Risques nucléaires, radiologiques, biologiques et chimiques (NRBC) : la « chaîne de survie NRBC » et son acronyme « DUST DAHO », un outil cognitif destiné aux primo-intervenants non spécialistes pour la prise en charge des victimes les premières heures

Les risques terroristes nucléaires, radiologiques, biologiques et chimiques (NRBC) constituent une menace permanente. Les primo-intervenants seront probablement des personnels non spécialisés face à un événement de cette nature. À l’extérieur ou à l’accueil des hôpitaux, leur rôle sera pourtant décisif sur le plan tactique afin de mettre en œuvre les premières mesures et minimiser les effets sur la population. Acquérir et entretenir un niveau de formation suffisant pour un risque d’occurrence rare, pour agir efficacement en tenue de protection dans un contexte aussi stressant sont des défis pédagogiques et organisationnels pour nos services. En 2019, la brigade de sapeurs-pompiers de Paris conceptualise la « chaîne de survie NRBC » regroupant les cinq actions essentielles à mener par les primointervenants en cas d’événements NRBC. Ces tâches, indissociables, sont représentées sous la forme d’une chaîne constituée de cinq maillons : 1) Décontamination d’urgence pour limiter l’intoxication et la contamination ; 2) Recherche de symptômes pour identifier l’agent et alerter les secours ; 3) Administration précoce des traitements pour réduire la morbi mortalité ; 4) Décontamination approfondie pour protéger le système de santé ; 5) Évacuation vers l’hôpital. En 2020, l’acronyme « DUST DAHO » est ajouté pour optimiser la mémorisation et la restitution des cinq maillons de cette chaîne. Cet outil cognitif s’adresse à tous les acteurs, soignants ou non, à l’extérieur ou à l’accueil de l’hôpital, quel que soit l’agent NRBC en cause. Il pourrait également être un outil de communication précieux pour le grand public en cas de crise.

Burn wound care of civilians in Sahel region by French military surgical teams: ethical challenges and future training requirements

The primary mission of the French military surgical teams deployed in external operations in the Sahel is to provide support for combatants. However, many of their activities and of the limited human and material resources allocated to them are devoted to providing free medical assistance to the local population. The French military surgical teams are very often expected to take care of serious burns for the benefit of civil populations because of the absence of dedicated civilian medical structures. Surgical teams are faced with a necessary triage of patients to be taken care of because of the discrepancy between the high demand for care and the means at their disposal. But the triage can lead to ethical dilemmas when the values that come into play in the decision contradict each other or when they run up against the quota of available human and material resources, as well as the interests of the military institution. The challenge is then to become aware of these dilemmas in this particular context. A discussion of these ethical dilemmas would help carers to avoid developing fatalistic attitudes or developing chronic pathologies due to unresolved or unconscious predicaments. Solutions are proposed that place ethical reflection at the heart of the practices during external operations by the French surgical teams. The ethics of discussion must bring together all players in care management and also the military authorities, before, during and after the missions. Training programmes for ethical reflection would benefit surgical teams and help them approach and become aware of the dilemmas they will necessarily face.

[Imported malaria at Desgenettes Military Hospital in Lyon, France: a retrospective study of 115 cases from 2006 to 2008]

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to describe the clinical, epidemiologic, and parasitological features and therapeutic modalities associated with cases of imported malaria managed at the Desgenettes Military Hospital in Lyon, France.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Review of the files of all patients treated for imported malaria in the emergency and travel medicine departments of the Desgenettes Military Hospital from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2008.

RESULTS

The study included 115 patients (13 of them French armed forces personnel). Most cases (75.6%) were due to falciparum malaria. Only 28.7% of patients had taken proper malaria prophylaxis. Severe symptoms were seen in none of the ambulatory care patients versus 22.7% of the hospitalized patients. Quinine treatment was used for 67% of ambulatory care patients and 89.4% of those hospitalized.

CONCLUSIONS

The epidemiologic features observed in the patients described here are similar to those reported by the French national reference center for imported and autochthonous malaria. The frequent use of quinine for ambulatory treatment was not consistent with current guidelines recommending first-line treatment with atovaquone-proguanil or artemether-lumefantrine.