P = .006). Those with AR alone had an increased risk of DCGF at 3 years post transplant (hazard ratio = 3.10; 95% confidence interval 1.3-8.5; P = .01) in crude analyses. There was no association between DGF etiology and mortality. Early renal biopsy can be used to distinguish AR, which has protocolized treatments, from other etiologies. This could potentially alter allograft survival within 1 year of transplant complicated by DGF.

Risk factors and outcomes for delayed kidney graft function in simultaneous heart and kidney transplant recipients: A UNOS/OPTN database analysis

There are no prior studies assessing the risk factors and outcomes for kidney delayed graft function (K-DGF) in simultaneous heart and kidney (SHK) transplant recipients. Using the OPTN/UNOS database, we sought to identify risk factors associated with the development of K-DGF in this unique population, as well as outcomes associated with K-DGF. A total of 1161 SHK transplanted between 1998 and 2018 were included in the analysis, of which 311 (27%) were in the K-DGF (+) group and 850 in the K-DGF (-) group. In the multivariable analysis, history of pretransplant dialysis (OR: 3.95; 95% CI: 2.94 to 5.29; p < .001) was significantly associated with the development of K-DGF, as was donor death from cerebrovascular accident and longer cold ischemia time of either organ. SHK recipients with K-DGF had increased mortality (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.52 to 2.60; p < .001) and death censored kidney graft failure (HR: 3.51; 95% CI: 2.29 to 5.36; p < .001) in the multivariable analysis. Similar outcomes were obtained when limiting our study to 2008-2018. Similar to kidney-only recipients, K-DGF in SHK recipients is associated with worse outcomes. Careful matching of recipients and donors, as well as peri-operative management, may help reduce the risk of K-DGF and the associated detrimental effects.

Delayed kidney graft function in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients is associated with early pancreas allograft failure

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication associated with significant untoward effects in kidney-alone transplantation. The incidence and outcomes following kidney delayed graft function (K-DGF) among patients undergoing simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation are less certain. We analyzed SPK recipients transplanted at our center between January 1994 and December 2017. A total of 632 recipients fulfilled the selection criteria, including 69 (11%) with K-DGF and 563 without. The incidence of K-DGF was significantly higher in recipients of organs from older donors and donation after circulatory death (DCD). The presence of K-DGF was significantly associated with an increased risk of pancreas graft failure during the first 90 days (n = 9, incidence rate [IR] 2.45/100 person-months), but not with late pancreas failure (n = 32, IR 0.84/100 person-months), kidney graft failure, or patient death. Although DCD was associated with K-DGF, it was not associated with either pancreas (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.58-1.44, P = .69) or kidney (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.66-1.82, P = .74) graft failure after adjustment for potential confounders. We found K-DGF to be a significant risk factor for pancreas graft failure but not kidney graft failure, with the major risk period being early (<90 days) posttransplant, and the major donor risk factor being older donor age.

Blessing and a curse of outpatient management of delayed graft function

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication occurring most often after deceased donor kidney transplant with several donor characteristics as well as immunologic factors that lead to its development post-transplant. These patients require dialysis and close kidney function monitoring until sufficient allograft function is achieved. This has resulted in limited options for DGF management, either prolonged hospitalization until graft function improves to the point where dialysis is no longer needed or discharge back to their home dialysis unit with periodic follow up in the transplant clinic. DGF is associated with a higher risk for acute rejection, premature graft failure, and 30-d readmission; therefore, these patients need close monitoring, immunosuppression management, and prompt allograft biopsy if prolonged DGF is observed. This may not occur if these patients are discharged back to their home dialysis unit. To address this issue, the University of Wisconsin-Madison created a clinic in 2011 specialized in outpatient DGF management. This clinic was able to successfully reduce hospital length of stay without an increase in 30-d readmission, graft loss, and patient death.

Management of Tumor Necrosis Factor α Inhibitor Therapy After Renal Transplantation: A Comparative Analysis and Associated Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Biologic agents inhibiting the tumor necrosis factor α pathway (TNFα-Is) are used to treat systemic inflammatory diseases. The best management of these agents after renal transplantation is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate peritransplant use of TNFα-Is and associated outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-center study of adult renal-transplant-recipients (RTRs) transplanted between 1/1/1998-12/31/2017, who received TNFα-Is for inflammatory disease prior to transplant. Qualifying patients were divided into 2 cohorts: patients who resumed TNFα-Is after transplant and those who did not. Outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 5256 renal transplants occurred in the study window; 14 patients met inclusion criteria. Primary indication for TNFα-I was Crohn's-disease (CD; 57.1%). Infliximab was utilized most frequently (50%). Seven RTRs resumed TNFα-I posttransplant; mean time to resumption of 10.6±4.35 months (median=6 months), 85.7% for CD. Immunosuppression was modified in 2 patients (28.6%) in response to restarting TNFα-I therapy. Seven RTRs did not resume TNFα-Is following transplant; the majority of these had rheumatic diseases. There was no significant difference in time to first bacterial or fungal infection, rejection, or patient survival between the 2 groups. Last measured estimated glomerular-filtration-rate was similar between groups (TNFα-I: 41 ± 14.2 vs 48.6 ± 8.6, P = 0.25). No patient had cytomegalovirus infection; however, 42.8% of each cohort had documented BK virus infection. Malignancy occurred more frequently in the cohort that resumed TNFα-Is (42.8% vs 14.3%, P = 0.24); however, this was not statistically significant. Conclusion and Relevance: TNFα-I therapy prior to renal-transplant is relatively uncommon. The decision to continue therapy after transplant must balance risks of infection and malignancy against inflammatory disease recurrence. A multidisciplinary treatment approach is necessary as use of TNFα-I affects immunosuppressive management and appears to affect transplant outcomes. Future studies are needed to further clarify the role of TNFα-I therapy use in RTRs with inflammatory disorders focusing on its correlation with both BK and malignancy.

