1
|
Pomey MP, Le Roux E, Nadon N, Perron J, Barry A, Bémeur C, Poder TG, Duford F, Laviolette L, Tétrault-Lassonde J, Vialaron C, Escalona MJ, Normandin L, Huard G, Girardin C, Rose C, Malas K, Ouellet D, Vincent C. Telehealth-Delivered Program and Accompanying Patients to Enhance the Clinical Condition of Patients Throughout a Liver Transplant: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e54440. [PMID: 38517464 PMCID: PMC10998179 DOI: 10.2196/54440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation (LT) is indicated in patients with severe acute or chronic liver failure for which no other therapy is available. With the increasing number of LTs in recent years, liver centers worldwide must manage their patients according to their clinical situation and the expected waiting time for transplantation. The LT clinic at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) is developing a new health care model across the entire continuum of pre-, peri-, and posttransplant care that features patient monitoring by an interdisciplinary team, including an accompanying patient; a digital platform to host a clinical plan; a learning program; and data collection from connected objects. OBJECTIVE This study aims to (1) evaluate the outcomes following the implementation of a patient platform with connected devices and an accompanying patient, (2) identify implementation barriers and facilitators, (3) describe service outcomes in terms of health outcomes and the rates and nature of contact with the accompanying patient, (4) describe patient outcomes, and (5) assess the intervention's cost-effectiveness. METHODS Six types of participants will be included in the study: (1) patients who received transplants and reached 1 year after transplantation before September 2023 (historical cohort or control group), (2) patients who will receive an LT between December 2023 and November 2024 (prospective cohort/intervention group), (3) relatives of those patients, (4) accompanying patients who have received an LT and are interested in supporting patients who will receive an LT, (5) health care professionals, and (6) decision makers. To describe the study sample and collect data to achieve all the objectives, a series of validated questionnaires, accompanying patient logbooks, transcripts of interviews and focus groups, and clinical indicators will be collected throughout the study. RESULTS In total, 5 (steering, education, clinical-technological, nurse prescription, and accompanying patient) working committees have been established for the study. Recruitment of patients is expected to start in November 2023. All questionnaires and technological platforms have been prepared, and the clinicians, stakeholders, and accompanying patient personnel have been recruited. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of this model in the trajectory of LT recipients at the CHUM may allow for better monitoring and health of patients undergoing transplantation, ultimately reducing the average length of hospital stay and promoting better use of medical resources. In the event of positive results, this model could be transposed to all transplant units at the CHUM and across Quebec (potentially affecting 888 patients per year) but could also be applied more widely to the monitoring of patients with other chronic diseases. The lessons learned from this project will be shared with decision makers and will serve as a model for other initiatives involving accompanying patients, connected objects, or digital platforms. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/54440.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Pascale Pomey
- Carrefour de l'Innovation, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Département de gestion, évaluation et politique de santé, école de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre d'excellence sur le partenariat avec les patients et le public, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Enora Le Roux
- Carrefour de l'Innovation, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Université Paris Cité, ECEVE UMR 1123, Inserm, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France
- AP-HP.Nord-Université Paris Cité, Hôpital Universitaire Robert Debré, Unité d'épidémiologie clinique, Inserm, CIC 1426, Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Nadon
- Carrefour de l'Innovation, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jessie Perron
- Carrefour de l'Innovation, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Regroupement cardio-vasculaire, hépatologie et transplantation, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Angèle Barry
- Carrefour de l'Innovation, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Axe immunopathologie, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Réseau transplantation et cliniques externes de transplantation et d'hépatologie, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Chantal Bémeur
- Axe Cardiométabolique, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Thomas G Poder
- Département de gestion, évaluation et politique de santé, école de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche de l'IUSMM, CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Île de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Fernand Duford
- Département d'hépatologie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Louise Laviolette
- Département d'hépatologie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Johanne Tétrault-Lassonde
- Département d'hépatologie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Cécile Vialaron
- Carrefour de l'Innovation, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Manuel J Escalona
- Carrefour de l'Innovation, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Louise Normandin
- Carrefour de l'Innovation, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Geneviève Huard
- Axe immunopathologie, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Département d'hépatologie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Catherine Girardin
- Axe immunopathologie, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Département d'hépatologie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Christopher Rose
