An Automated, Dynamic Radiation Oncology Prescription Checking System.
Pract Radiat Oncol 2023:S1879-8500(23)00345-4. [PMID:
38151183 DOI:
10.1016/j.prro.2023.12.002]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE
Despite serving as a critical communication tool, radiation oncology prescriptions are entered manually and prone to error. An automated prescription checking system was developed and implemented to help address this problem.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Rules defining clinically appropriate prescriptions were generated, examining specific types of errors: (1) unapproved dose per fraction for a given disease site; (2) dose per fraction too large for nonstereotactic treatment technique; and (3) dose per fraction too low. With a goal of catching errors as upstream as possible to minimize their propagation, a report was created and ran every 30 minutes to check all newly written or approved prescriptions against the 3 rules. When a prescription violated these rules, an automated email was immediately sent to the prescriber alerting them of the potential error. System performance was continuously monitored and the criteria triggering an alert adjusted to balance error detection against false positives. Alerts leading to prescription amendment were considered true errors.
RESULTS
From June 2021 to November 2022, the system checked 24,047 prescriptions. A total of 241 email alerts were triggered, for an average alert rate of 1%. Of the 241 alerts, 198 (82.2%) were unapproved doses per fraction for the disease site, 14 (5.8%) were doses per fraction that were too low, and 29 (12%) were doses too large for nonstereotactic treatment technique. Thirty-one percent of alerts led to a change of prescription, suggesting they were true errors. The baseline rate of erroneous prescription entry was 0.3%. A regression model showed that trainee prescription entry and dose per fraction <150 cGy were significantly associated with true errors.
CONCLUSIONS
Given the significant consequences of erroneous prescription entry, which ranged from wasted resources and treatment delays to potentially serious misadministration, there is significant value in implementing automated prescription checking systems in radiation oncology clinics.
Collapse