Outpatient Management of Delayed Graft Function Is Associated With Reduced Length of Stay Without an Increase in Adverse Events

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common and costly complication of kidney transplantation. In July 2011, we established a multidisciplinary DGF clinic managed by nurse practitioners to facilitate early discharge and intensive management of DGF in the outpatient setting. We compared length of stay, 30-day readmission, acute rejection, and patient/graft survival in 697 consecutive deceased donor kidney transplantations performed between July 2009 and July 2014. Patients were divided into three groups: no DGF (n = 487), DGF before implementation of the DGF clinic (n = 118), and DGF clinic (n = 92). Baseline characteristics including age, gender, panel reactive antibody, retransplantation rates, HLA mismatches, induction, and maintenance immunosuppression were not significantly different between pre- and post-DGF clinic groups. Length of stay was significantly longer in pre-DGF clinic (10.9 ± 6.2 vs. 6.1 ± 2.1 days, p < 0.001). Thirty-day readmission (21% vs. 16%), graft loss (7% vs. 20%), and patient death (2% vs. 11%) did not differ significantly between pre- and post-DGF clinic. Patients in the DGF clinic were less likely to develop acute rejection (21% vs. 40%, p = 0.006). Outpatient management of DGF in a specialized clinic is associated with substantially shorter hospitalization and lower incidence of acute rejection without significant difference in 30-day readmission or patient and graft survival.

Initial vascular access type in patients with a failed renal transplant

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Permanent hemodialysis vascular access is crucial for RRT in ESRD patients and patients with failed renal transplants, because central venous catheters are associated with greater risk of infection and mortality than arteriovenous fistulae or arteriovenous grafts. The objective of this study was to determine the types of vascular access used by patients initiating hemodialysis after a failed renal transplant.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Data from the US Renal Data System database on 16,728 patients with a failed renal transplant and 509,643 patients with native kidney failure who initiated dialysis between January 1, 2006, and September 30, 2011 were examined.

RESULTS

At initiation of dialysis, of patients with a failed transplant, 27.7% (n=4636) used an arteriovenous fistula, 6.9% (n=1146) used an arteriovenous graft, and 65.4% (n=10,946) used a central venous catheter. Conversely, 80.8% (n=411,997) of patients with native kidney failure initiated dialysis with a central venous catheter (P<0.001). Among patients with a failed transplant, predictors of central venous catheter use included women (adjusted odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.63 to 1.87), lack of referral to a nephrologist (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.72 to 2.33), diabetes (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.22), peripheral vascular disease (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.16 to 1.48), and being institutionalized (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.23 to 1.89). Factors associated with lower odds of central venous catheter use included older age (odds ratio, 0.85 per 10 years; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 0.87), public insurance (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 0.80), and current employment (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Central venous catheters are used in nearly two thirds of failed renal transplant patients. These patients are usually followed closely by transplant physicians before developing ESRD after a failed transplant, but the relatively low prevalence of arteriovenous fistulae/arteriovenous grafts in this group at initiation of dialysis needs to be investigated more thoroughly.

Increase in proteinuria >200 mg/g after late rejection is associated with poor graft survival

BACKGROUND

There is no information on the effects of proteinuria on outcomes following rejection.

METHODS

We addressed this question in a retrospective study of 925 kidney transplant recipients between January 2003 and December 2007. Selection criteria were based on (i) biopsy proven diagnosis of a first episode of acute rejection, and (ii) available data on urine protein to creatinine (UPC) ratios at baseline (lowest serum creatinine before biopsy), time of biopsy and 1 month after biopsy. We examined the effects of a change in UPC (DeltaUPC = UPC 1 month after biopsy-baseline UPC) on outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 82 patients with both acute rejection and available data on proteinuria. Mean time (+/-SE) to acute rejection was 19 +/- 2.3 months, and patients were followed up for 38.7 +/- 2.6 months after transplant. Median DeltaUPC was 200 mg/g (95% confidence interval 0.00 to 0.300). Forty-two patients had a DeltaUPC > or =200 (high proteinuria group). Baseline characteristics were similar between high and low proteinuria groups except for more induction therapy with interleukin-2 receptor blockade in the former (71 vs. 47%, P = 0.04). Patient with DeltaUPC > or =200 had higher rates of graft loss (26 vs. 15%, P = 0.01) or combined graft loss or death (38 vs. 20%, P = 0.002 by log-rank). In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, DeltaUPC > or =200 mg/g, sirolimus therapy 1 month after rejection and re-transplant status were significant factors associated with death-censored graft loss (hazard ratio (HR) 4.4, 14.9 and 6.2, P < or = 0.008) or combined graft loss or patient death (HR 3.8, 6.5 and 3.9, P < or = 0.03). Conclusions. An increase in proteinuria > or =200 mg/g after late acute rejection is associated with poor graft and patient outcomes. Clinical trials are needed to determine whether post-rejection anti-proteinuric strategies improve outcomes.