- Axe Cardiométabolique, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kathy Malas
- Carrefour de l'Innovation, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Denis Ouellet
- Direction de la biovigilance et de la biologie médicale, Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux du Québec, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Catherine Vincent
- Axe immunopathologie, Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Département d'hépatologie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pomey MP, Paquette J, Nelea MI, Vialaron C, Mourad R, Bouchard K, Normandin L, Côté MA, Desforges M, Pomey-Carpentier P, Fortin I, Ganache I, Régis C, Rosberger Z, Charpentier D, Vachon MF, Bélanger L, Dorval M, Ghadiri DP, Lavoie-Tremblay M, Boivin A, Pelletier JF, Fernandez N, Danino AM, de Guise M. Integrating accompanying patients into clinical oncology teams: limiting and facilitating factors. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:150. [PMID: 38291443 PMCID: PMC10826234 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10624-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Since 2018, four establishments in Quebec have been instrumental in implementing the PAROLE-Onco program, which introduced accompanying patients (APs) into healthcare teams to improve cancer patients' experience. APs are patient advisors who have acquired specific experiential knowledge related to living with cancer, using services, and interacting with healthcare professionals. They are therefore in a unique and reliable position to be able to provide emotional, informational, cognitive and navigational support to patients who are dealing with cancer. We aimed to explore APs' perspectives regarding the limiting and facilitating factors in terms of how they are integrated into the clinical oncology teams. METHODS A qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews and focus groups was conducted with 20 APs at the beginning of their intervention (T1) and, two years later, during a second data collection (T2). Limiting and facilitating factors of APs' integration into clinical teams were analyzed in terms of governance, culture, resources and tools. RESULTS The limited factors raised by APs to be integrated into clinical teams include the following: confusion about the specific roles played by APs, lifting the egos of certain professionals who feel they are already doing what APs typically do, lack of identification of patient needs, absence of APs in project governance organizational boundaries, and team members' availability. Various communication challenges were also raised, resulting in the program being inadequately promoted among patients. Also mentioned as limiting factors were the lack of time, space and compensation. Creating opportunities for team members to meet with APs, building trust and teaching team members how APs' activities complement theirs were enhancing factors. Other facilitators include APs being involved in decision-making committees, being leaders in promoting the PAROLE-Onco program to patients and clinical team members and creating opportunities to communicate with team members to help enhance their work and provide feedback to improve patient services. Awareness of APs' added value for the team and patients is also a key facilitator. Regarding tools, offering accompanying services by telephone allows both patients and APs to benefit from the flexibility they need. CONCLUSION Over time, APs were able to identify optimal factors for successful implementation. Recommendations include APs and professionals working in co-construction on organization, leadership, resources and status factors. This could help catalyze a change in culture within health establishments and allow people dealing with cancer to benefit from the experiential knowledge of other patients within their clinical team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Pascale Pomey
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Centre d'excellence Sur Le Partenariat Avec Les Patients Et Le Public, Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, School of Public Health, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC, CA, Canada.
| | - Jesseca Paquette
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Monica Iliescu Nelea
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Cécile Vialaron
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Rim Mourad
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Karine Bouchard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire- CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Louise Normandin
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Andrée Côté
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Mado Desforges
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Israël Fortin
- Centre Intégré, Universitaire de Santé Et Services Sociaux de L'Est-de-L'Île-de Montréal, Hôpital de Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Isabelle Ganache
- Institut National d'excellence en Santé Et Services Sociaux (INESSS), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Catherine Régis
- Université de Montréal - Faculté de droit, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Zeev Rosberger
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital &, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Lynda Bélanger
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire- CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Michel Dorval
- Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CISSS Chaudière Appalaches, Lévis, QC, Canada
| | | | - Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay
- Faculté Des Sciences Infirmières, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Antoine Boivin
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Centre d'excellence Sur Le Partenariat Avec Les Patients Et Le Public, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-François Pelletier
- Centre Intégré de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de La Montérégie-Ouest, St-Hubert, QC, Canada
- Yale Program for Recovery & Community Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Nicolas Fernandez
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Alain M Danino
