Global Otitis Media Incidence Changes During the COVID Pandemic: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to analyze the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and national lockdowns on the incidence of otitis media (OM), a common otolaryngologic disease.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using PRISMA reporting guidelines. OM incidence (measured as newly diagnosed OM cases over total patients seen over a time period), OM antibiotic prescriptions (OM cases for which antibiotics were prescribed over total OM cases), and tympanostomy tube surgeries (all tympanostomy tube surgeries over total surgical cases) were extracted. Meta-analysis of proportions and comparison of proportions were performed.

RESULTS

Of 1004 studies screened, 26 studies in 11 countries met inclusion criteria. The percentages of OM cases pre- and during-lockdown were 6.67%, 95% CI [4.68%, 8.99%], and 2.63% [2.02%, 3.31%], respectively, with an OR of 0.31 favoring during-lockdown [0.25, 0.39] (p < 0.00001). Antibiotic prescriptions per all OM episodes pre- and during-lockdown were 1.61% [0.17%, 8.46%] and 0.62% [0.07%, 3.32%], with an OR of 0.37 favoring during-lockdown ([0.35, 0.40], p < 0.00001). Tympanostomy tube surgery proportions pre- and during-lockdown were 31.64% [6.85%, 64.26%] and 29.99% [4.14%, 66.55%], with an OR of 0.94 favoring neither during- nor pre-lockdown [0.45, 2.00] (p = 0.88).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of OM decreased significantly following international lockdowns due to the COVID-19 pandemic, with antibiotic prescriptions for OM episodes showing a corresponding decrease. Despite these reductions, numbers of tympanostomy tube procedures did not change significantly. These reductions are likely due to social distancing, decreased exposure through high transmission facilities such as day cares, decreased health care utilization, and even possibly decreased air pollution. Laryngoscope, 134:2028-2037, 2024.

Elevated Body Mass Index Associated with Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak after Lateral Skull Base Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine if body mass index (BMI) increases the risk of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak after lateral skull base surgery.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus were searched from January 2010 to September 2022 for articles published in English.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles that reported BMI or obesity with and without CSF leaks after lateral skull base surgery were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers (F.G.D. and B.K.W.) independently performed study screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 11 studies and 9,132 patients met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of mean difference (MD), odds ratio (OR), proportions, and risk ratio (RR) were calculated using RevMan 5.4 and MedCalc 20.110. BMI for patients with CSF leak after lateral skull base surgery (29.39 kg/m2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 27.75 to 31.04) was significantly greater than BMI for patients without CSF leak after lateral skull base surgery (27.09 kg/m2, 95% CI = 26.16 to 28.01) with an MD of 2.21 kg/m2 (95% CI = 1.09 to 3.34, p = 0.0001). The proportion of patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 that had a CSF leak was 12.7%, and the proportion of patients with BMI < 30 kg/m2 (control) that had a CSF leak was 7.9%. The OR for CSF leak after lateral skull base surgery in patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 was 1.94 (95% CI = 1.40 to 2.68, p < 0.0001), and the RR was 1.82 (95% CI = 1.36 to 2.43, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Elevated BMI increases the risk of CSF leak after lateral skull base surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IIa.

Use of dexmedetomidine for controlled hypotension in middle ear surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Microsurgical operations such as middle ear surgery rely heavily on visibility of the surgical field. Anesthetic techniques such as controlled hypotension have been developed to improve surgical field visibility by attempting to decrease bleeding. Many agents have been utilized to achieve controlled hypotension intraoperatively. Dexmedetomidine is a relatively newer agent which works on alpha-2 receptors to decrease sympathetic tone. This paper sought to determine the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for optimizing surgical field visibility in MES.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy was used in PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and CENTRAL through August 9, 2022 for this systematic review and meta-analysis.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

adult patients undergoing middle ear surgery with dexmedetomidine used for controlled hypotension to improve surgical field visibility. Risk of bias was assessed via Cochrane RoB 2. Meta-analysis of mean difference for surgical field scores and risk ratios for positive surgical field scores were used to compare dexmedetomidine with placebo or other agents.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included in this review. Statistically significant mean difference was found to favor dexmedetomidine over placebo for Fromme-Boezaart surgical field scores. Statistically significant results were also demonstrated favoring dexmedetomidine over other agents in risk ratio for receiving positive surgical field scores, as well as surgeon and patient satisfaction scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Controlled hypotension is an invaluable tool for surgical field visibility. Improved surgical field visibility was observed with dexmedetomidine compared with placebo and various other agents. Risk of sub-optimal bleeding scores was significantly lower with dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine is effective at improving surgical field visibility in middle ear surgery.