Epidemiology and outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteriuria in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) bacteriuria following kidney transplantation. We determined the incidence of post-transplant CRKP bacteriuria in adults who underwent kidney transplant from 2007 to 2010 at 2 New York City centers.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study to identify factors associated with CRKP bacteriuria compared with carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae (CSKP) bacteriuria, assessed whether CRKP bacteriuria was associated with mortality or graft failure, and compared outcomes of treated episodes of CRKP and CSKP bacteriuria.

RESULTS

Of 1852 transplants, 20 (1.1%) patients developed CRKP bacteriuria. Factors associated with CRKP bacteriuria included receipt of multiple organs (odds ratio [OR] 4.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-20.4), deceased-donor allograft (OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.3-26.8), transplant admission length of stay (OR 1.1 per day, 95% CI 1.0-1.1), pre-transplant CRKP infection or colonization (OR 18.3, 95% CI 2.0-170.5), diabetes mellitus (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.0-7.8), and receipt of antimicrobials other than trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (OR 4.3, 95% CI 1.6-11.2).

CONCLUSION

Compared to CSKP bacteriuria, CRKP bacteriuria was associated with increased mortality (30% vs. 10%, P = 0.03) but not graft failure. Treated episodes of CRKP bacteriuria were less likely to achieve microbiologic clearance (83% vs. 97%; P = 0.05) and more likely to recur within 3 months (50% vs. 22%, P = 0.02) than CSKP episodes. CRKP bacteriuria after kidney transplant is associated with mortality and antimicrobial failure after treatment.

Risk factors associated with Clostridium difficile infection after kidney and pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a common cause of nosocomial antibiotic-associated diarrhea with an increased incidence reported in solid organ transplant recipients. We sought to determine if kidney and/or pancreas transplant recipients possess unique risk factors for CDI.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and February 2011, 942 kidney and 56 pancreas transplants were performed at the 2 centers. Of these, 28 recipients (kidney, n = 24; pancreas, n = 4) developed CDI. Cases were matched to controls (n = 56) in a 1:2 ratio.

RESULTS

Those with CDI were mostly male patients (82% vs. 48%, P = 0.003), deceased-donor organ recipients (86% vs. 64%, P = 0.045), more likely to have leukopenia (18% vs. 4%, P = 0.038), and had undergone a gastrointestinal procedure within 3 months preceding CDI diagnosis (18% vs. 4%, P = 0.038). Cases had higher cumulative and restricted antimicrobial exposure in days (37 ± 79 vs. 8 ± 12, P = 0.009 and 27 ± 69 vs. 7 ± 10, P = 0.032). Cephalosporin use was more common among cases (43% vs. 16%, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Careful antimicrobial selection and assurance of optimal treatment duration in the kidney and pancreas transplant population is prudent. Clinicians should have a heightened awareness of CDI risk particularly during periods of leukopenia and in the setting of gastrointestinal procedures.

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium meningitis successfully managed with linezolid: case report and review of the literature

Enterococci cause serious illness in immunocompromised patients and severely ill, hospitalized patients. Resistance to vancomycin has increased in frequency during the past few years. Limited therapeutic options are available for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections and the optimum therapy has not been established. We report a case of nosocomial vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium meningitis in the setting of hyperinfection with Strongyloides stercoralis that was successfully treated with linezolid. We also review the previously reported cases of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium meningitis.

Delayed-onset ticlopidine-induced cholestatic jaundice

An 86-year-old man experienced a rash approximately 2 weeks after starting ticlopidine therapy, necessitating discontinuation of the drug. About 1 month later, despite discontinuation, he developed jaundice and liver test abnormalities. These resolved gradually over the next few months. Based on case reports and the drug's pharmacokinetic profile, a high index of suspicion for ticlopidine-induced jaundice is prudent in patients with recent exposure to the agent who have evidence of liver damage.