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Michèle de Guise
- Institut National d'excellence en Santé Et Services Sociaux (INESSS), Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pomey MP, Nelea MI, Normandin L, Vialaron C, Bouchard K, Côté MA, Duarte MAR, Ghadiri DP, Fortin I, Charpentier D, Lavoie-Tremblay M, Fernandez N, Boivin A, Dorval M, Desforges M, Régis C, Ganache I, Bélanger L, Rosberger Z, Danino MA, Pelletier JF, Vu TTT, de Guise M. An exploratory cross-sectional study of the effects of ongoing relationships with accompanying patients on cancer care experience, self-efficacy, and psychological distress. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:369. [PMID: 37087438 PMCID: PMC10122087 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10856-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal in Canada introduced accompanying patients (APs) into the breast cancer care trajectory. APs are patients who have been treated for breast cancer and have been integrated into the clinical team to expand the services offered to people affected by cancer. This study describes the profiles of the people who received the support and explores whether one-offs vs ongoing encounters with APs influence their experience of care, on self-efficacy in coping with cancer, and on their level of psychological distress. METHODS An exploratory cross-sectional study was carried out among patients to compare patients who had one encounter with an AP (G1) with those who had had several encounters (G2). Five questionnaires were administered on socio-demographic characteristics, care pathway, evaluation of the support experience, self-efficacy in coping with cancer, and level of psychological distress. Logbooks, completed by the APs, determined the number of encounters. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations between the number of encounters, patient characteristics, care pathway, number of topics discussed, self-efficacy measures in coping with cancer, and level of psychological distress. RESULTS Between April 2020 and December 2021, 60% of 535 patients who were offered support from an AP accepted. Of these, one hundred and twenty-four patients participated in the study. The study aimed to recruit a minimum of 70 patients with the expectation of obtaining at least 50 participants, assuming a response rate of 70%. There were no differences between G1 and G2 in terms of sociodemographic data and care pathways. Statistical differences were found between G1 and G2 for impacts on and the return to daily life (p = 0.000), the return to the work and impacts on professional life (p = 0.044), announcement of a diagnosis to family and friends (p = 0.033), and strategies for living with treatment under the best conditions (p = 0.000). Significant differences were found on the topics of cancer (p = 0.000), genetic testing (p = 0.023), therapeutic options (p = 0.000), fatigue following treatment (p = 0.005), pain and discomfort after treatment or surgery (p = 0.000), potential emotions and their management (p = 0.000) and the decision-making processes (p = 0.011). A significant relationship was found between the two groups for patients' ability to cope with cancer (p = 0.038), and their level of psychological distress at different stages of the care pathway (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS This study shows differences between one-time and ongoing support for cancer patients. It highlights the potential for APs to help patients develop self-efficacy and cope with the challenges of cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Pascale Pomey
- Innovation Axis, Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Department of Health Management, Evaluation, and Policy, School of Public Health, Université de Montreal, 7101 Av du Parc 3E Étage, Montréal, QC, H3N 1X9, Canada.
- Research Chair in Evaluation of State-of-the-Art Technologies and Methods, Montréal, QC, Canada.
- Center of Excellence On Patient Partnership and the Public, Montréal, QC, Canada.
| | - Monica Iliescu Nelea
- Innovation Axis, Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Louise Normandin
- Innovation Axis, Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Cécile Vialaron
- Innovation Axis, Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Karine Bouchard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire - CHU de Québec- Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Andrée Côté
- Innovation Axis, Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Israël Fortin
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et Services Sociaux de L'Est-de-L'Île-de-Montréal, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Nicolas Fernandez
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Antoine Boivin
- Innovation Axis, Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
- Center of Excellence On Patient Partnership and the Public, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Michel Dorval
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire - CHU de Québec- Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Université Laval - Faculty of Pharmacy, Québec, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CISSS Chaudière Appalaches, Lévis, QC, Canada
| | - Mado Desforges
- Innovation Axis, Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Catherine Régis
- Université de Montréal - Faculty of Law, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Isabelle Ganache
- Institut National d'excellence en Santé Et Services Sociaux (INESSS), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Lynda Bélanger
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire - CHU de Québec- Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Zeev Rosberger
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital &, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Michel Alain Danino
- Innovation Axis, Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
- Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-François Pelletier
- Centre Intégré de Santé Et de Services Sociaux de La Montérégie-Ouest, St-Hubert, QC, Canada
- Yale Program for Recovery & Community Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Thi Trinh Thuc Vu
- Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Michèle de Guise
- Institut National d'excellence en Santé Et Services Sociaux (INESSS), Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pomey MP, Paquette J, Iliescu-Nelea M, Vialaron C, Mourad R, Bouchard K, Normandin L, Côté MA, Desforges M, Pomey-Carpentier P, Fortin I, Ganache I, Régis C, Rosberger Z, Charpentier D, Bélanger L, Dorval M, Ghadiri DP, Lavoie-Tremblay M, Boivin A, Pelletier JF, Fernandez N, Danino AM, de Guise M. Accompanying patients in clinical oncology teams: Reported activities and perceived effects. Health Expect 2023; 26:847-857. [PMID: 36704843 PMCID: PMC10010089 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since 2018, four establishments in Quebec, Canada, have decided to implement the PAROLE-Onco programme, which introduced accompanying patients (APs) in healthcare teams to improve the experience of cancer patients. APs are patient advisors who have had a cancer treatment experience and who conduct consultations to complement the service offered by providing emotional, informational and educational support to patients undergoing treatments (e.g., radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery), mostly for breast cancer. We aimed to explore the evolution of APs' perspectives regarding their activities within the clinical oncology teams as well as the perceived effects of their intervention with patients, the clinical team and themselves. METHODS A qualitative study based on semistructured interviews and focus groups was conducted with APs at the beginning of their intervention (T1) and 2 years afterwards (T2). The themes discussed were APs' activities and the perceived effects of their interventions on themselves, on the patients and on the clinical team. RESULTS In total, 20 APs were interviewed. In T2, APs' activities shifted from listening and sharing experiences to empowering patients by helping them become partners in their care and felt generally more integrated into the clinical team. APs help patients feel understood and supported, alleviate stress and become partners in the care they receive. They also alleviate the clinical team's workload by offering a complementary service through emotional support, which, according to them, helps patients feel calmer and more prepared for their appointments with healthcare professionals. They communicate additional information about their patients' health journey, which makes the appointment more efficient for healthcare professionals. When APs accompany patients, they feel as if they can make a difference in patients' lives. Their activities are perceived by some as an opportunity to give back but also as a way of giving meaning to their own experience, in turn serving as a learning experience. CONCLUSION By mobilizing their experiential knowledge, APs provide emotional, informational, cognitive and navigational support, which allows patients to be more empowered in their care and which complements professionals' scientific knowledge, thereby helping to refine their sensitivity to the patients' experiences. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Two patient-researchers have contributed to the study design, the conduct of the study, the data analysis and interpretation, as well as in the preparation and writing of this manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Pascale Pomey
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA.,Centre d'excellence sur le partenariat avec les patients et le public, Montréal, Quebec, CA.,Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, School of Public Health, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jesseca Paquette
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA
| | - Monica Iliescu-Nelea
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA
| | - Cécile Vialaron
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA
| | - Rim Mourad
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA
| | - Karine Bouchard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire-CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Louise Normandin
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA
| | - Marie-Andrée Côté
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA
| | - Mado Desforges
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA
| | | | - Israël Fortin
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de santé et services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de Montréal, Hôpital de Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Isabelle Ganache
- Institut national d'excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Catherine Régis
- Université de Montréal-Faculté de Droit, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Zeev Rosberger
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital & McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Lynda Bélanger
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire-CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Michel Dorval
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire-CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.,Université Laval-Faculté de pharmacie, Québec, Québec, Canada.,Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.,Centre de recherche du CISSS Chaudière Appalaches, Lévis, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Mélanie Lavoie-Tremblay
- Faculté des sciences infirmières, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Antoine Boivin
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA.,Centre d'excellence sur le partenariat avec les patients et le public, Montréal, Quebec, CA.,Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jean-François Pelletier
- Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de la Montérégie-Ouest, St-Hubert, Québec, Canada.,Yale Program for Recovery & Community Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Nicolas Fernandez
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Alain M Danino
- Research Centre of the University of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montréal, Quebec, CA.,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Michèle de Guise
