Standardized Microbiological Sampling and Testing Procedures for the Beef Industry †

Standardized microbiological sampling and testing procedures were developed that can be used throughout the beef slaughter and processing industry to facilitate the collection and any desired compilation of comparative data. Twenty samples each from carcasses (brisket, flank, and rump areas combined); subprimal cuts (clods); lean trim; and cutting and/or conveyor surfaces were collected in three slaughter and processing operations, with the first operation being a preliminary trial and resulting in no reported data. Microbiological analyses for Clostridium perfringens , Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes , Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus aureus , Campylobacter jejuni/coli , total coliforms, E. coli Biotype I, and aerobic mesophilic bacteria (aerobic plate count, APC) were performed on all samples by an outside laboratory. The procedures developed were effective in allowing samples to be collected, shipped, and analyzed in the same manner for all operations. From a logistical standpoint, approximately 20 samples each of carcasses, clods, lean trim, and surfaces could be taken within 4 to 6 h by five people. Forty samples each of carcass, clod, lean trim, and conveyor surfaces from two plants tested negative for E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella spp., and Listeria spp., with the exception of L. monocytogenes being isolated from one carcass and one clod sample. APCs and total coliform counts were between 10³ to 10⁵ and 10² to 10³ CFU/cm² or CFU/g, respectively, for the 40 samples each of carcasses, clods, and lean trim. APCs for surface swab counts ranged from ≤ 10 to 10³ CFU/cm².

Effectiveness of Trimming and/or Washing on Microbiological Quality of Beef Carcasses

Beef carcass sides (n = 48) were selected randomly on three different days in a commercial processing facility and microbiologically analyzed before being moved to the cooler. Four types of samples were obtained per side from the inside round area: no trim and no wash (NTNW); trim, but no wash (TNW); trim and wash (TW), and no trim but wash (NTW). A flame-sterilized knife, forceps, and scalpel were used for each trimming treatment and sampling. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed in mean aerobic plate counts (APCs) between treatments. The greatest reduction in APC (log₁₀ colony forming units [CFU] per cm²) was observed in TNW samples followed by TW and NTW, with the corresponding mean APC reductions relative to NTNW being 3.0, 0.9, and 0.3, respectively, indicating that trimming can be an effective control point in reducing bacterial contamination in the slaughter process. Although TNW samples, had the lowest counts, samples from the same location after wash (TW) had counts 2 log cycles higher than TNW samples. These results indicate that washing spreads contamination to adjacent carcass sites. However, washing of carcasses was effective in lowering microbial populations relative to the NTNW treatment. Escherichia coli and coliform counts in all samples were low (0.03 to 0.4 log₁₀ CFU/cm²); however, the mean E. coli or coliform count in NTNW samples was higher (P < 0.05) than those in the rest of the treatments.