Psychological interventions to reduce suicidality in high-risk patients with major depression: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Positive psychological constructs have been associated with reduced suicidal ideation, and interventions to cultivate positive feelings have the potential to reduce suicide risk. This study compares the efficacy of a 6-week, telephone-based positive psychology (PP) intervention against a cognition-focused (CF) control intervention among patients recently hospitalized for depression and suicidal ideation or behavior.

METHOD

A total of 65 adults with a current major depressive episode reporting suicidal ideation or a recent suicide attempt were enrolled from participating in-patient psychiatric units. Prior to discharge, participants were randomized to the PP (n = 32) or CF (n = 33) intervention. In both interventions, participants received a treatment manual, performed weekly PP (e.g. gratitude letter) or CF (e.g. recalling daily events) exercises, and completed weekly one-on-one telephone sessions over 6 weeks. Between-group differences in hopelessness (primary outcome), depression, suicidality and positive psychological constructs at 6 and 12 weeks were tested using mixed-effects models accounting for intensity of post-hospitalization psychiatric treatment.

RESULTS

Compared with PP, the CF intervention was associated with significantly greater improvements in hopelessness at 6 weeks (β = -3.15, 95% confidence interval -6.18 to -0.12, effect size = -0.84, p = 0.04), but not 12 weeks. Similarly, the CF intervention led to greater improvements in depression, suicidal ideation, optimism and gratitude at 6 and 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our hypothesis, the CF intervention was superior to PP in improving hopelessness, other suicide risk factors and positive psychological constructs during a key post-discharge period among suicidal patients with depression. Further study of this CF intervention is warranted in populations at high suicide risk.

Understanding the decision to take the predictive test for Huntington disease

The predictive test for Huntington disease (HD) has allowed those at risk to determine gene status prior to symptoms. The purpose of this research was to understand the motivation and the anticipated reactions of those requesting the test. Forty persons at 50% risk for HD and 31 companions participated in a structured personal interview as part of the predictive test protocol. Reasons for taking the test centered on the reduction of anxiety and uncertainty associated with being at risk and enhanced planning and decision making. Participants also believed that taking the test would produce more positive than negative outcomes. With a favorable result, most anticipated a reduction of anxiety, a more normal future, and relief knowing their children would be at a very low risk. Most also cited benefits as more likely than consequences with an unfavorable result. Making the most of life, easier planning, and reduced uncertainty were rated as more likely than any of the adverse impacts, including short-term depression and becoming frightened. Almost all participants (95%) said they would rather learn that they have the HD gene than remain at 50% risk. The uncertainty, anxiety, and chronic stress associated with being at risk appears to underlie the motivation of many seeking the predictive test for HD.

Homozygote for Huntington disease

Four offspring of three different Huntington disease (HD) affected x affected matings were assessed by genetic linkage analysis for possible homozygosity. One individual was found to have a 95% likelihood of being an HD homozygote. The homozygote individual had an age at onset and symptoms which were similar to those of affected HD heterozygote relatives, including some with younger onset. This confirms the observation of Wexler et al. that in HD the homozygote is not more severely afflicted than the heterozygote.

Estimation of fertility and fitness in Huntington disease in New England

The advent of presymptomatic and prenatal testing in Huntington disease (HD) may change the reproductive behavior of persons at risk for HD. In order to assess future change, an analysis of fertility and reproductive fitness was carried out on 999 affected and 2,253 unaffected offspring from 235 New England families. Ascertainment biases observed for persons born before 1910 and after 1929 reduced the sample to 250 HD cases and 201 unaffected sib controls born between 1910 and 1929. No increase in reproductive rate was found in HD-affected men compared to male control sibs. A small increase in fertility averaging 0.5 child was seen in HD-affected females compared to unaffected females, but this difference was not significant. The increase in mean number of children for HD females is accounted for in part by a small number of affected women who had very large families. No evidence was found to suggest that any increase in reproductive rate for affected persons was related to offspring being born after HD onset. The fitness of both HD-affected and unaffected females was not significantly different from that of the general population of Massachusetts.

Predictive testing for Huntington's disease with use of a linked DNA marker

The probability of carrying the gene for Huntington's disease can in many cases be estimated in the children of affected persons by identifying a specific DNA marker that is genetically linked to the gene. We studied 47 persons at 50 percent risk of inheriting Huntington's disease who requested a presymptomatic or prenatal genetic-linkage test between September 1986 and January 1988. The participants were given pre-test counseling and psychological and neurologic evaluations. Nineteen persons later voluntarily withdrew from the protocol, including one who would have been excluded anyway, and one person was from a family that was too small to allow testing. Three D4S10 restriction-fragment-length polymorphisms produced by the HindIII, EcoRI, and Bg/I enzymes were used for all tests, and the probability that a subject was a Huntington's disease carrier was calculated. The accuracy of the test was compromised by a 4 percent recombination frequency between D4S10 and the Huntington's disease gene. Fifteen presymptomatic tests and one prenatal test were completed. Four yielded positive results, seven yielded negative results, and five were uninformative; seven persons are awaiting test results. All participants with positive tests experienced intermittent depression, but none required hospitalization, and no suicide threats were reported. Five participants received a diagnosis of Huntington's disease on the basis of the neurologic assessment. We conclude that some persons in the early stages of Huntington's disease may seek presymptomatic testing rather than neurologic evaluations.