- Institut national d'excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Normandin L, Wong C, Dumez V, Malas K, Grégoire A, Grégoire J, Pettigrew L, Allanot N, Vialaron C, El Mansali SA, Nguyen C, Brunet F, Pomey MP. Reducing social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Assessing the contribution of courtesy phone calls by volunteers. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266328. [PMID: 35507534 PMCID: PMC9067884 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Context During the COVID-19 pandemic, restrictions were imposed on visits in hospitals in the province of Quebec, Canada in an effort to reduce the risk of viral exposure by minimizing face-to-face contact in order to protect patients, visitors and staff. These measures led to social isolation for patients. In order to reduce this isolation, CHUM (the Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, a teaching hospital) shifted from in-person visits to courtesy telephone calls delivered by volunteers from CHUM’s Volunteers, Recreation and Leisure Department. Objectives To study: (1) the contribution made by these calls to reducing isolation and their limitations, (2) how the calls can be improved, and (3) whether they should be maintained, based on the views of patients and volunteers. Methodology This study examined two populations. The first one consisted of 189 adult patients hospitalized at CHUM who received a courtesy phone call from a volunteer and the second one consisted of the 25 CHUM volunteers who made these calls. Quantitative data were collected from patients and volunteers through questionnaires and a Smartsheet. The patient questionnaire evaluated isolation, the courtesy phone calls, the relationship of trust with the volunteer and sociodemographic questions. The volunteer questionnaire evaluated the appropriateness of the technology for the intervention, the support and training received, the impacts of the courtesy phone call on both the patients and the volunteers, an experience report and sociodemographic information. In addition, a focus group was held with 7 volunteers. Then the verbatim were transcribed and analyzed using QDA miner software. Results From April 27, 2020 to September 5, 2020 more than 11,800 calls were made, mainly concerning hospitalization conditions or home follow-ups (n = 83), and relationships with relatives, friends, and family (n = 79). For 73.6% of hospitalized patients, the courtesy calls from volunteers were a good response to their needs, and 72% of volunteers agreed. 64.5% of patients felt less isolated and 40% of volunteers felt useful. Conclusion Our data suggest that patients felt less isolated during their hospitalization because of the courtesy calls made by the volunteers, that smartphones could also be used for video calls and, finally, that maintaining this type of service seems as relevant after as during a pandemic to provide social interactions to people isolated for medical reasons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Normandin
- Innovation Axis, Research Center of The Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Caroline Wong
- Center of Excellence on Patient Partnership and The Public, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Vincent Dumez
- Center of Excellence on Patient Partnership and The Public, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Kathy Malas
- General Directorate, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Alexandre Grégoire
- Center of Excellence on Patient Partnership and The Public, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Julie Grégoire
- Education and Academy Directorate, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Lise Pettigrew
- Volunteer, Recreation and Leisure Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nicolas Allanot
- Volunteer, Recreation and Leisure Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Cécile Vialaron
- Innovation Axis, Research Center of The Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sabrina Anissa El Mansali
- Innovation Axis, Research Center of The Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Volunteer, Recreation and Leisure Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Christine Nguyen
- Innovation Axis, Research Center of The Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fabrice Brunet
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- General Directorate, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Marie-Pascale Pomey
- Innovation Axis, Research Center of The Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Center of Excellence on Patient Partnership and The Public, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Health Management, Evaluation, and Policy, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Research Chair in Evaluation of State-of-the-Art Technologies and Methods, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pomey MP, de Guise M, Desforges M, Bouchard K, Vialaron C, Normandin L, Iliescu-Nelea M, Fortin I, Ganache I, Régis C, Rosberger Z, Charpentier D, Bélanger L, Dorval M, Ghadiri DP, Lavoie-Tremblay M, Boivin A, Pelletier JF, Fernandez N, Danino AM. Correction to: The patient advisor, an organizational resource as a lever for an enhanced oncology patient experience (PAROLEonco): a longitudinal multiple case study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:67. [PMID: 33446153 PMCID: PMC7807428 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06065-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M P Pomey
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM), 850, rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada. .,Centre d'Excellence pour le Partenariat avec les Patients et le Public, 900, rue Saint-Denis, Porte S03.900, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada. .,École de santé publique de l'université de Montréal-Département de gestion, évaluation et politique de santé, 7101 Av du Parc, Montréal, Québec, H3N 1X9, Canada. .,Université de Montréal - Faculté de Médecine, 2900 boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J4, Canada. .,Institut national d'excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS), 2021, avenue Union, 12e étage, bureau 1200, Montréal, Québec, H3A 2S9, Canada.
