Severe vitamin D deficiency in chronic renal failure patients on peritoneal dialysis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in chronic renal failure (CRF) patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and to correlate the findings with various demographic and renal osteodystrophy markers.

METHOD

This cross-sectional, multicenter study was carried out in 273 PD patients with a mean age of 61.7 +/- 10.9 years and mean duration of PD 3.3 +/- 2.2 years. It included 123 female and 150 male patients from 20 centers in Greece and Turkey, countries that are on the same latitude, namely, 36-42 degrees north. We measured 25(OH)D3 and 1.25(OH)2D3 levels and some other clinical and laboratory indices of bone mineral metabolism.

RESULTS

Of these 273 patients 92% (251 patients) had vitamin D deficiency i.e. serum 25(OH)D3 levels less than 15 ng/ml, 119 (43.6%) had severe vitamin D deficiency i.e., serum 25(OH)D3 levels, less than 5 ng/ml, 132 (48.4%) had moderate vitamin D deficiency i.e., serum 25(OH)D3 levels, 5-15 ng/ml, 12 (4.4%) vitamin D insufficiency i.e., serum 25(OH)D3 levels 15 - 30 ng/ml and only 10 (3.6%) had adequate vitamin D stores. We found no correlation between 25(OH)D3 levels and PTH, serum albumin, bone alkaline phosphatase, P, and Ca x P. In multiple regression analyses, the independent predictors of 25(OH)D3 were age, presence of diabetes (DM-CRF), levels of serum calcium and serum 1.25(OH)2D3.

CONCLUSION

We found a high prevalence (92%) of vitamin D deficiency in these 273 PD patients, nearly one half of whom had severe vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D deficiency is more common in DM-CRF patients than in non-DM-CRF patients. Our findings suggest that these patients should be considered for vitamin D supplementation.

Hemodialysis for patients bleeding or at risk for bleeding, can be simple, safe and efficient

AIM

Hemodialysis for patients bleeding or at risk for bleeding requires special modalities of treatment that are difficult to perform without potential side effects. A simple, safe and adequate method may be applied.

METHODS

A modified way of extracorporeal circuit preparation, which focuses on minimizing the blood-air interface and negligible saline flushing of 50 ml/h, is applied for a maximum of 3-hour session with routine (not one-to-one) nursing attendance. Data from 16,954 sessions performed with patients bleeding or at risk for bleeding (15,730 retrospectively and 1,224 prospectively collected) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Cumulative failure of treatment, as defined by clotting of the extracorporeal circuit requiring termination of the procedure or replacement of the clotted part, was not more than 5% as expected for anticoagulation-free hemodialysis. For the prospectively recorded sessions, blood flow was 234 +/- 30 ml/min with less than 250 ml/min in 42.4% of the sessions. Native blood access was used in 426 (34.8%), double-lumen catheter in 798 (65.2%), 42 were isolated ultrafiltration sessions and 64 blood, 21 plasma, 9 platelet units were transfused. Post/pre urea ratio was 0.50 +/- 0.12. Logistic regression showed that among the following: duration of the session, type of dialysis, ultrafiltration rate, hematocrit, number of platelets, serum total protein, transfusions, blood flow and type of access, only blood flow significantly affected failure incidence (coefficient B = -0.041, exp(B) = 0.96, p = 0.04). No complications due to treatment were noted.

CONCLUSION

In patients with active, or at risk for, bleeding, hemodialysis without systemic anticoagulation can be adequately and safely performed almost as a routine session.

Cyclosporine levels at 2 hours after dose and body mass index in relation to graft function in renal transplant patients treated with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of C(2) levels on renal graft function in relation to body mass index (BMI). This retrospective study of 95 renal transplant patients included 53 on AZA and 42 on MMF at 3.1 years after transplantation. The cohort was divided into groups according to their C(2) levels, namely <600 ng/mL, 600 to 900 ng/mL, or >900 ng/mL, and according to BMI (>26 kg/m(2)). In every group, we evaluated the percentage of patients with an increase in creatinine by 1 mg/dL or >/=50% from the first year posttransplant. There was no difference in age, gender, graft source, and dose of corticosteroids or CsA between the groups. Patients on AZA with C(2) 600 to 900 ng/mL showed a lower prevalence of renal dysfunction (3.4%) than those with C(2) levels <600 ng/mL (14.3%) or >900 ng/mL (20%). Seventeen percent of the patients on AZA and 11.9% on MMF had BMI >26 kg/m(2) (P = NS). An increased serum creatinine was present in 22.2% of patients with BMI >26 kg/m(2) in the AZA group vs 20% in the cohort MMF (P = NS). These findings suggest that long-standing renal recipients on AZA with C(2) levels of between 600 and 900 ng/mL show better preservation of renal function. We did not identify differences on the basis of C(2) levels in MMF-treated recipients. The influence of BMI on long-term graft function seemed to be independent of AZA or MMF therapy.