| | - M de Guise
- Institut national d'excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS), 2021, avenue Union, 12e étage, bureau 1200, Montréal, Québec, H3A 2S9, Canada
| | - M Desforges
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de santé et services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de Montréal, Hôpital de Maisonneuve-Rosemont, 5415, boulevard de l'Assomption, Montréal, Québec, H1T 2M4, Canada
| | - K Bouchard
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 10, Rue de l'Espinay, Québec, Québec, G1L 3L5, Canada
| | - C Vialaron
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM), 850, rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - L Normandin
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM), 850, rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - M Iliescu-Nelea
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM), 850, rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - I Fortin
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de santé et services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de Montréal, Hôpital de Maisonneuve-Rosemont, 5415, boulevard de l'Assomption, Montréal, Québec, H1T 2M4, Canada
| | - I Ganache
- Institut national d'excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS), 2021, avenue Union, 12e étage, bureau 1200, Montréal, Québec, H3A 2S9, Canada
| | - C Régis
- Université de Montréal - Faculté de Droit, 3101 chemin de la Tour, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J7, Canada
| | - Z Rosberger
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital & McGill University, Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, 5100 de Maisonneuve Blvd West, Montréal, Québec, H4A 3T2, Canada
| | - D Charpentier
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0C1, Canada
| | - L Bélanger
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 10, Rue de l'Espinay, Québec, Québec, G1L 3L5, Canada
| | - M Dorval
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 10, Rue de l'Espinay, Québec, Québec, G1L 3L5, Canada.,Université Laval - Faculté de pharmacie, 050, avenue de la Médecine, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.,Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 1050 chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, Québec, G1S4L8, Canada.,Centre de recherche du CISSS Chaudière Pomey et al. BMC Health Services Research (2021) 21:10 Page 10 of 12 Appalaches, 143 rue Wolfe, Lévis, Québec, G6V 3Z1, Canada
| | - D P Ghadiri
- HEC Montréal, Department of management, 3000, chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, H3T 2A7, Canada
| | - M Lavoie-Tremblay
- McGill University, Ingram School of Nursing (IsoN), 680 Sherbrooke Street West, Montréal, Québec, H3A 2M7, Canada.,Centre Universitaire de Santé McGill (CUSM), 1650, avenue Cedar, Montréal, Québec, H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - A Boivin
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM), 850, rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada.,Centre d'Excellence pour le Partenariat avec les Patients et le Public, 900, rue Saint-Denis, Porte S03.900, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada.,Université de Montréal - Faculté de Médecine, 2900 boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - J F Pelletier
- Université de Montréal - Faculté de Médecine, 2900 boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J4, Canada.,Centre de Recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, 7331 Rue Hochelaga, Montréal, Québec, H1N 3V2, Canada
| | - N Fernandez
- Université de Montréal - Faculté de Médecine, 2900 boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - A M Danino
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM), 850, rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada.,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0C1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pomey MP, de Guise M, Desforges M, Bouchard K, Vialaron C, Normandin L, Iliescu-Nelea M, Fortin I, Ganache I, Régis C, Rosberger Z, Charpentier D, Bélanger L, Dorval M, Ghadiri DP, Lavoie-Tremblay M, Boivin A, Pelletier JF, Fernandez N, Danino AM. The patient advisor, an organizational resource as a lever for an enhanced oncology patient experience (PAROLE-onco): a longitudinal multiple case study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:10. [PMID: 33397386 PMCID: PMC7780212 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-06009-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quebec is one of the Canadian provinces with the highest rates of cancer incidence and prevalence. A study by the Rossy Cancer Network (RCN) of McGill university assessed six aspects of the patient experience among cancer patients and found that emotional support is the aspect most lacking. To improve this support, trained patient advisors (PAs) can be included as full-fledged members of the healthcare team, given that PA can rely on their knowledge with experiencing the disease and from using health and social care services to accompany cancer patients, they could help to round out the health and social care services offer in oncology. However, the feasibility of integrating PAs in clinical oncology teams has not been studied. In this multisite study, we will explore how to integrate PAs in clinical oncology teams and, under what conditions this can be successfully done. We aim to better understand effects of this PA intervention on patients, on the PAs themselves, the health and social care team, the administrators, and on the organization of services and to identify associated ethical and legal issues. METHODS/DESIGN We will conduct six mixed methods longitudinal case studies. Qualitative data will be used to study the integration of the PAs into clinical oncology teams and to identify the factors that are facilitators and inhibitors of the process, the associated ethical and legal issues, and the challenges that the PAs experience. Quantitative data will be used to assess effects on patients, PAs and team members, if any, of the PA intervention. The results will be used to support oncology programs in the integration of PAs into their healthcare teams and to design a future randomized pragmatic trial to evaluate the impact of PAs as full-fledged members of clinical oncology teams on cancer patients' experience of emotional support throughout their care trajectory. DISCUSSION This study will be the first to integrate PAs as full-fledged members of the clinical oncology team and to assess possible clinical and organizational level effects. Given the unique role of PAs, this study will complement the body of research on peer support and patient navigation. An additional innovative aspect of this study will be consideration of the ethical and legal issues at stake and how to address them in the health care organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Pomey
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM), 850, rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada.
- Centre d'Excellence pour le Partenariat avec les Patients et le Public, 900, rue Saint-Denis, Porte S03.900, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada.
- École de santé publique de l'université de Montréal-Département de gestion, évaluation et politique de santé, 7101 Av du Parc, Montréal, Québec, H3N 1X9, Canada.
- Université de Montréal - Faculté de Médecine, 2900 boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J4, Canada.
- Institut national d'excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS), 2021, avenue Union, 12e étage, bureau 1200, Montréal, Québec, H3A 2S9, Canada.
| | - M de Guise
- Institut national d'excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS), 2021, avenue Union, 12e étage, bureau 1200, Montréal, Québec, H3A 2S9, Canada
| | - M Desforges
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de santé et services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de Montréal, Hôpital de Maisonneuve-Rosemont, 5415, boulevard de l'Assomption, Montréal, Québec, H1T 2M4, Canada
| | - K Bouchard
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 10, Rue de l'Espinay, Québec, Québec, G1L 3L5, Canada
| | - C Vialaron
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM), 850, rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - L Normandin
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM), 850, rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - M Iliescu-Nelea
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM), 850, rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - I Fortin
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de santé et services sociaux de l'Est-de-l'Île-de Montréal, Hôpital de Maisonneuve-Rosemont, 5415, boulevard de l'Assomption, Montréal, Québec, H1T 2M4, Canada
| | - I Ganache
- Institut national d'excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS), 2021, avenue Union, 12e étage, bureau 1200, Montréal, Québec, H3A 2S9, Canada
| | - C Régis
- Université de Montréal - Faculté de Droit, 3101 chemin de la Tour, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J7, Canada
| | - Z Rosberger
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital & McGill University, Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, 5100 de Maisonneuve Blvd West, Montréal, Québec, H4A 3T2, Canada
| | - D Charpentier
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0C1, Canada
| | - L Bélanger
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 10, Rue de l'Espinay, Québec, Québec, G1L 3L5, Canada
| | - M Dorval
- CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 10, Rue de l'Espinay, Québec, Québec, G1L 3L5, Canada
- Université Laval - Faculté de pharmacie, 050, avenue de la Médecine, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
- Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, 1050 chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, Québec, G1S4L8, Canada
- Centre de recherche du CISSS Chaudière Appalaches, 143 rue Wolfe, Lévis, Québec, G6V 3Z1, Canada
| | - D P Ghadiri
- HEC Montréal, Department of management, 3000, chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, H3T 2A7, Canada
| | - M Lavoie-Tremblay
- McGill University, Ingram School of Nursing (IsoN), 680 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Québec, H3A 2M7, Canada
- Centre Universitaire de Santé McGill (CUSM), 1650, avenue Cedar, Montréal, Québec, H3G 1A4, Canada
| | - A Boivin
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM), 850, rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada
- Centre d'Excellence pour le Partenariat avec les Patients et le Public, 900, rue Saint-Denis, Porte S03.900, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada
- Université de Montréal - Faculté de Médecine, 2900 boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - J F Pelletier
- Université de Montréal - Faculté de Médecine, 2900 boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J4, Canada
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, 7331 Rue Hochelaga, Montréal, Québec, H1N 3V2, Canada
| | - N Fernandez
- Université de Montréal - Faculté de Médecine, 2900 boulevard Edouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J4, Canada
| | - A M Danino
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM), 850, rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal (CHUM), 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0C1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pomey MP, Fortin I, Côté MA, Desforges M, Bouchard K, Vialaron C, Iliescu-Nelea M, Normandin L. Support by peers in the clinical team in oncology: Perception of the contribution of patient advisors to improve the patient experience. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.29_suppl.57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
57 Background: Since 2018, three establishments in Quebec have introduced patient advisors (PA) in their healthcare team in order to improve cancer patients’ experience. These PA, who have had a cancer experience, meet patients undergoing radiotherapy treatments or in oncogenetics for breast cancer on the healthcare site. They conduct consultations to complete the offer of services by bringing emotional, informational, and educational support. Methods: A longitudinal study of multiple cases was completed from January to June 2020. After each accompaniment, the PA filled out a logbook to document the main themes covered and the accompanied patient fill out a survey to evaluate their experience one week after the intervention. A qualitative analysis of the logbook content and descriptive statistics were conducted. The REDCAP platform was used for monitoring the process of data collection and to administer the surveys online. Results: In total, 67 patients were accompanied by 4 PA. 71 logbooks were completed by the PA. The logbooks show that 70.3% of accompaniments took place right before radiotherapy and 63.6% following the results of the genetic test in oncogenetics. 50% of meetings took place in person in the establishment (in a space dedicated to the PA or not) and 45.8% were by phone. The meetings lasted approximately 37 minutes (min: 15 minutes and max: 90 minutes). The majority only met once (93.1 %). The most common themes discussed are: the role of the PA (94.1%), returning to day life (57.6%) and dealing with stress and anxiety (52.2%). 96% of PA felt that they did not encounter any difficulties during the accompaniment. For the accompanied women, the partnership was most beneficial for their experience with the illness (sharing experiences of side-effects, on the impact of the illness on every day life, with their social circle). 79% of patients found that the accompaniment met their needs. 90% of patients estimate that these meetings are complimentary to the healthcare professionals’ interventions. Finally, 89.5% of accompanied patients think that it would be very important to develop these types of meetings on a larger scale. Concerning the adaptation of spaces for the meetings, 26.3% are very satisfied and 26.3% are rather satisfied (probably an area for improvement). Conclusions: Overall, the partnerships seem to answer the needs of the accompanied patients and the PA can share their experience inside the clinical team.
Collapse
|
9
|
Pomey MP, Vachon MF, Charpentier D, Côté MA, Desforges M, Bouchard K, Vialaron C, Iliescu-Nelea M, Normandin L. Process of the integration of patient advisors in oncology: Patient advisors' views. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.29_suppl.54] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
54 Background: Since 2017, in Quebec (Canada), a research project is focusing on the feasibility, the processes, and the contribution of integrating patients who have already had cancer experiences (named patient advisors (PA)) in the oncology clinical team. In fact, the trained PA meet patients in health care settings in addition to the other health professionals in order to improve health care and partnership between professionals and patients. This presentation communicates the PA’s perception of their contribution and the factors influencing implementation of these programs in 4 establishments. Methods: Between April and May 2020, semi-structured virtual interviews lasting about 60 minutes were conducted on 12 patient advisors involved since 2017 in the elaboration of these support programs. The interviews were recorded and transcribed completely. The data analysis was done with content analysis using the QDA Miner 5.0 software, applying the qualitative analysis quality standards. Results: First of all, the 12 PAs have reported that the accompaniment of 67 patients have allowed them to share their experiential knowledge not only related to living with the illness but also about healthcare organization and the anticipation of treatments. They also highlighted their capacity to share situations that can be improved by healthcare professionals (example: wait times for exams; patients’ difficulty in understanding their illness, etc). However, they also highlighted 4 factors which limit the implementation: 1) organizational (the unclear and changing nature of the breast cancer consultation schedule, difficulty of access to consultation rooms and unsuitable schedules for the PA’s reality.; 2) leadership (lack of clinicians promoting the intervention; managers’ low involvement; lack of clarity of roles); 3) human (work overload and employee turnover); 4) PA’s status (lack of compensation and of recognition). Also, to optimize their integration, the PA’s suggest to work on a lasting bond of trust with the professionals, the creation of a status recognized by health establishments, the recognition of their role by the clinical team, to give them access to physical spaces, and an openness of the teams to their complementary knowledge. Conclusions: These first results suggest the importance during the implementation of such programs of working proactively with the PAs and the professionals on organization, leadership, resources, and status factors to allow the people dealing with cancer to benefit from experiential knowledge of other patients within their clinical team.
Collapse
|